The improvement of potato yield and overall production is significantly dependent on the integration of advanced technologies, particularly the use of enhanced potato varieties. Nevertheless, the uptake of these improved varieties in developing nations, such as Ethiopia, is constrained by a range of factors, including socio-economic, demographic, and institutional challenges. To investigate this matter, the study was conducted in Ezha District, located in southern Ethiopia. This research utilized a three-stage sampling technique and gathered primary data through interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews, also sourcing secondary data from various references. The analysis of the data showed that the adoption rate of improved potato varieties was 48.4%, while the intensity of adoption was 55.01%. Based on the probit regression model, it was found that factors such as level of education, size of land and livestock, frequency of extension contact, and membership in a cooperative had a positive impact on farmers' decisions to adopt improved potato varieties. Conversely, the distance to the farmer's training center and the nearest market had a negative influence. As a result, suggested that stakeholders, including the local community, District Agriculture Office, and research institutes, should promote improved potato varieties in the study area to enhance potato yield and production.
Published in | World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11 |
Page(s) | 24-31 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Improved Potato Varieties, Determinants, Probit Model
Variables | Total HH | Adopter | Non-adopter | X2 test | P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | (%) | N | (%) | N | (%) | |||
Sex HHH | 0.87 | 0.351 | ||||||
Female | 23 | 9.20 | 9 | 7.44 | 14 | 10.85 | ||
Male | 227 | 90.8 | 112 | 92.56 | 115 | 89.15. | ||
Participation of demonstration | 4.45 | 0.035** | ||||||
Yes | 54 | 21.60 | 33 | 27.27 | 21 | 16.28 | ||
No | 196 | 78.40 | 88 | 72.73 | 108 | 83.72 | ||
Credit access | 3.88 | 0.049** | ||||||
Yes | 82 | 32.8 | 47 | 38.84 | 35 | 42.68 | ||
No | 168 | 67.20 | 74 | 61.11 | 94 | 55.05 | ||
Cooperative membership | 29.59 | 0.000*** | ||||||
Yes | 153 | 61.21 | 95 | 78.51 | 58 | 44.96 | ||
No | 97 | 38.80 | 26 | 21.49 | 80 | 55.03 | ||
Off-farm Participation | 3.66 | 0.05* | ||||||
Yes | 129 | 51.60 | 70 | 57.85 | 59 | 45.74 | ||
No | 121 | 48.40 | 51 | 42.15 | 70 | 54.26 |
Variable | Total HH (N = 250) | Adopter (n=121) | Non-adopter (n=129) | T-test | p-value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
Educat level of hhh | 5.69 | 3.14 | 6.61 | 3.19 | 4.82 | 2.83 | 4.71 | 0.000*** |
Experience of hhh | 25.35 | 11.83 | 25.53 | 11.3 | 25.17 | 12.36 | 0.23 | 0.811 |
Family size | 4.05 | 1.59 | 4.54 | 1.72 | 3.60 | 1.31 | 4.38 | 0.000*** |
Distance to FTC | 33.77 | 16.79 | 28.04 | 13.73 | 39.14 | 17.65 | -5.52 | 0.000*** |
Dis.to nearest market | 31.88 | 14.69 | 28.52 | 10.55 | 35.03 | 17.17 | -3.61 | 0.000*** |
Land owned | 1.44 | 0.58 | 1.71 | 0.57 | 1.19 | 0.47 | 7.81 | 0.000*** |
Livestock holding | 3.20 | 1.31 | 3.39 | 1.29 | 2.83 | 1.22 | 4.75 | 0.000*** |
Frequency of extension. Contact | 10.86 | 11.97 | 14.32 | 10.70 | 7.62 | 8.08 | 5.59 | 0.000*** |
Name of varieties | Number of farmers | Prcent | Area in hectare | Percent |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gudene | 65 | 53.72 | 38.46 | 61.71 |
Belete | 37 | 30.58 | 17.18 | 27.57 |
Jalene | 19 | 15.7 | 6.68 | 10.71 |
Total | 121 | 100 | 62.32 | 100 |
Variable | Coefficient | Std. error | Marginal effect (dy/dx) |
---|---|---|---|
Sex of household head | -0.471 | 0.343 | -0.184 |
Education status of HHH | 0.056* | 0.034 | 0.022 |
Experience | 0.005 | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Family size | 0.069 | 0.065 | 0.027 |
Distance to FTC | -0.014** | 0.006 | -0.005 |
Distance to nearest market | -0.015** | 0.006 | -0.006 |
Land size | 0.547*** | 0.206 | 0.218 |
Tropical livestock | 0.131* | 0.073 | 0.052 |
Extension contact | 0.021* | 0.012 | 0.008 |
Credit. access | -0.234 | 0.258 | -0.092 |
Off far participation | -0.085 | 0.224 | -0.034 |
Cooperative member | 0.384* | 0.219 | 0.151 |
Demonstration participation | -0.096 | 0.237 | -0.038 |
Constant | -0.943 | 0.553 | |
LR ch2 | 92.58 | ||
Prob > chi2 | 0.0000 | ||
Pseudo R2 | 0.2673 |
EIAR | Ethiopia Institute of Agriculture Research |
FGDs | Focus group Discussions |
KIIs | Key Format Interviews |
Hhh | House Hold Head |
IPVS | Improve Potato Varieties |
TLU | Tropical Livestock Unit |
[1] | Yigezu, Y. A., C. Y.Tizale And A. Aw-Hassan. 2015. Modeling farmers’ adoption decisions of multiple crop technologies The case of barley and potatoes in Ethiopia. 1008: 2016-80 241. |
[2] | Faostat, F. A. O. 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-Statistic Division https://www. Fao. Org/faost at/en/# data. QC. |
[3] | Seifu, F., E.Betewulign. 2017. Evaluation of released and local potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties for growth performance. Journal of Agronomy. Asian Network for Scientific Information 16(1): 40-44. |
[4] | Burke, J. J. 2017. Growing the potato crop Vita equity house upper Ormond quay Dublin, 7. |
[5] | Singh, B. P. And Rana, R. K. 2015. Potato for food and nutritional security in India. Indian Council of Agricutural Research. |
[6] | Ketema, M., D. Kebede, N. Dechassa and F.Hundessa. 2016. Determinants of adoption of potato production technology package by smallholder farmers: evidences from Eastern Ethiopia. Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE). 19(395-2016-24364): 61-68. |
[7] | Nigussie, D., K. Mengistu, D. Haile, K.Wole, A.Tamiru, B. Olkaba, A. Solomon and T.Samuel. 2012 Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) for Gurawa. Haramaya, Kombolcha, and Habro Districts (Woredas) of East and West Hararghe Zones in Ethiopia. |
[8] | Solomon and T.Samuel. 2012. Adoption Rate and Trends in Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Ethiopia. Oxfam. |
[9] | Anis, G., H. Hassa, A. El-Sherif. H.Saneoka and A. EL Sabagh. 2019.Evaluation of new promising rice hybrid and its parental lines for floral, agronomic traits and genetic purity assessment. Pak. J. Agric. Sci 56: 567-576. |
[10] | Chakraborty, S., A. V. Tiedemann. and P. S.Teng. 2000. Climate change potential impact on plant diseases Environmental pollution. Elsevier 108(3): 317-326. |
[11] | Song, H. H., H. S. Lee, J. H. Jeong, H.S.Park and C. Lee, 2008. Diversity in beauvericin and enniatins H, I, and MK1688 by Fusarium oxysporum isolated from potato. International journal of food microbiology. Elsevier 122(3): 296-301. |
[12] | Thiele, G. 1999. Informal potato seed systems in the Andes Why are they important and what should we do with them?’, World development. Elsevier 27(1): 83-99. |
[13] | Woldegiorgis, G. 2013. Potato variety development strategies and methodologies in Ethiopia Seed potato tuber production and dissemination: experiences, challenges and prospects. |
[14] | Gebru, H., A. Mohammed, N. Dechassa and D. Belew 2017. Assessment of production practices of smallholder potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Ethiopia Agriculture and Food Security. Biomed Central, 6(1): 1-11. |
[15] | Greene, W. 2004. ‘Convenient estimators for the panel probit model Further results Empirical Economics. Springer 29(1): 21-47. |
[16] | Williams, R. 2016. Understanding and interpreting generalized ordered logit models The Journal of Mathematical Sociology. Taylor and Francis 40(1): 7-20. |
[17] | Agwu, N. M., E.E.Nwankwo And C.I.Anyanwu. 2014. Determinants of agricultural labour participation among youths in Abia State Nigeria International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC) 2(1128-2016-92018): 157-164. |
[18] | Sebopetji, T.O., And A. Belete. 2009. An application of probit analysis to factors affecting small-scale farmers decision to take credit: a case study of the Greater Letaba Local Municipality in South Africa. African journal of agricultural research. Academic Journals 4(8): 718-723. |
[19] | Zeru, M. 2018. Adoption of improved potato varieties by smallholder farmers: the case of chilga District, north gonder zone, amhara region, Ethiopia.M.Sc Thesis. University of Haramaya, Ethiopia. 68 p. |
[20] | Bati, B. And M. Aman 2017. Determinants of adoption of improved potato varieties by smallholder farmers in shashemene district, west arsi zone, oromia national regional state, Ethiopia. M.Sc Thesis. University of Haramaya, Ethiopia. 78p. |
[21] | Bagheri, A. 2015.Determinants of adoption of mini-tuber seed Potato: A case in Ardabil Province of Iran International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), 5(1047-2017-1625): 263-270. |
[22] | Tesfaye, A., G.Woldegiorgis, W. Kaguongo, B. Lemaga and D. Nigussie. 2013. Adoption and impact of potato production technologies in Oromiya and Amhara Regions.’ |
[23] | Yirga, C. And D.Alemu, 2016. Adoption of crop technologies among Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia Implications for Research and Development. Eth. J. Agric. Sci. EIAR 50th Year Jubilee Anniversary Special, (1-16). |
[24] | Teshome, B. 2018. Determinants of Adoption of Improved Jalenea Potato Variety.M.Sc Thesis University, Ethiopia. 65 p. |
[25] | Tsion, T. E. 2022. ‘Impact of Improved Potato Varieties Adoption on Household Resilience to Food Insecurity.M.Sc Thesis. University Jimma, Ethiopia. 80 p. |
[26] | Teklemariam, T. M. 2014. The impact of International Potato Center’s nutrition project on smallholder farmers’ income and adoption of improved potato varieties.M.Sc Thesis. |
[27] | Wabwile, V. K., Ingasia, O. A. And Langat, J. K. 2016. Effect of the improved sweet potato varieties on household food security: empirical evidence from Kenya. (No. 310-2016-5492). |
[28] | Ahmed, M. H. 2015. Adoption of multiple agricultural technologies in maize production of the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Studies in Agricultural Economics 117(1316-2016-102848): 162-168. |
[29] | Tufa, A. And T.Tefera. 2016. Determinants of improved barley adoption intensity International journal of agricultural economics. Science Publishing Group 1(3): 78-83. |
[30] | Ketema, M. And D. Kebede. 2017. Adoption intensity of inorganic fertilizers in maize production: empirical evidence from smallholder farmers in eastern Ethiopia Journal of Agricultural Science 9(5): 124-132. |
[31] | Sileshi, M., R. Kadigi, K. Mutabazi and S. Sieber. 2019. Determinants for adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures by smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. International soil and water conservation research. Elsevier 7(4): 354-361. |
[32] | Abreham, G. And Y.Sete. 2019. Adoption of Improved Potato VarietyThe Case of Dabatworeda Ethiopia. Indian Journal of Economics and Development 7(6): 123-137. |
[33] | Feleke, A., Regasa, G. And Muche, M. 2019. ‘Factors influencing adoption of improved potato (Belete) variety: evidence from Ethiopian smallholder farmers’. Estonian Academic Agricultural Society. |
APA Style
Yirga, A. (2025). Adoption of Improved Potato Varieties in Ezha District Southern, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 3(2), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11
ACS Style
Yirga, A. Adoption of Improved Potato Varieties in Ezha District Southern, Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2025, 3(2), 24-31. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11
@article{10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11, author = {Amsalech Yirga}, title = {Adoption of Improved Potato Varieties in Ezha District Southern, Ethiopia }, journal = {World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {24-31}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjast.20250302.11}, abstract = {The improvement of potato yield and overall production is significantly dependent on the integration of advanced technologies, particularly the use of enhanced potato varieties. Nevertheless, the uptake of these improved varieties in developing nations, such as Ethiopia, is constrained by a range of factors, including socio-economic, demographic, and institutional challenges. To investigate this matter, the study was conducted in Ezha District, located in southern Ethiopia. This research utilized a three-stage sampling technique and gathered primary data through interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews, also sourcing secondary data from various references. The analysis of the data showed that the adoption rate of improved potato varieties was 48.4%, while the intensity of adoption was 55.01%. Based on the probit regression model, it was found that factors such as level of education, size of land and livestock, frequency of extension contact, and membership in a cooperative had a positive impact on farmers' decisions to adopt improved potato varieties. Conversely, the distance to the farmer's training center and the nearest market had a negative influence. As a result, suggested that stakeholders, including the local community, District Agriculture Office, and research institutes, should promote improved potato varieties in the study area to enhance potato yield and production. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Adoption of Improved Potato Varieties in Ezha District Southern, Ethiopia AU - Amsalech Yirga Y1 - 2025/06/06 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11 DO - 10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11 T2 - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology JF - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology JO - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology SP - 24 EP - 31 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7332 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20250302.11 AB - The improvement of potato yield and overall production is significantly dependent on the integration of advanced technologies, particularly the use of enhanced potato varieties. Nevertheless, the uptake of these improved varieties in developing nations, such as Ethiopia, is constrained by a range of factors, including socio-economic, demographic, and institutional challenges. To investigate this matter, the study was conducted in Ezha District, located in southern Ethiopia. This research utilized a three-stage sampling technique and gathered primary data through interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews, also sourcing secondary data from various references. The analysis of the data showed that the adoption rate of improved potato varieties was 48.4%, while the intensity of adoption was 55.01%. Based on the probit regression model, it was found that factors such as level of education, size of land and livestock, frequency of extension contact, and membership in a cooperative had a positive impact on farmers' decisions to adopt improved potato varieties. Conversely, the distance to the farmer's training center and the nearest market had a negative influence. As a result, suggested that stakeholders, including the local community, District Agriculture Office, and research institutes, should promote improved potato varieties in the study area to enhance potato yield and production. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -