Ethiopia is the center of origin and has a varied genetic foundation for Arabica coffee, but there is still a lack of yield-competitive enhanced varieties, which is why the average productivity in the country is significantly lower than the global average. The average national productivity is quite low as a result. Ethiopia's pure line variety development program has shown that it is rarely possible to increase yield over 1800–2000 kg/ha through direct selection. This suggests that heterotic hybrids are needed to maximize yield up to 2500–3000 kg/ha. Therefore, in order to find high yielding hybrids, it may be helpful to further assess the performance of the best performing hybrids for yield and growth traits at full bearing stage. Therefore, creating hybrid coffee kinds that are stable, disease-resistant, and high yielding is crucial to closing this gap and increasing coffee productivity. Thus, assessing coffee hybrid genotypes for yield and yield components was the goal of this study. To illustrate the growth and yield characteristics of four promising hybrid genotypes of Arabica coffee, the experiment was carried out at Awada and Leku. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used to carry out the experiment between 2016 and 2021. Data were gathered on plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, length of the longest primary branch, number of main stem nodes, stem girth, internode length on the main stem, canopy diameter, and yield per hectare. The findings showed that there were statistically significant differences between the growth features. The number of primary branches (52.08 – 58.83), number of secondary branches (148.23 – 179.25), number of major stem nodes (27.96 – 30.66), stem diameter (2.82 – 3.45cm), canopy diameter (199 – 221.77cm), and average length of primary branches (107.00 –116.84cm) are all reported. According to the study's findings, the hybrid 75227x1681 (3491 kg/ha) produced the highest overall yield per hectare, followed by 75227xAngafa (3023kg/ha) cultivated at Awada and 75227X1681 (1437kg/ha) in Leku. There will be a greater probability of obtaining enhanced Arabica coffee hybrid varieties in the south Ethiopian growing environment because the potential hybrid genotypes outperformed the current improved varieties at Awada and Leku. In order to suggest a stable and appropriate hybrid variety for coffee growers in the South, the experiment should be conducted again at various representative trial sites.
Published in | American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 10, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12 |
Page(s) | 10-17 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Coffee, Hybrids, Growing Characteristics, Clean Coffee
No | Arabica Coffee Hybrid genotypes | Designation | Germplasm composition | Cross category |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 744xAngafa | Arabica Coffee Hybrid | SWEXSE | CBDR xHY+Q |
2 | 7440xAngafa | Arabica Coffee Hybrid | SWEXSE | CBDR xHY+Q |
3 | 75227xAngafa | Arabica Coffee Hybrid | SWEXSE | CBDR xHY+Q |
4 | 75227x1681 | Arabica Coffee Hybrid | SWEXSE | CBDR xHY+Q |
5 | Feyata | Released Arabica coffee pure line check variety | SE | CBDRxHY |
6 | Ababuna | Released Arabica Coffee Hybrid check Variety | SWEXSWE | HY+Q |
7 | Angafa | Released Arabica coffee pure line check variety | SE | HY+Q |
Candidate hybrids and checks | Awada | Leku | Over all mean | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Mean | Survival rate (%) | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Mean | Survival rate (%) | ||
75227 x Angafa | 2109 | 4442 | 2520 | 3023 | 90 | 828 | 1854 | 1258 | 1313 | 100 | 2168 |
744 x Angafa | 2152 | 3713 | 1942 | 2602 | 96 | 867 | 1573 | 1134 | 1192 | 100 | 1897 |
75227 x 1681 | 3189 | 4976 | 2309 | 3491 | 100 | 660 | 2679 | 971 | 1437 | 100 | 2464 |
7440 x Angafa | 2639 | 3942 | 2272 | 2951 | 100 | 729 | 1987 | 1289 | 1335 | 100 | 2143 |
Checks | |||||||||||
Ababuna | 696 | 2953 | 1070 | 1573 | 100 | 999 | 1106 | 800 | 968 | 100 | 1271 |
Feyate | 707 | 4032 | 1086 | 1941 | 100 | 693 | 2257 | 974 | 1308 | 100 | 1625 |
Angafa | 1305 | 3447 | 1534 | 2095 | 100 | 682 | 1530 | 1285 | 1166 | 100 | 1630 |
LSD | 2.97 | 8.11 | 10.03 | 4.44 | 8.27 | 8.21 | 5.33 | 4.32 | 100 | 2.56 | |
CV | 9.12 | 11.61 | 30.99 | 9.88 | 59.64 | 24.88 | 27.21 | 19.49 | 100 | 7.64 | |
Sig. | *** | ** | * | *** | Ns | * | Ns | Ns | *** |
Candidate Hybrids and Checks | Height (m) | Canopy diameter (cm) | Stem girth (cm) | No. of nodes on the main stem | Inter node length on the main stem (cm) | No. of primary branches | No. of secondary branches | Length of first primary (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
75227 x 1681 | 2.27ab | 221.77a | 3.43ab | 30.96ab | 8.75ab | 53.62b | 169.25ab | 115.833ab |
75227 x Angafa | 2.24ab | 210.02bc | 3.21abc | 29.04ab | 8.52ab | 55.08ab | 179.25a | 116.837a |
7440 x Angafa | 2.45a | 216.02ab | 3.45a | 29.88ab | 9.04a | 58.46a | 173.92ab | 113.753ab |
744 x Angafa | 2.42a | 209.02bc | 3.13bcd | 30.66ab | 8.15ab | 58.83a | 173.33ab | 111.543abc |
Feyate | 2.24ab | 211.87ab | 2.72e | 29.46ab | 8.00ab | 55.87ab | 178.34a | 113.963ab |
Angeffa | 2.44a | 206.23bc | 3.07cd | 49.79a | 7.93ab | 59.21a | 148.25b | 109.75bc |
Ababuna | 1.99b | 199.10c | 2.82de | 27.96b | 7.13b | 52.08b | 167.46ab | 107.00c |
Mean | 2.294 | 210.57 | 3.12 | 31.68 | 8.22 | 56.19 | 169.97 | 112.66 |
CV | 7.34 | 2.92 | 5.62 | 26.62 | 11.83 | 4.64 | 8.58 | 3.18 |
LSD | 0.2998 | 10.97 | 0.314 | 15 | 1.73 | 4.64 | 25.956 | 6.37 |
Candidate Hybrids and Checks | Plant height (m) | Canopy diameter (cm) | Stem girth (cm) | Number of nodes on the main stem | Inter node length on the main stem (cm) | No. of primary branches | No. of 20 branches | Length of longest primary (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
75227x1681 | 2.8967ab | 210.83abc | 5.34ab | 31.93 | 7.46ab | 61.2ab | 99.00 | 108.00 |
75227 x Angafa | 2.7533ab | 191.33c | 5.2ab | 30.60 | 6.06b | 55.13b | 108.46 | 108.00 |
7440 x Angafa | 3.0667a | 204.17abc | 5.38ab | 34.33 | 7.66ab | 66.93a | 107.86 | 107.33 |
744 x Angafa | 2.9633ab | 216.33ab | 5.36ab | 32.80 | 6.86ab | 62.53ab | 101.33 | 111.80 |
Feyate | 2.9433ab | 218.33a | 5.09ab | 31.26 | 7.40ab | 61.73ab | 106.46 | 114.00 |
Angeffa | 2.92ab | 219.00a | 5.42a | 33.66 | 8.66a | 66.40a | 101.40 | 115.33 |
Ababuna | 2.7067b | 195.67bc | 4.82 | 31.20 | 6.20b | 59.33ab | 102.13 | 108.66 |
Mean | 2.8928 | 207.95 | 5.23 | 32.25 | 7.19 | 61.89 | 103.80 | 110.44 |
CV | 6.80 | 6.06 | 6.12 | 7.64 | 17.89 | 8.90 | 7.55 | 4.08 |
LSD | 35.23 | 22.42 | 0.56 | NS | 2.28 | 9.82 | NS | NS |
Hybrids and checks | Best parent heterosis |
---|---|
75227xAngafa | 33.27 |
744xAngafa | 16.48 |
75227x1681 | 43.44 |
7440xAngafa | 31.57 |
Checks | |
Ababuna | |
Feyate | |
Angafa |
AARCS | Awada Agricultural Research Sub-Center |
WGARC | Wondo Genet Agricultural Research Center |
JARC | Jimma Agricultural Research |
[1] | AARSC Awada Agricultural Research Sub-center (2011). Annual research progress report of the year 2011. |
[2] | Abdi Adem. (2009). Agro-morphological characterization of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) landrace collected from Mesela, West Harerge, Ethiopia. M. Sc. Thesis Submitted to Graduate Studies of Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia. 88 pp. |
[3] | Abdulfeta tariku kifle (2018). Characterization and yield performance evaluation of coffee (coffea arabica L.) germplasm accessions from tepi, southwestern Ethiopia. A thesis submitted to the school of plant and horticultural sciences, School of Graduate Studies, Hawassa University, College of Agriculture, Hawassa, Ethiopia.85 pp. |
[4] | Abu Tefera and Teddy Tefera (2013). Ethiopia: Coffee Annual Report, Gain report ET-1302, USDA (?). |
[5] | Anthony, F., M. C. Combes, C. Astorga, B. Bertrand, G. Graziosi and P. Lashermes, (2002). The Origin of Cultivated Coffea arabica L. Varieties Revealed by AFLP and SSR Markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 894-900. |
[6] | Ashenafi Ayano, (2013). Heterosis and Combining Ability for Morphological, Yield and Quality Characters in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) hybrids. An MSc Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Jimma University. 92p. |
[7] | Bayetta Bellachew, Mesfin Ameha, Ashenafi Ayana, Tadesse Benti. (1993). Screening of Arabica Coffee Collections for Bebeka Environment. P775. 15th International Scientific colloquium on coffee (Vol. I). 6-11 June 1993, Montpellier, France. |
[8] | CTA (2022). Coffee and tea Authority Annual report. |
[9] | Davis AP. (2011). “Psilanthusmannii, the type species of Psilanthus, transferred to Coffea.” Nordic Journal of Botany, 29: 471–472. |
[10] | EndaleTaye, Behailu Weledesenbet, Bayetta Bellachew and Fabrice Davrieux (2008). Effects of genotypes and fruit maturity stage on caffeine and other biochemical constituents of arabica coffee. Proceedings of a National Work Shop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia. 14-17, August 2007, EIAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 169-172. |
[11] | EU. (2014). Ethiopian coffee sector enhancement project (ECoSEP), SRNS: FED/2015/038- 977, Financed under 11th European Development Fund (FED). |
[12] | FAO, (2009). Study prepared in the framework of FAO project GCP/RAF/404/GER. The Market for Organic and Fair-Trade Coffee. “Increasing income and food security of small farmers in West and Central Africa through exports of organic and fair-trade tropical products.” September, 2009. |
[13] | Fontes, J. R. M. (2001). Heterose, capacidade combinatória divergência genética estimada por análise de marcadores RAPD em cruzamentos entre cafeeiros Catuaí (Coffea arabica L.) e Híbrido de Timor. PhD Disse., Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa. |
[14] | Gebre-Egziabher, T., (1990). The importance of Ethiopian forests in the conservation of arabica coffee gene-pools. In: Proceedings of the 12th plenary meeting of AETFAT Hamburg, 4-10 September 1988. Edited by H. D. Ihlenfeldt. Mitt. Inst. Allg. Bot. Hambg. |
[15] | Getachew WeldeMichael, Sentayehu Alamerew, Taye Kufa and Tadesse Benti, (2013). Genetic Diversity Analysis of Some Ethiopian Specialty Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Germplasm Accessions Based on Morphological Traits Time Journals of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 1(4): 47-54. |
[16] | Gizachew Atinafu, Hussien Mohammed and Taye Kufa (2017). Genetic Variability of Sidama Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Landrace for Agro-morphological Traits at Awada, Southern Ethiopia. Academic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Research. Vol. 5(4), pp. 263-275, |
[17] | Haarer, A. E. (1962). Modern Coffee Production. Leonard Hill (Books) Limited, London. |
[18] | Habtamu Gebreselassie, Gizachew Atinafu, Meseret Degefa, Ashenafi Ayano (2018). Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Hybrid Genotypes Evaluation for Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance under Southern Ethiopian Growing Condition. Acad. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Res. 6(2): 89-96. |
[19] | Habtamu Gebreselassie, Gizachew Atinafu, Meseret Degefaand Ashenafi Ayano (2017). Growth Characteristics and Yield Evaluation of Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Promising Selections Under Sidama and Gedeo Growing Condition, Southern Ethiopia. Advances in Crop Science and Technology, an open access journal ISSN: 2329-8863. 5(6): 1-6. |
[20] | Harlan, J. R., (1992). Crops and man. Second edition, American society of Agronomy, Madison. |
[21] | ICO, (2011). The Story of Coffee. |
[22] |
ITC, (2011). Ethiopian coffee quality improvement project: 2011 aid for trade global review
http://www.intracen.org/aidfortrade/documents/Ethopian%20Coffee%20Programme_A4.pdf. 27-01-2012 |
[23] | Lemi, B., and Ashenafi, A., (2016). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield components of limmu coffee (Coffea arabica L.) accessions in South Western Ethiopia. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 24(6): 1913-1919. |
[24] | Masreshaw Yirga Haile (2018). GENETIC VARIABILITY IN YAYU COFFEE (Coffea arabica L.) GERMPLASM AT METU, SOUTHWESTERN ETHIOPIA. A thesis Submitted to the Department of Horticulture and Plant Science, School of Post Graduate Studies, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University for the Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Masters of Science in Plant Breeding. Pp 96. |
[25] | Mesfin Kebede & Bayetta Bellachew (2008). Phenotypic diversity in the Harerge coffee (Coffee arabica L.) germplasm for quantitative traits. East African Journal of Sciences 2: 13-18. |
[26] | Mishra M. K., N. S. Rani, A. S. Ram, H. L. Sreenath and Jayarama, (2008). A simple method of DNA extraction from coffee seeds suitable for PCR analysis. African Journal of Biotechnology 7(4): 409-413. |
[27] | Nure, D. (2008). Mapping quality profiles of Ethiopian coffee by origin. |
[28] | Olika Kitila, Sentayehu Alamerew, Taye Kufa and Weyessa Garedew. (2011). Variability of quantitative Traits in Limmu Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 482-493. |
[29] | Pearl, H. M., C. Nagai, P. H. Moore, D. L. Steiger, R. V. Osgood and R. Ming, (2004). Construction of a genetic map for arabica coffee. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 829-835. |
[30] | Prakash, N. S., M. C. Combes, N. Somanna and P. Lashermes, (2002). AFLP analysis of introgression in coffee cultivars (Coffea arabica L.) derived from a natural interspecific hybrid. Euphytica 124: 265-271. |
[31] | Shimekit Tadele Gebabo, (2012). Genetic diversity of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) landraces from major coffee growing areas of southern Ethiopia as revealed by inter simple sequence repeat marker. An M. Sc. Thesis submitted to the school of graduate studies of Haramaya University, 10-45PP. |
[32] | Steiger, D. L., C. Nagai, P. H. Moore, C. W. Morden, R. V. Osgood and R. Ming, (2002). AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and among Coffea arabica cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 209-215. |
[33] | Tadesse Benti, (2017). Progress in Arabica Coffee Breeding in Ethiopia: Achievements, Challenges and Prospects. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research ISSN 2307-4531. |
[34] | Taye Kufa, T. (2008). Coffee diversity & knowledge, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 317-227. |
[35] | Tefera, A., and T. Tefera. (2013). Ethiopia: Coffee Annual Report, Gain report ET-1302, USDA. |
[36] | Vega, F. E., (2008). The rise of coffee. American Science 96: 138-145. [check for cor correction]. |
[37] | Walyaro, D. J. A. (1983). Consideration in breeding for improved yield on quality arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L). PhD thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. |
[38] | Wassu Mohammed (2004). Heterosis and Combining Ability Analysis of Yield and Yield Related Traits in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.). MSc. thesis submitted to Alamaya University, Alamaya. 99p. |
APA Style
Degefa, M., Gebreselassie, H., Bekele, D., Shewangezaw, K., Manaye, K., et al. (2025). Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant Biology, 10(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12
ACS Style
Degefa, M.; Gebreselassie, H.; Bekele, D.; Shewangezaw, K.; Manaye, K., et al. Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2025, 10(1), 10-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12
AMA Style
Degefa M, Gebreselassie H, Bekele D, Shewangezaw K, Manaye K, et al. Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia. Am J Plant Biol. 2025;10(1):10-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12, author = {Meseret Degefa and Habtamu Gebreselassie and Dejene Bekele and Kidist Shewangezaw and Ketema Manaye and Rahile Mengestu and Wondagegnehu G/tsaddik and Leta Ajema and Desalegn Alemayhu and Lemi Beksisa and Tadesse Benti and Ashenafi Ayano}, title = {Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia }, journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology}, volume = {10}, number = {1}, pages = {10-17}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20251001.12}, abstract = {Ethiopia is the center of origin and has a varied genetic foundation for Arabica coffee, but there is still a lack of yield-competitive enhanced varieties, which is why the average productivity in the country is significantly lower than the global average. The average national productivity is quite low as a result. Ethiopia's pure line variety development program has shown that it is rarely possible to increase yield over 1800–2000 kg/ha through direct selection. This suggests that heterotic hybrids are needed to maximize yield up to 2500–3000 kg/ha. Therefore, in order to find high yielding hybrids, it may be helpful to further assess the performance of the best performing hybrids for yield and growth traits at full bearing stage. Therefore, creating hybrid coffee kinds that are stable, disease-resistant, and high yielding is crucial to closing this gap and increasing coffee productivity. Thus, assessing coffee hybrid genotypes for yield and yield components was the goal of this study. To illustrate the growth and yield characteristics of four promising hybrid genotypes of Arabica coffee, the experiment was carried out at Awada and Leku. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used to carry out the experiment between 2016 and 2021. Data were gathered on plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, length of the longest primary branch, number of main stem nodes, stem girth, internode length on the main stem, canopy diameter, and yield per hectare. The findings showed that there were statistically significant differences between the growth features. The number of primary branches (52.08 – 58.83), number of secondary branches (148.23 – 179.25), number of major stem nodes (27.96 – 30.66), stem diameter (2.82 – 3.45cm), canopy diameter (199 – 221.77cm), and average length of primary branches (107.00 –116.84cm) are all reported. According to the study's findings, the hybrid 75227x1681 (3491 kg/ha) produced the highest overall yield per hectare, followed by 75227xAngafa (3023kg/ha) cultivated at Awada and 75227X1681 (1437kg/ha) in Leku. There will be a greater probability of obtaining enhanced Arabica coffee hybrid varieties in the south Ethiopian growing environment because the potential hybrid genotypes outperformed the current improved varieties at Awada and Leku. In order to suggest a stable and appropriate hybrid variety for coffee growers in the South, the experiment should be conducted again at various representative trial sites. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia AU - Meseret Degefa AU - Habtamu Gebreselassie AU - Dejene Bekele AU - Kidist Shewangezaw AU - Ketema Manaye AU - Rahile Mengestu AU - Wondagegnehu G/tsaddik AU - Leta Ajema AU - Desalegn Alemayhu AU - Lemi Beksisa AU - Tadesse Benti AU - Ashenafi Ayano Y1 - 2025/04/14 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12 T2 - American Journal of Plant Biology JF - American Journal of Plant Biology JO - American Journal of Plant Biology SP - 10 EP - 17 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8337 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12 AB - Ethiopia is the center of origin and has a varied genetic foundation for Arabica coffee, but there is still a lack of yield-competitive enhanced varieties, which is why the average productivity in the country is significantly lower than the global average. The average national productivity is quite low as a result. Ethiopia's pure line variety development program has shown that it is rarely possible to increase yield over 1800–2000 kg/ha through direct selection. This suggests that heterotic hybrids are needed to maximize yield up to 2500–3000 kg/ha. Therefore, in order to find high yielding hybrids, it may be helpful to further assess the performance of the best performing hybrids for yield and growth traits at full bearing stage. Therefore, creating hybrid coffee kinds that are stable, disease-resistant, and high yielding is crucial to closing this gap and increasing coffee productivity. Thus, assessing coffee hybrid genotypes for yield and yield components was the goal of this study. To illustrate the growth and yield characteristics of four promising hybrid genotypes of Arabica coffee, the experiment was carried out at Awada and Leku. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used to carry out the experiment between 2016 and 2021. Data were gathered on plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, length of the longest primary branch, number of main stem nodes, stem girth, internode length on the main stem, canopy diameter, and yield per hectare. The findings showed that there were statistically significant differences between the growth features. The number of primary branches (52.08 – 58.83), number of secondary branches (148.23 – 179.25), number of major stem nodes (27.96 – 30.66), stem diameter (2.82 – 3.45cm), canopy diameter (199 – 221.77cm), and average length of primary branches (107.00 –116.84cm) are all reported. According to the study's findings, the hybrid 75227x1681 (3491 kg/ha) produced the highest overall yield per hectare, followed by 75227xAngafa (3023kg/ha) cultivated at Awada and 75227X1681 (1437kg/ha) in Leku. There will be a greater probability of obtaining enhanced Arabica coffee hybrid varieties in the south Ethiopian growing environment because the potential hybrid genotypes outperformed the current improved varieties at Awada and Leku. In order to suggest a stable and appropriate hybrid variety for coffee growers in the South, the experiment should be conducted again at various representative trial sites. VL - 10 IS - 1 ER -