The study area covers approximately 200x250 m2. This area is one of the most active locations with the greatest landslide displacement amount. This study aims to determine the depth of the sliding surface with geophysical (seismic refraction tomography (SRT) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR)) methods. The results of the TUBITAK-111Y111 project were also used in this study. According to the geophysical results, three layers with average seismic P-wave velocities (VP) of 600, 1200, and 2100 m/sec were identified within an investigation depth of approximately 20 m. It was determined that the depths of the sliding surface changed between approximately 3 to 7 m and seismic velocities were lower than 600 m/sec from these depths to the surface. The geophysical results demonstrated that the landslide type was planar sliding, the sliding direction was S-SE, and the tilt of the geological layer was in the same direction with the topographic slope, mostly bigger than 50. It was observed that deformations in the landslide mass were caused by the geological unit, the layer or topographic slope, and precipitation. According to these results the landslide activity may continue in the landslide area and in the study area in the future. Therefore, as a result, it was also expressed that the study area contains the risks and the natural/anthropogenic hazards because the findings show that the settlement area and urban constructions are under threat in the west of Koyulhisar town center.
Published in | Earth Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15 |
Page(s) | 277-288 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Geophysics-Geodesy, Koyulhisar, Sliding Surface, Landslide, Risk, Hazard
[1] | Tatar, O., Gürsoy, H., Altunel, E., Akyüz, S., Topal, T, Sezen, T. F., Koçbulut, F., Mesci, L., Kavak, K. Ş., Dikmen, Ü, Türk, T., Poyraz, F., Hastaoğlu, K. Ö., Ayazlı, E., Gürsoy, Ö., Polat, A., Akın, M., Demir, G., Zabcı, C., Karabacak, V., Çakır, Z. (2007). Natural disaster risk analysis of residential areas along the Kelkit Valley on the North Anatolian Fault Zone, GIS-based disaster information system (KABİS) design: project introduction and preliminary findings. the Active Tectonics Research Group (ATAG), 11th Workshop, TUBITAK-MAM Institute of Earth and Marine Sciences Gebze-Kocaeli, Turkey, 14-16, https://atag.itu.edu.tr/dosya/ATAG11bildiriozleri.pdf, http://www.koyulhisar.gov.tr /bulten3.doc, (in Turkish). |
[2] | Duman, T. Y., Nefeslioğlu, H., Gökçeoğlu, C., & Sönmez, H. (2005). 17/03/2005 Kuzulu (Sivas-Koyulhisar) landslide. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Department of Geological Studies, Hacettepe University, https://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/sayfalar/bilgi-merkezi/deprem/pdf/sugozu_heyelani.pdf (in Turkish). |
[3] | Över, D. (2015). The Research of the landslide area ground of Koyulhisar district in Sivas with geophysical methods. Sivas Cumhuriyet University, MS Thesis, Sivas, Turkey. |
[4] | Demirel, M., Tatar, O., Koçbulut, F. (2016). Kinematics of the faults around the Koyulhisar (Sivas) region on the North Anatolian Fault Zone. Geol. Bull., 59 (3): 357-370 (in Turkish). |
[5] | Sendir, H., & Yılmaz, I. (2001). Structural and geomorphological perspective on Koyulhisar landslides. Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Engineering, Series A: Earth Sciences 18 (1): 47-54 (in Turkish). |
[6] | Hastaoğlu, K. O., & Şanlı, D. U. (2011). Monitoring Koyulhisar landslide using rapid static GPS: a strategy to remove biases from vertical velocities. Nat. Hazards, 58: 1275-1294. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9728-5. |
[7] | Hastaoğlu, K. O. (2013). Investigation of the groundwater effect on slow-motion landslides by using dynamic Kalman filtering method with GPS: Koyulhisar town center. Turkish J. Earth Sci., 1033-1046. DOI: 10.3906/yer-1210-10. |
[8] | Hastaoğlu, K. Ö., Türk, T., Koçbulut, F., Balık Şanlı, F., & Poyraz, F. (2015). Monitoring landslides and performing disaster information system-based risk analysis using GNSS and PS-InSAR methods: Koyulhisar (Sivas) landslides. Final report. TUBITAK Project Number: 111Y111, Program Code: 3501, Turkey (unpublished). |
[9] | Hastaoğlu, K. O. (2016). Comparing the results of PSInSAR and GNSS on slow motion landslides, Koyulhisar, Turkey. Geomatics Nat. Hazards and Risk, 7 (2): 786-803. DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2014.978822. |
[10] | Hastaoglu, K. O., Poyraz, F., Turk, T., Yılmaz, I., Kocbulut, F., Demirel, M. & Balik Sanli, F. (2018). Investigation of the success of monitoring slow motion landslides using Persistent Scatterer Interferometry and GNSS methods. Survey review, 50 (363), 475-486. DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2017.1295631. |
[11] | Toprak, G. M. V. (1989). Tectonic and stratigraphic characteristics of the Koyulhisar segment of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Sivas-Turkey). METU (Middle East Technical University) (unpublished), Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara, Türkiye. |
[12] | Uysal, S. (1995). Koyulhisar (Sivas) yöresinin jeolojisi. General Directorate of the Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA) Report number: 9838 (in Turkish). |
[13] | Sendir, H., & Yılmaz, I. (2002). Structural, geomorphological and geomechanical aspects of the Koyulhisar landslides in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Sivas, Turkey). Environ. Geol., 42: 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-002-0528-9 |
[14] | Yılmaz, I., Ekemen T., Yıldırım, M., Keskin, İ., & Özdemir, G. (2005) Failure and flow development of a collapse induced complex landslide: the 2005 Kuzulu (Koyulhisar, Turkey) landslide hazard. Environ. Geol., 49: 467-476. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-005-0113-0. |
[15] | Gökçeoğlu, C., Nefeslioğlu, H. A., Sönmez H., Duman, T., & Can, T. (2005b). The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Eng. Geol., 81 (1): 65-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-006-0322-1. |
[16] | Yılmaz, I. (2009) A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by Artificial Neural Networks. Bull. Eng. Geol. and the Environ., 68: 297-306. DOI 10.1007/s10064-009-0185-2. |
[17] | Topal, T., & Hatiboğlu, O. (2015). Assessment of slope stability and monitoring of a landslide in the Koyulhisar settlement area (Sivas, Turkey). Environ. Earth Sci., 74 (5). DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-4476-6. |
[18] | Demir, G. (2018). Landslide susceptibility mapping by using statistical analysis in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) on the northern part of Suşehri Town, Turkey. Nat. Hazards, 92: 133-154. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3195-1. |
[19] | McCann, D. M., & Forster A. (1990). Reconnaissance geophysical methods in landslide investigations. Eng. Geol., 29 (1): 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(90)90082-C |
[20] | Demirağ, O. (1991). Jeofizik yöntemlerle heyelan araştırmaları. TMMOB-JFMO (The Chamber of Geophysical Engineers of Turkish) publications. Jeofizik, 5 (1), 43-50, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish). |
[21] | Hack, R. (2000). Geophysics for slope stability. Surv. Geophys., 21: 423-448. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006797126800. |
[22] | Perrone, A., Iannuzzi, A., Lapenna, V., Lorenzo, P., Piscitelli, S., Rizzo, E., & Sdao, F. (2004). High-resolution electrical imaging of the Varco d'Izzo earthflow (southern Italy). J. Appl. Geophys., 56: 17-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2004.03.004. |
[23] | Göktürkler, G., Baklaya, Ç., & Erhan, Z. (2008). Geophysical investigation of the landslide: The Altındağ landslide site, Izmir (western Turkey). J. Appl. Geophys., 65: 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.05.008 |
[24] | Hu, Z., & Shan, W. (2016). Landslide investigations in the northwest section of the lesser Khingan range in China using combined HDR and GPR methods. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 75: 591-603. DOI 10.1007/s10064-015-0805-y. |
[25] | Su, L., Xu, X., Geng, X., & Liang, S. (2016). An integrated geophysical approach for investigating hydro-geological characteristics of a debris landslide in the Wenchuan earthquake area. Engineering Geology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.11.020. |
[26] | Popescu, M., Șerban, R. D., Urdea, P., & Onaca, A. (2016). Conventional geophysical surveys for landslide investigations: Two case studies from Romania. Carpathian J. Earth and Environ. Sci., 11 (1): 281-292. |
[27] | Bichler, A., Bobrowsky, P., Best, M., Douma, M., Hunter, J., Calvert, T., & Burns, R. (2004). Three-dimensional mapping of a landslide using a multi-geophysical approach: the Quesnel Forks landslide. Landslides, 1: 29-40. DOI: 10.1007/s10346-003-0008-7. |
[28] | Otto, J. C., & Sass, O. (2006). Comparing geophysical methods for talus slope investigations in the Turtmann valley (Swiss Alps). Geomorphology, 76: 257-272. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.11.008. |
[29] | Ristić, A., Abolmasov, B., Govedarica, M., & Petrovački, D. (2012). Shallow-landslide spatial Structure interpretation using a multi-geophysical approach. Acta Geotechnica, Slovenica 47-59. |
[30] | Timothy, R. H., Davies Warburton, J., Stuart A., Dunning Alodie Bubeck, A. P. (2013). A large landslide event in a post-glacial landscape: rethinking glacial legacy. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38 (11): 1261-1268. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3377 |
[31] | Lissak, C., Maquaire, O., Malet, J. P., Lavigne Virmoux, C., Gomez, C., & Davidson, R. (2015). Ground-penetrating radar observations for estimating the vertical displacement of rotational landslides. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15: 1399-1406. doi: 10.5194/nhess-15-1399-2015. |
[32] | Davis, J. L., & Annan, A. P. (1989). Ground-penetrating radar for high resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophys. Prosp., 37: 531-551. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02221.x. |
[33] | Slater, L., & Niemi, T. M. (2003). Ground penetrating radar investigation of active faults along the Dead Sea transform and implications for seismic hazards within the city of Aqaba, Jordan. Tectonophys, 368: 33-50. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00149-5. |
[34] | Green, A., Gross, R., Holliger, K., Horstmeyer, H., & Baldwin, J. (2003). Results of 3D georadar surveying and trenching the San Andreas fault near its northern landward limit. Tectonophys, 368: 7-23. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00147-1. |
[35] | Benson, A. K. (1995). Applications of ground penetrating radar in assessing some geological hazards: Examples of groundwater contaminants, faults, cavities. J Appl Geophys 33: 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-9851(95)90040-3 |
[36] | Harrari, Z. (1996). Ground penetrating radar (GPR) for imaging stratigraphic features and groundwater in sand dunes, J. Appl. Geophys., 36: 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(96)00031-6 |
[37] | Bano, M., Marquis, G., Niviere, B, Maurin, J. C., & Cushing, M. (2000). Investigating alluvial and tectonic features with ground penetrating radar and analyzing diffractions patterns. J Appl Geophys 43: 3-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00031-2. |
[38] | Bubeck, A., Wilkinson, M., Roberts, G. P., Cowie, P. A., McCaffrey, K. J. W., Phillips, R, & Sammonds, P. (2015). The tectonic geomorphology of bedrock scarps on active normal faults in the Italian Apennines mapped using combined ground penetrating radar and terrestrial laser scanning. Geomorphology, 237: 38-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.03.011. |
[39] | Hatiboğlu, O. (2009). Investigation of Koyulhisar (Sivas) Settlement area in terms of slope instability. Middle East Technical University, MS Thesis, Ankara, Turkey. |
[40] | UDİM (2016). Uluslararası Deprem İzleme Merkezi (National Earthquake Monitoring Center), Boğaziçi University KOERI (Kandilli Observatory And Earthquake Research Institute). www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/ (last access: 11.04.2018), Istanbul, Turkey. |
[41] | MTA (2018). General Directorate of the Mineral Research and Exploration. http://yerbilimleri.mta.gov.tr/anasayfa.aspx (last access: 11.04.2018). |
[42] | MGM (2016). Turkish State Meteorological Service. Hydrothermal Directorate of Ankara Meteorology Regional Directorate. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/ (accepted: 12.11.2008). |
[43] | Annan, A. P., Davis, J. L., & Gendzwill, D. (1988). Radar sounding in potash mines: Saskatchewan, Canada. Geophys., 53, 1556-1564. |
[44] | Wilchek, L. (2000). Ground Penetrating Radar for Detection of Rock Structure. Alberta University, MS Thesis, Canada. |
[45] | Cardimona, S. (2002). Subsurface investigation using ground penetrating radar. Presented at the 2nd International Conference on the Application of Geophysics and NDT Methodologies Transportation Facilities and Infrastructure, Los Angels, California. |
[46] | Demirel, Y., & Türk, T. (2022). Investigation of Mass Movements Occurring in Landslide Areas with the Help of Optical Satellite Images: A Case Study in Koyulhisar Town. Photogrammetry Journal of Turkey, 4 (1): 07-16. DOI: 10.53030/tufod.1084630. |
APA Style
Sevda Ozel, Demet Over, Kemal Ozgur Hastaoglu. (2022). The Sliding Surface Investigation of in the West of Koyulhisar (Sivas, Turkey). Earth Sciences, 11(5), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15
ACS Style
Sevda Ozel; Demet Over; Kemal Ozgur Hastaoglu. The Sliding Surface Investigation of in the West of Koyulhisar (Sivas, Turkey). Earth Sci. 2022, 11(5), 277-288. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15
@article{10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15, author = {Sevda Ozel and Demet Over and Kemal Ozgur Hastaoglu}, title = {The Sliding Surface Investigation of in the West of Koyulhisar (Sivas, Turkey)}, journal = {Earth Sciences}, volume = {11}, number = {5}, pages = {277-288}, doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20221105.15}, abstract = {The study area covers approximately 200x250 m2. This area is one of the most active locations with the greatest landslide displacement amount. This study aims to determine the depth of the sliding surface with geophysical (seismic refraction tomography (SRT) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR)) methods. The results of the TUBITAK-111Y111 project were also used in this study. According to the geophysical results, three layers with average seismic P-wave velocities (VP) of 600, 1200, and 2100 m/sec were identified within an investigation depth of approximately 20 m. It was determined that the depths of the sliding surface changed between approximately 3 to 7 m and seismic velocities were lower than 600 m/sec from these depths to the surface. The geophysical results demonstrated that the landslide type was planar sliding, the sliding direction was S-SE, and the tilt of the geological layer was in the same direction with the topographic slope, mostly bigger than 50. It was observed that deformations in the landslide mass were caused by the geological unit, the layer or topographic slope, and precipitation. According to these results the landslide activity may continue in the landslide area and in the study area in the future. Therefore, as a result, it was also expressed that the study area contains the risks and the natural/anthropogenic hazards because the findings show that the settlement area and urban constructions are under threat in the west of Koyulhisar town center.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Sliding Surface Investigation of in the West of Koyulhisar (Sivas, Turkey) AU - Sevda Ozel AU - Demet Over AU - Kemal Ozgur Hastaoglu Y1 - 2022/09/28 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15 DO - 10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15 T2 - Earth Sciences JF - Earth Sciences JO - Earth Sciences SP - 277 EP - 288 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5982 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20221105.15 AB - The study area covers approximately 200x250 m2. This area is one of the most active locations with the greatest landslide displacement amount. This study aims to determine the depth of the sliding surface with geophysical (seismic refraction tomography (SRT) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR)) methods. The results of the TUBITAK-111Y111 project were also used in this study. According to the geophysical results, three layers with average seismic P-wave velocities (VP) of 600, 1200, and 2100 m/sec were identified within an investigation depth of approximately 20 m. It was determined that the depths of the sliding surface changed between approximately 3 to 7 m and seismic velocities were lower than 600 m/sec from these depths to the surface. The geophysical results demonstrated that the landslide type was planar sliding, the sliding direction was S-SE, and the tilt of the geological layer was in the same direction with the topographic slope, mostly bigger than 50. It was observed that deformations in the landslide mass were caused by the geological unit, the layer or topographic slope, and precipitation. According to these results the landslide activity may continue in the landslide area and in the study area in the future. Therefore, as a result, it was also expressed that the study area contains the risks and the natural/anthropogenic hazards because the findings show that the settlement area and urban constructions are under threat in the west of Koyulhisar town center. VL - 11 IS - 5 ER -