A Student-Lecturer Rating System is the rating of the lecturers by the students where factors like level of class interaction, classroom cooperation, frequency of meeting, teaching effectiveness, punctuality and open communication etc are considered as rating factors. Evaluation of lecturer’s performance usually faces challenges such as unfairness, imprecise and subjectivity in the area of allotting marks to lecturers. Another problem is the issue of information supplied by the lecturers that might not be one hundred percent true due to some typographical errors; it is often difficult to quantify performance dimensions, hence there is need to develop a model for rating lecturers by their students. The objective of this paper is to develop a model for student-lecturer rating system. The proposed system is based on using some variables which represent the rating factors which are evaluated using the models and using the aggregates are computed. On the basis of the aggregates, the rating factors are ranked. This system can be adopted to complement the existing system. The proposed model can be used where the students have the capacity to rate their lecturers on the basis of the rating factors. The lecturers with the high rated values can be promoted to the next level while the lecturers with low rated values are not qualified for promotion. If this can be adopted in the institutions, lecturers would like to add high rating factors to their values and to their work.
Published in | American Journal of Computer Science and Technology (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14 |
Page(s) | 217-221 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Model, Variables, Education, Rating Factors
[1] | Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M. & Griffiths, M., (2000): The Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: Love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol 25: 4, pp: 397-405. |
[2] | Reckers, P. M. J. (1995). Know Thy Customers, Change in Accounting Education: A Research Blueprint. Center for Research in Accounting Education. James Madison University. pp. 29-35. |
[3] | Wachtel, H. K. (1998) Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23 (2), 191–210. |
[4] | Weaver and Qi, (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 570-601. |
[5] | Rocca, K. A., and McCroskey, J. C. (1999). The Interrelationship of Student Ratings of Instructors’ Immediacy, Verbal Aggressiveness, Homophily, and Interpersonal Attraction. Communication Education, 48, 308-316. |
[6] | Chireshe, R. (2011). Effective and Ineffective Lecturers: University Students’ Perspective in Zimbabwe. Anthropologist, 13 (4), 265-269. |
[7] | Drumea, C. (2014). Staff Performance Evaluation in Public Organizations. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov. Vol. 7 (56). pp 133-138. |
[8] | Nyadanu, S. D., Garglo, M. Y., Adampah, T., Garglo and R. L. (2015). The Impact of Lecturer-Student Relationship on Self-Esteem and Academic Performance at Higher Education. Journal Social Science Studies. Vol. 2 (1), pp 264-281. |
[9] | Kamath, R. S. (2014). Design and Development of Soft Computing Model for Teaching Staff Performance Evaluation. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology. |
[10] | Arbaiy, N., Suradi, Z. (2007). Staff Performance Appraisal using Fuzzy Evaluation. In: Boukis, C., Pnevmatikakis, A., Polymenakos, L. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Innovations 2007: from Theory to Applications. AIAI 2007. IFIP TheInternational Federation for Information Processing, vol 247. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74161-1_21 |
[11] | Faeq, M. (2020). Performance Evaluation Criteria Development Process for AcademicStaff at Universities. Black Sea Journal of Management and Marketing, 1 (1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.47299/bsjmm.v1i1.17 |
[12] | Melnyk, K. V., Borysova, N. V., and Melnyk, V. I. (nd). Information System Development for Teaching Staff Performance Evaluation. |
[13] | Ijaduola, K. O. (no date). A Survey of Teacher-Student Relations in Secondary Schools. pp 65-75. |
[14] | Merkine, B., Bisa, Y. and Ayele, A, (2019). The Relationship between Student-TeachersInteraction and Academic Achievement of Trainee Teachers in Dilla College ofTeacher Education. Global Journal of Human-Social Science. Vol 19 (3). page 35-48. |
APA Style
Akinbohun Folake, Akinbohun Opeyemi Samuel, Daodu Babalola Julius, Ologunagba Grace Feyikemi. (2022). Development of a Model for Student-Lecturer Rating System. American Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 5(4), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14
ACS Style
Akinbohun Folake; Akinbohun Opeyemi Samuel; Daodu Babalola Julius; Ologunagba Grace Feyikemi. Development of a Model for Student-Lecturer Rating System. Am. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2022, 5(4), 217-221. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14, author = {Akinbohun Folake and Akinbohun Opeyemi Samuel and Daodu Babalola Julius and Ologunagba Grace Feyikemi}, title = {Development of a Model for Student-Lecturer Rating System}, journal = {American Journal of Computer Science and Technology}, volume = {5}, number = {4}, pages = {217-221}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcst.20220504.14}, abstract = {A Student-Lecturer Rating System is the rating of the lecturers by the students where factors like level of class interaction, classroom cooperation, frequency of meeting, teaching effectiveness, punctuality and open communication etc are considered as rating factors. Evaluation of lecturer’s performance usually faces challenges such as unfairness, imprecise and subjectivity in the area of allotting marks to lecturers. Another problem is the issue of information supplied by the lecturers that might not be one hundred percent true due to some typographical errors; it is often difficult to quantify performance dimensions, hence there is need to develop a model for rating lecturers by their students. The objective of this paper is to develop a model for student-lecturer rating system. The proposed system is based on using some variables which represent the rating factors which are evaluated using the models and using the aggregates are computed. On the basis of the aggregates, the rating factors are ranked. This system can be adopted to complement the existing system. The proposed model can be used where the students have the capacity to rate their lecturers on the basis of the rating factors. The lecturers with the high rated values can be promoted to the next level while the lecturers with low rated values are not qualified for promotion. If this can be adopted in the institutions, lecturers would like to add high rating factors to their values and to their work.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Development of a Model for Student-Lecturer Rating System AU - Akinbohun Folake AU - Akinbohun Opeyemi Samuel AU - Daodu Babalola Julius AU - Ologunagba Grace Feyikemi Y1 - 2022/12/27 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14 T2 - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology JF - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology JO - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology SP - 217 EP - 221 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-012X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20220504.14 AB - A Student-Lecturer Rating System is the rating of the lecturers by the students where factors like level of class interaction, classroom cooperation, frequency of meeting, teaching effectiveness, punctuality and open communication etc are considered as rating factors. Evaluation of lecturer’s performance usually faces challenges such as unfairness, imprecise and subjectivity in the area of allotting marks to lecturers. Another problem is the issue of information supplied by the lecturers that might not be one hundred percent true due to some typographical errors; it is often difficult to quantify performance dimensions, hence there is need to develop a model for rating lecturers by their students. The objective of this paper is to develop a model for student-lecturer rating system. The proposed system is based on using some variables which represent the rating factors which are evaluated using the models and using the aggregates are computed. On the basis of the aggregates, the rating factors are ranked. This system can be adopted to complement the existing system. The proposed model can be used where the students have the capacity to rate their lecturers on the basis of the rating factors. The lecturers with the high rated values can be promoted to the next level while the lecturers with low rated values are not qualified for promotion. If this can be adopted in the institutions, lecturers would like to add high rating factors to their values and to their work. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -