Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training

Xu Chaojun; Guo Shaoqing; Bai Hongquan; Li Yi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training

Xu Chaojun, Guo Shaoqing, Bai Hongquan, Li Yi

Published in American Journal of Information Science and Technology (Volume 3, Issue 1)

Received: 13 January 2019 Accepted: 14 March 2019 Published: 10 April 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

iTeach contest works is the display window of educational technology students’ ability of instruction design, computer programming, software UI, and so on. It can also give out lots of information about China educational technology curriculum implement status, and students training focuses. The analysis of iTeach contest works is not only an inspection of the training quality of educational technology students, it’s also a process of communication of training experience of educational technology students. The article takes 196 educational technology students’ works from 2017 annual contest as samples, and conducts quantitative statistics from six aspects, including qualifications of contestants, work types, target users, distribution types and authoring tools. The analysis of the works shows there are many fresh work topics, creatively used technologies, specific information technology application in the contest works. The statistics also reveal some points should be paid attention to during the course of educational technology student development. Lastly, based on contest experts' interview, the article puts forward some suggestions for educational technology student training, including the reflection of curriculum structure, the construction of authentic curriculum resources, the implementation of curriculum quality standards, the integration of practical teaching system and scientific research feeding back teaching.

Published in	American Journal of Information Science and Technology (Volume 3, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14
Page(s)	26-34
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Works Analysis, Educational Technology, Student Training, Practice Teaching, Authentic Resources

References

[1]	K. Chilingaryan and R. Gorbatenko (2015). Students’ Professional Contests as a Tool for Motivation outside the Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 214, 559-564.
[2]	I. Munteanu, A. Zapciu and Marian Vocurek (2016). Students Contests, Complementary Activity of University Curricula in The Mechatronics Engineer Training. The Romanian Review Precision Mechanics, Optics & Mechatronics 49, 28-33.
[3]	Wang. Boyu, and Z. Hao (2014). The Practice Teaching Platform and System for Innovating Talents and Performing Research. Higher Education Studies 4, 75-81.
[4]	X. Hu, H. Wan, D. Yang and X. Shen (2018). Organizational Mechanisms and Practice of Innovative Talents Cultivation in Local Colleges - A Case Study of Hubei University. Higher Education Studies 8, 65-71.
[5]	G. King, M. Sen (2013), The Teacher: How Social Science Research Can Improve Teaching. American Political Science Association 46, 612-629.
[6]	S. Y. Wang, S. C. Chang, G. J. Hwang and P. Y. Chen (2018). A Microworld-based role-playing Game Development Approach to Engaging Students in Interactive, Enjoyable, and Effective Mathematics Learning. Interactive Learning Environments 26,411-423.
[7]	J. Jacqmin (2018), Providing MOOCs: A FUN way to enroll students? Information Economics and Policy, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2018.10.002.
[8]	Sledgianowski. Deb, M. Gomaa, and C. Tan (2017). Toward Integration of Big Data, Technology and Information Systems Competencies into the Accounting Curriculum [J]. Journal of Accounting Education 38, 81-93.
[9]	C. A. Castillo Losada, E. A. Insuasty, and M. F. Jaime Osorio (2017). The impact of authentic materials and tasks on students’ communicative competence at a Colombian language school. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development 19, 89-104.
[10]	E. Bai and D. Lin (2014). The Enterprise Oriented Computer Graphic Design Courses Construction of Practice Teaching System. Advanced Materials Research 989-994, 5237-5240.
[11]	Gonzalez-Manzanon Lorena and J. M. de Fuentes (2019). Design Recommendations for Online Cybersecurity courses. Computers & Security 80, 238-256.
[12]	D. Vlachopoulos (2016). Assuring Quality in E-Learning Course Design: The Roadmap. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 17,183-205.
[13]	C. A. Castillo Losada, E. A. Insuasty and M. F. Jaime Osorio (2017). The Impact of Authentic Materials and Tasks on Students' Communicative Competence at a Colombian Language School. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development 19,89-104.
[14]	X. Hu, H. Wan, D. Yang and X. Shen (2018). Organizational Mechanisms and Practice of Innovative Talents Cultivation in Local Colleges - A Case Study of Hubei University. Higher Education Studies 8,65-71.
[15]	Y. Du, Q. Shi, L. Gai, and J. Li (2017). Exploration and Construction of Practice Teaching System in Local Engineering Colleges. International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine & Education IEEE, 2017.
[16]	B. Allehyani, D. Burnapp and J. Wilson (2017). A comparison of teaching materials (school textbooks vs authentic materials) from the perspective of English teachers and educational supervisors in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research 5,1-14.
[17]	Zamira Makieva, F. Khalikov and Ruslan Alimbaev (2017). Kyrgyzstan Olympiad in Informatics: Training Students, Conducting the Olympiad and Using Contest Management System. Olympiads in Informatics l, 159–166.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Xu Chaojun, Guo Shaoqing, Bai Hongquan, Li Yi. (2019). Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training. American Journal of Information Science and Technology, 3(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Xu Chaojun; Guo Shaoqing; Bai Hongquan; Li Yi. Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training. Am. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2019, 3(1), 26-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Xu Chaojun, Guo Shaoqing, Bai Hongquan, Li Yi. Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training. Am J Inf Sci Technol. 2019;3(1):26-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14,
  author = {Xu Chaojun and Guo Shaoqing and Bai Hongquan and Li Yi},
  title = {Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training},
  journal = {American Journal of Information Science and Technology},
  volume = {3},
  number = {1},
  pages = {26-34},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajist.20190301.14},
  abstract = {iTeach contest works is the display window of educational technology students’ ability of instruction design, computer programming, software UI, and so on. It can also give out lots of information about China educational technology curriculum implement status, and students training focuses. The analysis of iTeach contest works is not only an inspection of the training quality of educational technology students, it’s also a process of communication of training experience of educational technology students. The article takes 196 educational technology students’ works from 2017 annual contest as samples, and conducts quantitative statistics from six aspects, including qualifications of contestants, work types, target users, distribution types and authoring tools. The analysis of the works shows there are many fresh work topics, creatively used technologies, specific information technology application in the contest works. The statistics also reveal some points should be paid attention to during the course of educational technology student development. Lastly, based on contest experts' interview, the article puts forward some suggestions for educational technology student training, including the reflection of curriculum structure, the construction of authentic curriculum resources, the implementation of curriculum quality standards, the integration of practical teaching system and scientific research feeding back teaching.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training
AU  - Xu Chaojun
AU  - Guo Shaoqing
AU  - Bai Hongquan
AU  - Li Yi
Y1  - 2019/04/10
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14
T2  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
JF  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
JO  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
SP  - 26
EP  - 34
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-0588
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14
AB  - iTeach contest works is the display window of educational technology students’ ability of instruction design, computer programming, software UI, and so on. It can also give out lots of information about China educational technology curriculum implement status, and students training focuses. The analysis of iTeach contest works is not only an inspection of the training quality of educational technology students, it’s also a process of communication of training experience of educational technology students. The article takes 196 educational technology students’ works from 2017 annual contest as samples, and conducts quantitative statistics from six aspects, including qualifications of contestants, work types, target users, distribution types and authoring tools. The analysis of the works shows there are many fresh work topics, creatively used technologies, specific information technology application in the contest works. The statistics also reveal some points should be paid attention to during the course of educational technology student development. Lastly, based on contest experts' interview, the article puts forward some suggestions for educational technology student training, including the reflection of curriculum structure, the construction of authentic curriculum resources, the implementation of curriculum quality standards, the integration of practical teaching system and scientific research feeding back teaching.
VL  - 3
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Xu Chaojun

Department of Educational Technology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
Guo Shaoqing

College of Educational Technology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China
Bai Hongquan

Department of Educational Technology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
Li Yi

Department of Educational Technology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Xu Chaojun, Guo Shaoqing, Bai Hongquan, Li Yi. (2019). Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training. American Journal of Information Science and Technology, 3(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Xu Chaojun; Guo Shaoqing; Bai Hongquan; Li Yi. Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training. Am. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2019, 3(1), 26-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Xu Chaojun, Guo Shaoqing, Bai Hongquan, Li Yi. Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training. Am J Inf Sci Technol. 2019;3(1):26-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14,
  author = {Xu Chaojun and Guo Shaoqing and Bai Hongquan and Li Yi},
  title = {Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training},
  journal = {American Journal of Information Science and Technology},
  volume = {3},
  number = {1},
  pages = {26-34},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajist.20190301.14},
  abstract = {iTeach contest works is the display window of educational technology students’ ability of instruction design, computer programming, software UI, and so on. It can also give out lots of information about China educational technology curriculum implement status, and students training focuses. The analysis of iTeach contest works is not only an inspection of the training quality of educational technology students, it’s also a process of communication of training experience of educational technology students. The article takes 196 educational technology students’ works from 2017 annual contest as samples, and conducts quantitative statistics from six aspects, including qualifications of contestants, work types, target users, distribution types and authoring tools. The analysis of the works shows there are many fresh work topics, creatively used technologies, specific information technology application in the contest works. The statistics also reveal some points should be paid attention to during the course of educational technology student development. Lastly, based on contest experts' interview, the article puts forward some suggestions for educational technology student training, including the reflection of curriculum structure, the construction of authentic curriculum resources, the implementation of curriculum quality standards, the integration of practical teaching system and scientific research feeding back teaching.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Analysis of iTeach 2017 Contest Works and Suggestions for Educational Technology Students Training
AU  - Xu Chaojun
AU  - Guo Shaoqing
AU  - Bai Hongquan
AU  - Li Yi
Y1  - 2019/04/10
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14
T2  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
JF  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
JO  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
SP  - 26
EP  - 34
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-0588
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20190301.14
AB  - iTeach contest works is the display window of educational technology students’ ability of instruction design, computer programming, software UI, and so on. It can also give out lots of information about China educational technology curriculum implement status, and students training focuses. The analysis of iTeach contest works is not only an inspection of the training quality of educational technology students, it’s also a process of communication of training experience of educational technology students. The article takes 196 educational technology students’ works from 2017 annual contest as samples, and conducts quantitative statistics from six aspects, including qualifications of contestants, work types, target users, distribution types and authoring tools. The analysis of the works shows there are many fresh work topics, creatively used technologies, specific information technology application in the contest works. The statistics also reveal some points should be paid attention to during the course of educational technology student development. Lastly, based on contest experts' interview, the article puts forward some suggestions for educational technology student training, including the reflection of curriculum structure, the construction of authentic curriculum resources, the implementation of curriculum quality standards, the integration of practical teaching system and scientific research feeding back teaching.
VL  - 3
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download