Earthquake is a most disaster event, responsible a lot of structural damage and casualties worldwide on the earth’s surface without any early warning. The trends in using dampers in buildings and tall buildings, increasing yearly based on their outstanding feature during an earthquake event. Typically, there are four types of energy dissipation device system such as friction damper, viscous damper, viscoelastic damper and metallic damper. The theoretical and experimental study results indicate that all fourth types of dampers can be able to minimize the structural damages and cracking during an earthquake occurrence event. But only viscous damper device has an acceptable feature against of earthquake forces as compare to other kinds of damper devices in symmetric and asymmetric building plan configurations as well. Based on the reviews, a viscous damper device system plays major role in reducing the lateral displacement of buildings about 30% to 85%, inter-storey drift of building about 60% to 80% and 1487.82KN drop in base shear of structural components in symmetric and asymmetric building plan configurations upward as compared to friction dampers, viscoelastic dampers and metallic dampers. Contradictory, dampers can decrease the construction cost limitation of multi-storey structures economically rather than conventional buildings.
Published in | Science Research (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12 |
Page(s) | 8-12 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Friction Damper, Viscous Damper, Viscoelastic Damper and Metallic Damper
[1] | G. Huadong, Understanding of global nature disasters and the role of earth observation, International Journal Digital Earth, (2010), 3, 221-230. |
[2] | Y. Burak, S. Erkut and O. Onur, Earthquakes and structural damages, Tectonic Hazards and Risk Mitigation (2017), 320-339. |
[3] | L. Hongani and H. Linshing, Advances in structural control in Civil Engineering in China, Mathematical problems in Engineering, (2010). |
[4] | S. Punneth and B. Praven, Study on the effect of viscous damper for RCC fame structure, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, (2016), 05, 31-36. |
[5] | A. Jorge, Cortes-Ramirez and M. Martinez, Characterization, modelling and simulation of magnetorheological damper behavior under triangular excitation, Mechatronic Safety, Security Dependability in a new era, (2007). |
[6] | T. Tabassum and S. A. Khodaker, Seismic Performance of dampers installed in high rise steel building in Bangladesh, Journal of Civil Engineering Science and Technology, (2018), 2. |
[7] | V. Chachpara, P. V. Patel and S. P. Purhit, Seismic response control of the buildings passive devices, International Conference on Current Trends in Technology, (2011). |
[8] | V. Sunitha, H. Eramma and Madhukaran, Comparative study of RC building with different bracing system and friction dampers, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, (2019), 6, 1143-1151. |
[9] | H. Alireza. and D. Jahad, Types of dampers and their performance during an earthquake, International Research Journal of Environmental Science, (2015), 21. |
[10] | W. Xiaoli, G. Wei, H. Ping and B. Dan, Seismic performance evaluation of building-damper system under near fault earthquake, Shock and Vibration, (2020), 21. |
[11] | M. Landge and P. Joshi, Comparative study of various types of dampers used for multi-story RCC building, International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Technology, (2017), 5, 639-651. |
[12] | M. Anshul, R. Tathagata and M. Vasant, Effectiveness of dampers in seismic and wind response control of connected adjacent steel buildings, Shock and vibration, (2020), 21, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8304359. |
[13] | K. Usha and H. Prabhakara, Studies on effect of friction dampers on the seismic performance of RC multi-story building, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, (2017), 04, 612-617. |
[14] | P. Abhihitsinh, P. Vidh, K. Bhrugu and P. Mittal, Seismic response control of asymmetric building using viscous damper, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, (2014), 5, 267-276. |
[15] | Z. Yousef, S. Rasoul, M. B. Mahdizadeh, S. Dehghan, Evaluation of performance of viscoelastic dampers in reduction seismic base shear structures in near fault earthquakes using non-linear time history analysis, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, (2012), 2, 1538-1545. |
[16] | U. Vijay, P. Kannan. R and P. Ravichandran, Seismic response control of RC structure using viscoelastic damper, Indian Journal of science and Technology, (2015), 8, 28. |
[17] | B. Amando, E. David, Julio and P. Hermis, New metallic damper with multiphase behavior for seismic protection of structures, (2021), 29. |
[18] | B. Roman and R. Dipti, using metallic dampers to improve seismic performance of soft-story RC frames: Experimental and numerical study, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facility, (2018), 33. |
[19] | A. Majid, D. Hala, H. Jaffer and F. Mahmoud, Effectiveness of friction dampers on the seismic behavior of high rise building shear wall system, Willy, (2019), 1-14. |
[20] | Z. Wei, Application research of liquid viscous damper in controllable structures, IOP conf. series: Material Science and Engineering, (2019), 592, 012062. |
[21] | https://www.google.com/search?q=metallic+damper&sxsrf=AOaemvJ4lcaMXRuFvgwEqAfEjZO3emdZ. |
APA Style
Najia Karimi, Nasiba Fakor, Shima Shahswar Kaihan. (2023). Seismic Behavior of Multi-Storey Structure Using Different Energy Dissipation Devices A-review. Science Research, 11(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12
ACS Style
Najia Karimi; Nasiba Fakor; Shima Shahswar Kaihan. Seismic Behavior of Multi-Storey Structure Using Different Energy Dissipation Devices A-review. Sci. Res. 2023, 11(1), 8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12
AMA Style
Najia Karimi, Nasiba Fakor, Shima Shahswar Kaihan. Seismic Behavior of Multi-Storey Structure Using Different Energy Dissipation Devices A-review. Sci Res. 2023;11(1):8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12
@article{10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12, author = {Najia Karimi and Nasiba Fakor and Shima Shahswar Kaihan}, title = {Seismic Behavior of Multi-Storey Structure Using Different Energy Dissipation Devices A-review}, journal = {Science Research}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {8-12}, doi = {10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sr.20231101.12}, abstract = {Earthquake is a most disaster event, responsible a lot of structural damage and casualties worldwide on the earth’s surface without any early warning. The trends in using dampers in buildings and tall buildings, increasing yearly based on their outstanding feature during an earthquake event. Typically, there are four types of energy dissipation device system such as friction damper, viscous damper, viscoelastic damper and metallic damper. The theoretical and experimental study results indicate that all fourth types of dampers can be able to minimize the structural damages and cracking during an earthquake occurrence event. But only viscous damper device has an acceptable feature against of earthquake forces as compare to other kinds of damper devices in symmetric and asymmetric building plan configurations as well. Based on the reviews, a viscous damper device system plays major role in reducing the lateral displacement of buildings about 30% to 85%, inter-storey drift of building about 60% to 80% and 1487.82KN drop in base shear of structural components in symmetric and asymmetric building plan configurations upward as compared to friction dampers, viscoelastic dampers and metallic dampers. Contradictory, dampers can decrease the construction cost limitation of multi-storey structures economically rather than conventional buildings.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Seismic Behavior of Multi-Storey Structure Using Different Energy Dissipation Devices A-review AU - Najia Karimi AU - Nasiba Fakor AU - Shima Shahswar Kaihan Y1 - 2023/03/04 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12 T2 - Science Research JF - Science Research JO - Science Research SP - 8 EP - 12 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0927 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20231101.12 AB - Earthquake is a most disaster event, responsible a lot of structural damage and casualties worldwide on the earth’s surface without any early warning. The trends in using dampers in buildings and tall buildings, increasing yearly based on their outstanding feature during an earthquake event. Typically, there are four types of energy dissipation device system such as friction damper, viscous damper, viscoelastic damper and metallic damper. The theoretical and experimental study results indicate that all fourth types of dampers can be able to minimize the structural damages and cracking during an earthquake occurrence event. But only viscous damper device has an acceptable feature against of earthquake forces as compare to other kinds of damper devices in symmetric and asymmetric building plan configurations as well. Based on the reviews, a viscous damper device system plays major role in reducing the lateral displacement of buildings about 30% to 85%, inter-storey drift of building about 60% to 80% and 1487.82KN drop in base shear of structural components in symmetric and asymmetric building plan configurations upward as compared to friction dampers, viscoelastic dampers and metallic dampers. Contradictory, dampers can decrease the construction cost limitation of multi-storey structures economically rather than conventional buildings. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -