University–industry collaborations (UICs) are increasingly recognized as essential for fostering innovation, skills development, and knowledge transfer. However, in developing countries, these collaborations are often constrained by weak governance structures, limited resources, and lack of sustainability mechanisms. This study aimed to explore the current state of UICs at Uganda Christian University (UCU) and industries in Mukono Municipality, and design an ICT-enabled model to strengthen UICs in developing countries. The study employed a qualitative approach, and data was collected from 21 participants through interviews with university (senior administrators, faculty heads) and representatives from the industry (service, manufacturing, research, and not-for-profit organizations). Insights from General Systems Theory, Collaborative Control Theory and Rybnicek & Königsgruber model, informed thematic analysis. From the analysis, five themes emerged, which are: Nature of Collaborations; Management Structures and Platforms for UICs; Stakeholder Capacity and Readiness for UICs; Information Exchange & Dissemination; Impact and Sustainability of UICs. The study findings revealed that UICs have weak governance & coordination mechanisms, lack sustainability & digital implementation, are largely informal, under-resourced. Internship was seen to be the dominant form of engagement between universities and the industry. This suggests that; adopting ICT-mechanisms improves UIC effectiveness and sustainability. This study therefore proposes a context-sensitive, systems-oriented JMS Model to enhance UIC management in developing countries which contributes to literature and practice.
| Published in | American Journal of Computer Science and Technology (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12 |
| Page(s) | 8-18 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
University–industry Collaboration, Digital Transformation, ICT-enabled Model, University Education, Developing Countries
| [1] | A. Alexander, D. P. Martin, C. Manolchev, and K. Miller, “University–industry collaboration: using meta-rules to overcome barriers to knowledge transfer,” Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 371–392, Apr. 2020, |
| [2] | F. Ahmed, M. T. Fattani, S. R. Ali, and R. N. Enam, “Strengthening the Bridge Between Academic and the Industry Through the Academia-Industry Collaboration Plan Design Model,” Front Psychol, vol. 13, Jun. 2022, |
| [3] | Z. Hojeij, “An overview of university-industry collaboration in the Arab world,” Dec. 01, 2024, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. |
| [4] | E. C. Bastos, A. R. Sengik, and J. Tello-Gamarra, “Fifty years of University-industry collaboration: a global bibliometrics overview,” Sci Public Policy, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 177–199, Jun. 2021, |
| [5] | Y. Zhang and X. Chen, “Empirical Analysis of University–Industry Collaboration in Postgraduate Education: A Case Study of Chinese Universities of Applied Sciences,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 7, Apr. 2023, |
| [6] | K. Atta-Owusu, R. D. Fitjar, and A. Rodríguez-Pose, “What drives university-industry collaboration? Research excellence or firm collaboration strategy?,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 173, p. 121084, Dec. 2021, |
| [7] | M. Zheng, S. Yan, and S. Xu, “Digital Economy, Industry–Academia–Research Collaborative Innovation, and the Development of New-Quality Productive Forces,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 318, Jan. 2025, |
| [8] | F. Naseer, R. Tariq, H. M. Alshahrani, N. Alruwais, and F. N. Al-Wesabi, “Project based learning framework integrating industry collaboration to enhance student future readiness in higher education,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 24985, Jul. 2025, |
| [9] | B. N. Kayondo and M. T. Kamondo, “Towards a Prospective Communication Model for University-Industry Collaborations in Uganda,” University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 66–81, Dec. 2024, |
| [10] | 2030 Agenda United Nations, “70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Preamble,” 2015. |
| [11] | P. P. Walsh, A. Banerjee, and E. Murphy, “The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” 2022, pp. 1–12. |
| [12] | L. Alcántara-Rubio, R. Valderrama-Hernández, C. Solís-Espallargas, and J. Ruiz-Morales, “The implementation of the SDGs in universities: a systematic review,” Environ Educ Res, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1585–1615, 2022, |
| [13] | J. Liu, X. Wang, W. Miao, and X. Wang, “What factors enable sustainable university-industry collaboration communities? Evidence from a symbiosis theory perspective,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 10, p. 101166, Dec. 2025, |
| [14] | G. Tolin and A. Piccaluga, “Commercializing technology from university-industry collaborations: A configurational perspective on organizational factors,” J Bus Res, vol. 188, p. 115105, Feb. 2025, |
| [15] | A. L. Rossoni, E. P. G. de Vasconcellos, and R. L. de Castilho Rossoni, “Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review,” Management Review Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 1841–1877, Sep. 2024, |
| [16] | T. Zhuang, M. Oh, and K. Kimura, “Modernizing higher education with industrial forces in Asia: a comparative study of discourse of university-industry collaboration in China, Japan and Singapore,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 195–210, Mar. 2025, |
| [17] | D. Bamford, I. Reid, P. Forrester, B. Dehe, J. Bamford, and M. Papalexi, “An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework,” J Technol Transf, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1411–1443, Aug. 2024, |
| [18] | R. Rybnicek and R. Königsgruber, “What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature,” Journal of Business Economics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 221–250, Mar. 2019, |
| [19] | 1L. Von Bertalanffy, “An Outline of General System Theory,” 1950. |
| [20] | O. Granstrand and M. Holgersson, “Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition,” Feb. 01, 2020, Elsevier Ltd. |
| [21] | H. S. Leonard, R. R. Kilburg, and A. M. Freedman, Essential strategies for organizational and systems change: An overview for consultants. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2023. |
| [22] | S. Y. Nof, “Collaborative control theory for e-Work, e-Production, and e-Service,” Annu Rev Control, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 281–292, Jan. 2007, |
| [23] | M. O’Dwyer, R. Filieri, and L. O’Malley, “Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed,” Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 900–931, Jun. 2023, |
| [24] | N. Evans, A. Miklosik, and J. T. Du, “University-industry collaboration as a driver of digital transformation: Types, benefits and enablers,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 10, Oct. 2023, |
| [25] | I. Etikan, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, |
| [26] | V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, |
| [27] | D. Mortelmans, “Springer Texts in Social Sciences Doing Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo,” 2025. |
APA Style
Mukalere, J., Kabanda, M., Mukisa, S. (2026). Digital Transformation of University-industry Collaborations: An Information Systems Approach in a Developing Country Context. American Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 9(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12
ACS Style
Mukalere, J.; Kabanda, M.; Mukisa, S. Digital Transformation of University-industry Collaborations: An Information Systems Approach in a Developing Country Context. Am. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2026, 9(1), 8-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12,
author = {Justine Mukalere and Martin Kabanda and Simon Mukisa},
title = {Digital Transformation of University-industry Collaborations: An Information Systems Approach in a Developing Country Context},
journal = {American Journal of Computer Science and Technology},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {8-18},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcst.20260901.12},
abstract = {University–industry collaborations (UICs) are increasingly recognized as essential for fostering innovation, skills development, and knowledge transfer. However, in developing countries, these collaborations are often constrained by weak governance structures, limited resources, and lack of sustainability mechanisms. This study aimed to explore the current state of UICs at Uganda Christian University (UCU) and industries in Mukono Municipality, and design an ICT-enabled model to strengthen UICs in developing countries. The study employed a qualitative approach, and data was collected from 21 participants through interviews with university (senior administrators, faculty heads) and representatives from the industry (service, manufacturing, research, and not-for-profit organizations). Insights from General Systems Theory, Collaborative Control Theory and Rybnicek & Königsgruber model, informed thematic analysis. From the analysis, five themes emerged, which are: Nature of Collaborations; Management Structures and Platforms for UICs; Stakeholder Capacity and Readiness for UICs; Information Exchange & Dissemination; Impact and Sustainability of UICs. The study findings revealed that UICs have weak governance & coordination mechanisms, lack sustainability & digital implementation, are largely informal, under-resourced. Internship was seen to be the dominant form of engagement between universities and the industry. This suggests that; adopting ICT-mechanisms improves UIC effectiveness and sustainability. This study therefore proposes a context-sensitive, systems-oriented JMS Model to enhance UIC management in developing countries which contributes to literature and practice.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Digital Transformation of University-industry Collaborations: An Information Systems Approach in a Developing Country Context AU - Justine Mukalere AU - Martin Kabanda AU - Simon Mukisa Y1 - 2026/02/02 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12 T2 - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology JF - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology JO - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology SP - 8 EP - 18 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-012X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20260901.12 AB - University–industry collaborations (UICs) are increasingly recognized as essential for fostering innovation, skills development, and knowledge transfer. However, in developing countries, these collaborations are often constrained by weak governance structures, limited resources, and lack of sustainability mechanisms. This study aimed to explore the current state of UICs at Uganda Christian University (UCU) and industries in Mukono Municipality, and design an ICT-enabled model to strengthen UICs in developing countries. The study employed a qualitative approach, and data was collected from 21 participants through interviews with university (senior administrators, faculty heads) and representatives from the industry (service, manufacturing, research, and not-for-profit organizations). Insights from General Systems Theory, Collaborative Control Theory and Rybnicek & Königsgruber model, informed thematic analysis. From the analysis, five themes emerged, which are: Nature of Collaborations; Management Structures and Platforms for UICs; Stakeholder Capacity and Readiness for UICs; Information Exchange & Dissemination; Impact and Sustainability of UICs. The study findings revealed that UICs have weak governance & coordination mechanisms, lack sustainability & digital implementation, are largely informal, under-resourced. Internship was seen to be the dominant form of engagement between universities and the industry. This suggests that; adopting ICT-mechanisms improves UIC effectiveness and sustainability. This study therefore proposes a context-sensitive, systems-oriented JMS Model to enhance UIC management in developing countries which contributes to literature and practice. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -