Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University

Aizhi Wu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University

Aizhi Wu

Published in American Journal of Information Science and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 4)

Received: 19 November 2018 Accepted: 10 December 2018 Published: 15 January 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Revealing advantages of disciplines and gaps between one university and others is essential. Although most researchers and institutions are involving evaluation by using various indicators for resulting in the diversified discipline rankings in colleges and universities and for improving education level and enhancing core competitiveness of scientific research. Based on the previous selection standards and evaluation indicators for disciplinary competitiveness and information resources and intelligence analysis being available at the library, the article uses Peking University in this study as a specific case to construct the evaluation system with indicators from six aspects, staff & teams, research output, programs & awards, international cooperation & exchanging, discipline ranking, and innovation ability. The indicators are synthesized to judge the comprehensive competitiveness of universities and their disciplines, and strive to form a reasonable systemic evaluation method and measuring mode so that it can be popularized and used.

Published in	American Journal of Information Science and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12
Page(s)	93-99
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Disciplinary Competitiveness, Evaluation Indicators, Chinese Universities

References

[1]	Zhu Qiandong. Research on the division of scientific research competitiveness in universities from a multidimensional perspective [J]. Journal of Library Science. 2016, No. 1, pp. 24-27.
[2]	Zhou Haihua, Hua Weina. Scientific research competitive ability of chinese scholars from the perspective of two international core journals [J]. Journal of Intelligence. 2012, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 91-96.
[3]	Li Guiying, Zhou Qin. University’s science research competitiveness analysis and discipline development forecast: Case study of Xi’an Jiaotong University [J]. Information Research. 2015, No. 12, pp. 58-61.
[4]	Xu Zhiwei, Luo Chunrong, Feng Chunhua. Analysis on scientific research competitiveness of State Key Laboratories: A case study at State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies of Sun Yat Sen University [J]. Science and Technology Management Research. 2013, No. 23, pp. 89-93.
[5]	Liu Yuelei. Research performance analysis on domestic and foreign top universities of geosciences based on ESI [J]. Technology Intelligence Engineering. 2016, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 15-23.
[6]	Zhou Jing. The subject evaluation plan based on SciVal spotlight: Taking subject research of Nankai University as an example [J]. Library Work and Study. 2014, No. 3, pp. 105-107.
[7]	Zhao Fei, Ai Chunyan, Li Feng. Improving university research evaluation by integrating faculty research information [J]. Journal of Academic Libraries. 2016, No. 1, pp. 76-82.
[8]	Ai Chunyan, Zhao Fei, You Yue, Liu Suqing. Evaluation methods of scientific research competitiveness [J]. Journal of Academic Libraries. 2013, No. 5, pp. 84-87.
[9]	Fudan University Library. No pain, no gain: Innovation of library's decision support service [R/OL]. [2017-05-28]. http://conference.lib.sjtu.edu.cn/rscp/files
[10]	Huazhong Normal University Library. Exploration and practice of university libraries in providing decision support services for schools [R/OL]. [2017-05-28]. http://conference.lib.sjtu.edu.cn/rscp/files
[11]	Xu Juan. The Scientific Research competitiveness of chinese universities: A comparative analysis based on InCites Database [J]. Fudan Education Forum. 2016, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 37-43.
[12]	Qiu Junping, Sun Kai. Metrological analysis on science research competitive abilities of chinese universities based on ESI Database [J]. Library and Information Service. 2007, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 45-48.
[13]	Wang Yitao, Gao Fei, Qiu Kunshu. Evaluation of the research competitiveness of non-governmental regular universities and independent colleges [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Shuren University (Humanities and Social Sciences). 2016, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 9-13.
[14]	Deng Xuepeng. On the indicators system and the applications of the philosophy, social science university scientific research competence [J]. Statistics & Information Forum. 2007, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 81-84.
[15]	Li Chunying, Zhang Weiwei, Liu Chunyan, et al. Research on evaluation of university discipline competitiveness under the background of double first-rate [J]. Journal of Academic Library, 2018, No. 2, pp. 45-51.
[16]	Qiu Junping, Ou Yufang. Building world class universities: analysis on scientific research competitiveness evaluation of “985 Project” universities: RCCSE research competitiveness evaluation reports on world class universities during the 12th Five-Year Plan period [J]. China Higher Education Research, 2016, No. 4, pp. 57-63.
[17]	Lutz Bornmanna, Loet Leydesdorff. The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7 (2): 2012, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 286-291.
[18]	Lutz Bornmanna. Scientific peer review [J]. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 2011, 45 (1): 2012, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 197-245.
[19]	Zhiqiang Wu. Average evaluation intensity: A quality-oriented indicator for the evaluation of research performance [J]. Library & Information Science Research, 2015, 37 (1): 2012, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 51-60.
[20]	Fu Jiajia, Pan Wei. A comparative study on InCites and SciVal Spotlight as subject service tools [J]. Library Journal, 2014, (3): 2015, No. 12, pp. 37-42.
[21]	Niu Yuanyuan. Evaluation of university scientific research competitiveness based on AHP and DEA: Taking “One Province and One School” engineering school as an example [J]. Journal of Higher Education Finance, 2015, 18 (3): 2012, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 38-42.
[22]	Li Feng. How to carry out discipline competitiveness of library subject service: Inspiration from the international comparative performance of the UK research base report [J]. Journal of Academic Libraries. 2015, No. 2, pp. 72-76.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Aizhi Wu. (2019). Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University. American Journal of Information Science and Technology, 2(4), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Aizhi Wu. Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University. Am. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2019, 2(4), 93-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Aizhi Wu. Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University. Am J Inf Sci Technol. 2019;2(4):93-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12,
  author = {Aizhi Wu},
  title = {Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University},
  journal = {American Journal of Information Science and Technology},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {93-99},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajist.20180204.12},
  abstract = {Revealing advantages of disciplines and gaps between one university and others is essential. Although most researchers and institutions are involving evaluation by using various indicators for resulting in the diversified discipline rankings in colleges and universities and for improving education level and enhancing core competitiveness of scientific research. Based on the previous selection standards and evaluation indicators for disciplinary competitiveness and information resources and intelligence analysis being available at the library, the article uses Peking University in this study as a specific case to construct the evaluation system with indicators from six aspects, staff & teams, research output, programs & awards, international cooperation & exchanging, discipline ranking, and innovation ability. The indicators are synthesized to judge the comprehensive competitiveness of universities and their disciplines, and strive to form a reasonable systemic evaluation method and measuring mode so that it can be popularized and used.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University
AU  - Aizhi Wu
Y1  - 2019/01/15
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12
T2  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
JF  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
JO  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
SP  - 93
EP  - 99
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-0588
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12
AB  - Revealing advantages of disciplines and gaps between one university and others is essential. Although most researchers and institutions are involving evaluation by using various indicators for resulting in the diversified discipline rankings in colleges and universities and for improving education level and enhancing core competitiveness of scientific research. Based on the previous selection standards and evaluation indicators for disciplinary competitiveness and information resources and intelligence analysis being available at the library, the article uses Peking University in this study as a specific case to construct the evaluation system with indicators from six aspects, staff & teams, research output, programs & awards, international cooperation & exchanging, discipline ranking, and innovation ability. The indicators are synthesized to judge the comprehensive competitiveness of universities and their disciplines, and strive to form a reasonable systemic evaluation method and measuring mode so that it can be popularized and used.
VL  - 2
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Aizhi Wu

Peking University Library, Peking University, Beijing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Aizhi Wu. (2019). Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University. American Journal of Information Science and Technology, 2(4), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Aizhi Wu. Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University. Am. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2019, 2(4), 93-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Aizhi Wu. Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University. Am J Inf Sci Technol. 2019;2(4):93-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12,
  author = {Aizhi Wu},
  title = {Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University},
  journal = {American Journal of Information Science and Technology},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {93-99},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajist.20180204.12},
  abstract = {Revealing advantages of disciplines and gaps between one university and others is essential. Although most researchers and institutions are involving evaluation by using various indicators for resulting in the diversified discipline rankings in colleges and universities and for improving education level and enhancing core competitiveness of scientific research. Based on the previous selection standards and evaluation indicators for disciplinary competitiveness and information resources and intelligence analysis being available at the library, the article uses Peking University in this study as a specific case to construct the evaluation system with indicators from six aspects, staff & teams, research output, programs & awards, international cooperation & exchanging, discipline ranking, and innovation ability. The indicators are synthesized to judge the comprehensive competitiveness of universities and their disciplines, and strive to form a reasonable systemic evaluation method and measuring mode so that it can be popularized and used.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation Indicators and Method of Disciplinary Competitiveness of Colleges and Universities: An Example of Peking University
AU  - Aizhi Wu
Y1  - 2019/01/15
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12
T2  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
JF  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
JO  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
SP  - 93
EP  - 99
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-0588
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20180204.12
AB  - Revealing advantages of disciplines and gaps between one university and others is essential. Although most researchers and institutions are involving evaluation by using various indicators for resulting in the diversified discipline rankings in colleges and universities and for improving education level and enhancing core competitiveness of scientific research. Based on the previous selection standards and evaluation indicators for disciplinary competitiveness and information resources and intelligence analysis being available at the library, the article uses Peking University in this study as a specific case to construct the evaluation system with indicators from six aspects, staff & teams, research output, programs & awards, international cooperation & exchanging, discipline ranking, and innovation ability. The indicators are synthesized to judge the comprehensive competitiveness of universities and their disciplines, and strive to form a reasonable systemic evaluation method and measuring mode so that it can be popularized and used.
VL  - 2
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download