The idea and practice of Municipal Solid Waste Management is multifaceted problems that cannot be solved when solutions focuses only on technical performance, but also treated in holistic manner. Hence, the status and types of community engagement in SWM at the study area was addressed in detail as an objective of the study. The study employed descriptive survey research design using quantitative and qualitative data. It applied convenience sampling procedure. The data have been collected through key informants interview, document review, field observation, FGD and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using ordinal regression. This study reveals the following findings. The contribution of the society in different perspectives like finance, material and labor ranging in low status of 61.1%., the formal organizational structure create low status of 65.3%. The capacity building and sensitization aspect accounts to 71.4% with low status in raising the society’s awareness’s and sensitization. Whereas, the FGD pertains that at least there were two waste campaigns at the town administration for awareness creation and cleansing. Most of the respondents accounts 217 (63.8%) do not know the laws, regulations and directives of solid waste; and also the status of community empowerment provides 67.5% low. The formal organizational structures system, roles, and responsibilities has very low and low (65.3%). As a result; LagaTafo LagaDadi town is characterized by poor management of solid waste and low community participation in the process. In consequence, poor SWM is becoming a major threat for health, environment and economic development of the town.
Published in | Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13 |
Page(s) | 15-24 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Community Participation, Municipal Solid Waste, Integrated Solid Waste Management, Awareness Rising
[1] | Adum, A. E. (2013). Bottom-Up Approach to Sustainable Solid Waste Management in African Countries. Germany: Brandenburg Univesity of Technology, Cottubus. |
[2] | Ahmadi, M., Mohammed, A. F., & Kamali, M. (2016). Sustainable Municipal Waste Management Improvement in Tehran Town through Community Participation. International Journal of Waste Resources Volume 6, No. 247, Issue 3; doi: 10.4172/2252-5211.1000247, 1-5. |
[3] | Bryman, A. (2004). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press |
[4] | Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Fourth Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. |
[5] | Elagroudy, S., Warith, M. A., & Zayat, M. E. (2016). Municipal Solid Waste Management and Green Economy. Berlin: Global Young Academy. |
[6] | Finn, K. R. (2007). A Study of the Households' Willingness to Contribute to an Improved Solid Waste Managment Progrma in Kratovo Macedonia. Michigan Technology University. |
[7] | Rangeti I, Tendere T, Guzha E and Gwisai RD (2018). Community Participation, the Missing Link towards Sustainable Solid Waste Management: Lessons from Bindura Town, Zimbabwe. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (2): 018- 028, http://doi.org/10.15580/GJSS.2018.2.050516085. |
[8] | Hayal Desta, Hailu Worku and Aramde Fetene. (2014). Assessment of the Contemporary Municipal Solid Waste Management in Urban Environment: The Case of Addis Ababa, |
[9] | Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610 Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7, 107-122. |
[10] | Mesfin Assefa, Muktar Mohammed. Solid Waste Generation Rate and Characterization Study for Legetafo-Legedadi Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy. Vol. 5, No. 6, 2017, pp. 84-93. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20170506.11 |
[11] | Modak, P. (2016). Municcipal Solid Waste Management: A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development in the 21st Century. Shanghai. |
[12] | Muller, M., & Hoffman, L. (2001). Community Partnerships in Integrated Sustainable Waste Management: Tools for Decision makers experiences from the Urban Waste Expertise Progamme (1995-2001). Nieuwehaven 201, Netherlands: WASTE. |
[13] | Oakely and Marsden (1984). Approaches to participation in rural development. International Labour Office, Geneva, Swizerland. |
[14] | Tracey J. M. McKay, John Tambe-Ddip Mbanda, Michelle Lawton. (2015) Exploring the challenges facing the solid waste sector in Douala, Cameroon. Department of Environmental Science, University of South Africa. |
[15] | Tukahirwa (2010). Civil society participation in urban sanitation and solid waste management in Uganda; The International Journal of Justice and SustainabilityVolume 15, 2010 - Issue. |
[16] | Yakubu, K., & Mado, H. (2018). Assessment of Community Participation in Solid Waste Management in Kaduna Metropolis. ResearchGate, Research Gate. |
APA Style
Mesfin Assefa, Birhanu Girma. (2020). Community Participation in Integrated Solid Waste Management in Legetafo-Legedadi Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Urban and Regional Planning, 5(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13
ACS Style
Mesfin Assefa; Birhanu Girma. Community Participation in Integrated Solid Waste Management in Legetafo-Legedadi Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Urban Reg. Plan. 2020, 5(1), 15-24. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13
AMA Style
Mesfin Assefa, Birhanu Girma. Community Participation in Integrated Solid Waste Management in Legetafo-Legedadi Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Urban Reg Plan. 2020;5(1):15-24. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13
@article{10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13, author = {Mesfin Assefa and Birhanu Girma}, title = {Community Participation in Integrated Solid Waste Management in Legetafo-Legedadi Town, Oromia, Ethiopia}, journal = {Urban and Regional Planning}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {15-24}, doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20200501.13}, abstract = {The idea and practice of Municipal Solid Waste Management is multifaceted problems that cannot be solved when solutions focuses only on technical performance, but also treated in holistic manner. Hence, the status and types of community engagement in SWM at the study area was addressed in detail as an objective of the study. The study employed descriptive survey research design using quantitative and qualitative data. It applied convenience sampling procedure. The data have been collected through key informants interview, document review, field observation, FGD and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using ordinal regression. This study reveals the following findings. The contribution of the society in different perspectives like finance, material and labor ranging in low status of 61.1%., the formal organizational structure create low status of 65.3%. The capacity building and sensitization aspect accounts to 71.4% with low status in raising the society’s awareness’s and sensitization. Whereas, the FGD pertains that at least there were two waste campaigns at the town administration for awareness creation and cleansing. Most of the respondents accounts 217 (63.8%) do not know the laws, regulations and directives of solid waste; and also the status of community empowerment provides 67.5% low. The formal organizational structures system, roles, and responsibilities has very low and low (65.3%). As a result; LagaTafo LagaDadi town is characterized by poor management of solid waste and low community participation in the process. In consequence, poor SWM is becoming a major threat for health, environment and economic development of the town.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Community Participation in Integrated Solid Waste Management in Legetafo-Legedadi Town, Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Mesfin Assefa AU - Birhanu Girma Y1 - 2020/03/17 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13 DO - 10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13 T2 - Urban and Regional Planning JF - Urban and Regional Planning JO - Urban and Regional Planning SP - 15 EP - 24 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1697 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20200501.13 AB - The idea and practice of Municipal Solid Waste Management is multifaceted problems that cannot be solved when solutions focuses only on technical performance, but also treated in holistic manner. Hence, the status and types of community engagement in SWM at the study area was addressed in detail as an objective of the study. The study employed descriptive survey research design using quantitative and qualitative data. It applied convenience sampling procedure. The data have been collected through key informants interview, document review, field observation, FGD and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using ordinal regression. This study reveals the following findings. The contribution of the society in different perspectives like finance, material and labor ranging in low status of 61.1%., the formal organizational structure create low status of 65.3%. The capacity building and sensitization aspect accounts to 71.4% with low status in raising the society’s awareness’s and sensitization. Whereas, the FGD pertains that at least there were two waste campaigns at the town administration for awareness creation and cleansing. Most of the respondents accounts 217 (63.8%) do not know the laws, regulations and directives of solid waste; and also the status of community empowerment provides 67.5% low. The formal organizational structures system, roles, and responsibilities has very low and low (65.3%). As a result; LagaTafo LagaDadi town is characterized by poor management of solid waste and low community participation in the process. In consequence, poor SWM is becoming a major threat for health, environment and economic development of the town. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -