Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies

Adama Ouattara; Kouacou Koimbla Francine; Yao Kouassi Benjamin

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies

Adama Ouattara, Kouacou Koimbla Francine, Yao Kouassi Benjamin

Published in American Journal of Chemical Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 6)

Received: 25 October 2022 Accepted: 15 November 2022 Published: 15 December 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The optimization of stripping processes requires the simulation of correlations for a preliminary analysis of the system behavior while avoiding complex, costly, and time-consuming manipulations on a reduced scale. This study gives a suitable strategy while selecting stripping column packings. The strategic use of the genetic algorithm NGSAIIb allowed for solving the optimization problems based on environmental and technical-economic criteria of the Trichloroethylene (TCE) stripping column. For that, a numerical procedure was developed on MATLAB software. Then MATLAB software was linked by the mean of the COM protocol to the Multigen library that is an add-in for Microsoft Excel. In the developed strategy the decision-making method, TOPSIS is considered to compare four random packings (Flexiring), (Rashig ring), structured packings (Mellapak Y250), and (Sulzer BX). After the implementation of the strategy on all the packings, the Sulzer BX structured packing was selected as the best one. This section was based on two decision criteria that are, the TCE removal rate of 99.99% and the ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow of 44.38%. The study shows that the Sulzer BX packing is the least expensive and promotes increased mass transfer and low total column pressure drop. The analysis of the evolution of the mass transfer coefficient according to the liquid flow rate showed that an efficient stripping column must have a ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow rate strictly lower than 50%.

Published in	American Journal of Chemical Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12
Page(s)	121-130
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Genetic Algorithms (GA), Steam Stripping, Wastewater Treatment, Multicriteria Decision Making

References

[1]	N. Vlasopoulos, F. A. Memon, D. Butler, and R. Murphy (2006). Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment technologies treating petroleum process waters. Science of The Total Environment, vol. 367, no. 1, pp. 58–70, Aug. 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.03.007.
[2]	T. M. Zygula (2007). A design review of steam stripping columns for wastewater service. US, Houston: AIChE Spring National.
[3]	B. I. Dvorak, D. F. Lawler, J. R. Fair, and N. E. Handler (1996). Evaluation of the Onda correlations for mass transfer with large random packings. Environmental science & technology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 945–953.
[4]	R. Perry, D. Green, and J. Maloney (1997). Perry’s handbook of chemical engineering.
[5]	A. Ghoreyshi, H. Sadeghifar, and F. Entezarion (2014). Efficiency assessment of air stripping packed towers for removal of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) from industrial and drinking waters. Energy, vol. 73, pp. 838–843.
[6]	N. Nirmalakhandan, Y. Lee, and R. Speece (1987). Designing a cost-efficient air-stripping process. Journal-American Water Works Association, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 56–63.
[7]	D. A. Dzombak, S. B. Roy, and H. Fang (1993). Air-Stripper Design and Costing Computer Program. Journal-American Water Works Association, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 63–72.
[8]	M. Abdullahi, R. Yusuf, and F. Aloko (2014). Interactive Effect of Air-Water Ratio and Temperature on the Air Stripping of Benzene. Nigerian journal of technological development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–6.
[9]	Collette Yann, Patrick Siarry (2002). Optimisation multiobjectif. Paris: Eyrolles.
[10]	S. S. Parhi, G. P. Rangaiah, and A. K. Jana (2019). Optimizing reboiler duty and reflux ratio profiles of vapor recompressed batch distillation. Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 213, pp. 553–570.
[11]	T. M. Barakat, E. S. Fraga, and E. Sorensen (2006). Multi-objective optimization of batch distillation processes. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 21, Elsevier, pp. 955–960.
[12]	M. Leipold, S. Gruetzmann, and G. Fieg (2009). An evolutionary approach for multi-objective dynamic optimization applied to middle vessel batch distillation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 857–870.
[13]	Briones-Ramírez and C. Gutiérrez-Antonio (2018). Multiobjective Optimization of Chemical Processes with Complete Models using MATLAB and Aspen Plus. Computación y Sistemas, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1157–1170.
[14]	J. Ortiz-Del Castillo, G. Guerrero-Medina, J. Lopez-Toledo, and J. Rocha (2000). Design of steam-stripping columns for removal of volatile organic compounds from water using random and structured packings. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 731–739.
[15]	Ouattara, L. Pibouleau, C. Azzaro-Pantel, and S. Domenech (2013). Economic and environmental impacts of the energy source for the utility production system in the HDA process. Energy conversion and management, vol. 74, pp. 129–139.
[16]	J. H. Holland (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT Press.
[17]	Y. Djebbar and R. Narbaitz (2002). Neural network prediction of air stripping K_La. Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 451–460.
[18]	Gomez, L. Pibouleau, C. Azzaro-Pantel, S. Domenech, C. Latgé, and D. Haubensack (2010). Multiobjective genetic algorithm strategies for electricity production from generation IV nuclear technology. Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 859–871.
[19]	Z. Yue (2011). An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers. Knowledge-based systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 146–153.
[20]	V. Engel, J. Stichlmeir, and W. Geipel (2001). Fluid Dynamics of Packings for Gas-Liquid Contactors. Chemical Engineering & Technology: Industrial Chemistry-Plant Equipment-Process Engineering-Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 459–462.
[21]	J. Gualito, F. Cerino, J. Cardenas, and J. Rocha (1997). Design method for distillation columns filled with metallic, ceramic, or plastic structured packings. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1747–1757.
[22]	Mehta (2009). Steam stripping of bromine from sea Brine: Mass-transfer analysis of randomly packed columns. Indian Chemical Engineer, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–22.
[23]	Y. Djebbar and R. M. Narbaitz (1995). Mass transfer correlations for air stripping towers. Environmental progress, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 137–145.
[24]	J. M. Montgomery (1985). Water treatment: principles and design. Water treatment: Principles and design. John Wiley Sons.
[25]	J. Douglas (1978). Equipment costs by current methods. Journal of the Construction Division, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 191–205.
[26]	‘Marshall and Swift Cost Index 2022 - Fill Online, Printable, Fillable, Blank \| pdfFiller’. https://www.pdffiller.com/406193226-2017-Index_Factors_Srv_Life_Prcnt_GDpdf-marshall-and-swift-cost-index-2022- (accessed Sep. 13, 2022).
[27]	R. M. Narbaitz, W. J. Mayorga, P. Torres, J. H. Greenfield, G. L. Amy, and R. A. Minear (2022). EVALUATING aeration-stripping media on the pilot scale. Journal-American Water Works Association, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 97–111.
[28]	P. C. Chen, M.-W. Yang, and Y.-L. Lai (2020). Hydrodynamic and Mass Transfer in the Desorption Process of CO₂ Gas in a Packed-Bed Stripper. Processes, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 46.
[29]	S. Piché, S. Lévesque, B. P. Grandjean, and F. Larachi (2003). Prediction of HETP for randomly packed towers operation: integration of aqueous and non-aqueous mass transfer characteristics into one consistent correlation. Separation and purification technology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 145–162.
[30]	F. Larachi, S. Lévesque, and B. P. Grandjean (2008). Seamless mass transfer correlations for packed beds bridging random and structured packings. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 3274–3284.
[31]	Yala (2017). Optimisation des colonnes HIDiC, intégrant une mousse métallique, basée sur une étude théorique et expérimentale des transferts thermiques.
[32]	J. Stichlmair, J. Bravo, and J. Fair (1989). A general model for prediction of pressure drops and capacity of countercurrent gas/liquid packed columns. Gas Separation & Purification, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–28.
[33]	J. Mackowiak (2010). Fluid dynamics of packed columns. Chemische Technik. Verfahrenstechnik. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[34]	jose Almonte (2015). Preliminary Economic Evaluation of the Stripping Process. Unpublished. https://www.google.com/search?q=Preliminary+Economic+Evaluation+of+the+Stripping+Process,+jose+Almonte+2015&sxsrf=ALiCzsYiXnrRkJJF6mDYjF0gWNa-mRejFw:1663171274957&ei=yvohY4mMOs7qgQbpnayoBg&start=0&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwiJma3o05T6AhVOdcAKHekOC2U4ChDy0wN6BAgBED0&biw=1366&bih=625&dpr=1 (accessed Sep. 14, 2022).
[35]	Wagner, J. Stichlmair, and J. R. Fair (1997). Mass transfer in beds of modern, high-efficiency random packings. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 227–237.
[36]	R. Billet and M. Schultes (1993). Predicting mass transfer in packed columns. Chemical Engineering & Technology: Industrial Chemistry-Plant Equipment-Process Engineering-Biotechnology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–9.
[37]	J. G. Stichlmair, H. Klein, and S. Rehfeldt (2021). Distillation: principles and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
[38]	J. Fair (1988). A half-century of progress in separations technology. Chemical Processing, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 58–70.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Adama Ouattara, Kouacou Koimbla Francine, Yao Kouassi Benjamin. (2022). Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies. American Journal of Chemical Engineering, 10(6), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Adama Ouattara; Kouacou Koimbla Francine; Yao Kouassi Benjamin. Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies. Am. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10(6), 121-130. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Adama Ouattara, Kouacou Koimbla Francine, Yao Kouassi Benjamin. Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies. Am J Chem Eng. 2022;10(6):121-130. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12,
  author = {Adama Ouattara and Kouacou Koimbla Francine and Yao Kouassi Benjamin},
  title = {Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies},
  journal = {American Journal of Chemical Engineering},
  volume = {10},
  number = {6},
  pages = {121-130},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajche.20221006.12},
  abstract = {The optimization of stripping processes requires the simulation of correlations for a preliminary analysis of the system behavior while avoiding complex, costly, and time-consuming manipulations on a reduced scale. This study gives a suitable strategy while selecting stripping column packings. The strategic use of the genetic algorithm NGSAIIb allowed for solving the optimization problems based on environmental and technical-economic criteria of the Trichloroethylene (TCE) stripping column. For that, a numerical procedure was developed on MATLAB software. Then MATLAB software was linked by the mean of the COM protocol to the Multigen library that is an add-in for Microsoft Excel. In the developed strategy the decision-making method, TOPSIS is considered to compare four random packings (Flexiring), (Rashig ring), structured packings (Mellapak Y250), and (Sulzer BX). After the implementation of the strategy on all the packings, the Sulzer BX structured packing was selected as the best one. This section was based on two decision criteria that are, the TCE removal rate of 99.99% and the ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow of 44.38%. The study shows that the Sulzer BX packing is the least expensive and promotes increased mass transfer and low total column pressure drop. The analysis of the evolution of the mass transfer coefficient according to the liquid flow rate showed that an efficient stripping column must have a ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow rate strictly lower than 50%.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies
AU  - Adama Ouattara
AU  - Kouacou Koimbla Francine
AU  - Yao Kouassi Benjamin
Y1  - 2022/12/15
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12
T2  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
SP  - 121
EP  - 130
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8613
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12
AB  - The optimization of stripping processes requires the simulation of correlations for a preliminary analysis of the system behavior while avoiding complex, costly, and time-consuming manipulations on a reduced scale. This study gives a suitable strategy while selecting stripping column packings. The strategic use of the genetic algorithm NGSAIIb allowed for solving the optimization problems based on environmental and technical-economic criteria of the Trichloroethylene (TCE) stripping column. For that, a numerical procedure was developed on MATLAB software. Then MATLAB software was linked by the mean of the COM protocol to the Multigen library that is an add-in for Microsoft Excel. In the developed strategy the decision-making method, TOPSIS is considered to compare four random packings (Flexiring), (Rashig ring), structured packings (Mellapak Y250), and (Sulzer BX). After the implementation of the strategy on all the packings, the Sulzer BX structured packing was selected as the best one. This section was based on two decision criteria that are, the TCE removal rate of 99.99% and the ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow of 44.38%. The study shows that the Sulzer BX packing is the least expensive and promotes increased mass transfer and low total column pressure drop. The analysis of the evolution of the mass transfer coefficient according to the liquid flow rate showed that an efficient stripping column must have a ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow rate strictly lower than 50%.
VL  - 10
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Adama Ouattara

Laboratory of Industrial Processes, Syntheses and Renewable Energies, National Polytechnic Institute Houphouet-Boigny, Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast
Kouacou Koimbla Francine

Laboratory of Industrial Processes, Syntheses and Renewable Energies, National Polytechnic Institute Houphouet-Boigny, Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast
Yao Kouassi Benjamin

Laboratory of Industrial Processes, Syntheses and Renewable Energies, National Polytechnic Institute Houphouet-Boigny, Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Adama Ouattara, Kouacou Koimbla Francine, Yao Kouassi Benjamin. (2022). Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies. American Journal of Chemical Engineering, 10(6), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Adama Ouattara; Kouacou Koimbla Francine; Yao Kouassi Benjamin. Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies. Am. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10(6), 121-130. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Adama Ouattara, Kouacou Koimbla Francine, Yao Kouassi Benjamin. Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies. Am J Chem Eng. 2022;10(6):121-130. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12,
  author = {Adama Ouattara and Kouacou Koimbla Francine and Yao Kouassi Benjamin},
  title = {Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies},
  journal = {American Journal of Chemical Engineering},
  volume = {10},
  number = {6},
  pages = {121-130},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajche.20221006.12},
  abstract = {The optimization of stripping processes requires the simulation of correlations for a preliminary analysis of the system behavior while avoiding complex, costly, and time-consuming manipulations on a reduced scale. This study gives a suitable strategy while selecting stripping column packings. The strategic use of the genetic algorithm NGSAIIb allowed for solving the optimization problems based on environmental and technical-economic criteria of the Trichloroethylene (TCE) stripping column. For that, a numerical procedure was developed on MATLAB software. Then MATLAB software was linked by the mean of the COM protocol to the Multigen library that is an add-in for Microsoft Excel. In the developed strategy the decision-making method, TOPSIS is considered to compare four random packings (Flexiring), (Rashig ring), structured packings (Mellapak Y250), and (Sulzer BX). After the implementation of the strategy on all the packings, the Sulzer BX structured packing was selected as the best one. This section was based on two decision criteria that are, the TCE removal rate of 99.99% and the ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow of 44.38%. The study shows that the Sulzer BX packing is the least expensive and promotes increased mass transfer and low total column pressure drop. The analysis of the evolution of the mass transfer coefficient according to the liquid flow rate showed that an efficient stripping column must have a ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow rate strictly lower than 50%.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Trichloroethylene Stripping Column Optimal Design by Genetic Algorithm and Multicriteria Decision-Making Strategies
AU  - Adama Ouattara
AU  - Kouacou Koimbla Francine
AU  - Yao Kouassi Benjamin
Y1  - 2022/12/15
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12
T2  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Chemical Engineering
SP  - 121
EP  - 130
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8613
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20221006.12
AB  - The optimization of stripping processes requires the simulation of correlations for a preliminary analysis of the system behavior while avoiding complex, costly, and time-consuming manipulations on a reduced scale. This study gives a suitable strategy while selecting stripping column packings. The strategic use of the genetic algorithm NGSAIIb allowed for solving the optimization problems based on environmental and technical-economic criteria of the Trichloroethylene (TCE) stripping column. For that, a numerical procedure was developed on MATLAB software. Then MATLAB software was linked by the mean of the COM protocol to the Multigen library that is an add-in for Microsoft Excel. In the developed strategy the decision-making method, TOPSIS is considered to compare four random packings (Flexiring), (Rashig ring), structured packings (Mellapak Y250), and (Sulzer BX). After the implementation of the strategy on all the packings, the Sulzer BX structured packing was selected as the best one. This section was based on two decision criteria that are, the TCE removal rate of 99.99% and the ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow of 44.38%. The study shows that the Sulzer BX packing is the least expensive and promotes increased mass transfer and low total column pressure drop. The analysis of the evolution of the mass transfer coefficient according to the liquid flow rate showed that an efficient stripping column must have a ratio of the liquid flow to the gas flow rate strictly lower than 50%.
VL  - 10
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download