National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology

Lian Jingsen; Liao Muyun

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13

| Peer-Reviewed

National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology

Lian Jingsen, Liao Muyun

Published in American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 3)

Received: 20 April 2021 Published: 24 May 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

National archaeological site parks are important for scientific protection and sustainable utilization of China's large ancient ruins. It is noteworthy that there is a lack of systematic analyses and dynamic strategies for the planning of archaeological sites parks, a lack of a comprehensive method for extracting earth surface information of archaeological sites, and especially a lack of post procedural research on how human beings transform the surrounding environment of the sites. The traditional research paradigm of archaeological site park planning based solely on archaeology or landscape architecture needs to be updated, as an interdisciplinary discipline, landscape archaeology has the research advantages of being more inclusive and restoring the original state of human land interaction between ancient human and ancient environment. This paper first explains the concept of landscape archaeology and the new vision of Chinese archaeological sites parks, and then, puts forward the lack of cultural connotation in spatial background, and the absence of dynamic thinking in temporal dimension through the analysis of existing domestic archaeological site park. And it is further explored from the “protection of authenticity ", "heritage cultural landscape reproduction", "protection and utilization", "dynamic monitoring" four levels. Finally, from the micro perspective, the paper puts forward a five-stage optimized framework of archaeological site park planning based on the perspective of landscape archaeology.

Published in	American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13
Page(s)	74-83
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Landscape Archaeology, National Archaeological Site Park, Planning Strategy, Protection and Utilization, Optimization

References

[1]	State Administration of cultural relics. Guidelines for the establishment, operation and management of national archaeological sites Park (Trial) [EB / OL]. (2018) [2018-04-11] http://www.sach.gov.cn/art/2018/1/30/art_ 1036_ 146797.html.
[2]	State Administration of cultural relics. Development report of National Archaeological Heritage Park [EB / OL]. [April 20, 2019] http://www.gov.cn/fuwu/2018-10/12/content_ five million three hundred and twenty-nine thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight htm. National Cultural Heritage Administration. National Archaeological Site Park Development Report [EB/OL]. [2019-04-20]. http://www.gov.cn/fuwu/2018-10/12/
[3]	Wang Xinwen, Fu Xiaomeng, Zhang Pei. Research progress and trend of archaeological sites Park [J]. Chinese garden, 2019, 35 (07): 93-96.
[4]	State Administration of cultural relics. Requirements for the planning of national archaeological sites Park (Trial) [EB / OL]. (2009) [2018-04-15] http://www.sach.gov.cn/art/2012/12/31/art_ 1036_ 93843.html.
[5]	Shan Jixiang. Exploration and practice of large archaeological sites Park [J]. Chinese cultural relics research, 2010 (01): 2-12.
[6]	Zhao Wenbin. Research on planning mode of National Archaeological Site Park [D]. Beijing Forestry University, 2012.
[7]	Zhang Hai. Landscape archaeology: theory, method and practice [J]. Southern cultural relics, 2010 (04): 8-17.
[8]	Jiao Tianlong. Introduction to Landscape archaeology [n]. China Heritage daily, 2010-6-29.
[9]	G. Nicholas, J. Hollowell. Series Editors' Foreword. [C]. Handbook of landscape archaeology. Britain: Routledge., 2016. 123-130.
[10]	Graham Fairclough. Look the other way–from a branch of archaeology to a root of landscape studies [C]. Landscape archaeology between Art and Science. Holland: Amsterdam University Press, 2012. 471-483.
[11]	Wang Luyan. Research on the principles and methods of greening national archaeological sites Park [D]. Xi'an University of architecture and technology, 2013.
[12]	Feng Shumei, Yuan Yue, Zhu Xingying, Zhang Yifan, Zhu Yuanping. Study on tourism development validity and Countermeasures of Liangzhu site [J]. Jiangnan forum, 2020 (12): 36-38.
[13]	Zhao Xia. Analysis on the characteristics of Liangzhu site protection and utilization [J]. International cultural management, 2016 (00): 163-174.
[14]	Qian Guifeng. Peking Man Site in Zhoukoudian [J]. World heritage, 2015 (z1): 32-35.
[15]	Chen Ruyi, sun Bingying, Yang Hua. Research on the protection and development strategy of luonanlifang site in Luoyang City in Sui and Tang Dynasties [a] IFLA Asia Pacific region, Chinese society of landscape architecture, Shanghai greening and city appearance administration. 2012 IFLA Asia Pacific Conference and 2012 annual meeting of Chinese society of Landscape Architecture (Volume I) [C]. IFLA Asia Pacific region, Chinese society of landscape architecture, Shanghai greening and city appearance administration: Chinese society of Landscape Architecture, 2012: 4.
[16]	Tong Shishu. Research on the protection of Gaogouli mountain city site in Liaoning Province [D]. Shenyang Jianzhu University, 2012.
[17]	Hu Xing, Jiang Ying Chao. Study on the protection and sustainable development of Peking Man Site in Zhoukoudian [J]. Beijing Social Sciences, 2010 (03): 17-23.
[18]	Zhuang Youbo, Yang Rui. Study on zoning planning of Huangshan Scenic Area [J]. Chinese garden, 2006 (12): 32-36.
[19]	Guo Xiaotong, Yang Chen, Han Feng. Digital recording and protection innovation of cultural landscape heritage [J]. Chinese garden, 2020, 36 (11): 84-89.
[20]	V. Strang. The social construction of water. [C]. Handbook of landscape archaeology. Britain: Routledge., 2016. 123-130.
[21]	R. Hesse, J. Baade. A qualitative model for the effect of upstream land use on downstream water availability in a western Andean valley, southern Peru [C]. Landscape archaeology between art and science: From a multi-to an interdisciplinary approach. Holland: Amsterdam University Press, 2012. 241-247.
[22]	M. Kampa, I. Ispikoudis. Cultural forces in the creation of landscapes of south-eastern Rhodope: Evolution of the Byzantine monastic landscape [C]. Landscape archaeology between art and science: From a multi-to an interdisciplinary approach. Holland: Amsterdam University Press, 2012. 71-79.
[23]	Xu Yongjie. Settlement form of iron age in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Frontier archaeological research, 2003 (00): 211-222.
[24]	J. H. Blitz. Moundville [M]. University of Alabama Press: America, 2008. 98-105.
[25]	F. Pryor. The Flag Fen Basin: archaeology and environment of a Fenland landscape. [M]. English Heritage: Britain, 2013. 351-381.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lian Jingsen, Liao Muyun. (2021). National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 9(3), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lian Jingsen; Liao Muyun. National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2021, 9(3), 74-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lian Jingsen, Liao Muyun. National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology. Am J Civ Eng. 2021;9(3):74-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13,
  author = {Lian Jingsen and Liao Muyun},
  title = {National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology},
  journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {74-83},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20210903.13},
  abstract = {National archaeological site parks are important for scientific protection and sustainable utilization of China's large ancient ruins. It is noteworthy that there is a lack of systematic analyses and dynamic strategies for the planning of archaeological sites parks, a lack of a comprehensive method for extracting earth surface information of archaeological sites, and especially a lack of post procedural research on how human beings transform the surrounding environment of the sites. The traditional research paradigm of archaeological site park planning based solely on archaeology or landscape architecture needs to be updated, as an interdisciplinary discipline, landscape archaeology has the research advantages of being more inclusive and restoring the original state of human land interaction between ancient human and ancient environment. This paper first explains the concept of landscape archaeology and the new vision of Chinese archaeological sites parks, and then, puts forward the lack of cultural connotation in spatial background, and the absence of dynamic thinking in temporal dimension through the analysis of existing domestic archaeological site park. And it is further explored from the “protection of authenticity ", "heritage cultural landscape reproduction", "protection and utilization", "dynamic monitoring" four levels. Finally, from the micro perspective, the paper puts forward a five-stage optimized framework of archaeological site park planning based on the perspective of landscape archaeology.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology
AU  - Lian Jingsen
AU  - Liao Muyun
Y1  - 2021/05/24
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13
T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
SP  - 74
EP  - 83
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13
AB  - National archaeological site parks are important for scientific protection and sustainable utilization of China's large ancient ruins. It is noteworthy that there is a lack of systematic analyses and dynamic strategies for the planning of archaeological sites parks, a lack of a comprehensive method for extracting earth surface information of archaeological sites, and especially a lack of post procedural research on how human beings transform the surrounding environment of the sites. The traditional research paradigm of archaeological site park planning based solely on archaeology or landscape architecture needs to be updated, as an interdisciplinary discipline, landscape archaeology has the research advantages of being more inclusive and restoring the original state of human land interaction between ancient human and ancient environment. This paper first explains the concept of landscape archaeology and the new vision of Chinese archaeological sites parks, and then, puts forward the lack of cultural connotation in spatial background, and the absence of dynamic thinking in temporal dimension through the analysis of existing domestic archaeological site park. And it is further explored from the “protection of authenticity ", "heritage cultural landscape reproduction", "protection and utilization", "dynamic monitoring" four levels. Finally, from the micro perspective, the paper puts forward a five-stage optimized framework of archaeological site park planning based on the perspective of landscape archaeology.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Lian Jingsen

School of Architecture, Central Academy of Fine Arts, Beijing, Republic of China
Liao Muyun

School of Architecture, Central Academy of Fine Arts, Beijing, Republic of China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lian Jingsen, Liao Muyun. (2021). National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 9(3), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lian Jingsen; Liao Muyun. National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2021, 9(3), 74-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lian Jingsen, Liao Muyun. National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology. Am J Civ Eng. 2021;9(3):74-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13,
  author = {Lian Jingsen and Liao Muyun},
  title = {National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology},
  journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {74-83},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20210903.13},
  abstract = {National archaeological site parks are important for scientific protection and sustainable utilization of China's large ancient ruins. It is noteworthy that there is a lack of systematic analyses and dynamic strategies for the planning of archaeological sites parks, a lack of a comprehensive method for extracting earth surface information of archaeological sites, and especially a lack of post procedural research on how human beings transform the surrounding environment of the sites. The traditional research paradigm of archaeological site park planning based solely on archaeology or landscape architecture needs to be updated, as an interdisciplinary discipline, landscape archaeology has the research advantages of being more inclusive and restoring the original state of human land interaction between ancient human and ancient environment. This paper first explains the concept of landscape archaeology and the new vision of Chinese archaeological sites parks, and then, puts forward the lack of cultural connotation in spatial background, and the absence of dynamic thinking in temporal dimension through the analysis of existing domestic archaeological site park. And it is further explored from the “protection of authenticity ", "heritage cultural landscape reproduction", "protection and utilization", "dynamic monitoring" four levels. Finally, from the micro perspective, the paper puts forward a five-stage optimized framework of archaeological site park planning based on the perspective of landscape archaeology.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - National Archaeological Site Park Planning Based on Landscape Archaeology
AU  - Lian Jingsen
AU  - Liao Muyun
Y1  - 2021/05/24
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13
T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
SP  - 74
EP  - 83
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20210903.13
AB  - National archaeological site parks are important for scientific protection and sustainable utilization of China's large ancient ruins. It is noteworthy that there is a lack of systematic analyses and dynamic strategies for the planning of archaeological sites parks, a lack of a comprehensive method for extracting earth surface information of archaeological sites, and especially a lack of post procedural research on how human beings transform the surrounding environment of the sites. The traditional research paradigm of archaeological site park planning based solely on archaeology or landscape architecture needs to be updated, as an interdisciplinary discipline, landscape archaeology has the research advantages of being more inclusive and restoring the original state of human land interaction between ancient human and ancient environment. This paper first explains the concept of landscape archaeology and the new vision of Chinese archaeological sites parks, and then, puts forward the lack of cultural connotation in spatial background, and the absence of dynamic thinking in temporal dimension through the analysis of existing domestic archaeological site park. And it is further explored from the “protection of authenticity ", "heritage cultural landscape reproduction", "protection and utilization", "dynamic monitoring" four levels. Finally, from the micro perspective, the paper puts forward a five-stage optimized framework of archaeological site park planning based on the perspective of landscape archaeology.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download