Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari; Sushil Kumar

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari, Sushil Kumar

Published in American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 8, Issue 1)

Received: 28 January 2022 Accepted: 16 February 2022 Published: 25 February 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Rose is attacked by thrips, Frankliniella schultzei (Pergande), Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood; aphid, Macrosiphum rosae (Linnaeus); whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood); mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso); foliage feeders and bud borers, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner); Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) and mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. As great deal of variation of pest attack to rose varieties exists, role of plant morphological characters in inducing plant resistance need investigation. Rose varieties Barbone rose, cabbage rose, Chinese rose and Gladiator were screened against major pests at Navsari Agricultural University (NAU), Navsari, Gujarat, India. Relationship of each character to pest incidence was established on the basis of correlation. Gladiator was considered as tolerant variety against thrips, blister beetle, castor semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer. Chinese rose was tolerant against aphid while, it was moderately susceptible against thrips (R. syriacus) and blister beetle. Barbone rose was moderately susceptible against castor semilooper and tussock moth. Overall, Gladiator was considered tolerant against majority of pests (except aphid). Plant growth habit exhibited significant positive correlation with aphid. Plant height had significant positive correlation with all the pests except aphid. Higher number of primary branches showed increased susceptibility to thrips, blister beetle, semilooper and tussock moth while, aphid was indirectly related to primary branches. Increased prickle density indicated increased thrips on leaves, larval populations of semilooper and tussock moth. Leaf colour exhibited negative relationship with semilooper, tussock moth and bud. Leaf area also influenced abundance of bud borer significantly. Increased leaf thickness showed decreased defoliator pests. Increased leaf glossiness showed decreased plant susceptibility to thrips, semilooper and tussock moth. Flower colour had negative relationship with semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer. Increased flower compactness indicated increased aphids and decreased thrips and blister beetle. Number of flower petals exhibited significant positive relationship with aphid and negative relationship with thrips and blister beetle. Lastly, number of flowers exhibited significant positive relationship with thrips, blister beetle, semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer while, it exhibited indirect relationship with aphid. Overall, most important biophysical traits of rose varieties grown under open field condition were plant height, number of primary branches, flower (compactness, number of petals and number of flowers/plant) which directly or indirectly influenced plant tolerance or susceptibility against major pests.

Published in	American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13
Page(s)	17-30
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Rose, Biophysical Traits, Rose Varieties

References

[1]	Anonymous 2019-2020. Director of Horticulture, Agriculture, Farmers Welfare and Co-operation department, Govt. of Gujarat.
[2]	Dreistadt, S. H. 2001. Insects, mites and other invertebrates. Integrated pest management for floriculture and nurseries. Statewide-integrated pest management project, University of California, Division of Agriculture and natural resources publication 3402, pp. 131-226.
[3]	Duraimurugan, P. and Jagadish, A. 2004. Population fluctuation of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood on rose in Karnataka. Insect Environment, 10 (3): 112-113.
[4]	Duraimurugan, P. and Jagadish, A. 2006. Screening of rose cultivars to Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Applied Zoological Researches, 17 (2): 204-205.
[5]	Gahukar, R. T. 2003. Factors influencing thrips abundance and distribution on rose flowers in central India. Journal of Entomological Research, 27 (4): 271-279.
[6]	Hegde, J. N. 2010. Insect pest complex of rose with special reference to bioecology and management of thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Ph. D. (Agri.) thesis submitted to University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru (unpublished).
[7]	Hole, U. B., Salunkhe, G. N., Reddy, P. P., Kumar, N. K. and Verghese, A. 1997. Effect of meteorological parameters on population dynamics of aphid on rose. Advances in IPM for horticultural crops. Proceedings of the first National Symposium on Pest Management in Horticultural crops environmental implications and thrusts. Bangalore, India, 15-17 October. pp. 168-171.
[8]	Kanara, H. G. 2013. Bionomics, varietal screening and efficacy of newer molecules of insecticides against rose thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis submitted to Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat (unpublished).
[9]	Kanara, H. G. and Acharya, M. F. 2014. Categorization of rose varieties against thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande. International Journal of Science and Research, 3 (9): 1224-1226.
[10]	Kolavalli, S., Atheeq, L. K. and Jacob, K. 1991. Floricultural industry in India. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi.
[11]	Majhi, M. 2007. Studies on Insect Pests and Mites infesting Rose. M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis submitted to Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology; Bhubaneswar (unpublished).
[12]	Munib, M., Ahmad, M. and Abass, A. 2015. Survey and screening of different rose cultivars against rose aphid (Macrosiphum rosae). Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture, 10 (2): 175-179.
[13]	Murugan, D. P. and Jagadish, A. 2006. Screening of rose cultivar to Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Applied Zoological researches, 17 (2): 204-205.
[14]	Nirmala, H. R. 2015. Screening of rose genotypes against thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and its management. M. Sc. (Agri.) thesis submitted to University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot (unpublished).
[15]	Norboo, T., Ahmad, H. and Suhee 2017c. Screening for resistance in rose against rose aphid, Macrosiphum rosae (Linn.) and rose thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis (Hood.). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5 (6): 1960-1962.
[16]	Patel, C. C. and Koshiya, D. J. 1997. Seasonal abundance of American bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera on different crop host at Junagadh (Gujarat). Indian J. Ent., 59 (4): 396-401.
[17]	Patel, I. S., Prajapati, B. G., Patel, G. M. and Pathak A. R. 2002. Response of castor genotypes to castor semilooper, Achaea janata Fab. J. Oilseeds Res., 19 (1): 153.
[18]	Patel, R. S., Patel, K. A., Patel, J. B. and Patil, K. S. 2012. Screening of rose varieties against Helicoverpa armigera in south Gujarat. Bioinfolet, 9 (3): 358 - 359.
[19]	Rajkumar, M., Reddy, K. L. and Gour, T. B. 2004. Thrips and mites infesting roses. Insect Environment, 10 (1): 27-28.
[20]	Rani, J. B. and Sridhar, V. 2003. Screening of polyhouse grown rose varieties for resistance to thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 6 (3): 165-171.
[21]	Sharma, D., Chatha, J., Ahmad, H., Srivastva, K. and Jamwal, V. V. S. 2014. Screening of rose cultivars against rose aphid, Macrosiphum Rosae L. (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Indian Journal of Entomology, 76 (3): 262-263.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari, Sushil Kumar. (2022). Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 8(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari; Sushil Kumar. Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2022, 8(1), 17-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari, Sushil Kumar. Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition. Am J Biol Environ Stat. 2022;8(1):17-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13,
  author = {Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari and Sushil Kumar},
  title = {Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition},
  journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics},
  volume = {8},
  number = {1},
  pages = {17-30},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20220801.13},
  abstract = {Rose is attacked by thrips, Frankliniella schultzei (Pergande), Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood; aphid, Macrosiphum rosae (Linnaeus); whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood); mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso); foliage feeders and bud borers, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner); Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) and mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. As great deal of variation of pest attack to rose varieties exists, role of plant morphological characters in inducing plant resistance need investigation. Rose varieties Barbone rose, cabbage rose, Chinese rose and Gladiator were screened against major pests at Navsari Agricultural University (NAU), Navsari, Gujarat, India. Relationship of each character to pest incidence was established on the basis of correlation. Gladiator was considered as tolerant variety against thrips, blister beetle, castor semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer. Chinese rose was tolerant against aphid while, it was moderately susceptible against thrips (R. syriacus) and blister beetle. Barbone rose was moderately susceptible against castor semilooper and tussock moth. Overall, Gladiator was considered tolerant against majority of pests (except aphid). Plant growth habit exhibited significant positive correlation with aphid. Plant height had significant positive correlation with all the pests except aphid. Higher number of primary branches showed increased susceptibility to thrips, blister beetle, semilooper and tussock moth while, aphid was indirectly related to primary branches. Increased prickle density indicated increased thrips on leaves, larval populations of semilooper and tussock moth. Leaf colour exhibited negative relationship with semilooper, tussock moth and bud. Leaf area also influenced abundance of bud borer significantly. Increased leaf thickness showed decreased defoliator pests. Increased leaf glossiness showed decreased plant susceptibility to thrips, semilooper and tussock moth. Flower colour had negative relationship with semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer. Increased flower compactness indicated increased aphids and decreased thrips and blister beetle. Number of flower petals exhibited significant positive relationship with aphid and negative relationship with thrips and blister beetle. Lastly, number of flowers exhibited significant positive relationship with thrips, blister beetle, semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer while, it exhibited indirect relationship with aphid. Overall, most important biophysical traits of rose varieties grown under open field condition were plant height, number of primary branches, flower (compactness, number of petals and number of flowers/plant) which directly or indirectly influenced plant tolerance or susceptibility against major pests.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition
AU - Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari
AU - Sushil Kumar
Y1 - 2022/02/25
PY - 2022
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13
DO - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13
T2 - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
JF - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
JO - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
SP - 17
EP - 30
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2471-979X
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13
AB - Rose is attacked by thrips, Frankliniella schultzei (Pergande), Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood; aphid, Macrosiphum rosae (Linnaeus); whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood); mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso); foliage feeders and bud borers, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner); Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) and mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. As great deal of variation of pest attack to rose varieties exists, role of plant morphological characters in inducing plant resistance need investigation. Rose varieties Barbone rose, cabbage rose, Chinese rose and Gladiator were screened against major pests at Navsari Agricultural University (NAU), Navsari, Gujarat, India. Relationship of each character to pest incidence was established on the basis of correlation. Gladiator was considered as tolerant variety against thrips, blister beetle, castor semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer. Chinese rose was tolerant against aphid while, it was moderately susceptible against thrips (R. syriacus) and blister beetle. Barbone rose was moderately susceptible against castor semilooper and tussock moth. Overall, Gladiator was considered tolerant against majority of pests (except aphid). Plant growth habit exhibited significant positive correlation with aphid. Plant height had significant positive correlation with all the pests except aphid. Higher number of primary branches showed increased susceptibility to thrips, blister beetle, semilooper and tussock moth while, aphid was indirectly related to primary branches. Increased prickle density indicated increased thrips on leaves, larval populations of semilooper and tussock moth. Leaf colour exhibited negative relationship with semilooper, tussock moth and bud. Leaf area also influenced abundance of bud borer significantly. Increased leaf thickness showed decreased defoliator pests. Increased leaf glossiness showed decreased plant susceptibility to thrips, semilooper and tussock moth. Flower colour had negative relationship with semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer. Increased flower compactness indicated increased aphids and decreased thrips and blister beetle. Number of flower petals exhibited significant positive relationship with aphid and negative relationship with thrips and blister beetle. Lastly, number of flowers exhibited significant positive relationship with thrips, blister beetle, semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer while, it exhibited indirect relationship with aphid. Overall, most important biophysical traits of rose varieties grown under open field condition were plant height, number of primary branches, flower (compactness, number of petals and number of flowers/plant) which directly or indirectly influenced plant tolerance or susceptibility against major pests.
VL - 8
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari

Navinchandra Mafatlal College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, India
Sushil Kumar

American Spring and Pressure Works Private Limited College of Horticulture and Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, India

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari, Sushil Kumar. (2022). Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 8(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari; Sushil Kumar. Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2022, 8(1), 17-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari, Sushil Kumar. Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition. Am J Biol Environ Stat. 2022;8(1):17-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13,
  author = {Shefalikumari Dipakbhai Chaudhari and Sushil Kumar},
  title = {Susceptibility of Rose Varieties Against Pests in Relation to Plant Morphological Characters Under Open Field Condition},
  journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics},
  volume = {8},
  number = {1},
  pages = {17-30},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20220801.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20220801.13},
  abstract = {Rose is attacked by thrips, Frankliniella schultzei (Pergande), Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood; aphid, Macrosiphum rosae (Linnaeus); whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood); mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso); foliage feeders and bud borers, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner); Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) and mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. As great deal of variation of pest attack to rose varieties exists, role of plant morphological characters in inducing plant resistance need investigation. Rose varieties Barbone rose, cabbage rose, Chinese rose and Gladiator were screened against major pests at Navsari Agricultural University (NAU), Navsari, Gujarat, India. Relationship of each character to pest incidence was established on the basis of correlation. Gladiator was considered as tolerant variety against thrips, blister beetle, castor semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer. Chinese rose was tolerant against aphid while, it was moderately susceptible against thrips (R. syriacus) and blister beetle. Barbone rose was moderately susceptible against castor semilooper and tussock moth. Overall, Gladiator was considered tolerant against majority of pests (except aphid). Plant growth habit exhibited significant positive correlation with aphid. Plant height had significant positive correlation with all the pests except aphid. Higher number of primary branches showed increased susceptibility to thrips, blister beetle, semilooper and tussock moth while, aphid was indirectly related to primary branches. Increased prickle density indicated increased thrips on leaves, larval populations of semilooper and tussock moth. Leaf colour exhibited negative relationship with semilooper, tussock moth and bud. Leaf area also influenced abundance of bud borer significantly. Increased leaf thickness showed decreased defoliator pests. Increased leaf glossiness showed decreased plant susceptibility to thrips, semilooper and tussock moth. Flower colour had negative relationship with semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer. Increased flower compactness indicated increased aphids and decreased thrips and blister beetle. Number of flower petals exhibited significant positive relationship with aphid and negative relationship with thrips and blister beetle. Lastly, number of flowers exhibited significant positive relationship with thrips, blister beetle, semilooper, tussock moth and bud borer while, it exhibited indirect relationship with aphid. Overall, most important biophysical traits of rose varieties grown under open field condition were plant height, number of primary branches, flower (compactness, number of petals and number of flowers/plant) which directly or indirectly influenced plant tolerance or susceptibility against major pests.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download