Vulnerable regions in particular especially face increased risks in periods of disruptive change. This mechanism is fed by a strongly felt uncertainty about the future, consisting of unprecedented events and is strengthened by an unshakeable faith in past approaches, reinforcing the problems. It is a common response to deal with these risks using traditional planning approaches. In other words, the problem here is that the current ‘regime’ (the set of policy responses) is embedded in the existing landscape of standards, habits, norms and approaches that lead to repetition of former solutions, which are often the obvious ones. This incrementality of the regime is in nature withstanding creative transformations. Unsafe planning is required to overcome a locked-in situation, especially in dynamic circumstances. The Toukomst Groningen project tries to escape this mechanism. In this article the crucial elements to achieve this are investigated and whether this is successful. In the Groningen region incremental planning has led to an increased vulnerability of population, nature and the land. People no longer trust their governments. In this article an alternative approach is investigated giving space to the most peripheric ideas in society, sublimating these into an overall ‘mindblowmap’ and implementing this long-term vision by executing a travelling circus, engaging the local residents in the realisation in order to rebuild local trust.
| Published in | Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-14 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Disruption, Incremental Planning, Transformation, Groningen, Future Visioning, Multi-layer Perspective, Regime Shift, Future Urban Landscape
| [1] | IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C. B., V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, and L. L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 2014; 1132 pp. |
| [2] | Gu, D.; Gerland, P.; Pelletier, F.; Cohen, B. Risks of Exposure and Vulnerability to Natural Disasters at the City Level: A Global Overview. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, USA, 2015; Technical Paper No. 2015/2. |
| [3] | Rosegrant, M. W.; Cline, S. A. Global food security: challenges and policies. Science 2003, 302, 5652, 1917-1919. |
| [4] | Madhav, N.; Oppenheim, B.; Gallivan, M.; Mulembakani, P;, Rubin, E.; Wolfe, N. Pandemics: Risks, Impacts, and Mitigation. In: Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders. Disease Control Priorities, 3rd ed., volume 4; Patel, V., D. Chisholm., T. Dua, R. Laxminarayan, M. E., Medina-Mora, Eds.; World Bank: Washington, DC., USA, 2015; Volume 4: doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0426-7. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO. |
| [5] | Lindblom, C. E. The Science of "Muddling Through". Public Administration Review 19, 2 (Spring, 1959) pp. 79-88. Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the American Society for Public Administration. |
| [6] | Roggema, R. Swarm Planning: The development of a Methodology to Deal with Climate Adaptation. PhD-thesis, Delft University of Technology and Wageningen University and Research Centre. Delft, Wageningen, 2 October 2012. |
| [7] | Roggema, R. The use of spatial planning to increase the resilience for future turbulence in the spatial system of the Groningen region to deal with climate change. Proceedings UKSS-conference, Oxford, UK, 1-3 September 2008. |
| [8] | Roggema, R.; Genel Altinkaya, Ö; Psarra, I. De Toukomst is al lang begonnen. Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen. Groningen, the Netherlands, 2020. |
| [9] | Ten Hooven, M. No doom image but a green image (Geen doembeeld maar een groen beeld, in Dutch). Vrij Nederland 2020 144, 17-18 18-23. |
| [10] | Batty, M. Building a science of cities. Cities 2012, 29, Supplement 1 S9-S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008 |
| [11] | Roggema, R;, Vermeend, T.; Van den Dobbelsteen, A. Incremental change, transition or transformation? Optimising change pathways for climate adaptation in spatial planning. Sustainability 2012, 4 2525-2549. |
| [12] | Gunder, M. Fake it until you make it, and then… Planning Theory 2011, 10, 3 201–212. |
| [13] | Davy B. Plan it without a condom! Planning Theory 2008, 7, 3 301–317. |
| [14] | Miraftab, F. Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the Global South. Planning Theory 2009, 8, 1 32–50. |
| [15] | Boelens, L. Theorizing practice and practising theory: outlines for an actor- relational - approach in planning. Planning Theory 2010, 9, 1 28–62. |
| [16] | Newman, S. Post-anarchism and space: Revolutionary fantasies and autonomous zones. Planning Theory 2011 10, 4 344–365. |
| [17] | Chapin III, F. S.; McGuire, A. D.; Ruess, R. W.; Hollingsworth, T. N.; Mack, M. C.; Johnstone, J. F.; Kasischke, E. S.; Euskirchen, E. S.; Jones, J. B.; Jorgenson, M. T.; Kielland, K.; Kofinas, G. P.; Turetsky, M. R.; Yarie, J.; Lloyd, A. H.; Taylor, D. L. Resilience of Alaska’s boreal forest to climatic change. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2010, 40, doi: 10.1139/X10-074. |
| [18] | Geels, F. W.; Kemp, R. Transitions, transformations and reproduction: Dynamics of socio-technical systems. In Flexibility and Stability in Economic Transformation; McKelvey, M., M. Holmén (Eds.). Oxford University Press: New York, USA, 2006, pp. 227-256. |
| [19] | Gunderson, L.; C. S. Holling Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems;. Island Press: Washington DC, USA, 2002. |
| [20] | Folke, C.; Carpenter, S. R.; Walker, B.; Scheffer, M.; Chapin, T.; Rockström, J. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 2010 15, 4 20. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/ |
| [21] | Perez, C. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Edgar Elgar: Cheltenham, 2002. |
| [22] | Ainsworth-Land, G. T. Grow or Die. The Unifying Principle of Transformation, Reissued Edition. John Wiley & Sons: New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, 1986. |
| [23] | Geels, F. W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multilevel perspective and a case study. Research Policy 2002, 31, 1257-1274. |
| [24] | Geels, F. W. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2005, 72, 681-696. |
| [25] | Geels, F. W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2011 1, 24-40. |
| [26] | Kemp, R.,; Rip, A.; Schot, J. W. Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. In Path Dependence and Creation; Garud, R., Karnoe, P. (Eds.) 269- 299. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, 2001. |
| [27] | Geels, F. W.; Schot, J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research policy 2007 36, 3 399-417. |
| [28] | Van der Ploeg, J. D.; Boutna, J.; Rip, A.; Rijkenberg, F. H. J.; Ventura, F.; Wiskerke, J. S. C. On Regimes, Novelties, Niches and Co-Production. In Seeds of Transition. Essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture; Wiskerke, J. S. C., Van der Ploeg, J. D. (Eds.) Royal Van Gorcum: Assen, 2004. |
| [29] | Vos, L. Innovations in Organisational and Community Learning. In The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures; Roggema, R. (Ed.) Springer: Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer, 2013. |
| [30] | Homan, T. Teamleren: Theorie en facilitatie. Academic Service: Schoonhoven, 2001. |
| [31] | Argyris, C.; Schön, D. Theory in practice. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1974. |
| [32] | Argyris, C.; Schön, D. Organizational learning. Addison-Wesley: Reading, 1978. |
| [33] | Argyris, C. On organizational learning. Blackwell Publishers: Cambridge, 1992. |
| [34] | Noordhoff, I.; Melief, M. Routekaart #vrijetoukomst. Digitale special Noorderbreedte, September 2020. URL: https://noorderbreedte.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/NB_Toukomst_Special-DEF.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2020). |
| [35] | Willett, W.; Rockström J.; Loken, B.; Springmann, M.; Lang, T.; Vermeulen, S.; Garnett, T.; Tilman, D.; DeClerck, F.; Wood, A.; Jonell, M.; Clark, M.; Gorden, L. J.; Fanzo, J.; Hawkes, C.; Zurayk, R.; Rivera, J. A.; De Vries, W.; Sibanda, L. M.; Afshin, A.; Chaudhary, A.; Herrero, M.; Augustina, R.; Branca, F.; Lartey, A.; Fan, S.; Crona, B.; Fox, E.; Bignet, V.; Troell, M.; Lindahl, T.; Singh, S.; Cornell, S. E.; Srinath Reddy, K.; Naraïn, S.; Nishtar, S.; Murray, C. J. L. (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet Commissions 2019 393, 10170, 447-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. |
APA Style
Rob Roggema. (2021). Bypassing the Obvious: Implementing Cutting Edge Ideas for Futuring Urban Landscapes. Urban and Regional Planning, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11
ACS Style
Rob Roggema. Bypassing the Obvious: Implementing Cutting Edge Ideas for Futuring Urban Landscapes. Urban Reg. Plan. 2021, 6(1), 1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11
AMA Style
Rob Roggema. Bypassing the Obvious: Implementing Cutting Edge Ideas for Futuring Urban Landscapes. Urban Reg Plan. 2021;6(1):1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11,
author = {Rob Roggema},
title = {Bypassing the Obvious: Implementing Cutting Edge Ideas for Futuring Urban Landscapes},
journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {1-14},
doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20210601.11},
abstract = {Vulnerable regions in particular especially face increased risks in periods of disruptive change. This mechanism is fed by a strongly felt uncertainty about the future, consisting of unprecedented events and is strengthened by an unshakeable faith in past approaches, reinforcing the problems. It is a common response to deal with these risks using traditional planning approaches. In other words, the problem here is that the current ‘regime’ (the set of policy responses) is embedded in the existing landscape of standards, habits, norms and approaches that lead to repetition of former solutions, which are often the obvious ones. This incrementality of the regime is in nature withstanding creative transformations. Unsafe planning is required to overcome a locked-in situation, especially in dynamic circumstances. The Toukomst Groningen project tries to escape this mechanism. In this article the crucial elements to achieve this are investigated and whether this is successful. In the Groningen region incremental planning has led to an increased vulnerability of population, nature and the land. People no longer trust their governments. In this article an alternative approach is investigated giving space to the most peripheric ideas in society, sublimating these into an overall ‘mindblowmap’ and implementing this long-term vision by executing a travelling circus, engaging the local residents in the realisation in order to rebuild local trust.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Bypassing the Obvious: Implementing Cutting Edge Ideas for Futuring Urban Landscapes AU - Rob Roggema Y1 - 2021/01/12 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11 DO - 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11 T2 - Urban and Regional Planning JF - Urban and Regional Planning JO - Urban and Regional Planning SP - 1 EP - 14 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1697 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.11 AB - Vulnerable regions in particular especially face increased risks in periods of disruptive change. This mechanism is fed by a strongly felt uncertainty about the future, consisting of unprecedented events and is strengthened by an unshakeable faith in past approaches, reinforcing the problems. It is a common response to deal with these risks using traditional planning approaches. In other words, the problem here is that the current ‘regime’ (the set of policy responses) is embedded in the existing landscape of standards, habits, norms and approaches that lead to repetition of former solutions, which are often the obvious ones. This incrementality of the regime is in nature withstanding creative transformations. Unsafe planning is required to overcome a locked-in situation, especially in dynamic circumstances. The Toukomst Groningen project tries to escape this mechanism. In this article the crucial elements to achieve this are investigated and whether this is successful. In the Groningen region incremental planning has led to an increased vulnerability of population, nature and the land. People no longer trust their governments. In this article an alternative approach is investigated giving space to the most peripheric ideas in society, sublimating these into an overall ‘mindblowmap’ and implementing this long-term vision by executing a travelling circus, engaging the local residents in the realisation in order to rebuild local trust. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: