Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia

Received: 16 December 2024     Accepted: 3 January 2025     Published: 14 April 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Ethiopia is the center of origin and has a varied genetic foundation for Arabica coffee, but there is still a lack of yield-competitive enhanced varieties, which is why the average productivity in the country is significantly lower than the global average. The average national productivity is quite low as a result. Ethiopia's pure line variety development program has shown that it is rarely possible to increase yield over 1800–2000 kg/ha through direct selection. This suggests that heterotic hybrids are needed to maximize yield up to 2500–3000 kg/ha. Therefore, in order to find high yielding hybrids, it may be helpful to further assess the performance of the best performing hybrids for yield and growth traits at full bearing stage. Therefore, creating hybrid coffee kinds that are stable, disease-resistant, and high yielding is crucial to closing this gap and increasing coffee productivity. Thus, assessing coffee hybrid genotypes for yield and yield components was the goal of this study. To illustrate the growth and yield characteristics of four promising hybrid genotypes of Arabica coffee, the experiment was carried out at Awada and Leku. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used to carry out the experiment between 2016 and 2021. Data were gathered on plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, length of the longest primary branch, number of main stem nodes, stem girth, internode length on the main stem, canopy diameter, and yield per hectare. The findings showed that there were statistically significant differences between the growth features. The number of primary branches (52.08 – 58.83), number of secondary branches (148.23 – 179.25), number of major stem nodes (27.96 – 30.66), stem diameter (2.82 – 3.45cm), canopy diameter (199 – 221.77cm), and average length of primary branches (107.00 –116.84cm) are all reported. According to the study's findings, the hybrid 75227x1681 (3491 kg/ha) produced the highest overall yield per hectare, followed by 75227xAngafa (3023kg/ha) cultivated at Awada and 75227X1681 (1437kg/ha) in Leku. There will be a greater probability of obtaining enhanced Arabica coffee hybrid varieties in the south Ethiopian growing environment because the potential hybrid genotypes outperformed the current improved varieties at Awada and Leku. In order to suggest a stable and appropriate hybrid variety for coffee growers in the South, the experiment should be conducted again at various representative trial sites.

Published in American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12
Page(s) 10-17
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Coffee, Hybrids, Growing Characteristics, Clean Coffee

1. Introduction
The most traded tropical agricultural product in the world is Arabica coffee , with oil coming in second . Up to 25 million farming households worldwide produce 80 percent of the world's coffee, making it the most traded tropical product . In addition to making a significant contribution to foreign exchange as a primary cash crop in many producing nations, it provides millions of people with a living . For millions of people in coffee-growing nations in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, it is a significant source of income .
Ethiopia is renowned among African nations for producing Arabica coffee (C arabica), which is prized for its exceptional quality, distinct flavor, and aroma .
The mountains in the southwest of Ethiopia are where Coffea arabica originated and where its genetic variety was concentrated . Ethiopia's most significant gift to the world is coffee, which has had and continues to have a profound economic, social, and spiritual influence on a wide range of individuals from various geographic areas, cultural backgrounds, and personality types. Almost daily, sometimes twice a day, or more, it is one of the most valued international beverages.
Ethiopia's primary source of foreign exchange profits is coffee, which generates US$1.4 billion annually and accounts for almost 35% of all major export commodity earnings . Coffee also makes up a significant portion of the country's foreign currency income . Ethiopia has a favorable climate for coffee production, with the right amount of rainfall, soil type, altitude, temperature, and pH. According to , the nation is the origin of Coffea Arabica and has a genetic background for Arabica coffee that is quite heterogeneous. Ethiopia has the ability to sell a significant number of specialty coffees and generates a variety of unique Arabica coffees . Ninety five percent of Ethiopia's coffee is grown by smallholder farmers .
The dearth of high-yielding, disease-resistant hybrid cultivars that are best suited to the region's current environmental conditions has significantly limited coffee production in Ethiopia overall and in the southern region in particular. In Coffea Arabica, heterosis has been reported in a number of studies , with hybrid F1 cultivars accounting for an average of up to 30%. A hybridization project was started in 1996 GC with the goal of creating high-yielding coffee hybrids that are resistant to coffee berry disease (CBD) and have the typical quality of Sidama and Gedeo coffee.
A maximum over best parent heterosis of 44.6% for yield was found for the 15 hybrids under study based on a number of observations conducted since 1998. Eight of these fifteen hybrids demonstrated an average production of more than 15 kg/ha of clean coffee, significantly above the performance of the experiment's routine checks . Lastly, four of these eight hybrids (744xAngafa, 7440xAngafa, 75227xAngafa, and 75227X1681) are being encouraged for additional research to validate their performance over time at Sidama Region under Awada & Leku growing conditions.
A variety must be suited to a region because a variety or hybrid may adapt and satisfy the commercial interest in one coffee-growing region but may not be appropriate for use in another due to environmental factors like soil, temperature, humidity, and rainfall . In Ethiopia, the selection and breeding process is tailored for each locality using local landraces and crosses from the specific place in order to reduce adaptation issues and prevent the blending impacts of coffee from known quality growing areas with coffee from another area or locations.
Similar to this, southern Ethiopia is one of the best places to cultivate high-quality coffee. Research is being done at the Awada Agricultural Research Sub Center and its trial sites to create coffee types that are suitable for the region's growing conditions. Thus, the purpose of this experiment was to ascertain the hybrid coffee variety's growth traits and yield performance.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. An Explanation of the Research Area
During the 2016–2021 cropping seasons, the experiment was carried out on a trial plot of the Leku trial site substation and the Awada agricultural research sub-center (AARSC). The mid-highland agroecology of Awada is tepid to cool semi-arid. Situated in the Sidama Region, approximately 43 kilometers south of Hawassa and 315 kilometers south of Addis Ababa, at 603' N latitude and 380 E longitude, and at an elevation of roughly 1750 m.a.s.l., it is close to Yirgalem town. With two wet and dry seasons and an average annual precipitation of 1342 mm, the region exhibits a semi-bimodal rainfall distribution . The average yearly air temperature is between 11°C and 28.40°C. The sub-center's primary soil types are chromotic-cambisols and eutric-nitosols, both of which are excellent for growing coffee . The Leku trial site is located at an altitude of 1805 m.a.s.l. of. According to the country's coffee-growing agroecology, the experimental site (Awada) is classed as mid-altitude, while the remaining experimental site (Leku) is defined as high land .
2.2. Design and Treatment of Experiments
Three common check cultivars and four promising hybrids of Arabica coffee, whose progenitors were from south and southwest Ethiopia, were employed as a treatment (Table 1). Using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications, normal and healthy seedlings were planted in experimental plots in 2016. Each plot included 20 trees spaced 2 m by 2 m apart. All standard management procedures were rigorously and consistently implemented for every plot .
Table 1. Description of experimental coffee genotypes.

No

Arabica Coffee Hybrid genotypes

Designation

Germplasm composition

Cross category

1

744xAngafa

Arabica Coffee Hybrid

SWEXSE

CBDR xHY+Q

2

7440xAngafa

Arabica Coffee Hybrid

SWEXSE

CBDR xHY+Q

3

75227xAngafa

Arabica Coffee Hybrid

SWEXSE

CBDR xHY+Q

4

75227x1681

Arabica Coffee Hybrid

SWEXSE

CBDR xHY+Q

5

Feyata

Released Arabica coffee pure line check variety

SE

CBDRxHY

6

Ababuna

Released Arabica Coffee Hybrid check Variety

SWEXSWE

HY+Q

7

Angafa

Released Arabica coffee pure line check variety

SE

HY+Q

Whereas: SWE=South west Ethiopian coffee type, SE=South Ethiopian coffee type, CBDR=Coffee berry disease resistance, HY=High yielder, Q=Quality.
2.3. Data Collection
Using the standard IPGRI procedures, data for eight growth characteristics were recorded from each treatment during the study period: plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, length of the longest primary branch, number of main stem nodes, stem girth, internode length on the main stem, canopy diameter, and average yield over three years.
Each character's data was gathered using the following methodology: A pocket meter was used to measure the height of the plants in cm from the base to the tip.
Using a Vernier caliper, the stem girth was measured in centimeters at ground level, or five centimeters above the ground. A pocket meter was used to measure the canopy's diameter in centimeters from east to west and north to south. The average was then calculated.
Total plant height (TPH) - height up to first primary branches (HUFPM) / Number of main stem nodes (NMSN) was used to compute the internode length on the main stem.
Counting the number of principal branches allowed for the recording of this character.
Number of secondary branches: the number of secondary branches was counted in order to record this character. Using a pocket meter, the length of the longest primary branch was measured in meters. The number of nodes on the main stem was counted in order to determine the number of main stem nodes. Yield: The weight of the fresh cherry and the dried cherry (buni) yield per plot were measured in grams. The dried cherry yield was converted to fresh cherry by multiplying it by 2.6 as a correction factor, and then it was converted to kilograms per hectare .
2.4. Analysis of Data
The SAS statistical software package (version 9.3) was used to analyze the data, and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) Test procedure was used to compare the mean values at the 5% level of significance .
2.5. Estimating Heterosis
Based on the superior parent and heterosis, the hybrid performance for every cross combination was assessed. Using the approach, the percentage of heterosis was determined for the characters exhibiting significant differences for crosses. Heterobeltosis, or best-parent heterosis: It alludes to how much better the F1 hybrid performs than its finest parent.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Clean Coffee Yield
According to the overall mean analysis of variance (ANOVA), there was a significant difference between the genotypes' yield potential (Table 2). Crosses 75227*1681 had the highest three-year mean output (2464 kg/ha), whereas crosses 744* Angafa produced the lowest three-year mean yield (1897 kg/ha). Ababuna produced the lowest yield of 1271 kg/ha among the standard tests, whereas Angafa recorded the best three-year mean yield of 1630 kg/ha (Table 2).
According to the individual location analysis, crosses 75227*1681 produced the highest three-year mean yield (3491 kg/ha), while crosses 744* Angafa at Awada produced the lowest three-year mean yield (2602 kg/ha). Ababuna produced the lowest yield of 1573 kg/ha at Awada, whereas Angafa recorded the highest three-year mean yield of 2095 kg/ha among the standard tests. The Leku site's mean yield data result showed that crosses 75227X1681 had the highest three-year mean yield (1437 kg/ha), while crosses 744X Angafa had the lowest three-year mean yield (1192 kg/ha). Ababuna produced the lowest yield of 800 kg/ha at Leku, while Angafa had the best three-year mean yield of 1166 kg/ha among the standard checks (Table 2). In the future coffee development program, the occurrence of adequate variety among the analyzed materials presents a huge chance to bring about significant improvement through cross-breeding and selection. Earlier authors reported significant genetic variability in arabica coffee for growth, disease resistance, and yield , which was consistent with the significant yield difference found in this study.
3.2. Growth Characters
With the exception of the number of main stem nodes, the number of secondary branches, and the average length of primary branches, all quantitative features analyzed under Awada and Leku growth conditions shown significant (P<0.05) variance among coffee hybrids (Tables 3 and 4).
The plant's overall height (1.99–2.45 m), stem diameter (2.72–3.45 cm), canopy diameter (199.10 –221.77 cm), number of main stem nodes (27.96–49.79), inter node length on the main stem (7.13– 9.04 cm), number of primary branches (52.08–59.21), number of secondary branches (148.25–179.25), and average length of primary branches (107.00–116.84 cm) are some of the morphological and growth characteristics analyzed at Awada (Table 3).
The plant's overall height (2.71–3.07 cm), stem diameter (5.20–5.42 cm), canopy diameter (191.33–219.00 cm), number of main stem nodes (30.60–34.33), inter node length on the main stem (6.06–8.66 cm), number of primary branches (55.13–66.93), number of secondary branches (99.00–108.46), and average length of primary branches (107.33–115.33 cm) are all displayed in Table 4's morphological and growth characteristics for Leku. There is a great opportunity to greatly progress the future coffee variety creation program through cross-breeding because there is adequate variance among the materials under examination. In line with the findings of previous authors, this study found a significant difference for the quantitative features that were measured .
Table 2. Mean yield of clean coffee (Kg/ha) of hybrids and their checks at Awada and Leku Location.

Candidate hybrids and checks

Awada

Leku

Over all mean

2019

2020

2021

Mean

Survival rate (%)

2019

2020

2021

Mean

Survival rate (%)

75227 x Angafa

2109

4442

2520

3023

90

828

1854

1258

1313

100

2168

744 x Angafa

2152

3713

1942

2602

96

867

1573

1134

1192

100

1897

75227 x 1681

3189

4976

2309

3491

100

660

2679

971

1437

100

2464

7440 x Angafa

2639

3942

2272

2951

100

729

1987

1289

1335

100

2143

Checks

Ababuna

696

2953

1070

1573

100

999

1106

800

968

100

1271

Feyate

707

4032

1086

1941

100

693

2257

974

1308

100

1625

Angafa

1305

3447

1534

2095

100

682

1530

1285

1166

100

1630

LSD

2.97

8.11

10.03

4.44

8.27

8.21

5.33

4.32

100

2.56

CV

9.12

11.61

30.99

9.88

59.64

24.88

27.21

19.49

100

7.64

Sig.

***

**

*

***

Ns

*

Ns

Ns

***

Table 3. Mean growth characteristics of hybrids and their checks at Awada location.

Candidate Hybrids and Checks

Height (m)

Canopy diameter (cm)

Stem girth (cm)

No. of nodes on the main stem

Inter node length on the main stem (cm)

No. of primary branches

No. of secondary branches

Length of first primary (cm)

75227 x 1681

2.27ab

221.77a

3.43ab

30.96ab

8.75ab

53.62b

169.25ab

115.833ab

75227 x Angafa

2.24ab

210.02bc

3.21abc

29.04ab

8.52ab

55.08ab

179.25a

116.837a

7440 x Angafa

2.45a

216.02ab

3.45a

29.88ab

9.04a

58.46a

173.92ab

113.753ab

744 x Angafa

2.42a

209.02bc

3.13bcd

30.66ab

8.15ab

58.83a

173.33ab

111.543abc

Feyate

2.24ab

211.87ab

2.72e

29.46ab

8.00ab

55.87ab

178.34a

113.963ab

Angeffa

2.44a

206.23bc

3.07cd

49.79a

7.93ab

59.21a

148.25b

109.75bc

Ababuna

1.99b

199.10c

2.82de

27.96b

7.13b

52.08b

167.46ab

107.00c

Mean

2.294

210.57

3.12

31.68

8.22

56.19

169.97

112.66

CV

7.34

2.92

5.62

26.62

11.83

4.64

8.58

3.18

LSD

0.2998

10.97

0.314

15

1.73

4.64

25.956

6.37

Whereas **, is significant at P < 0.01, ***, is significant at P < 0.001 and ns = not significant at P ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. Mean growth characteristics of hybrids and their checks at Leku location.

Candidate Hybrids and Checks

Plant height (m)

Canopy diameter (cm)

Stem girth (cm)

Number of nodes on the main stem

Inter node length on the main stem (cm)

No. of primary branches

No. of 20 branches

Length of longest primary (cm)

75227x1681

2.8967ab

210.83abc

5.34ab

31.93

7.46ab

61.2ab

99.00

108.00

75227 x Angafa

2.7533ab

191.33c

5.2ab

30.60

6.06b

55.13b

108.46

108.00

7440 x Angafa

3.0667a

204.17abc

5.38ab

34.33

7.66ab

66.93a

107.86

107.33

744 x Angafa

2.9633ab

216.33ab

5.36ab

32.80

6.86ab

62.53ab

101.33

111.80

Feyate

2.9433ab

218.33a

5.09ab

31.26

7.40ab

61.73ab

106.46

114.00

Angeffa

2.92ab

219.00a

5.42a

33.66

8.66a

66.40a

101.40

115.33

Ababuna

2.7067b

195.67bc

4.82

31.20

6.20b

59.33ab

102.13

108.66

Mean

2.8928

207.95

5.23

32.25

7.19

61.89

103.80

110.44

CV

6.80

6.06

6.12

7.64

17.89

8.90

7.55

4.08

LSD

35.23

22.42

0.56

NS

2.28

9.82

NS

NS

Whereas **, is significant at P < 0.01, ***, is significant at P < 0.001 and ns = not significant at P ≤ 0.05.
3.3. Estimation of Heterosis
Heterosis was found for the yield character examined when comparing the analysis of heterosis to the superior parent. For yield best parent heterosis, the estimated heterosis as a percentage of yield varied from 16.48 to 43.44% (Table 5). Crosses 75227x1681 had the highest best parent heterosis (43.44%), followed by crosses 75227xAngafa (33.27%), and crosses 744xAngafa had the lowest best parent heterosis (16.48%). For this specific characteristic, the overall heterosis manifestation magnitude was good. The findings of earlier researchers who documented a greater magnitude of better-parent heterosis for this trait are consistent with our conclusion. Differences in the parental lines involved and the experiment's setting are most likely the main causes of the discrepancies between the current and earlier findings.
Table 5. Heterosis parameters in yield of hybrid Arabica coffee.

Hybrids and checks

Best parent heterosis

75227xAngafa

33.27

744xAngafa

16.48

75227x1681

43.44

7440xAngafa

31.57

Checks

Ababuna

Feyate

Angafa

4. Summary and Conclusion
Ethiopia's economy depends heavily on coffee. About 15 million Ethiopians, or four million smallholder families, or sixteen percent of the country's total population, depend on coffee production for their livelihood. Coffee is the main source of income for a large number of these growers. Therefore, increasing productivity and production is crucial to helping coffee growers. In order to ascertain the hybrid coffee variety's growth characteristics and yield performance, the current experiment was carried out. Ethiopia's pure line variety development program has shown that it is rarely possible to increase yield over 1800–2000 kg/ha through direct selection. This suggests that heterotic hybrids are needed to maximize yield up to 2500–3000 kg/ha. To find high-yielding hybrids for commercial usage, it may be helpful to further assess the performance of the top-performing hybrids for growth and yield characteristics. To find and suggest hybrid genotypes of Arabica coffee for coffee-growing regions in southern Ethiopia, growth traits and yield performance were considered.
In light of this, the promising Arabica coffee hybrid 75227x1681 (3491 kg/ha) and 75227x Angafa (3023 kg/ha) outperformed the current improved varieties in the Awada growing environment. In the Leku growing environment, the hybrid 75227X1681 (1437 kg/ha) and 7440XAngafa (1335 kg/ha) outperformed the current improved check varieties. As a result, the likelihood of obtaining better Arabica coffee types for the growing conditions in Awada and Leku is higher. Therefore, before developing improved hybrid varieties, more package development studies for the most promising hybrids must be conducted side by side in order to increase production and productivity at Awada and Leku as well as the same growing environment.
Much work has not been done to take advantage of the potential in germplasm diversity to create superior hybrids and pure-line selections for the region, despite the enormous potential that exists within coffee populations in the Sidama and Gedio areas in southern Ethiopia and the encouraging heterosis results reported from the crosses among elite coffee lines selected from this area. The current study made it abundantly evident that hybrid breeding could result in notable advancements. Therefore, in order to create higher-yielding and better-performing hybrids for the region, a continual crossing program is needed to obtain a large number of cross combinations for thorough and in-depth examination.
Abbreviations

AARCS

Awada Agricultural Research Sub-Center

WGARC

Wondo Genet Agricultural Research Center

JARC

Jimma Agricultural Research

Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the financial assistance provided by the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) in carrying out this investigation. We especially like to thank the staff at Awada Agricultural Research Sub-Center (AARCS), Wondo Genet Agricultural Research Center (WGARC) and Jimma Agricultural Research (JARC) for their encouragement and support.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest are disclosed by the authors.
References
[1] AARSC Awada Agricultural Research Sub-center (2011). Annual research progress report of the year 2011.
[2] Abdi Adem. (2009). Agro-morphological characterization of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) landrace collected from Mesela, West Harerge, Ethiopia. M. Sc. Thesis Submitted to Graduate Studies of Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia. 88 pp.
[3] Abdulfeta tariku kifle (2018). Characterization and yield performance evaluation of coffee (coffea arabica L.) germplasm accessions from tepi, southwestern Ethiopia. A thesis submitted to the school of plant and horticultural sciences, School of Graduate Studies, Hawassa University, College of Agriculture, Hawassa, Ethiopia.85 pp.
[4] Abu Tefera and Teddy Tefera (2013). Ethiopia: Coffee Annual Report, Gain report ET-1302, USDA (?).
[5] Anthony, F., M. C. Combes, C. Astorga, B. Bertrand, G. Graziosi and P. Lashermes, (2002). The Origin of Cultivated Coffea arabica L. Varieties Revealed by AFLP and SSR Markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 894-900.
[6] Ashenafi Ayano, (2013). Heterosis and Combining Ability for Morphological, Yield and Quality Characters in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) hybrids. An MSc Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Jimma University. 92p.
[7] Bayetta Bellachew, Mesfin Ameha, Ashenafi Ayana, Tadesse Benti. (1993). Screening of Arabica Coffee Collections for Bebeka Environment. P775. 15th International Scientific colloquium on coffee (Vol. I). 6-11 June 1993, Montpellier, France.
[8] CTA (2022). Coffee and tea Authority Annual report.
[9] Davis AP. (2011). “Psilanthusmannii, the type species of Psilanthus, transferred to Coffea.” Nordic Journal of Botany, 29: 471–472.
[10] EndaleTaye, Behailu Weledesenbet, Bayetta Bellachew and Fabrice Davrieux (2008). Effects of genotypes and fruit maturity stage on caffeine and other biochemical constituents of arabica coffee. Proceedings of a National Work Shop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia. 14-17, August 2007, EIAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 169-172.
[11] EU. (2014). Ethiopian coffee sector enhancement project (ECoSEP), SRNS: FED/2015/038- 977, Financed under 11th European Development Fund (FED).
[12] FAO, (2009). Study prepared in the framework of FAO project GCP/RAF/404/GER. The Market for Organic and Fair-Trade Coffee. “Increasing income and food security of small farmers in West and Central Africa through exports of organic and fair-trade tropical products.” September, 2009.
[13] Fontes, J. R. M. (2001). Heterose, capacidade combinatória divergência genética estimada por análise de marcadores RAPD em cruzamentos entre cafeeiros Catuaí (Coffea arabica L.) e Híbrido de Timor. PhD Disse., Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa.
[14] Gebre-Egziabher, T., (1990). The importance of Ethiopian forests in the conservation of arabica coffee gene-pools. In: Proceedings of the 12th plenary meeting of AETFAT Hamburg, 4-10 September 1988. Edited by H. D. Ihlenfeldt. Mitt. Inst. Allg. Bot. Hambg.
[15] Getachew WeldeMichael, Sentayehu Alamerew, Taye Kufa and Tadesse Benti, (2013). Genetic Diversity Analysis of Some Ethiopian Specialty Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Germplasm Accessions Based on Morphological Traits Time Journals of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 1(4): 47-54.
[16] Gizachew Atinafu, Hussien Mohammed and Taye Kufa (2017). Genetic Variability of Sidama Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Landrace for Agro-morphological Traits at Awada, Southern Ethiopia. Academic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Research. Vol. 5(4), pp. 263-275,
[17] Haarer, A. E. (1962). Modern Coffee Production. Leonard Hill (Books) Limited, London.
[18] Habtamu Gebreselassie, Gizachew Atinafu, Meseret Degefa, Ashenafi Ayano (2018). Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Hybrid Genotypes Evaluation for Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance under Southern Ethiopian Growing Condition. Acad. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Res. 6(2): 89-96.
[19] Habtamu Gebreselassie, Gizachew Atinafu, Meseret Degefaand Ashenafi Ayano (2017). Growth Characteristics and Yield Evaluation of Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Promising Selections Under Sidama and Gedeo Growing Condition, Southern Ethiopia. Advances in Crop Science and Technology, an open access journal ISSN: 2329-8863. 5(6): 1-6.
[20] Harlan, J. R., (1992). Crops and man. Second edition, American society of Agronomy, Madison.
[21] ICO, (2011). The Story of Coffee.
[22] ITC, (2011). Ethiopian coffee quality improvement project: 2011 aid for trade global review
[23] Lemi, B., and Ashenafi, A., (2016). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield components of limmu coffee (Coffea arabica L.) accessions in South Western Ethiopia. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 24(6): 1913-1919.
[24] Masreshaw Yirga Haile (2018). GENETIC VARIABILITY IN YAYU COFFEE (Coffea arabica L.) GERMPLASM AT METU, SOUTHWESTERN ETHIOPIA. A thesis Submitted to the Department of Horticulture and Plant Science, School of Post Graduate Studies, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University for the Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Masters of Science in Plant Breeding. Pp 96.
[25] Mesfin Kebede & Bayetta Bellachew (2008). Phenotypic diversity in the Harerge coffee (Coffee arabica L.) germplasm for quantitative traits. East African Journal of Sciences 2: 13-18.
[26] Mishra M. K., N. S. Rani, A. S. Ram, H. L. Sreenath and Jayarama, (2008). A simple method of DNA extraction from coffee seeds suitable for PCR analysis. African Journal of Biotechnology 7(4): 409-413.
[27] Nure, D. (2008). Mapping quality profiles of Ethiopian coffee by origin.
[28] Olika Kitila, Sentayehu Alamerew, Taye Kufa and Weyessa Garedew. (2011). Variability of quantitative Traits in Limmu Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 482-493.
[29] Pearl, H. M., C. Nagai, P. H. Moore, D. L. Steiger, R. V. Osgood and R. Ming, (2004). Construction of a genetic map for arabica coffee. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 829-835.
[30] Prakash, N. S., M. C. Combes, N. Somanna and P. Lashermes, (2002). AFLP analysis of introgression in coffee cultivars (Coffea arabica L.) derived from a natural interspecific hybrid. Euphytica 124: 265-271.
[31] Shimekit Tadele Gebabo, (2012). Genetic diversity of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) landraces from major coffee growing areas of southern Ethiopia as revealed by inter simple sequence repeat marker. An M. Sc. Thesis submitted to the school of graduate studies of Haramaya University, 10-45PP.
[32] Steiger, D. L., C. Nagai, P. H. Moore, C. W. Morden, R. V. Osgood and R. Ming, (2002). AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and among Coffea arabica cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 209-215.
[33] Tadesse Benti, (2017). Progress in Arabica Coffee Breeding in Ethiopia: Achievements, Challenges and Prospects. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research ISSN 2307-4531.
[34] Taye Kufa, T. (2008). Coffee diversity & knowledge, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 317-227.
[35] Tefera, A., and T. Tefera. (2013). Ethiopia: Coffee Annual Report, Gain report ET-1302, USDA.
[36] Vega, F. E., (2008). The rise of coffee. American Science 96: 138-145. [check for cor correction].
[37] Walyaro, D. J. A. (1983). Consideration in breeding for improved yield on quality arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L). PhD thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
[38] Wassu Mohammed (2004). Heterosis and Combining Ability Analysis of Yield and Yield Related Traits in Coffee (Coffea arabica L.). MSc. thesis submitted to Alamaya University, Alamaya. 99p.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Degefa, M., Gebreselassie, H., Bekele, D., Shewangezaw, K., Manaye, K., et al. (2025). Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant Biology, 10(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Degefa, M.; Gebreselassie, H.; Bekele, D.; Shewangezaw, K.; Manaye, K., et al. Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2025, 10(1), 10-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Degefa M, Gebreselassie H, Bekele D, Shewangezaw K, Manaye K, et al. Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia. Am J Plant Biol. 2025;10(1):10-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12,
      author = {Meseret Degefa and Habtamu Gebreselassie and Dejene Bekele and Kidist Shewangezaw and Ketema Manaye and Rahile Mengestu and Wondagegnehu G/tsaddik and Leta Ajema and Desalegn Alemayhu and Lemi Beksisa and Tadesse Benti and Ashenafi Ayano},
      title = {Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {10-17},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20251001.12},
      abstract = {Ethiopia is the center of origin and has a varied genetic foundation for Arabica coffee, but there is still a lack of yield-competitive enhanced varieties, which is why the average productivity in the country is significantly lower than the global average. The average national productivity is quite low as a result. Ethiopia's pure line variety development program has shown that it is rarely possible to increase yield over 1800–2000 kg/ha through direct selection. This suggests that heterotic hybrids are needed to maximize yield up to 2500–3000 kg/ha. Therefore, in order to find high yielding hybrids, it may be helpful to further assess the performance of the best performing hybrids for yield and growth traits at full bearing stage. Therefore, creating hybrid coffee kinds that are stable, disease-resistant, and high yielding is crucial to closing this gap and increasing coffee productivity. Thus, assessing coffee hybrid genotypes for yield and yield components was the goal of this study. To illustrate the growth and yield characteristics of four promising hybrid genotypes of Arabica coffee, the experiment was carried out at Awada and Leku. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used to carry out the experiment between 2016 and 2021. Data were gathered on plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, length of the longest primary branch, number of main stem nodes, stem girth, internode length on the main stem, canopy diameter, and yield per hectare. The findings showed that there were statistically significant differences between the growth features. The number of primary branches (52.08 – 58.83), number of secondary branches (148.23 – 179.25), number of major stem nodes (27.96 – 30.66), stem diameter (2.82 – 3.45cm), canopy diameter (199 – 221.77cm), and average length of primary branches (107.00 –116.84cm) are all reported. According to the study's findings, the hybrid 75227x1681 (3491 kg/ha) produced the highest overall yield per hectare, followed by 75227xAngafa (3023kg/ha) cultivated at Awada and 75227X1681 (1437kg/ha) in Leku. There will be a greater probability of obtaining enhanced Arabica coffee hybrid varieties in the south Ethiopian growing environment because the potential hybrid genotypes outperformed the current improved varieties at Awada and Leku. In order to suggest a stable and appropriate hybrid variety for coffee growers in the South, the experiment should be conducted again at various representative trial sites.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Growth Characteristics and Yield Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Genotypes in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Meseret Degefa
    AU  - Habtamu Gebreselassie
    AU  - Dejene Bekele
    AU  - Kidist Shewangezaw
    AU  - Ketema Manaye
    AU  - Rahile Mengestu
    AU  - Wondagegnehu G/tsaddik
    AU  - Leta Ajema
    AU  - Desalegn Alemayhu
    AU  - Lemi Beksisa
    AU  - Tadesse Benti
    AU  - Ashenafi Ayano
    Y1  - 2025/04/14
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12
    T2  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JF  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JO  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    SP  - 10
    EP  - 17
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8337
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20251001.12
    AB  - Ethiopia is the center of origin and has a varied genetic foundation for Arabica coffee, but there is still a lack of yield-competitive enhanced varieties, which is why the average productivity in the country is significantly lower than the global average. The average national productivity is quite low as a result. Ethiopia's pure line variety development program has shown that it is rarely possible to increase yield over 1800–2000 kg/ha through direct selection. This suggests that heterotic hybrids are needed to maximize yield up to 2500–3000 kg/ha. Therefore, in order to find high yielding hybrids, it may be helpful to further assess the performance of the best performing hybrids for yield and growth traits at full bearing stage. Therefore, creating hybrid coffee kinds that are stable, disease-resistant, and high yielding is crucial to closing this gap and increasing coffee productivity. Thus, assessing coffee hybrid genotypes for yield and yield components was the goal of this study. To illustrate the growth and yield characteristics of four promising hybrid genotypes of Arabica coffee, the experiment was carried out at Awada and Leku. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used to carry out the experiment between 2016 and 2021. Data were gathered on plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, length of the longest primary branch, number of main stem nodes, stem girth, internode length on the main stem, canopy diameter, and yield per hectare. The findings showed that there were statistically significant differences between the growth features. The number of primary branches (52.08 – 58.83), number of secondary branches (148.23 – 179.25), number of major stem nodes (27.96 – 30.66), stem diameter (2.82 – 3.45cm), canopy diameter (199 – 221.77cm), and average length of primary branches (107.00 –116.84cm) are all reported. According to the study's findings, the hybrid 75227x1681 (3491 kg/ha) produced the highest overall yield per hectare, followed by 75227xAngafa (3023kg/ha) cultivated at Awada and 75227X1681 (1437kg/ha) in Leku. There will be a greater probability of obtaining enhanced Arabica coffee hybrid varieties in the south Ethiopian growing environment because the potential hybrid genotypes outperformed the current improved varieties at Awada and Leku. In order to suggest a stable and appropriate hybrid variety for coffee growers in the South, the experiment should be conducted again at various representative trial sites.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Awada Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Material and Methods
    3. 3. Results and Discussion
    4. 4. Summary and Conclusion
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information