Chinese traditional philosophy can provide insights for teacher education. The purpose of this article is to discuss two main aspects of Dao philosophy, Dao teachers’ cultivation and Dao teaching behavior, in order to interpret the nature of Dao teaching. This article outlines a conceptual model of Dao teaching consisting of Dao teachers’ cultivation based on Laozi’s three essentials and Dao teaching behavior based on the nature of water philosophy to guide the teaching performance of teachers. The Dao teaching construction model offers a new perspective for teacher education research and practice. The article concludes with a discussion of the practical value of considering Dao philosophy as an underlying approach to teacher education.
Published in | Education Journal (Volume 6, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11 |
Page(s) | 145-151 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Dao De Jing, Dao Philosophy, Dao Teaching, Teacher Education
[1] | Althof, W. and Oser, F. (1993), “EDITORIAL Professional morality: Ethical dimensions of teaching”, Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 197-200. |
[2] | Berkowitz, M. and Bier, M. (2005), What works in character education? A research driven guide for educators, Character Education Partnership (CEP), Washington DC. |
[3] | Campbell, E. (2011), “Teacher education as a missed opportunity in the professional preparation of ethical practitioners”, in Bondi, L., Carr, D., Clark, C. and Clegg, C. (Eds.), Towards professional wisdom: Practical deliberation in the “people professions”, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Farnham, UK, pp. 81–93. |
[4] | Cochran-Smith, M. (2004), “Taking Stock in 2004: Teacher Education in Dangerous Times”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 3–7. |
[5] | Javary, C. (1997), Understanding the I Ching, Shambhala, Boston, MA and London. |
[6] | Jing, R. and Van de Ven, A. H. (2014), “A Yin-Yang Model of Organizational Change: The Case of Chengdu Bus Group”, Management and Organization Review, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 29-54. |
[7] | Kosnik, C., Miyata, C., Cleovoulou, Y., Fletcher, T. and Menna, L. (2015), “The education of teacher educators”, in Falkenberg, T. (Ed.), Handbook of Canadian research in initial teacher education, Canadian Association of Teacher Education, Ottawa, ON, pp. 207–224. |
[8] | Labaree, D. F. (2005), “Life on the margins”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 186–191. |
[9] | Lee, Y. T., Han, A., Byron, T. K. and Fan, H. X. (2008), “Daoist leadership: Theory and application”, in Chen, C. C. and Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 83-107. |
[10] | Lickona, T. (1991), Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility, Bantam, New York. |
[11] | Loughran, J. J. (2015), “Thinking about teaching as sophisticated business”, in Garbett, D. and Ovens, A. (Eds.), Teaching for tomorrow today, Edify, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 5–8. |
[12] | Ma, L. and Tsui, A. S. (2015), “Traditional Chinese philosophies and contemporary leadership”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 13–24. |
[13] | Mackinnon, A. (1996), “Learning to teach at the elbows: The Dao of teaching”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 653-664. |
[14] | Martin, A. K. and Russell, T. (2009), “Seeing teaching as a discipline in the context of preservice teacher education: Insights, confounding issues, and fundamental questions”, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 319–331. |
[15] | Noddings, N. (2008), “Caring and moral education”, in Nucci, L. P. and Narvaez, D. (Eds.), Handbook of moral and character education, Routledge, New York, pp. 161–174. |
[16] | Richardson, V. (2013), “Teaching moral teaching in teacher education”, in Sanger, M. and Osguthorpe, R. (Eds.), The moral work of teaching and teacher education. Preparing and supporting practitioners, Teachers College Press, New York/London, pp. 183–194. |
[17] | Wilhelm, R. and Baynes, C. F. trans. (1967), I Ching or book of changes (3rd ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. |
[18] | Yao, D. and Gan, S. (2013), Dao De Jing and Leadership, Economic management press, Beijing. |
APA Style
Dilin Yao, Jun Chen, Bingliang Song. (2017). Dao Philosophy and Dao Teaching: From the Perspective of Dao De Jing. Education Journal, 6(5), 145-151. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11
ACS Style
Dilin Yao; Jun Chen; Bingliang Song. Dao Philosophy and Dao Teaching: From the Perspective of Dao De Jing. Educ. J. 2017, 6(5), 145-151. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11
AMA Style
Dilin Yao, Jun Chen, Bingliang Song. Dao Philosophy and Dao Teaching: From the Perspective of Dao De Jing. Educ J. 2017;6(5):145-151. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11
@article{10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11, author = {Dilin Yao and Jun Chen and Bingliang Song}, title = {Dao Philosophy and Dao Teaching: From the Perspective of Dao De Jing}, journal = {Education Journal}, volume = {6}, number = {5}, pages = {145-151}, doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20170605.11}, abstract = {Chinese traditional philosophy can provide insights for teacher education. The purpose of this article is to discuss two main aspects of Dao philosophy, Dao teachers’ cultivation and Dao teaching behavior, in order to interpret the nature of Dao teaching. This article outlines a conceptual model of Dao teaching consisting of Dao teachers’ cultivation based on Laozi’s three essentials and Dao teaching behavior based on the nature of water philosophy to guide the teaching performance of teachers. The Dao teaching construction model offers a new perspective for teacher education research and practice. The article concludes with a discussion of the practical value of considering Dao philosophy as an underlying approach to teacher education.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Dao Philosophy and Dao Teaching: From the Perspective of Dao De Jing AU - Dilin Yao AU - Jun Chen AU - Bingliang Song Y1 - 2017/09/22 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11 DO - 10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11 T2 - Education Journal JF - Education Journal JO - Education Journal SP - 145 EP - 151 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2619 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20170605.11 AB - Chinese traditional philosophy can provide insights for teacher education. The purpose of this article is to discuss two main aspects of Dao philosophy, Dao teachers’ cultivation and Dao teaching behavior, in order to interpret the nature of Dao teaching. This article outlines a conceptual model of Dao teaching consisting of Dao teachers’ cultivation based on Laozi’s three essentials and Dao teaching behavior based on the nature of water philosophy to guide the teaching performance of teachers. The Dao teaching construction model offers a new perspective for teacher education research and practice. The article concludes with a discussion of the practical value of considering Dao philosophy as an underlying approach to teacher education. VL - 6 IS - 5 ER -