Potato is ranked third after rice and wheat in terms of consumption in the world, and first among root and tuber crops. However, the production is limited by several factors including low in soil fertility, lack of improved varieties, inappropriate spacing, and other poor agronomic management. The objective of the present study is to recognize the optimum rate of the blended NPSZnB and potassium fertilizers for profitable production of potato at Assosa area. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with arrangement of split plot in three replications. The main plot consisted of two potato varieties i.e. Belete and Gudane varieties. The subplot consisted of four levels of blended NPSZnB with potassium chloride rates, one recommended NPK (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) and unfertilized plot. The interaction effects of potato tuber size distribution and quality traits were not significantly (P>0.05) affected by different rates of NPSZnB with adjusted nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium chloride fertilizers and different potato varieties. Out of different potato varieties, Belete variety gave the highest yield as compared to Gudane variety. The highest total tuber yield and large sized tuber yield were obtained by the application of 200% NPSZnB (35.4N+70.6P2O5+15.2S+0.5B+4.4Zn) +138 kg K2O ha-1, with adjusted 184.6kg N+ 109.6kg P2O5 per ha therefore, we are tentatively recommended for beneficiaries at Assosa area.
Published in | World Journal of Applied Chemistry (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12 |
Page(s) | 25-32 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Potato Varieties, Interaction Effects, Fertilizers Rates
S.N | Fertilizer types | Rates of NPSZnB plus adjusted NPK | Nutrient contents of NPSZnB |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Control (0) | Control (0) | 0 |
2 | 100% NPK | 100% NPK (110 N+90 P2O5+69K2O) | |
3 | 50 %NPSZnB | 50 %NPSZnB+ 46.15 N+27.35 P2O5 + 34.5 K2O | 8.85 N+17.65 P2O5+2.85 S+0.13 B+1.1 Zn |
4 | 100% NPSZnB | 100% NPSZnB +92.3 N+ 54.7 P2O5 + 69 K2O | 17.7 N + 35.3 P2O5 +7.6 S + 0.25 B -2.2 Zn |
5 | 150% NPSZnB | 150% NPSZnB + 138.45 N+82.05 P2O5 + 103.5 K2O | 26.55 N+52.95 P2O5+11.4 S+0.38 B+ 3.3 Zn |
6 | 200% NPSZnB | 200% NPSZnB + 184.6 N+ 109.6 P2O5 + 138 K2O | 35.4 N+70.6 P2O5+15.2 S+0.5 B+4.4 Zn |
SN: Serial Number, NPSZnB; Blended N: Nitrogen, P: Phosphorus, S: Sulfur, Zn: Zinc, B: Boron |
Soil physicochemical properties | Contents | Rating | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
pH (H2O) | 5.2 | strongly acidic | [26] |
Sand (%) | 24 | ||
Silt (%) | 22 | ||
Clay (%) | 54 | ||
Textural Class | Clay | [27] | |
Organic carbon (%) | 3.35 | medium | [26, 28] |
Organic matter (%) | 5.8 | medium | [26] |
CEC (Cmol(+) kg -1soil) | 21.93 | medium | [29] |
Total nitrogen (%) | 0.19 | low | [26] |
Exchangeable potassium (ppm) | 9.98 | very low | [26] |
Available of phosphorus(mg/kg) | 6.45 | very low | [26] |
Sulfur (ppm) | 3.01 | very low | [26] |
Boron (ppm) | 0.61 | Low | [30] |
Zinc (ppm) | 0.34 | very low | [26] |
Varieties | TDMC (%) | SG | Potato tuber size distribution in % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS (<39g) | MS (39-75g) | LS (>75g) | TTY (tha-1) | |||
Belete | 19.05 | 1.097 | 7.5 | 29.56 | 62.94 | 29.41 |
Gudane | 20.43 | 1.092 | 12.24 | 40.42 | 47.34 | 26.27 |
LSD | Ns | Ns | Ns | Ns | Ns | Ns |
Fertilizers | ||||||
Control | 20.19 | 1.08 | 14.79ab | 48.65a | 36.55c | 13.18c |
100%NPK | 21.47 | 1.09 | 15.13a | 31.08cd | 53.78b | 30.94a |
50%NPSZnB | 17.95 | 1.097 | 9.26abc | 41.54ab | 49.2b | 25.38b |
100%NPSZnB | 19.04 | 1.097 | 8.54bc | 36.73bc | 54.73b | 30.86a |
150%NPSZnB | 22.49 | 1.103 | 6.62c | 24.64d | 68.75a | 32.98a |
200%NPSZnB | 17.31 | 1.097 | 4.86c | 27.29cd | 67.84a | 33.12a |
LSD | Ns | Ns | 13.18 | 10.31 | 9.85 | 8.93 |
CV | 15.63 | 1.87 | 55.25 | 22.84 | 26.17 | 13.03 |
RCBD | Randomized Complete Block Design |
CIP | International Potato Center |
pH | Potential of Hydrogen |
[1] | Vollmer, R., Villagaray, R., Cárdenas, J., Castro, M., Chávez, O., Anglin, N. L., & Ellis, D. (2017). A large-scale viability assessment of the potato cryobank at the International Potato Center (CIP). Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 53(4), 309–317. |
[2] | Fernández-López, J., Botella-Martínez, C., de Vera C, N. R., Sayas-Barberá, M. E., Viuda-Martos, M., SánchezZapata, E., & J A, P. Á. (2020). Vegetable soups and creams: Raw materials, processing, health benefits, and innovation trends. Plants, 9(12), 1769. |
[3] | FAOSTAT (2024). Data base of agricultural production. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. |
[4] | Lung’aho C, Lemaga B, Nyongesa M, Gildermacher P, Kinyale P, Demo P, Kabira J (2007). Commercial seed potato production in eastern and central Africa. Kenya Agricultural Institute, 140p. |
[5] | Tolessa, E. S. (2018). Importance, nutrient content and factors affecting nutrient content of potato. American Journal of Food, Nutrition and Health, 3(3). |
[6] | Desta B., Girma A. and Amsalu G, 2020. Effects of chemical fertilizer types and rates on tuber yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Assosa, Western Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science, 14(4): 155-164. |
[7] | CSA (Central statistical agency). 2017. Agricultural sample survey 2016/2017. Vol. I. Report on farm management practices (private peasant holdings, meher season). Statistical Bulletin 584, Central Statistical Agency. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[8] | Arsenault, W.J., LeBlanc, D. A., Tai, G. C. C., and Boswall P. 2001. Effects of nitrogen application and seed piece spacing on yield and tuber size distribution in eight potato cultivars. American Journal of Potato Research 78: pp. 301-309. |
[9] | Bekabil F, Befekadu B, Rupert S, Tareke B (2011). Strengthening the teff Value Chain in Ethiopia (Unpublished Report). pp. 12. Agricultural Transformation Agency. |
[10] | Pervez, M. A., Ayyub, C. M., Shaheen, M. R., & Noor, M. A. (2013). Determination of physiomorphological characteristics of potato crop regulated by potassium management. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 50(4). |
[11] | EARO (2004). Research Strategy Document for Assosa Agricultural Research Center, Benishangul Gumuz National Regional State. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 1-6. |
[12] | ATA (Agricultural Transformation Agency). 2016. Transforming the use of fertilizer in Ethiopia: Launching the national fertilizer blending program, Addis Ababa. |
[13] | Ryan J, Rashid A. Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual. Second edition. Jointly published by the international center for agricultural research in the dry areas (ICARDA) and the National Agricultural Research Center (NARC). Available from ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria. 2001;172. |
[14] | Motsara MR, Roy RN. Guide to Laboratory Establishments for Plant nutrient Analysis: Rome, FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 19, 2008. pp 1-204. |
[15] | Jackson M (1967). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi. |
[16] | Page AL (1982). Methods of soil analysis. Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison. |
[17] | Walkley A, Black AC (1934). An examination of the DEGTJAREFF method for western Potato Council. 2003. Botany of the potato plant. Adaptation from Guide to Commercial Potato Production on the Canadian Prairies. |
[18] | Dewis J, Fraitas P (1984). Physical and chemical methods of soil and water analysis. FAO Bulletin, No. 10, Rome 275p. |
[19] | Hesse PR (1971). A Text Book of Soil Chemical Analysis, 1st edition, Michigan University. Chemical Publishing Company, 1972, Pp1-520. |
[20] | Olsen SR, Cole CW, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954). Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate circular 939, US. Department of Agriculture. |
[21] | Kleinkopf, G. E., Westermann, D. T., Wille, M. J. et al. Specific gravity of Russet Burbank potatoes. American Potato Journal 64, 579–587 (1987). |
[22] | William MA, Woodbury GW (1968). Specific gravity dry matter relationship and reducing sugar changes affected by potato variety, production area and storage. American Potato Journal 45(4): 119-131. |
[23] | SAS (Statistical Analysis System Institute). 2004. SAS statistical guide for personal computers, version 9.0. SAS Institute. |
[24] | Gomez, A. K. and A. A. Gomez., 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edition. An Inter. Research Institute Book, John Willey and Sons Inc., New York. |
[25] | Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Jones CA (2011). Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops 3 Edition., Taylor & Francis Group. Available at: |
[26] | Ethiopia Soil Information System (Ethiosis) (2014). Soil fertility status and fertilizer recommendation atlas for SNNPR state, Ethiopia. |
[27] | FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1990. Guidelines for profile description. 3rd Edition. Rome. |
[28] | Tekalign Tadesse. 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa. |
[29] | Hazelton P. and Murphy B. 2007. Interpreting soil test results: What do all the numbers mean? 2nd Edition. CSIRO Publishing. 152p. |
[30] | Jones, J. B., 2003. Agronomic Handbook: Management of Crops, Soils, and Their Fertility. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 482p. |
[31] | Alemayehu, M., & Jemberie, M. (2018). Optimum rates of NPS fertilizer application for economically profitable production of potato varieties at Koga irrigation scheme, Northwestern Ethiopia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 4(1), 1439663. |
[32] | Mekides Mekashaw , Melkamu Alemayehu , Getachew Shumye & Amare Haileslassie | (2020) Effects of blended NPS fertilizer rates on yield and yield components of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties at Dessie Zuria district, Northeast Ethiopia, Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6: 1, 177947. |
[33] | Seid Hussen Muhie and Tesfanesh Goli 2023. Growth and Yield response of potato (solanum tuberosum l) to organic and blended fertilizers. Potato J 50 (1) 1-9. |
[34] | Zelalem A, Tekalign T, Nigussie D (2009). Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different rates of N and P fertilization on Vertisol at Debre Berhan, in the entral highlands of Ethiopia. African Plant Scientific Journal 3(2): 16-24. |
[35] | Simret B, Nigussie D, Tekalign T (2010). Influence of inorganic nitrogen and potassium fertilizers on seed tuber yield and size distribution of potato. Proceedings of the National Workshop on Seed Potato Tuber Production and Dissemination, 12-14 March 2012. |
[36] | Gezahegn Assefa, Yibekal Alemayehu, Wassu Mohammed. Effects of Blended NPSB Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Related Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties in Oda Bultum District, Eastern Ethiopia. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021, pp. 21-32. |
[37] | Sharma, V. C. and Arora, B. R. 1987. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium application on the yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 108: 321-329. |
APA Style
Bekele, D. (2024). Effects of Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer Rates on Yield and Quality Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L) at Assosa District. World Journal of Applied Chemistry, 9(2), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12
ACS Style
Bekele, D. Effects of Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer Rates on Yield and Quality Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L) at Assosa District. World J. Appl. Chem. 2024, 9(2), 25-32. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12
AMA Style
Bekele D. Effects of Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer Rates on Yield and Quality Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L) at Assosa District. World J Appl Chem. 2024;9(2):25-32. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12
@article{10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12, author = {Desta Bekele}, title = {Effects of Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer Rates on Yield and Quality Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L) at Assosa District }, journal = {World Journal of Applied Chemistry}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {25-32}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjac.20240902.12}, abstract = {Potato is ranked third after rice and wheat in terms of consumption in the world, and first among root and tuber crops. However, the production is limited by several factors including low in soil fertility, lack of improved varieties, inappropriate spacing, and other poor agronomic management. The objective of the present study is to recognize the optimum rate of the blended NPSZnB and potassium fertilizers for profitable production of potato at Assosa area. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with arrangement of split plot in three replications. The main plot consisted of two potato varieties i.e. Belete and Gudane varieties. The subplot consisted of four levels of blended NPSZnB with potassium chloride rates, one recommended NPK (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) and unfertilized plot. The interaction effects of potato tuber size distribution and quality traits were not significantly (P>0.05) affected by different rates of NPSZnB with adjusted nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium chloride fertilizers and different potato varieties. Out of different potato varieties, Belete variety gave the highest yield as compared to Gudane variety. The highest total tuber yield and large sized tuber yield were obtained by the application of 200% NPSZnB (35.4N+70.6P2O5+15.2S+0.5B+4.4Zn) +138 kg K2O ha-1, with adjusted 184.6kg N+ 109.6kg P2O5 per ha therefore, we are tentatively recommended for beneficiaries at Assosa area. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of Blended NPSZnB Fertilizer Rates on Yield and Quality Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L) at Assosa District AU - Desta Bekele Y1 - 2024/07/23 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12 DO - 10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12 T2 - World Journal of Applied Chemistry JF - World Journal of Applied Chemistry JO - World Journal of Applied Chemistry SP - 25 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-5982 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20240902.12 AB - Potato is ranked third after rice and wheat in terms of consumption in the world, and first among root and tuber crops. However, the production is limited by several factors including low in soil fertility, lack of improved varieties, inappropriate spacing, and other poor agronomic management. The objective of the present study is to recognize the optimum rate of the blended NPSZnB and potassium fertilizers for profitable production of potato at Assosa area. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with arrangement of split plot in three replications. The main plot consisted of two potato varieties i.e. Belete and Gudane varieties. The subplot consisted of four levels of blended NPSZnB with potassium chloride rates, one recommended NPK (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) and unfertilized plot. The interaction effects of potato tuber size distribution and quality traits were not significantly (P>0.05) affected by different rates of NPSZnB with adjusted nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium chloride fertilizers and different potato varieties. Out of different potato varieties, Belete variety gave the highest yield as compared to Gudane variety. The highest total tuber yield and large sized tuber yield were obtained by the application of 200% NPSZnB (35.4N+70.6P2O5+15.2S+0.5B+4.4Zn) +138 kg K2O ha-1, with adjusted 184.6kg N+ 109.6kg P2O5 per ha therefore, we are tentatively recommended for beneficiaries at Assosa area. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -