| Peer-Reviewed

Assessment of Metropolitan Environment Sustainability with Use of Ecological Footprint Index (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis)

Received: 22 April 2016     Accepted: 4 May 2016     Published: 1 June 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Sustainable development is an environmental reaction to traditional development patterns emphasis on coordinating development in the economic, social and environmental dimensions simultaneously. It specially takes two fundamental principles of natural resources preservation and observance of people’s rights in future satisfaction of the natural resources into consideration. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators for measuring sustainable development for many communities have been provided that one of the most efficient of them is ecological footprint index. This index is an introduction to environmental planning which is one of the crucial pillars to reach the maintainable environmental growth. Ecological footprint is applied to measure the progress of societies in to the sustainability. So far, the value of the ecological footprint in different levels global, national and regional have been estimated. The article outlines the “Evaluation on the Sustainability of Metropolitan Environment by Ecological Footprint Index”. Due to the growth of environmental problems, rapid development of urban area without planning, population grow of the city, changing in consumption patterns and unstable ecosystem, this study mainly focuses on Tehran metropolis. By considering the scale of the present study, six elements have been considered to estimate ecological footprint. These factors include: electricity, Warming natural gas, water, transportation, garbage and food. The rate of the land consumption for the population’s requirements of Tehran metropolis during 2006 and 2011 has been estimated by use of ecological footprint index. The results have shown that during these five years, the population of Tehran metropolis has raised five percent. Meanwhile, the amount of the ecological footprint index has also increased 22%. The trend illustrates that ecological footprint is not influenced by only the impact of population but also the amount of the wealth, consumption pattern, technology used along with unstable urban development are the main reasons of increasing Tehran metropolis ecological footprint.

Published in Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14
Page(s) 17-22
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Evaluation, Urban Environment, Ecological Footprint, Sustainable Development

References
[1] Asayesh, Hossein. (2002), Principles and methods of rural planning, Payame Noor University Press, Tehran.
[2] Fetros, Mohammad Hasan., Ferdosi, Mahdi and Mehrpeima, Hossein. (2011). The effect of energy intensity and urbanization development on environmental destruction in Iran (integration analysis). Journal of Environmental Studies 60: Pp 13-22.
[3] Food Balance Sheets of Islamic Republic of Iran 2002- 2006, The Ministry of Agriculture Jihad.
[4] Goodarzi, Masoud. (2000). Sustainable development of biological resources (Case Study: Karkheh Dam). Environmental Researches: 30.
[5] Haberl, H. (2006). The Global Socioeconomic Energetic Metabolism as a Sustainability Problem. Energy 31: 87–99.
[6] Hesam, Mahdi; Poorahmad, Ahmad and Ashour, Hadiseh. (2013). Environmental effects of horizontal expansion of city (Case study: Gorgan City). Journal of Environmental Studies, 3: 91-104.
[7] Hosseinzadeh Dalir, Karim and Sasanpour, Farzaneh. (2006). Ecological sustainability of Tehran metropolis. Geographical Research, 83.
[8] Huang, Qing., Ranghui Wang., Zhiyuan Ren., Jing Li and Huizhi Zhang (2007) Regional ecological security assessment based on long periods of ecological footprint analysis, Resources, Conservation and Recycling: 24, 41-51.
[9] Living Planet Report. (2008). Global footprint network, http://assets.panda.org/downloads/living_planet_report.pdf
[10] Majid, Makhdoum. (2005). Ecological economics of biodiversity: application of methods and policies. University of Tehran Press
[11] Manning, R., B. Wang, W. Valliere, S. Lawson, and P. Newman. (2002). Research to Estimate and Manage Carrying Capacity of a Tourist Attraction: A Study of Alcatraz Island. Journal of Sustainable Toursim 10: 388-464.
[12] Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M and Deumling, D. (2004). Establishing national natural capital. accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy 21: 231–246.
[13] Motiei Langaroudi, Hasan. (2003). Rural Planning with an emphasis on Iran, Publications of the Jihad-e Daneshgahi of the Mashhad University, Mashhad.
[14] National Iranian Gas Company, report of Tehran's gas consumption (2006 and 2011).
[15] Pezzetta, W. E and Drossman, D. (2005). The Ecological Footprint of the Colorado College: An Examination of Sustainability.
[16] Poumanyvong, Phetkeo and Kaneko, Shinji. (2010). Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis, Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70 (2), pages 434-444.
[17] Qarkholoo, Mahdi., Hatami Nezhad, Hossein., Baqvand, Akbar and Yalveh, Mostafa. (2013). Evaluating the sustainability of urban development with ecological footprint method (Case Study: Kermanshah City). Human Geography Research Quarterly. Pp 105-120.
[18] Rees, W. E. and M. Wackernagel. (1996) Urban Ecological Footprints: Why Cities Cannot be Sustainable and Why They are a Key to Sustainability, Environmental Impact Assess Review, 16: 223-248.
[19] Samadpoor, Parimah and Faryadi, Shahrzad. (2008). Determination of the ecological footprint in high density urban areas (Case Study: Elahieh district, Tehran). Journal of Environmental Studies, 45: Pp 63-73.
[20] Saraei, Mohammad Hossein and zareei Farshad, Abdolhamid, (2011). Sustainability analysis of ecological resources using Ecological Footprint index (Case study: Iran). Geography and Environmental Planning, 41.
[21] Sarafi, Mozafar. (2000). What is a sustainable city? Urban Management, No 4.
[22] Shakour, Ali., Qoreishi, Mohammad Baset., Lashkari, Maryam and Jafari, Mahtab. (2011). Assessment and evaluation of ways of tourism sustainability in Paradise Lost, Bevan mamasani using ecological footprint index. Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, 3: Pp 57-67.
[23] Sheikh azami, Ali., Divsalar, Asadollah. (2010). Comparative study of the effectiveness of ecological footprint in Islamic countries of Southwest Asia and the Western industrialized countries, 4th international congress of the Islamic World Geographers.
[24] Statistical Center of Iran, General Population and Housing Census. www.amar.org
[25] Tehran Water and Wastewater Company, report of the Tehran water consumption (2006 and 2011).
[26] Tehran Electricity Distribution Company, report of Tehran's electricity consumption (2006 and 2011).
[27] Turner, R. Kerry, David Pearce, and Ian Bateman. Environmental economics: an elementary introduction Translated by Siavash Dehghanian et al. (2002), Publications of the Jihad-e Daneshgahi of the Mashhad University.
[28] UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2006). Human Development Report (2006). Palgrave Macmillan, New York, USA. hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/ (accessed 10.10.10).
[29] UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2007). GEO4 Global Environment Outlook: Environment for Development. Progress Press Ltd., Malta.
[30] V. Niccolucci., E. Tiezzi., F. M. Pulselli., C. Capineri. (2012). Biocapacity vs Ecological Footprint of world regions: A geopolitical interpretation. Ecological Indictors. Elsevier. 16: 23-30.
[31] Wackernagel, M and Yount, J. D. (2000). Footprints for Sustainability: The Next Steps. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2: 21-42.
[32] Wackernagel, Mathis, Chad Monfreda, and Diana Deumling (2002) Ecological Footprint of Nations - November 2002 Update: How Much Nature Do They Use? How Much Nature Do They Have? Edefining Progress for People, Nature, and the Economy. Oakland, CA: Sustainability Issue Brief.
[33] Wackernagel, M and Rees, W. E. (1996). Our Ecological footprint: Reducing the human impact on earth. New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, PA.
[34] Waste Management Organization, Tehran Municipality (2006 and 2011). report of the amount of waste generated in Tehran.
[35] WWF (WWF International), Global Footprint Network, ZSL (Zoological Society of London). (2010). Living Planet Report (2010). WWF, Gland, Switzerland. ISBN 978-2-940443-08-6. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/lpr2010.pdf (accessed 13.10.10).
[36] http://www.footprintnetwork.or./en/index.php/GFN/page/ecological_footprint_atlas (2010).
[37] http://www.fao.org. (2012). Food and Agriculture Indicators
[38] http://www.economist.com. (2014).
[39] http://www.RedefiningProgress.org
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mohammad Javad Amiri, Shahrzad Bouzari, Sepideh Karimi. (2016). Assessment of Metropolitan Environment Sustainability with Use of Ecological Footprint Index (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis). Urban and Regional Planning, 1(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mohammad Javad Amiri; Shahrzad Bouzari; Sepideh Karimi. Assessment of Metropolitan Environment Sustainability with Use of Ecological Footprint Index (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis). Urban Reg. Plan. 2016, 1(1), 17-22. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mohammad Javad Amiri, Shahrzad Bouzari, Sepideh Karimi. Assessment of Metropolitan Environment Sustainability with Use of Ecological Footprint Index (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis). Urban Reg Plan. 2016;1(1):17-22. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14,
      author = {Mohammad Javad Amiri and Shahrzad Bouzari and Sepideh Karimi},
      title = {Assessment of Metropolitan Environment Sustainability with Use of Ecological Footprint Index (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis)},
      journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
      volume = {1},
      number = {1},
      pages = {17-22},
      doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20160101.14},
      abstract = {Sustainable development is an environmental reaction to traditional development patterns emphasis on coordinating development in the economic, social and environmental dimensions simultaneously. It specially takes two fundamental principles of natural resources preservation and observance of people’s rights in future satisfaction of the natural resources into consideration. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators for measuring sustainable development for many communities have been provided that one of the most efficient of them is ecological footprint index. This index is an introduction to environmental planning which is one of the crucial pillars to reach the maintainable environmental growth. Ecological footprint is applied to measure the progress of societies in to the sustainability. So far, the value of the ecological footprint in different levels global, national and regional have been estimated. The article outlines the “Evaluation on the Sustainability of Metropolitan Environment by Ecological Footprint Index”. Due to the growth of environmental problems, rapid development of urban area without planning, population grow of the city, changing in consumption patterns and unstable ecosystem, this study mainly focuses on Tehran metropolis. By considering the scale of the present study, six elements have been considered to estimate ecological footprint. These factors include: electricity, Warming natural gas, water, transportation, garbage and food. The rate of the land consumption for the population’s requirements of Tehran metropolis during 2006 and 2011 has been estimated by use of ecological footprint index. The results have shown that during these five years, the population of Tehran metropolis has raised five percent. Meanwhile, the amount of the ecological footprint index has also increased 22%. The trend illustrates that ecological footprint is not influenced by only the impact of population but also the amount of the wealth, consumption pattern, technology used along with unstable urban development are the main reasons of increasing Tehran metropolis ecological footprint.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Assessment of Metropolitan Environment Sustainability with Use of Ecological Footprint Index (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis)
    AU  - Mohammad Javad Amiri
    AU  - Shahrzad Bouzari
    AU  - Sepideh Karimi
    Y1  - 2016/06/01
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14
    T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
    JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
    JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
    SP  - 17
    EP  - 22
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1697
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20160101.14
    AB  - Sustainable development is an environmental reaction to traditional development patterns emphasis on coordinating development in the economic, social and environmental dimensions simultaneously. It specially takes two fundamental principles of natural resources preservation and observance of people’s rights in future satisfaction of the natural resources into consideration. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators for measuring sustainable development for many communities have been provided that one of the most efficient of them is ecological footprint index. This index is an introduction to environmental planning which is one of the crucial pillars to reach the maintainable environmental growth. Ecological footprint is applied to measure the progress of societies in to the sustainability. So far, the value of the ecological footprint in different levels global, national and regional have been estimated. The article outlines the “Evaluation on the Sustainability of Metropolitan Environment by Ecological Footprint Index”. Due to the growth of environmental problems, rapid development of urban area without planning, population grow of the city, changing in consumption patterns and unstable ecosystem, this study mainly focuses on Tehran metropolis. By considering the scale of the present study, six elements have been considered to estimate ecological footprint. These factors include: electricity, Warming natural gas, water, transportation, garbage and food. The rate of the land consumption for the population’s requirements of Tehran metropolis during 2006 and 2011 has been estimated by use of ecological footprint index. The results have shown that during these five years, the population of Tehran metropolis has raised five percent. Meanwhile, the amount of the ecological footprint index has also increased 22%. The trend illustrates that ecological footprint is not influenced by only the impact of population but also the amount of the wealth, consumption pattern, technology used along with unstable urban development are the main reasons of increasing Tehran metropolis ecological footprint.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

  • Environmental Planning, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

  • Environmental Planning, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

  • Sections