Potato production in Ethiopia is constrained by poor soil fertility and limited use of balanced fertilizers. This study evaluated the effects of varying rates of blended NPS (Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur) fertilizer on the growth, yield, and tuber quality of five potato varieties-Belete, Gudanie, Milki, Gera, and CIP 396004.337 (Dagem)-in Mulo District, Oromia. A factorial randomized complete block design with three replications was used to test four NPS rates (0, 100, 200, and 300 kg ha-1). Increasing NPS rates significantly improved aboveground biomass, with Belete reaching 6.5 t ha-1 at 300 kg ha-1. Total and marketable tuber yields also increased, with Belete achieving the highest marketable yield of 30 t ha-1. Higher fertilizer rates enhanced average tuber weight, tubers per plant, and dry matter content, benefiting processing quality. Unmarketable tuber yield declined, while tuber firmness improved, particularly in Belete and Milki, enhancing storage potential. Reducing sugar content decreased with increasing NPS, producing lighter chips suitable for processing. Sprout length was reduced at higher NPS levels, indicating improved tuber dormancy. Among the varieties, Belete consistently outperformed the others, followed by Milki and Gera, while Gudanie and CIP (Dagem) showed moderate performance. These findings highlight the importance of integrating improved potato varieties with optimal NPS fertilization to enhance yield, tuber quality, and farmer income, contributing to sustainable potato production and food security in the region.
| Published in | Science Discovery Plants (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-11 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Potato Production, NPS Fertilizer, Potato Varieties, Tuber Yield, Tuber Quality
Characteristics | Belete (CIP393371.58) | Gudanie (CIP-386423.13) | Gera | Milki (CIP394640.539) | CIP396004.337 (Dagem) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Altitude (m.a.s.l) | 1600–2800 | 1600–2800 | 1600–2800 | 2000–3000 | 2000–3000 |
Rainfall (mm) | 750–1000 | Sufficient rain/irrigation | Sufficient | Sufficient | Sufficient |
Seed rate (t ha-1) | 1.8–2 | 1.8–2 | 1.8–2 | 1.8–2 | 1.8–2 |
DAP rate (kg ha-1) | 195 | 195 | 195 | 195 | 195 |
Urea rate (kg ha-1) | 165 | 165 | 165 | 165 | 165 |
Days to maturity | 110–120 | 120 | ~120 | ~120 | ~120 |
Plant height (cm) | 76 | 60 | ~70 | ~75 | ~72 |
No. of main stems per plant | 5 | 4 | 4–5 | 5 | 5 |
Tuber skin color | Cream/yellow | Light red | White | Light brown | Light yellow |
Tuber shape | Round | Round | Round | Oval-round | Round |
Eye depth | Intermediate | Deep | Shallow | Intermediate | Intermediate |
On-station yield (t ha-1) | 47.19 | 29.17 | 32–37 | 42–49.3 | 33–47 |
Farmer’s field yield (t ha-1) | 28.1 | 21 | 27–30 | 35–43 | 28–40 |
Avg. dry matter content (%) | 25.55 | 24.89 | ~24–25 | ~25 | ~25 |
Pest resistance | Tolerant to late blight | Tolerant to late blight | Resistant | Resistant | Highly resistant |
Year of release | 2009 | 2006 | 2011 | 2012/13 | Under testing |
Treatment Code | Variety | NPS (kg ha-1) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
T1 | Belete | 0 | Belete + 0 kg ha-1 NPS |
T2 | Belete | 100 | Belete + 100 kg ha-1 NPS |
T3 | Belete | 200 | Belete + 200 kg ha-1 NPS |
T4 | Belete | 300 | Belete + 300 kg ha-1 NPS |
T5 | Gudane | 0 | Gudane + 0 kg ha-1 NPS |
T6 | Gudane | 100 | Gudane + 100 kg ha-1 NPS |
T7 | Gudane | 200 | Gudane + 200 kg ha-1 NPS |
T8 | Gudane | 300 | Gudane + 300 kg ha-1 NPS |
T9 | Gera | 0 | Gera + 0 kg ha-1 NPS |
T10 | Gera | 100 | Gera + 100 kg ha-1 NPS |
T11 | Gera | 200 | Gera + 200 kg ha-1 NPS |
T12 | Gera | 300 | Gera + 300 kg ha-1 NPS |
T13 | Milki (CIP 394640.539) | 0 | Milki + 0 kg ha-1 NPS |
T14 | Milki (CIP 394640.539) | 100 | Milki + 100 kg ha-1 NPS |
T15 | Milki (CIP 394640.539) | 200 | Milki + 200 kg ha-1 NPS |
T16 | Milki (CIP 394640.539) | 300 | Milki + 300 kg ha-1 NPS |
T17 | CIP 396004.337 (Dagem) | 0 | Dagem + 0 kg ha-1 NPS |
T18 | CIP 396004.337 (Dagem) | 100 | Dagem + 100 kg ha-1 NPS |
T19 | CIP 396004.337 (Dagem) | 200 | Dagem + 200 kg ha-1 NPS |
T20 | CIP 396004.337 (Dagem) | 300 | Dagem + 300 kg ha-1 NPS |
Variety | Days to 50% Flowering (days) | Physiological Days to 90% Maturity (days) |
|---|---|---|
Belete (CIP393371.58) | 45ᵇ | 112ᵇ |
Gudanie (CIP-386423.13) | 50ᵃ | 120ᵃ |
Gera | 47ᵃᵇ | 117 ᵃᵇ |
Milki (CIP 394640.539) | 48ᵃᵇ | 118ᵃᵇ |
CIP 396004.337 (Dagem) | 43ᶜ | 115ᵇ |
LSD (0.05) | 2.1 | 3.5 |
CV (%) | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Variety | Fertilizer (kg ha-1) | Stems per Hill (no.) | Plant Height (cm) | Leaf Length (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Belete | 0 | 4.5ᵈ | 72.0ᵈ | 16.5ᵈ |
100 | 5.0ᶜ | 76.0ᶜ | 17.5ᶜ | |
200 | 5.2ᵇ | 78.0ᵇ | 18.5ᵇ | |
300 | 5.5ᵃ | 80.0ᵃ | 19.0ᵃ | |
Gudanie | 0 | 3.8ʰ | 58.0ʰ | 13.0ʰ |
100 | 4.0ᵍ | 60.0ᵍ | 14.0ᵍ | |
200 | 4.2ᶠ | 61.0ᶠ | 14.5ᶠ | |
300 | 4.3ᵉ | 62.0ᵉ | 15.0ᵉ | |
Gera | 0 | 4.2ᶠ | 68.0ᶠ | 15.5ᶠ |
100 | 4.5ᵉ | 70.0ᵉ | 16.0ᵉ | |
200 | 4.7ᵈ | 72.0ᵈ | 16.5ᵈ | |
300 | 5.0ᶜ | 74.0ᶜ | 17.0ᶜ | |
Milki | 0 | 4.4ᵉ | 72.0ᵉ | 16.5ᵉ |
100 | 4.7ᵈ | 75.0ᵈ | 17.0ᵈ | |
200 | 5.0ᶜ | 77.0ᶜ | 18.0ᶜ | |
300 | 5.3ᵇ | 79.0ᵇ | 18.5ᵇ | |
CIP 396004.337 (Dagem) | 0 | 4.0ᵍ | 70.0ᵍ | 16.0ᵍ |
100 | 4.2ᶠ | 71.0ᶠ | 16.5ᶠ | |
200 | 4.4ᵉ | 73.0ᵉ | 17.0ᵉ | |
300 | 4.6ᵈ | 75.0ᵈ | 17.5ᵈ | |
LSD (0.05) | 0.42 | 2.5 | 1.2 | |
CV (%) | 6.8% | 4.7% | 7.3% |
Variety | NPS (kg ha-1) | AGB (t ha-1) | TTY (t ha-1) | MTY (t ha-1) | UTY (t ha-1) | ATW (g) | TPP (no.) | DMC (%) | HI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Belete | 0 | 4.8ᵈ | 25.0ᵉ | 20.5ᵉ | 4.5ᵇ | 110ᶜ | 10ᵇᶜ | 25.2ᵃᵇ | 55ᵇᶜ |
100 | 5.6ᶜ | 30.5ᵇ | 26.0ᵇ | 4.5ᵇ | 120ᵇ | 11ᵇ | 25.4ᵃ | 58ᵇ | |
200 | 6.1ᵇ | 33.5ᵃ | 28.5ᵃ | 5.0ᵃ | 125ᵃ | 12ᵃ | 25.5ᵃ | 60ᵃ | |
300 | 6.5ᵃ | 35.6ᵃ | 30.0ᵃ | 5.6ᵃ | 130ᵃ | 12ᵃ | 25.7ᵃ | 62ᵃ | |
Gudanie | 0 | 3.8ᶦ | 20.0ᶦ | 16.5ᶦ | 3.5ᶜ | 85ᵉ | 9ᶜ | 24.1ᶜ | 50ᵈ |
100 | 4.3ʰ | 22.5ᵍ | 18.0ᵍ | 4.5ᵇ | 90ᵈ | 10ᵇᶜ | 24.3ᵇᶜ | 52ᶜᵈ | |
200 | 4.7ᵍ | 24.0ᶠ | 19.5ᶠ | 4.5ᵇ | 95ᶜᵈ | 11ᵇ | 24.4ᵇᶜ | 53ᶜᵈ | |
300 | 5.0ᶠ | 25.8ᵉ | 21.0ᵉ | 4.8ᵃᵇ | 100ᶜ | 11ᵇ | 24.6ᵇᶜ | 54ᵇᶜ | |
Gera | 0 | 4.5ᵍ | 23.0ᶠ | 18.7ᶠ | 4.3ᵇ | 100ᶜ | 11ᵇ | 24.8ᵇ | 54ᵇᶜ |
100 | 5.0ᶠ | 26.0ᵈ | 21.5ᵈ | 4.5ᵇ | 105ᶜ | 12ᵃ | 25.0ᵃᵇ | 56ᵇᶜ | |
200 | 5.4ᵉ | 28.0ᶜ | 23.0ᶜ | 5.0ᵃ | 110ᶜ | 12ᵃ | 25.1ᵃᵇ | 57ᵇ | |
300 | 5.7ᵈ | 29.5ᵇ | 25.0ᵇ | 4.5ᵇ | 115ᵇ | 12ᵃ | 25.3ᵃ | 58ᵇ | |
Milki | 0 | 4.7ᶠ | 24.5ᵉ | 20.0ᵉ | 4.5ᵇ | 105ᶜ | 10ᵇᶜ | 25.0ᵃᵇ | 55ᵇᶜ |
100 | 5.3ᵉ | 28.0ᶜ | 23.0ᶜ | 5.0ᵃ | 110ᶜ | 11ᵇ | 25.2ᵃᵇ | 57ᵇ | |
200 | 5.8ᵇ | 31.0ᵇ | 26.0ᵇ | 5.0ᵃ | 115ᵇ | 12ᵃ | 25.3ᵃ | 59ᵃ | |
300 | 6.2ᵃ | 33.0ᵃ | 28.0ᵃ | 5.0ᵃ | 120ᵇ | 13ᵃ | 25.5ᵃ | 60ᵃ | |
CIP 396004.337 | 0 | 4.2ʰ | 22.0ᵍ | 18.0ᵍ | 4.0ᶜ | 95ᶜᵈ | 10ᵇᶜ | 24.7ᵇ | 53ᶜᵈ |
(Dagem) | 100 | 4.6ᶠ | 24.5ᵉ | 20.0ᵉ | 4.5ᵇ | 100ᶜ | 11ᵇ | 24.9ᵇ | 55ᵇᶜ |
200 | 5.0ᶠ | 26.5ᵈ | 22.0ᵈ | 4.5ᵇ | 105ᶜ | 11ᵇ | 25.0ᵃᵇ | 56ᵇ | |
300 | 5.3ᵉ | 28.0ᶜ | 24.0ᶜ | 4.0ᶜ | 110ᶜ | 12ᵃ | 25.1ᵃᵇ | 57ᵇ | |
LSD (0.05) | 0.45 | 1.20 | 1.10 | 0.80 | 5 | 1 | 0.5 | 2.0 | |
CV (%) | 7.2 | 6.8 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Variety | Fertilizer (kg ha-1) | RSC (%) | TF (N) | CCS (1-5) | SC (%) | MC (%) | SB (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Belete | 0 | 0.18ᵇ | 5.2ᵇ | 2.5ᵇ | 22.0ᵇ | 79.1ᵃ | 3.2ᶜ |
100 | 0.16ᵇ | 5.5ᵇ | 2.2ᵇ | 22.3ᵇ | 78.9ᵃ | 2.9ᵈ | |
200 | 0.15ᶜ | 5.7ᵃ | 2.0ᶜ | 22.7ᵃ | 78.8ᵃ | 2.7ᵈ | |
300 | 0.15ᶜ | 5.8ᵃ | 1.8ᶜ | 22.5ᵃ | 78.7ᵃ | 2.4ᵉ | |
Gudanie | 0 | 0.35ᵃ | 4.0ᶜ | 3.7ᵃ | 19.8ᶜ | 79.3ᵃ | 4.5ᵃ |
100 | 0.33ᵃ | 4.1ᶜ | 3.5ᵃ | 20.0ᶜ | 79.2ᵃ | 4.3ᵇ | |
200 | 0.31ᵇ | 4.2ᶜ | 3.3ᵇ | 20.1ᵇ | 79.0ᵃ | 4.1ᶜ | |
300 | 0.30ᵇ | 4.3ᶜ | 3.1ᵇ | 20.3ᵇ | 78.9ᵃ | 3.8ᵈ | |
Milki | 0 | 0.22ᵇ | 5.0ᵇ | 2.7ᵇ | 21.7ᵇ | 78.8ᵃ | 3.5ᶜ |
100 | 0.20ᵇ | 5.3ᵇ | 2.4ᶜ | 22.0ᵇ | 78.7ᵃ | 3.2ᵈ | |
200 | 0.18ᶜ | 5.5ᵃ | 2.1ᶜ | 22.3ᵃ | 78.6ᵃ | 2.9ᵉ | |
300 | 0.17ᶜ | 5.6ᵃ | 2.0ᶜ | 22.4ᵃ | 78.5ᵃ | 2.7ᵉ | |
Gera | 0 | 0.28ᵃ | 4.5ᶜ | 3.1ᵃ | 20.8ᶜ | 79.0ᵃ | 4.0ᵇ |
100 | 0.26ᵃ | 4.7ᶜ | 2.9ᵇ | 21.0ᵇ | 78.9ᵃ | 3.8ᶜ | |
200 | 0.24ᵇ | 4.8ᵇ | 2.7ᶜ | 21.2ᵇ | 78.8ᵃ | 3.6ᶜ | |
300 | 0.23ᵇ | 5.0ᵇ | 2.5ᶜ | 21.3ᵇ | 78.7ᵃ | 3.4ᶜ | |
CIP 396004.337 | 0 | 0.30ᵃ | 4.3ᶜ | 3.3ᵃ | 20.2ᶜ | 79.1ᵃ | 4.2ᵇ |
(Dagem) | 100 | 0.28ᵃ | 4.5ᶜ | 3.1ᵇ | 20.4ᵇ | 79.0ᵃ | 4.0ᶜ |
200 | 0.26ᵇ | 4.7ᵇ | 2.9ᶜ | 20.6ᵇ | 78.9ᵃ | 3.8ᶜ | |
300 | 0.25ᵇ | 4.9ᵇ | 2.7ᶜ | 20.8ᵇ | 78.8ᵃ | 3.5ᶜ | |
LSD (5%) | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | |
CV (%) | 6.5% | 7.2% | 8.0% | 5.4% | 3.8% | 9.0% | |
AGB | Aboveground Biomass |
ADBMY | Aboveground Dry Biomass Yield |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
ATW | Average Tuber Weight |
CCS | Chip Color Score |
CIP | International Potato Center |
CSA | Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia |
CV | Coefficient of Variation |
DAP | Diammonium Phosphate |
DMC | Dry Matter Content |
HI | Harvest Index |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
MC | Moisture Content |
MTY | Marketable Tuber Yield |
SB | Sprouting Behavior |
SC | Starch Content |
TF | Tuber Firmness |
TPP | Tubers Per Plant |
TSD | Tuber Size Distribution |
| [1] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2023). FAOSTAT statistical database on crops and livestock products. Rome, Italy: FAO.FAOSTAT. (2024). Crop Production Statistics: Potato. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. |
| [2] | Woldemariam, T., Yirga, C., & Negash, M. (2023). Factors affecting potato productivity in Ethiopia: A review. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 15(1), 1–10. |
| [3] | Abebe, T., Mekuria, W., & Tadesse, T. (2022). Nutrient uptake and fertilizer response of potato under different soil fertility conditions in Ethiopia. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 208(2), 123–132. |
| [4] | Tesfaye, A., Tadesse, M., & Bekele, B. (2022). The role of potato in improving food security and income of smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 22(3), 19876–19892. |
| [5] | Mekonnen, A., Belay, T., & Demissie, T. (2021). Nutritional profile and economic importance of potato in Ethiopia: A review. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 6(2), 101–109. |
| [6] | Abebe, T., & Worku, W. (2019). Response of potato to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization under highland conditions of Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(6), 311–319. |
| [7] | International Potato Center (CIP). (2022). Potato variety characteristics and management practices for highland agro-ecologies. Lima, Peru: International Potato Center. |
| [8] | Tesfaye, A., Woldegiorgis, G., & Kaguongo, W. (2008). Improving potato production systems in Ethiopia through integrated nutrient and variety management. Potato Research, 51(3), 239–252. |
| [9] | Mekonnen, A., Tadesse, B., & Abebe, M. (2023). Genotypic variation and agronomic traits associated with flowering and maturity in potato varieties. Journal of Crop Improvement and Protection, 9(1), 88–95. |
| [10] | Kebede, G., Girma, A., & Mekonnen, A. (2020). Soil fertility constraints and fertilizer use in potato production systems in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 30(1), 45–58. |
| [11] | Kaur, G., Singh, J., & Brar, A. (2021). Impact of reducing sugars on acrylamide formation and chip quality in potato. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 45(6), e15532. |
| [12] | Zhou, L., Feng, Y., & Lin, S. (2023). Influence of nitrogen and sulfur nutrition on tuber firmness and postharvest quality of potato. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 193, 112088. |
| [13] | Kebede, H., Yilma, A., & Benti, A. (2024). Influence of maturity duration on yield stability and disease vulnerability of potato cultivars in highland Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 18(1), 52–60. |
APA Style
Deme, A. H., Erandufa, B. A. (2026). Effect of Blended NPS Fertilizer Rates on Growth, Yield and Quality of Potato Varieties at Mulo District, Oromia, Ethiopia. Science Discovery Plants, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11
ACS Style
Deme, A. H.; Erandufa, B. A. Effect of Blended NPS Fertilizer Rates on Growth, Yield and Quality of Potato Varieties at Mulo District, Oromia, Ethiopia. Sci. Discov. Plants 2026, 1(1), 1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11
@article{10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11,
author = {Alemu Hailu Deme and Biratu Abeshu Erandufa},
title = {Effect of Blended NPS Fertilizer Rates on Growth, Yield and Quality of Potato Varieties at Mulo District, Oromia, Ethiopia},
journal = {Science Discovery Plants},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {1-11},
doi = {10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sdplants.20260101.11},
abstract = {Potato production in Ethiopia is constrained by poor soil fertility and limited use of balanced fertilizers. This study evaluated the effects of varying rates of blended NPS (Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur) fertilizer on the growth, yield, and tuber quality of five potato varieties-Belete, Gudanie, Milki, Gera, and CIP 396004.337 (Dagem)-in Mulo District, Oromia. A factorial randomized complete block design with three replications was used to test four NPS rates (0, 100, 200, and 300 kg ha-1). Increasing NPS rates significantly improved aboveground biomass, with Belete reaching 6.5 t ha-1 at 300 kg ha-1. Total and marketable tuber yields also increased, with Belete achieving the highest marketable yield of 30 t ha-1. Higher fertilizer rates enhanced average tuber weight, tubers per plant, and dry matter content, benefiting processing quality. Unmarketable tuber yield declined, while tuber firmness improved, particularly in Belete and Milki, enhancing storage potential. Reducing sugar content decreased with increasing NPS, producing lighter chips suitable for processing. Sprout length was reduced at higher NPS levels, indicating improved tuber dormancy. Among the varieties, Belete consistently outperformed the others, followed by Milki and Gera, while Gudanie and CIP (Dagem) showed moderate performance. These findings highlight the importance of integrating improved potato varieties with optimal NPS fertilization to enhance yield, tuber quality, and farmer income, contributing to sustainable potato production and food security in the region.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Blended NPS Fertilizer Rates on Growth, Yield and Quality of Potato Varieties at Mulo District, Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Alemu Hailu Deme AU - Biratu Abeshu Erandufa Y1 - 2026/02/24 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11 DO - 10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11 T2 - Science Discovery Plants JF - Science Discovery Plants JO - Science Discovery Plants SP - 1 EP - 11 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.11 AB - Potato production in Ethiopia is constrained by poor soil fertility and limited use of balanced fertilizers. This study evaluated the effects of varying rates of blended NPS (Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur) fertilizer on the growth, yield, and tuber quality of five potato varieties-Belete, Gudanie, Milki, Gera, and CIP 396004.337 (Dagem)-in Mulo District, Oromia. A factorial randomized complete block design with three replications was used to test four NPS rates (0, 100, 200, and 300 kg ha-1). Increasing NPS rates significantly improved aboveground biomass, with Belete reaching 6.5 t ha-1 at 300 kg ha-1. Total and marketable tuber yields also increased, with Belete achieving the highest marketable yield of 30 t ha-1. Higher fertilizer rates enhanced average tuber weight, tubers per plant, and dry matter content, benefiting processing quality. Unmarketable tuber yield declined, while tuber firmness improved, particularly in Belete and Milki, enhancing storage potential. Reducing sugar content decreased with increasing NPS, producing lighter chips suitable for processing. Sprout length was reduced at higher NPS levels, indicating improved tuber dormancy. Among the varieties, Belete consistently outperformed the others, followed by Milki and Gera, while Gudanie and CIP (Dagem) showed moderate performance. These findings highlight the importance of integrating improved potato varieties with optimal NPS fertilization to enhance yield, tuber quality, and farmer income, contributing to sustainable potato production and food security in the region. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -