This work aims to study coagulation process for hard Ghrib Dam (GD) water treatment. Conventional coagulation (CC), enhanced coagulation (EC) and alkaline coagulation (AC) experiments were realized on jar tests. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of GD water treatment by the EC process compared to CC. Indeed, by CC, it has been demonstrated that each of the two coagulants studied (alum and FeCl3) is effective for remarkable reductions in OM of 36% and 47.4%, respectively. However, EC, by slightly acidifying water, gave better removal efficiencies of the studied parameters. Indeed, the best abatement of OM is about 78% when water is treated with ferric chloride at pH 5.5, lowered with nitric acid. The observed disadvantage here is the residual nitrate, which existed in the raw water at only low level. On the other hand, at the same pH, the reduction of the OM is 64% when alum is used as coagulant. In addition, the data collected have led to the conclusion that the physicochemical quality of the GD water has a high salinity and lowering its pH (EC) does not affect it at all. On the other hand, its pH elevation (AC) considerably reduces its total hardness which is 41% with NaOH. Such a performance advantageously positions this total hardness reduction technology among the possible solutions to the problems associated with total hardness.
Published in | World Journal of Applied Chemistry (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12 |
Page(s) | 41-55 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Conventional Coagulation (CC), Enhanced Coagulation (EC), Alkaline Coagulation, Alum, Lime; Ferric Chloride
[1] | D. Ghernaout, The Holy Koran Revelation: Iron is a “sent down” metal, Am. J. Environ. Prot. 6 (2017) 101-104. |
[2] | D. Ghernaout, The hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratio vs. dissolved organics removal by coagulation - A review, J. King Saud Univ. – Sci. 26 (2014) 169-180. |
[3] | D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, From chemical disinfection to electrodisinfection: The obligatory itinerary? Desalin. Water Treat. 16 (2010) 156-175. |
[4] | D. Ghernaout, Environmental principles in the Holy Koran and the Sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, Am. J. Environ. Prot. 6 (2017) 75-79. |
[5] | B. Ghernaout, D. Ghernaout, A. Saiba, Algae and cyanotoxins removal by coagulation/flocculation: A review, Desalin. Water Treat. 20 (2010) 133-143. |
[6] | D. Ghernaout, Entropy in the Brownian motion (BM) and coagulation background, Colloid Surface Sci. 2 (2017) 143-161. |
[7] | D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, M. W. Naceur, Embodying the chemical water treatment in the green chemistry – A review, Desalination 271 (2011) 1-10. |
[8] | D. Ghernaout, Water reuse (WR): The ultimate and vital solution for water supply issues, Intern. J. Sustain. Develop. Res. 3 (2017) 36-46. |
[9] | D. Ghernaout, Increasing trends towards drinking water reclamation from treated wastewater, World J. Appl. Chem. 3 (2018) 1-9. |
[10] | D. Ghernaout, Magnetic field generation in the water treatment perspectives: An overview, Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 5 (2018) 193-203. |
[11] | D. Ghernaout, M. Aichouni, A. Alghamdi, Applying Big Data (BD) in water treatment industry: A new era of advance, Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 5 (2018) 89-97. |
[12] | D. Ghernaout, S. Moulay, N. Ait Messaoudene, M. Aichouni, M. W. Naceur, A. Boucherit, Coagulation and chlorination of NOM and algae in water treatment: A review, Intern. J. Environ. Monit. Analy. 2 (2014) 23-34. |
[13] | A. Boucherit, S. Moulay, D. Ghernaout, A. I. Al-Ghonamy, B. Ghernaout, M. W. Naceur, N. Ait Messaoudene, M. Aichouni, A. A. Mahjoubi, N. A. Elboughdiri, New trends in disinfection by-products formation upon water treatment, J. Res. Develop. Chem., 2015, DOI: 10.5171/2015.628833. |
[14] | D. Ghernaout, Water treatment chlorination: An updated mechanistic insight review, Chem. Res. J. 2 (2017) 125-138. |
[15] | D. Ghernaout, Disinfection and DBPs removal in drinking water treatment: A perspective for a green technology, Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 5 (2018) 108-117. |
[16] | D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, A. Kellil, Natural organic matter removal and enhanced coagulation as a link between coagulation and electrocoagulation, Desalin. Water Treat. 2 (2009) 209-228. |
[17] | D. Ghernaout, A. Badis, G. Braikia, N. Matâam, M. Fekhar, B. Ghernaout, A. Boucherit, Enhanced coagulation for algae removal in a typical Algeria water treatment plant, Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 16 (2017) 2303-2315. |
[18] | D. Ghernaout, M. W. Naceur, Ferrate(VI): In situ generation and water treatment – A review, Desalin. Water Treat. 30 (2011) 319-332. |
[19] | D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, On the concept of the future drinking water treatment plant: Algae harvesting from the algal biomass for biodiesel production––A Review, Desalin. Water Treat. 49 (2012) 1-18. |
[20] | D. Ghernaout, The best available technology of water/wastewater treatment and seawater desalination: Simulation of the open sky seawater distillation, Green Sustain. Chem. 3 (2013) 68-88. |
[21] | D. Ghernaout, C. Benblidia, F. Khemici, Microalgae removal from Ghrib Dam (Ain Defla, Algeria) water by electroflotation using stainless steel electrodes, Desalin. Water Treat. 54 (2015) 3328-3337. |
[22] | D. Ghernaout, A. Simoussa, A. Alghamdi, B. Ghernaout, N. Elboughdiri, A. Mahjoubi, M. Aichouni, A. E. A. El-Wakil, Combining lime softening with alum coagulation for hard Ghrib dam water conventional treatment, Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 5 (2018) 61-70. |
[23] | J. Rodier (2009), Analyse de l’eau, (in French), 9th Ed., Dunod, Paris. |
[24] | ISO, https://www.iso.org/home.html (Accessed on 03/05/18). |
[25] | Wikipedia, 2018. Drinking water quality standards, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_water_quality_standards (Accessed on 12/05/18). |
[26] | Wikipedia, 2018. Turbidity, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbidity (Accessed on 12/05/18). |
[27] | D. Ghernaout, M. W. Naceur and A. Aouabed, On the dependence of chlorine by-products generated species formation of the electrode material and applied charge during electrochemical water treatment, Desalination 270 (2011) 9-22. |
[28] | D. Ghernaout, A. I. Al-Ghonamy, A. Boucherit, B. Ghernaout, M. W. Naceur, N. Ait Messaoudene, M. Aichouni, A. A. Mahjoubi, N. A. Elboughdiri, Brownian motion and coagulation process, Am. J. Environ. Prot. 4 (2015) 1-15. |
[29] | D. Ghernaout, C. Laribi, A. Alghamdi, B. Ghernaout, N. Ait Messaoudene, M. Aichouni, Decolorization of BF Cibacete Blue (CB) and Red Solophenyle 3BL (RS) Using Aluminum Sulfate and Ferric Chloride, World J. Appli. Chem. 3 (2018) 32-40. |
[30] | D. Ghernaout, A. I. Al-Ghonamy, M. W. Naceur, A. Boucherit, N. A. Messaoudene, M. Aichouni, A. A. Mahjoubi, N. A. Elboughdiri, Controlling coagulation process: From Zeta potential to streaming potential, Am. J. Environ. Prot. 4 (2015) 16-27. |
[31] | D. Ghernaout, A. Boucherit, Review of coagulation’s rapid mixing for NOM removal, J. Res. Develop. Chem., 2015, DOI: 10.5171/2015.926518. |
[32] | D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, Sweep flocculation as a second form of charge neutralisation – A review, Desalin. Water Treat. 44 (2012) 15-28. |
APA Style
Souaad Djezzar, Djamel Ghernaout, Hakima Cherifi, Abdulaziz Alghamdi, Badia Ghernaout, et al. (2018). Conventional, Enhanced, and Alkaline Coagulation for Hard Ghrib Dam (Algeria) Water. World Journal of Applied Chemistry, 3(2), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12
ACS Style
Souaad Djezzar; Djamel Ghernaout; Hakima Cherifi; Abdulaziz Alghamdi; Badia Ghernaout, et al. Conventional, Enhanced, and Alkaline Coagulation for Hard Ghrib Dam (Algeria) Water. World J. Appl. Chem. 2018, 3(2), 41-55. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12
AMA Style
Souaad Djezzar, Djamel Ghernaout, Hakima Cherifi, Abdulaziz Alghamdi, Badia Ghernaout, et al. Conventional, Enhanced, and Alkaline Coagulation for Hard Ghrib Dam (Algeria) Water. World J Appl Chem. 2018;3(2):41-55. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12
@article{10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12, author = {Souaad Djezzar and Djamel Ghernaout and Hakima Cherifi and Abdulaziz Alghamdi and Badia Ghernaout and Mohamed Aichouni}, title = {Conventional, Enhanced, and Alkaline Coagulation for Hard Ghrib Dam (Algeria) Water}, journal = {World Journal of Applied Chemistry}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {41-55}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjac.20180302.12}, abstract = {This work aims to study coagulation process for hard Ghrib Dam (GD) water treatment. Conventional coagulation (CC), enhanced coagulation (EC) and alkaline coagulation (AC) experiments were realized on jar tests. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of GD water treatment by the EC process compared to CC. Indeed, by CC, it has been demonstrated that each of the two coagulants studied (alum and FeCl3) is effective for remarkable reductions in OM of 36% and 47.4%, respectively. However, EC, by slightly acidifying water, gave better removal efficiencies of the studied parameters. Indeed, the best abatement of OM is about 78% when water is treated with ferric chloride at pH 5.5, lowered with nitric acid. The observed disadvantage here is the residual nitrate, which existed in the raw water at only low level. On the other hand, at the same pH, the reduction of the OM is 64% when alum is used as coagulant. In addition, the data collected have led to the conclusion that the physicochemical quality of the GD water has a high salinity and lowering its pH (EC) does not affect it at all. On the other hand, its pH elevation (AC) considerably reduces its total hardness which is 41% with NaOH. Such a performance advantageously positions this total hardness reduction technology among the possible solutions to the problems associated with total hardness.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Conventional, Enhanced, and Alkaline Coagulation for Hard Ghrib Dam (Algeria) Water AU - Souaad Djezzar AU - Djamel Ghernaout AU - Hakima Cherifi AU - Abdulaziz Alghamdi AU - Badia Ghernaout AU - Mohamed Aichouni Y1 - 2018/06/25 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12 DO - 10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12 T2 - World Journal of Applied Chemistry JF - World Journal of Applied Chemistry JO - World Journal of Applied Chemistry SP - 41 EP - 55 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-5982 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.12 AB - This work aims to study coagulation process for hard Ghrib Dam (GD) water treatment. Conventional coagulation (CC), enhanced coagulation (EC) and alkaline coagulation (AC) experiments were realized on jar tests. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of GD water treatment by the EC process compared to CC. Indeed, by CC, it has been demonstrated that each of the two coagulants studied (alum and FeCl3) is effective for remarkable reductions in OM of 36% and 47.4%, respectively. However, EC, by slightly acidifying water, gave better removal efficiencies of the studied parameters. Indeed, the best abatement of OM is about 78% when water is treated with ferric chloride at pH 5.5, lowered with nitric acid. The observed disadvantage here is the residual nitrate, which existed in the raw water at only low level. On the other hand, at the same pH, the reduction of the OM is 64% when alum is used as coagulant. In addition, the data collected have led to the conclusion that the physicochemical quality of the GD water has a high salinity and lowering its pH (EC) does not affect it at all. On the other hand, its pH elevation (AC) considerably reduces its total hardness which is 41% with NaOH. Such a performance advantageously positions this total hardness reduction technology among the possible solutions to the problems associated with total hardness. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -