A survival analysis model leads one to analyze main factors which impact a patient’s therapy process. In practice a survival analysis is capable of affecting therapeutic protocols. Different methods have been approached to analyze the survival of a breast cancer patient by researchers. The objective of this research is to lead specialists analyzing the breast cancer patients effectively. This research by analyzing 2010 breast cancer patients 1) attempts to propose six different statistical models using parametric and semi-parametric approaches for survival analysis of breast cancer patients, 2) compares the performance capabilities of the proposed statistical models analytically, and 3) addresses the most superior approach for a survival analysis of a breast cancer. To analyze the capability of the six proposed models Akaike term is used. This comprehensive research also indicates that the hazard factors commonly proposed in literature are not capable of leading a specialist to analyze the survival completely. Although it is possible to model the breast cancer survival using different approaches, this research reveals the proposed semi parametric model is capable of providing the most superior condition. The capability of the best parametric model among the five proposed parametric models of this comprehensive research is also addressed. Kaplan-Meier diagram is used to analyze the importance of two new hazard factors proposed in this paper.
Published in | Engineering Mathematics (Volume 2, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11 |
Page(s) | 56-62 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Survival Analysis, Breast Cancer, Cox Regression, Semi Parametric Model
[1] | Klein, J. P. Modelling competing risks in cancer studies. Statistics in medicine. 2006, 25 (6): 1015-1034. |
[2] | David, C. R. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1972, 34: 187-220. |
[3] | Moghadami, F. Z, Abolghasemi J, Asgari-darian A, Gohari M. R. Survival analysis of patients with breast cancer using the Aalen's additive hazard model. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Science. 2011, 3: 171-180. |
[4] | Atashgar K, Sheikhaliyan A, Biglarian A. Reviewing and Analyzing Breast Cancer Survival Models. Iranian Journal of Surgery. 2016, 24: 1-16. |
[5] | Vallinayagam, V, Prathap S, and Venkatesan P. Parametric Regression Models in the Analysis of Breast Cancer Survival Data. International Journal of Science Technology. 2014, 3 (3): 163-167. |
[6] | Aalen, O. O. A linear regression model for the analysis of life times. Statistics in medicine. 1989, 8 (8): 907-925. |
[7] | Klein, J. P. and M. L. Moeschberger. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. 2th edition. Springer 2005. |
[8] | Elisa T Lee, Wang JW. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. 3th edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2003. |
[9] | Kleinbaum, D. G. and M. Klein. Survival analysis: a self-learning text. 3th edition. Springer; 2006. |
[10] | Hosmer, D. W. , S. Lemeshow, May, S. Applied survival analysis: Regression modelling of time to event data. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2008. |
[11] | Stata Corporation LP. Stata survival analysis and epidemiological tables. Reference Manual, Release 8. Texas: Collage Station.2003. |
[12] | Collett, D. Modeling survival data in medical research.3th edition. New York: Chapman & Hal/CRC; 2003. |
[13] | Alizadeh A, Mohammadpour R A, Barzegar M A. Comparing Cox Model and Parametric Models in Estimating the Survival Rate of Patients with Prostate Cancer on Radiation Therapy. Journal of Mazandaran University Medicine Science.2013, 23 (100): 21-29. |
[14] | Nardi, A. and M. Schemper, Comparing Cox and parametric models in clinical studies. Statistics in Medicine.2003, 22 (23): 3597-3610. |
[15] | Balabram, D., C. M. Turra, and H. Gobbi. Survival of patients with operable breast cancer (Stages I-III) at a Brazilian public hospital-a closer look into cause-specific mortality. BMC cancer.2013, 13 (1): 1-10 |
[16] | Abadi, A, Yavari P, Dehghani-Arani M, Alavi-Majd H, Ghasemi E, Amanpour F, Bajdik CH. Cox Models Survival Analysis Based on Breast Cancer Treatments. Iranian Journal of Cancer Prevention.2014, 7 (3): 124-129 |
[17] | Fallahzadeh, H, Momayyezi M, Akhundzardeini R, Zarezardeini S. Five year survival of women with breast cancer in Yazd. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2014, 15: 6597-6601. |
[18] | Baulies S, Belin L, Mallon P, Senechal C, Pierga J-Y, Cottu P, Sablin M-P, Sastre X, Asselain B, Rouzier R, Reyal F. Time-varying effect and long-term survival analysis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. British Journal of Cancer. 2015, 113 (1): 30-36. |
[19] | Cetin, K, Christiansen C. F, Svaerke C, Jacobsen J. B, Sorensen H. T. Survival in patients with breast cancer with bone metastasis: a Danish population-based cohort study on the prognostic impact of initial stage of disease at breast cancer diagnosis and length of the bone metastasis-free interval. BMJ Open.2015, 5 (4): 1-8. |
[20] | Rezaianzadeh A, Peacock J, Reidpath D, Talei A, Hosseini S V, Mehrabani D. Survival analysis of 1148 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Southern Iran. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9 (168): 1-11 |
[21] | Atashgar K, Sheikhaliyan A, Tajvidi M, Molana S H, Jalaeian L. Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients with Different Chronic Diseases Using Parametric and Semi-Parametric Approaches. Multidisciplinary Cancer Investigation 2018; 2 (1): 26-32. |
[22] | Atashgar K, Sheikhaliyan A, Tajvidi M, A Survival Analysis of Invasive Breast Cancer Patients with and without In Situ Neoplasm. International Journal of Systems Science and Applied Methematics 2018 3 (2): 30-36. |
APA Style
Karim Atashgar, Ayeh Sheikhaliyan, Mina Tajvidi, Akbar Biglariyan, Seyed Hadi Molana, et al. (2018). A Comparative Study of Survival approaches for Breast Cancer Patients. Engineering Mathematics, 2(2), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11
ACS Style
Karim Atashgar; Ayeh Sheikhaliyan; Mina Tajvidi; Akbar Biglariyan; Seyed Hadi Molana, et al. A Comparative Study of Survival approaches for Breast Cancer Patients. Eng. Math. 2018, 2(2), 56-62. doi: 10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11
@article{10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11, author = {Karim Atashgar and Ayeh Sheikhaliyan and Mina Tajvidi and Akbar Biglariyan and Seyed Hadi Molana and Elnaz Badrkhani Sheikhdarabadi and Masoumeh Tabrizi bahemmat}, title = {A Comparative Study of Survival approaches for Breast Cancer Patients}, journal = {Engineering Mathematics}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, pages = {56-62}, doi = {10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.engmath.20180202.11}, abstract = {A survival analysis model leads one to analyze main factors which impact a patient’s therapy process. In practice a survival analysis is capable of affecting therapeutic protocols. Different methods have been approached to analyze the survival of a breast cancer patient by researchers. The objective of this research is to lead specialists analyzing the breast cancer patients effectively. This research by analyzing 2010 breast cancer patients 1) attempts to propose six different statistical models using parametric and semi-parametric approaches for survival analysis of breast cancer patients, 2) compares the performance capabilities of the proposed statistical models analytically, and 3) addresses the most superior approach for a survival analysis of a breast cancer. To analyze the capability of the six proposed models Akaike term is used. This comprehensive research also indicates that the hazard factors commonly proposed in literature are not capable of leading a specialist to analyze the survival completely. Although it is possible to model the breast cancer survival using different approaches, this research reveals the proposed semi parametric model is capable of providing the most superior condition. The capability of the best parametric model among the five proposed parametric models of this comprehensive research is also addressed. Kaplan-Meier diagram is used to analyze the importance of two new hazard factors proposed in this paper.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Comparative Study of Survival approaches for Breast Cancer Patients AU - Karim Atashgar AU - Ayeh Sheikhaliyan AU - Mina Tajvidi AU - Akbar Biglariyan AU - Seyed Hadi Molana AU - Elnaz Badrkhani Sheikhdarabadi AU - Masoumeh Tabrizi bahemmat Y1 - 2018/11/05 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11 DO - 10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11 T2 - Engineering Mathematics JF - Engineering Mathematics JO - Engineering Mathematics SP - 56 EP - 62 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-088X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.11 AB - A survival analysis model leads one to analyze main factors which impact a patient’s therapy process. In practice a survival analysis is capable of affecting therapeutic protocols. Different methods have been approached to analyze the survival of a breast cancer patient by researchers. The objective of this research is to lead specialists analyzing the breast cancer patients effectively. This research by analyzing 2010 breast cancer patients 1) attempts to propose six different statistical models using parametric and semi-parametric approaches for survival analysis of breast cancer patients, 2) compares the performance capabilities of the proposed statistical models analytically, and 3) addresses the most superior approach for a survival analysis of a breast cancer. To analyze the capability of the six proposed models Akaike term is used. This comprehensive research also indicates that the hazard factors commonly proposed in literature are not capable of leading a specialist to analyze the survival completely. Although it is possible to model the breast cancer survival using different approaches, this research reveals the proposed semi parametric model is capable of providing the most superior condition. The capability of the best parametric model among the five proposed parametric models of this comprehensive research is also addressed. Kaplan-Meier diagram is used to analyze the importance of two new hazard factors proposed in this paper. VL - 2 IS - 2 ER -