Kutul Amare was the second greatest victory won by the Turks during the First World War after Çanakkale This article tells you about the war from an objective perspective, how and why the war was finally politically won by the British, who was in charge at the time, how did the war progressed and how certain things changed during the time of this war, the imprisoning of the British soldiers in Yozgat City, This is what exactly makes this war so important and interesting. The (weak/ill-so called by the Europeans at those times) Ottoman forces withdrew and reinforced “Selman-i Pak”, under the command of Colonel 'Bearded Nurettin Bey'. While the reinforcement continued, Mirliva-the Major General- Halil Pasha the Uncle of Enver Pasa, entered the frontline with a corps and changed the course of the battle. General Townshend, with 4500 loss regressed to Kutu'l-Amare. The Turks had a different notion of what constitutes "humane treatment" and, as they treated their own soldiers with extreme brutality, saw no reason to pamper their captives. It is recorded that: about 1,750 men had died from wounds or disease during the siege. Some 2,600 British and 9,300 Indian other ranks were rounded up and marched away. Two-thirds of the British and about a seventh of the Indians never saw their homes again. Relative to the numbers of men involved, the British losses at Kut dwarfs those of the far bigger battles on the Western Front. And some British prisoners were even got to Yozgat City to Turkey and were treated in humane manners.
Published in | Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies (Volume 5, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11 |
Page(s) | 46-52 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Kut’ül Amare, Victory, British, Prisoners, War, Yozgat City
[1] | Days of Yozgat (1916-17) of a Kutul Amare War Prisoner (Major E. W. C. Sandes) - İsmet Üzen, M. Şah Özcan-1st International Bozok Semp.5-7 May, 2016. |
[2] | “The Road to Endore-“E. H. John Lane Company 1920. |
[3] | Edward J. Erickson, Ottoman Army Effectiveness in World War I: A comparative study, Routledge, 2007, ISBN 978-0-415-77099-6, p. 93. |
[4] | Spooner, Reverend H. Private Papers; Imperial War Museum Documents 7308. Entry for the 16th April 1916 (quoted by Rogan 2016 p. 263). |
[5] | New York The James A. McCann Comp., Major General Charles Mere Townshead, digitized by the New York Public Library, 1944. |
[6] | http://www.karar.com/yazarlar/hakan-albayrak/su-kizgin-topragin-gunesli-semasinda-890. |
[7] | Herbert, Edwin (2003). Small Wars and Skirmishes 1902–1918: Early Twentieth-Century Colonial Campaigns in Africa, Asia and the Americas. Nottingham, Foundry Books Publications. ISBN 1-901543-05-6. |
[8] | Qureshi, M Naeem (1999). Pan-Islam in British Indian Politics: A Study of the Khilafat Movement, 1918-1924. Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 90-04-11371-1. |
[9] | Rogan, Eugene (2016). The fall of the Ottomans. Penguin Books. |
[10] | Spackman, Tony, ed. (2008). Captured at Kut, Prisoner of the Turks: The Great War Diaries of Colonel W. C. Spackman. Pen & Sword Military. ISBN 978-184415873-7. |
[11] | The Tragedy of Kut-The Guardian News Media 2019. |
[12] | Barber, Major Charles H. (1917). Besieged in Kut–and After. Blackwood. |
[13] | Braddon, Russell (1970) [1969]. The Siege. Viking Adult. ISBN 0-670-64386-6. Sykes, Peter (1921). "South Persia and the Great War". The Geographical Journal. Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Royal Geographical Society. 58 (2): 101–116. Doi: 10.2307/1781457. ISSN. |
[14] | Davis, Paul K. (1994). Ends and Means: the British Mesopotamian Campaign and Commission. Associated University Presses. A Forgotten History: The Kutul Amare Siege, The Priren Digital Post, 2019. |
[15] | World Bulletin. Historical Events-‘A Forgotten Victory: Kutul Amare Siege’5 October 2015. |
APA Style
Mehmet Ertug Yavuz. (2020). A Forgotten Siege the Kutul Amare Victory and the British Soldiers in Yozgat City. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 5(3), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11
ACS Style
Mehmet Ertug Yavuz. A Forgotten Siege the Kutul Amare Victory and the British Soldiers in Yozgat City. Teach. Educ. Curric. Stud. 2020, 5(3), 46-52. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11
AMA Style
Mehmet Ertug Yavuz. A Forgotten Siege the Kutul Amare Victory and the British Soldiers in Yozgat City. Teach Educ Curric Stud. 2020;5(3):46-52. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11
@article{10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11, author = {Mehmet Ertug Yavuz}, title = {A Forgotten Siege the Kutul Amare Victory and the British Soldiers in Yozgat City}, journal = {Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies}, volume = {5}, number = {3}, pages = {46-52}, doi = {10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.tecs.20200503.11}, abstract = {Kutul Amare was the second greatest victory won by the Turks during the First World War after Çanakkale This article tells you about the war from an objective perspective, how and why the war was finally politically won by the British, who was in charge at the time, how did the war progressed and how certain things changed during the time of this war, the imprisoning of the British soldiers in Yozgat City, This is what exactly makes this war so important and interesting. The (weak/ill-so called by the Europeans at those times) Ottoman forces withdrew and reinforced “Selman-i Pak”, under the command of Colonel 'Bearded Nurettin Bey'. While the reinforcement continued, Mirliva-the Major General- Halil Pasha the Uncle of Enver Pasa, entered the frontline with a corps and changed the course of the battle. General Townshend, with 4500 loss regressed to Kutu'l-Amare. The Turks had a different notion of what constitutes "humane treatment" and, as they treated their own soldiers with extreme brutality, saw no reason to pamper their captives. It is recorded that: about 1,750 men had died from wounds or disease during the siege. Some 2,600 British and 9,300 Indian other ranks were rounded up and marched away. Two-thirds of the British and about a seventh of the Indians never saw their homes again. Relative to the numbers of men involved, the British losses at Kut dwarfs those of the far bigger battles on the Western Front. And some British prisoners were even got to Yozgat City to Turkey and were treated in humane manners.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Forgotten Siege the Kutul Amare Victory and the British Soldiers in Yozgat City AU - Mehmet Ertug Yavuz Y1 - 2020/06/20 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11 DO - 10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11 T2 - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies JF - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies JO - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies SP - 46 EP - 52 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-4971 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.11 AB - Kutul Amare was the second greatest victory won by the Turks during the First World War after Çanakkale This article tells you about the war from an objective perspective, how and why the war was finally politically won by the British, who was in charge at the time, how did the war progressed and how certain things changed during the time of this war, the imprisoning of the British soldiers in Yozgat City, This is what exactly makes this war so important and interesting. The (weak/ill-so called by the Europeans at those times) Ottoman forces withdrew and reinforced “Selman-i Pak”, under the command of Colonel 'Bearded Nurettin Bey'. While the reinforcement continued, Mirliva-the Major General- Halil Pasha the Uncle of Enver Pasa, entered the frontline with a corps and changed the course of the battle. General Townshend, with 4500 loss regressed to Kutu'l-Amare. The Turks had a different notion of what constitutes "humane treatment" and, as they treated their own soldiers with extreme brutality, saw no reason to pamper their captives. It is recorded that: about 1,750 men had died from wounds or disease during the siege. Some 2,600 British and 9,300 Indian other ranks were rounded up and marched away. Two-thirds of the British and about a seventh of the Indians never saw their homes again. Relative to the numbers of men involved, the British losses at Kut dwarfs those of the far bigger battles on the Western Front. And some British prisoners were even got to Yozgat City to Turkey and were treated in humane manners. VL - 5 IS - 3 ER -