Brucellosis disease is problematic in early abortion in herds, reduces the economic value of farm animals, reduces milk production and limits the breeding efficiency of cattle. A study was conducted to determine and compare the prevalence of antibodies against Brucella abortus in cattle under same husbandry practices at the Njala University, Njala campus and the Newton cattle holding ranches. A total of 80 cattle was randomly sampled and screened for the presence of B. abortus utilizing the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT). Results indicated that the general seroprevalence was 57.5% in Njala University cattle ranch and 92.5% Newton cattle ranch. The prevalence of infection increased with the age of animals i.e. from 3.75% to 47.5% (22.5%) in age groups <3yrs to 3-5yrs (5-8yrs), respectively. The female animals were more infected (52.5%) than the males (22.5%). The disease was more prevalent among different age groups and sexes in Newton cattle ranch than in Njala University. Findings showed no significant difference between the prevalence of B. abortus in the cattle of Njala University and Newton cattle ranches. The prevalence of brucellosis was however enzootic at the two studied sites. This study is relevant for policy makers, researchers, ministry of agriculture and the public for the promotion of regular testing of cattle and utilizing appropriate mitigation strategies to minimize the risk of the brucellosis disease.
| Published in | Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15 |
| Page(s) | 191-195 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cattle, Gender, Age, Brucella abortus, Prevalence
| [1] | Mwebe, R., Nakavuma, J. & Moriyón, I. M. (2011). Brucellosis seroprevalence in livestock in Uganda from 1998 to 2008: a retrospective study. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43, 603-608. Doi: 10.1007/s11250-010-9739-3. |
| [2] | Foster, G., Osterman, B. S., Godfroid, J., Jacques, I. & Cloeckaert, A. (2007). Brucella ceti sp. nov. and Brucella pinnipedialis sp. nov. for Brucella strains with cetaceans and seals as their preferred hosts. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 57 (11), 2688-2693. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65269. |
| [3] | Scholz, H. C., Hubalek, Z., Nesvadbova, J., Tomaso, H., Vergnaud, G., Le Fleche, P. & Pfeffer, M. (2008). Isolation of Brucella microti from soil. Emerging Infectious Disease, 14 (8), 1316-1327. |
| [4] | Upadhyay, A. K., Maansi, P. S. & Aastha, N. (2019). Epidemiology of brucellosis in India: a review. Pantnagar Journal of Research, 17 (3), 199-205. |
| [5] | Kungu, J. M., Okwee-Acai, J., Ayebazibwe, C., Okech, S. G. & Erume, J. (2010). Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in cattle in Gulu and Amuru districts, Northern Uganda. African Journal of Animal and Biomedical Sciences, 5, 36-42. |
| [6] | FAO (2009). The state of food and agriculture, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. |
| [7] | Kabagambe, E. K., Elzer, P. H., Geaghan, J. P., Opuda-Asibo, J., Scholl, D. T. and Miller, J. E. (2001). Risk factors for Brucella seropositivity in goat herds in eastern and western Uganda. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 52, 91-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0167-5877(01)00251-3. |
| [8] | Mwiine, F. N. (2004). Benefits and health risks associated with milk and cattle raised in urban and peri-urban areas of Kampala, Master’s thesis, Makerere University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kampala, Uganda. |
| [9] | Mangen, M. J., Otte, J., Pfeiffer, D. & Chilonda, P. (2002). Bovine brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa. Estimation of seroprevalence and impact of meat and milk off take potentials. FAO Livestock policy discussion paper No. 8, Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. |
| [10] | Krause, D. O. & Hendrick, S. (eds) (2010). Zoonotic pathogens in the food chain, CABI, Wallingford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845936815.0000. |
| [11] | Ducrotoy, M. J., Bertu, W. J., Ocholi, R. A., Gusi, A. M., Bryssinckx, W., Welburn, S. C. & Moriyon, I. (2014). Brucellosis as an emerging threat in developing economies: Lessons from Nigeria, PLos One 8, e3008. |
| [12] | Gameel, S. E. A. M., Mohammed, S. O., Mustafa, A. A. and Azwai, S. M. (1993). Prevalence of camel brucellosis in Libya. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 25, 91-93. |
| [13] | Marcotty, T., Matthys, F., Godfroid, J., Rigouts, L., Ameni, G., Gey van Pittius, N., Kazwala, R., Muma, J., Van Helden, P., Walravens, K., De Klerk, L. M., Geoghegan, C., Mbotha, D., Otte, M., Amenu, K., Abu Samra, N., Botha, C., Ekron, M., Jenkins, A., Jori, F., Kriek, N., Mccrindle, C., Michel, A., Morar, D., Roger, F., Thys, E. & Van Den Bossche, P. (2009). Zoonotic tuberculosis and brucellosis in Africa: Neglected zoonoses or minor public-health issues? The outcomes of a multi-disciplinary workshop. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 103 (5), 401-411. |
| [14] | Bayemi, P. H., Webb, E. C., Nsongka, M. V., Unger, H. & Njakoi, H. (2009). Prevalence of B. abortus antibodies in serum of Holstein cattle in Cameroon. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41, 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9184-8. |
| [15] | Schelling, E., Diguimbaye, C., Daoud, S, Nicolet, J., Boerlin, P., Tanner, M. & Zinsstag, J. (2003). Brucellosis and Q-fever seroprevalences of nomadic pastoralists and their livestock in Chad. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 61 (4), 279-293. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.08.004. |
| [16] | Suluku. R., Nyandeboh. J. P. J. & Moiforay, S. (2019). One Health Approach to Control Brucellosis in Sierra Leone. 10 p. Doi: 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.82378. |
| [17] | Bishop, G. C., Bosman, P. P. & Herr, S. (1994). Bovine Brucellosis. In: Coetzer, Thomson and Tustin (eds.): Infectious Diseases of Livestock. Vol. 2. Cape Town, RSA: Oxford University Press. |
| [18] | Radostits, O. M., Gay, C. C., Blood, C. D. & Hinchcliff, K. W. (2000). Veterinary Medicine, Textbook of the Disease of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses. 9th edition. New York: W. B. Saunders Company Ltd., 867-882. |
| [19] | Mansaray, A., Gogra. A. B., Fortune. D. & Borsuah. J. (2014). Groundwater at Mokonde, Kori Chiefdom, Moyamba District: Laying the foundation for Water Security planning at the Mokonde community. Page. 10. https://www.scirp.org/html/3-2000559_61149.htm. |
| [20] | Sesay, A. R. (2016). Review of the livestock/meat and milk value chains and policy influencing them in Sierra Leone. In: Smith OB, Salla A, Bedane B (eds). Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Economic Community of West African States, 66 p. |
| [21] | Alton, G. G., Maw, J., Rogerson, B. A. & McPherson, G. G. (1975). Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis – evaluation of Complement-Fixation, Serum Agglutination and Rose-Bengal tests. Australian Veterinary Journal, 51, 57-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1975.tb09404.x, PMid: 809027. |
| [22] | Poester, F. P., Ramos, E. T. & Thiesen, S. V. (2010). Application of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. Available at: http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/aph/public/poester-indirect-1055.pdf. |
| [23] | Nizeyimana, G., Mwiine, F. N. & Ayebazibwe, C. (2013). Comparative Brucella abortus antibody prevalence in cattle under contrasting husbandry practices in Uganda’, Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 84 (1), Art. #943, 5 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ jsava.v84i1.943. |
| [24] | Al–Majali, A. M., Talfha, A. Q., Ababneh, M. M. & Ababneh, M. (2009). Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in Jordan. Veterinary Journal of Science, 10 (1), 61- 65. |
APA Style
Mahmud Emkay Sesay, Esther Marie Kanu, Victor Patrick Bagla, Prince Emmanuel Norman. (2021). Prevalence of Brucella abortus in Cattle in the Njala and Newton Ranches of Sierra Leone Using Serological Analysis. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 9(6), 191-195. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15
ACS Style
Mahmud Emkay Sesay; Esther Marie Kanu; Victor Patrick Bagla; Prince Emmanuel Norman. Prevalence of Brucella abortus in Cattle in the Njala and Newton Ranches of Sierra Leone Using Serological Analysis. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2021, 9(6), 191-195. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15
AMA Style
Mahmud Emkay Sesay, Esther Marie Kanu, Victor Patrick Bagla, Prince Emmanuel Norman. Prevalence of Brucella abortus in Cattle in the Njala and Newton Ranches of Sierra Leone Using Serological Analysis. Anim Vet Sci. 2021;9(6):191-195. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15,
author = {Mahmud Emkay Sesay and Esther Marie Kanu and Victor Patrick Bagla and Prince Emmanuel Norman},
title = {Prevalence of Brucella abortus in Cattle in the Njala and Newton Ranches of Sierra Leone Using Serological Analysis},
journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
pages = {191-195},
doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20210906.15},
abstract = {Brucellosis disease is problematic in early abortion in herds, reduces the economic value of farm animals, reduces milk production and limits the breeding efficiency of cattle. A study was conducted to determine and compare the prevalence of antibodies against Brucella abortus in cattle under same husbandry practices at the Njala University, Njala campus and the Newton cattle holding ranches. A total of 80 cattle was randomly sampled and screened for the presence of B. abortus utilizing the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT). Results indicated that the general seroprevalence was 57.5% in Njala University cattle ranch and 92.5% Newton cattle ranch. The prevalence of infection increased with the age of animals i.e. from 3.75% to 47.5% (22.5%) in age groups B. abortus in the cattle of Njala University and Newton cattle ranches. The prevalence of brucellosis was however enzootic at the two studied sites. This study is relevant for policy makers, researchers, ministry of agriculture and the public for the promotion of regular testing of cattle and utilizing appropriate mitigation strategies to minimize the risk of the brucellosis disease.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Prevalence of Brucella abortus in Cattle in the Njala and Newton Ranches of Sierra Leone Using Serological Analysis AU - Mahmud Emkay Sesay AU - Esther Marie Kanu AU - Victor Patrick Bagla AU - Prince Emmanuel Norman Y1 - 2021/12/29 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15 DO - 10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15 T2 - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JF - Animal and Veterinary Sciences JO - Animal and Veterinary Sciences SP - 191 EP - 195 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5850 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210906.15 AB - Brucellosis disease is problematic in early abortion in herds, reduces the economic value of farm animals, reduces milk production and limits the breeding efficiency of cattle. A study was conducted to determine and compare the prevalence of antibodies against Brucella abortus in cattle under same husbandry practices at the Njala University, Njala campus and the Newton cattle holding ranches. A total of 80 cattle was randomly sampled and screened for the presence of B. abortus utilizing the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT). Results indicated that the general seroprevalence was 57.5% in Njala University cattle ranch and 92.5% Newton cattle ranch. The prevalence of infection increased with the age of animals i.e. from 3.75% to 47.5% (22.5%) in age groups B. abortus in the cattle of Njala University and Newton cattle ranches. The prevalence of brucellosis was however enzootic at the two studied sites. This study is relevant for policy makers, researchers, ministry of agriculture and the public for the promotion of regular testing of cattle and utilizing appropriate mitigation strategies to minimize the risk of the brucellosis disease. VL - 9 IS - 6 ER -
Information
Email: