This article is a bibliographical research, which resulted from discussions held in the discipline: Advanced Topics, offered by the Graduate Program in Communication, Language and Culture - GPCLC, the University of Amazonia - UNAMA, in which I asked myself the following question: Is it possible to see the discourse as a mark of identity and social representation? In view of this question, this paper proposes to verify how the discourse, more specifically, the linguistic variation of the use of pronouns (I / ME) in sentences that begin with verbs in the infinitive can be seen as a mark of identity and social representation at the same time. Therefore, this paper presents an analysis of the three categories: discourse, identity, and social representation based on the theoretical background of: Vasconcellos and Caetano (2014); Resende and Ramalho (2006) and Andrade (1995). Taking as sample, the use of the variation in question within two contexts. The first, in a news item in a local newspaper and the second, in a virtual environment (Facebook and Whatsapp). Thus, it is concluded that discourse can be seen not only as a mark of identity, but also as a social representation. But, both categories, since the discourse is influenced by the social environment in which the individual is inserted, making each individual possess a unique discourse.
Published in | Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12 |
Page(s) | 32-36 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Discourse, Identity, Social Representation
[1] | EVERETT, Daniel L. Linguagem: a história da maior invenção da humanidade [Adhd Language: the history of humanity’s greatest inventio]. São Paulo: Contexto, 2019. |
[2] |
VASCONCELLOS, Lícia Maria Vieira; CAETANO, Vitor Nunes. Diálogo entre representação social e identidade: considerações iniciais [Adhd Dialog between social representation and identity: initial considerations]. Rio de Janeiro: CAP UERJ, 2014. Disponível em |
[3] | RESENDE, Viviane de Melo; RAMALHO, Viviane. Análise de discurso crítica [Adhd Critical discourse anaçysis]. São Paulo: Contexto, 2006. |
[4] | ANDRADE, Maria Antonio Alonso de. A identidade como representação social [Adhd Identity as a scoial representation]. IN: Revista Política e trabalho. n. 11. Recife: PPGS-UFPB, 1995. PDF. |
[5] | WOLTON, Dominique. Pensar a comunicação [Adhd Thinking Communication]. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 2004. [p. 08-42]. |
[6] |
SILVA, Rodrigo de Carvalho da. Construção de Sentido e Produção de Discurso: a linguagem e subjetividade dos textos midiáticos [Adhd Construction of Meaning and Productions of Discourse: the language and subjectivity of media texts]. São Paulo: UNESP, S/D. PDF. Disponível em: |
[7] | PERINI, Mário A. Gramática do português brasileiro [Adhd Grammar of Brazilian Portuguese]. São Paulo: Parábola, 2010. [p. 115- 121]. |
[8] | CALVET, Louis-Jean. Sociolinguística: uma introdução crítica [Adhd Sociolinguistics: a critical introduction]. 2ª. ed. São Paulo: Parábola, 2002. |
[9] | FERREIRA, Aurélio Buarque de Holanda. Miniaurélio século XXI escolar: o minidicionário da língua portuguesa [Adhd Miniaurélio XXI century school: the mini dictionary of the Portuguese language]. 4ª.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2001. |
[10] | BOURDIEU. Pierre. Escritos de educação [Adhd Education writings]. 9ª. Ed. Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2007. PDF. |
[11] |
GLOBO, G1. Caso George Floyd: morte do homem negro filmado com policial branco de joelhos em seu pescoço causa indignação nos EUA [Adhd Death of black man filmed with White cop kneeling on his neck causes outrage in US]. Disponível em |
APA Style
Guilherme Pastana Fonseca de Oliveira. (2022). The Speech as a Mark of Identify and Social Representation. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 8(2), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12
ACS Style
Guilherme Pastana Fonseca de Oliveira. The Speech as a Mark of Identify and Social Representation. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2022, 8(2), 32-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12
@article{10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12, author = {Guilherme Pastana Fonseca de Oliveira}, title = {The Speech as a Mark of Identify and Social Representation}, journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, pages = {32-36}, doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20220802.12}, abstract = {This article is a bibliographical research, which resulted from discussions held in the discipline: Advanced Topics, offered by the Graduate Program in Communication, Language and Culture - GPCLC, the University of Amazonia - UNAMA, in which I asked myself the following question: Is it possible to see the discourse as a mark of identity and social representation? In view of this question, this paper proposes to verify how the discourse, more specifically, the linguistic variation of the use of pronouns (I / ME) in sentences that begin with verbs in the infinitive can be seen as a mark of identity and social representation at the same time. Therefore, this paper presents an analysis of the three categories: discourse, identity, and social representation based on the theoretical background of: Vasconcellos and Caetano (2014); Resende and Ramalho (2006) and Andrade (1995). Taking as sample, the use of the variation in question within two contexts. The first, in a news item in a local newspaper and the second, in a virtual environment (Facebook and Whatsapp). Thus, it is concluded that discourse can be seen not only as a mark of identity, but also as a social representation. But, both categories, since the discourse is influenced by the social environment in which the individual is inserted, making each individual possess a unique discourse.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Speech as a Mark of Identify and Social Representation AU - Guilherme Pastana Fonseca de Oliveira Y1 - 2022/04/20 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12 T2 - Advances in Sciences and Humanities JF - Advances in Sciences and Humanities JO - Advances in Sciences and Humanities SP - 32 EP - 36 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-0984 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220802.12 AB - This article is a bibliographical research, which resulted from discussions held in the discipline: Advanced Topics, offered by the Graduate Program in Communication, Language and Culture - GPCLC, the University of Amazonia - UNAMA, in which I asked myself the following question: Is it possible to see the discourse as a mark of identity and social representation? In view of this question, this paper proposes to verify how the discourse, more specifically, the linguistic variation of the use of pronouns (I / ME) in sentences that begin with verbs in the infinitive can be seen as a mark of identity and social representation at the same time. Therefore, this paper presents an analysis of the three categories: discourse, identity, and social representation based on the theoretical background of: Vasconcellos and Caetano (2014); Resende and Ramalho (2006) and Andrade (1995). Taking as sample, the use of the variation in question within two contexts. The first, in a news item in a local newspaper and the second, in a virtual environment (Facebook and Whatsapp). Thus, it is concluded that discourse can be seen not only as a mark of identity, but also as a social representation. But, both categories, since the discourse is influenced by the social environment in which the individual is inserted, making each individual possess a unique discourse. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -