The development of gully morphological parameters seems to vary with the land covers and lithology across the globe. This research analyzed the variations in morphological parameters of gullies across land covers and lithological units and investigated land cover change between 2003 and 2018. Eighteen gully locations were systematically selected based on land cover and lithology. Gully morphology parameters- length, Width, depth and Area were determined through standard field measurement and digital image analysis. Five major land covers identified in the study area between 2003 and 2018 shows substantial change in all of them. Greatest gain (6.99%) in land cover was observed in built up area, while the greatest loss (12.79%) was observed in farmland. Three out of the identified five lithological formations were affected by gully in UIRB. Coastal plain lithology was observed to be the most affected lithology as 71.83%, 78% and 79.29% of the gully length, width and area respectively are found in it. The mean gully length (0m, 28.9m, 337.89m, 345.88m and 269.00m), width (0m, 17.27m, 195.1m, 83.1m and 118.4m), depth (0m, 116.95m, 79.7m, 102.3m and110.3m) and area (0km2, 0.80km2, 0.82km2, 24.17km2 and 22.55km2) respectively were distributed for water bodies, wetland, forest, farmland and built up areas. Gully morphological parameters were observed to vary across lithology and land covers of UIRB.
| Published in | Earth Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14 |
| Page(s) | 206-214 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Land Cover, Lithological Formation, Gully Morphological Parameter, Upper Imo River Basin
| [1] | Oparaku, L. A, Iorkua, S. A and M, Joel 2014. Gully Erosion on the Ida Plateau of Anambra Basin, Nigeria; Some Field Observation. Paper presented in conference at University of Ibadan. |
| [2] | Fashae, O., Obateru, R., Olusola, A., and Dragovih, D. (2022) Factors Controlling GullyMorphology on Quartzite Ridge of Ibadan Nigeria, Catena 212 (2022) 106 – 127. |
| [3] | Chikelu, E. E and Ogbuagu, F. U. (2014) Geotechnical investigation of soils around MbaukwuGully Erosion site, southeastern Nigeria. IOSR journal of applied geology and geophysics 2: 06 -17. |
| [4] | Pal, S. C., Chakrabortty, R., (2019) Modeling of water induced surface soil erosion and potentiallRisk zone prediction in sub-tropical watershed of Eastern India. Modeling Earth System Environment 5(2), 369-393. |
| [5] | Arabameri, A., Asadi Nalivan, O., Chandra, Pal, S., Charkabortty, R., Saha, A., Lee, S., PradhanB., Tien Bui, D., 2020. Novel Machine learning approaches for modeling the gully erosion susceptibility. Remote Sensing 12(17), 28 - 336. |
| [6] | Amare, S. 2016, Langendoen, E., Keesstra, S., Ploeg, M. V. D., Gelagay, H., Lemma., H., Van der Zee S. C., Suseptibility to gully erosion: Applying Random Forest (R) and Frequency Ratio (FR) Approaches to small catchment in Ethiopia. Water 13(2) 2016. |
| [7] | Billi, P and Dramis, F. (2003) Geomorphological investigation on Gully Erosion in the Rift. |
| [8] | Valley and the Northern highland of Ethiopia Catena 50; 353-3688. Okereke, C. N., Onu, N. N., Akaolisa, C. Z., Ikoro, D. O., Ibeneme, S. I., Ubechu, E. S and Amadikwa, L. O. (2012) Mapping gully erosion using Remote Sensing Technique; ACase study of Okigwe Area, South eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering research and Applications, Volume 2, issue 3 pg 1955-1967. |
| [9] | Amangabara, G. T. (2015). Drainage Morphology in Imo River Basin in the Anambra-Imo RiverBasin of Imo State South Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International 3(1); 1-11. |
| [10] | Sidorchuk, A., (2001). GULTEM – The model to Predict gully Thermoerosion and erosionSelected papers on soil Conservation organization meeting held may 24-29th at Purde University and USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory. |
| [11] | Kaur, R., Srinivasan, R, Mishrak, K., Dutta, D., Prassad, D., and Bassal, G. (2003) Assessment ofSWAT Model for Soil and Water Management in India. Land cover and Water Resources Research, 3: 1 – 47. |
| [12] | Possen, J and Govers, G. (1990) Gully Erosion in the Loam Belt of Belgium; typology andcontrol measures. In Boardman J et al (ed). Soil erosion and agricultural land. Wiley, Chester. |
| [13] | Egboka B. C. E. and Nwankwo G. I. (1985) The hydro-Lithologicaland Geotechnical Parameters asCausative Agents in the Generation of Erosion in the Rain Forest Belt of Nigeria, J. Afr. Earth Sci. University Press.; 3(4): 417-425. |
| [14] | Igbokwe, J. I., Akinyede, J. O., Dang, B., Alanga, T., Ono, M. N., Nwodu, V. C., and Anike, C. O. (2008) Mapping and Monitoring of Impact of Gully Erosion in South Eastern Nigeria with Satellite Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System. The international Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Sciences, Vol, xxxvii, part B8, Beijing. |
| [15] | Egboka B. C. E. (2004) Gully erosion in Alaigbo, Osondu Newsletter, Online Edition. 2004; 4 |
| [16] | Ofomata, G. E. K. (2007) Missing links in Management of Soil Erosion problems in Nigeria, inOfomata, G. E. K. and P. O Phil – Eze (2007): Geographical perspectives on Environmental Problems and management in Nigeria. Jamoe publishers, Enugu, Nigeria. |
| [17] | Wu, Y., and Cheng, H. (2005) Monitoring of Gully Erosion on Loess Plateau of China usingGlobal Positioning System, Catena 63: 154-166. |
| [18] | Capra, A. (2013) Ephemeral Gully and Gully Erosion in Cultivated Land; A Review, InDrainage Basins and Catchment Management, Novena Science Publishers Inc, Researchgate, ISBN; 978-1-62 618-367-4. |
| [19] | Chibo, C, N and Fashae A. O. 2023: Respondent’s Perception on Anthropogenic Determinants of Gully Erosion in Upper Imo River Basin (UIRB), Southeastern Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 2023, 19(4): 107.117 |
| [20] | Chibo, C. N. 2022. Gully Morphological Assessment and Anthropogenic Determinants in Urban and Rural Settlements of Upper Imo River Basin, South Eastern Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 2022, 18(6): 135 – 144. |
| [21] | Possen, J., Natchergaele, J, Verstraeten, G and Valentin, C. (2003). Gully Erosion and Environmental Change: Importance and Research Needs. Catena, 50: 91 – 133. |
| [22] | Addis, H. K., Adugna, B. Gebretsadik, M., and Ayalew, B. (2015). Gully Morphology andRehabilitation in dfferent Agroecological Environments of Northwestern Ethiopia, Applied and Environmental Soil Science, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, volume 2015, |
| [23] | Capra, A., Di Stefano, C, Ferro, U., and Sciocolone, B. (2011) Morphological Characteristics of Ephemeral Gullies in Sicily, South Italy. Landform Analysis, 17, 27 – 32. |
| [24] | Capra, A., Di Stefano, C, Ferro, U, and Sciocolone, B. (2009a) Similarity between Morphological Characteristics of Rill and Ephemeral Gullies in Sicily, Italy, Hydrological Processes, 23: 3334 -3341, |
| [25] | Martinez-Casasnovas, J. A., and Cervira, T. (1996) Gully Erosion Mapping by Remote Sensing Techniques: A Case Study in the Anoia-Pendes Region (N. E Spain). Abstract Book Session 6; Measuring and Modeling Erosion Processes. Primer Congresso Europeo Sobre el Control de la Erosion Stages (Barcelona), 29 – 31. |
| [26] | Osadebe, L. L., Abam, T. K. S., Obiora, F. I., and Sani, R. O. (2014) Evaluating the Stability of Gully Walls in Agulu Nanka – Oko Erosion complex Area of Anambra State, Nigeria Using Empirical Approach. Advancement In Scientific and Engineering Research Vol 2(1) pp 1 – 9. |
| [27] | Okoro, B. C., Ibearugbulem, O. H., Agunwamba, J. C. (2013) Gully Erosion Control along Nworie River in Owerri, Imo State-A Deterministic Model Approach. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) Vol. 3, Issue. 3, May - June 2013 pp-1774-1782. |
| [28] | Valentin, C., Possen, J. and Young L. (2005) Gully Erosion Impact, Factors and Control. Catena 63: 132 –153. |
| [29] | Hancock, G. S. (2014) The Use of Landscape Evolution Model in Mining Rehabilitation Design. Env. Geol. 46: 561 – 573. |
| [30] | Avni, Y. (2005). Gully Incission as a Key Factor in Desertification in Arid Environment, the Negev Highland Israel. Catena. |
| [31] | Nyessen, J., Possen, J., Moeyerson, J., Luyten, E., Veyret Decken, M. J., Haile, J. and Govers, G. (2002) Impact of Road Buildings on Gully Erosion Risk: A Case Study from Nothern Ethiopia Highlands, Earth’s Surface Processes and Landform (in Press). |
| [32] | Iro, S. (2020b). Determining Causes of Gully Erosion and associated Rates of Change in Southeastern Nigeria using Remote Sensing and GIS Methodology, American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 16: 96 – 111. |
| [33] | Menendez- Duarte, R., Marquinez, J., Fernandez-Martinez, S., Santos, R. (2007) Incised Channel and Gully erosion in northern Iberian peninsula: Controls and geomorphic setting. Catena 71: 267-278. |
| [34] | Heimsath, M., Fink, D., Hancook, G. (2009) The ‘humped’ soil production function: eroding Amhem Land, Australia. Earth surface processes and landforms 34: 1674 – 1684. |
| [35] | NRW (2008) The State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Water) 2008. |
APA Style
Nnamdi, C. C., Fashae, O. A. (2025). Spatial Assessment of Expansion of Gully Morphological Parameters Between 2013 and 2018 and Their Variations Across Land Covers of Upper Imo River Basin (UIRB) South Eastern Nigeria. Earth Sciences, 14(5), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14
ACS Style
Nnamdi, C. C.; Fashae, O. A. Spatial Assessment of Expansion of Gully Morphological Parameters Between 2013 and 2018 and Their Variations Across Land Covers of Upper Imo River Basin (UIRB) South Eastern Nigeria. Earth Sci. 2025, 14(5), 206-214. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14
@article{10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14,
author = {Chibo Christian Nnamdi and Olutoyin A. Fashae},
title = {Spatial Assessment of Expansion of Gully Morphological Parameters Between 2013 and 2018 and Their Variations Across Land Covers of Upper Imo River Basin (UIRB) South Eastern Nigeria
},
journal = {Earth Sciences},
volume = {14},
number = {5},
pages = {206-214},
doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20251405.14},
abstract = {The development of gully morphological parameters seems to vary with the land covers and lithology across the globe. This research analyzed the variations in morphological parameters of gullies across land covers and lithological units and investigated land cover change between 2003 and 2018. Eighteen gully locations were systematically selected based on land cover and lithology. Gully morphology parameters- length, Width, depth and Area were determined through standard field measurement and digital image analysis. Five major land covers identified in the study area between 2003 and 2018 shows substantial change in all of them. Greatest gain (6.99%) in land cover was observed in built up area, while the greatest loss (12.79%) was observed in farmland. Three out of the identified five lithological formations were affected by gully in UIRB. Coastal plain lithology was observed to be the most affected lithology as 71.83%, 78% and 79.29% of the gully length, width and area respectively are found in it. The mean gully length (0m, 28.9m, 337.89m, 345.88m and 269.00m), width (0m, 17.27m, 195.1m, 83.1m and 118.4m), depth (0m, 116.95m, 79.7m, 102.3m and110.3m) and area (0km2, 0.80km2, 0.82km2, 24.17km2 and 22.55km2) respectively were distributed for water bodies, wetland, forest, farmland and built up areas. Gully morphological parameters were observed to vary across lithology and land covers of UIRB.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Spatial Assessment of Expansion of Gully Morphological Parameters Between 2013 and 2018 and Their Variations Across Land Covers of Upper Imo River Basin (UIRB) South Eastern Nigeria AU - Chibo Christian Nnamdi AU - Olutoyin A. Fashae Y1 - 2025/10/28 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14 DO - 10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14 T2 - Earth Sciences JF - Earth Sciences JO - Earth Sciences SP - 206 EP - 214 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5982 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251405.14 AB - The development of gully morphological parameters seems to vary with the land covers and lithology across the globe. This research analyzed the variations in morphological parameters of gullies across land covers and lithological units and investigated land cover change between 2003 and 2018. Eighteen gully locations were systematically selected based on land cover and lithology. Gully morphology parameters- length, Width, depth and Area were determined through standard field measurement and digital image analysis. Five major land covers identified in the study area between 2003 and 2018 shows substantial change in all of them. Greatest gain (6.99%) in land cover was observed in built up area, while the greatest loss (12.79%) was observed in farmland. Three out of the identified five lithological formations were affected by gully in UIRB. Coastal plain lithology was observed to be the most affected lithology as 71.83%, 78% and 79.29% of the gully length, width and area respectively are found in it. The mean gully length (0m, 28.9m, 337.89m, 345.88m and 269.00m), width (0m, 17.27m, 195.1m, 83.1m and 118.4m), depth (0m, 116.95m, 79.7m, 102.3m and110.3m) and area (0km2, 0.80km2, 0.82km2, 24.17km2 and 22.55km2) respectively were distributed for water bodies, wetland, forest, farmland and built up areas. Gully morphological parameters were observed to vary across lithology and land covers of UIRB. VL - 14 IS - 5 ER -