Foam mat drying (FMD) was employed to dry soursop pulp, with the objective of assessing the powder quality parameters. Egg albumen was applied at 3%, 6%, 9%, 12%, and 15% wt/wt and methylcellulose at 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2%, 1.6%, and 2% wt/wt as foaming and stabilizing agents, respectively. The samples were air-dried at different temperatures of 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75°C. The experimental design was determined using central composite. Physicochemical properties of the powders [hygroscopicity, bulk density (BD), pH, water absorption capacity (WAC), total soluble solids (TSS) and color], were evaluated. Additionally, qualitative analysis of the phytochemicals present, such as tannins, alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, and anthocyanins, was conducted. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of tannins, alkaloids, saponins, and flavonoids in soursop powder; anthocyanins were detected at selected drying temperatures indicating their retention under certain drying conditions. Identification of these phytochemicals is important for their potential application in functional foods. pH value ranged from 4.5 to 5.3, and TSS ranged from 3.9 to 6.95 brix. Hygroscopicity increased with increasing methylcellulose content, whereas the color parameters (L*, a*, and b*) were affected by the drying temperature, leading to discoloration during the process. BD, WAC, color, and wettability were significantly affected by drying temperature (p < 0.05). Based on these data, FMD may be considered a viable method for dehydrating soursop pulp; the resulting powder can be readily reconstituted for food formulations. Thus, soursop powder has significant potential for the development of functional foods.
| Published in | Science Discovery Nutrition (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15 |
| Page(s) | 51-67 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Phytochemicals, Egg Albumen, Methylcellulose, Drying Temperature, Functional Foods, Soursop Pulp
Source | Sum of Squares | df | MeanSquare | F-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 0.0763 | 9 | 0.0085 | 4.28 | 0.0165 | significant |
A-Temp | 0.0189 | 1 | 0.0189 | 9.54 | 0.0115 | |
B-Egg | 6.250E-06 | 1 | 6.250E-06 | 0.0032 | 0.9563 | |
C-CMC | 0.0028 | 1 | 0.0028 | 1.39 | 0.2655 | |
AB | 0.0028 | 1 | 0.0028 | 1.42 | 0.2610 | |
AC | 0.0010 | 1 | 0.0010 | 0.5110 | 0.4910 | |
BC | 0.0120 | 1 | 0.0120 | 6.06 | 0.0335 | |
A2 | 0.0225 | 1 | 0.0225 | 11.33 | 0.0072 | |
B2 | 0.0225 | 1 | 0.0225 | 11.33 | 0.0072 | |
C2 | 0.0001 | 1 | 0.0001 | 0.0723 | 0.7935 | |
Residual | 0.0198 | 10 | 0.0020 | |||
Lack of Fit | 0.0198 | 5 | 0.0040 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 0.0961 | 19 |
Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.04 | 9 | 0.1378 | 2.52 | 0.0434 | significant | |
A-Temp | 0.0100 | 1 | 0.0100 | 0.1826 | 0.67821 | |
B-Egg | 0.0625 | 1 | 0.0625 | 1.14 | 0.03105 | |
C-CMC | 0.1225 | 1 | 0.1225 | 2.24 | 0.01657 | |
AB | 0.0450 | 1 | 0.0450 | 0.8216 | 0.3860 | |
AC | 0.0050 | 1 | 0.0050 | 0.0913 | 0.7687 | |
BC | 0.0450 | 1 | 0.0450 | 0.8216 | 0.3860 | |
A2 | 0.7901 | 1 | 0.7901 | 14.43 | 0.0035 | |
B2 | 0.3312 | 1 | 0.3312 | 6.05 | 0.0337 | |
C2 | 0.1055 | 1 | 0.1055 | 1.93 | 0.1953 | |
Residual | 0.5477 | 10 | 0.0548 | |||
Lack of Fit | 0.5477 | 5 | 0.1095 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 1.79 | 19 |
Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 1.41 | 9 | 0.1572 | 9.05 | 0.0010 | significant |
A-Temp | 0.0260 | 1 | 0.0260 | 1.50 | 0.2491 | |
B-Egg | 0.0375 | 1 | 0.0375 | 2.16 | 0.1722 | |
C-CMC | 0.6380 | 1 | 0.6380 | 36.74 | 0.0001 | |
AB | 0.0458 | 1 | 0.0458 | 2.64 | 0.1356 | |
AC | 0.0248 | 1 | 0.0248 | 1.43 | 0.2600 | |
BC | 0.4442 | 1 | 0.4442 | 25.58 | 0.0005 | |
A2 | 0.1153 | 1 | 0.1153 | 6.64 | 0.0275 | |
B2 | 0.0315 | 1 | 0.0315 | 1.81 | 0.2077 | |
C2 | 0.0098 | 1 | 0.0098 | 0.5661 | 0.4691 | |
Residual | 0.1736 | 10 | 0.0174 | |||
Lack of Fit | 0.1736 | 5 | 0.0347 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 1.59 | 19 |
Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIGHTNESS (L*) | ||||||
Model | 981.40 | 9 | 109.04 | 1.54 | 0.0256 | Significant |
A-Temp | 7.56 | 1 | 7.56 | 0.1066 | 0.0350 | |
B-Egg | 312.41 | 1 | 312.41 | 4.40 | 0.0523 | |
C-CMC | 25.65 | 1 | 25.65 | 0.3615 | 0.5611 | |
AB | 5.35 | 1 | 5.35 | 0.0753 | 0.7893 | |
AC | 30.42 | 1 | 30.42 | 0.4286 | 0.5274 | |
BC | 18.97 | 1 | 18.97 | 0.2673 | 0.6164 | |
A2 | 0.0021 | 1 | 0.0021 | 0.0000 | 0.9957 | |
B2 | 66.36 | 1 | 66.36 | 0.9350 | 0.3564 | |
C2 | 536.84 | 1 | 536.84 | 7.56 | 0.0205 | |
Residual | 709.68 | 10 | 70.97 | |||
Lack of Fit | 709.68 | 5 | 141.94 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 1691.08 | 19 | ||||
REDNESS | ||||||
Model | 88.10 | 9 | 9.79 | 2.62 | 0.0444 | Significant |
A-Temp | 2.18 | 1 | 2.18 | 0.5853 | 0.4619 | |
B-Egg | 21.28 | 1 | 21.28 | 5.70 | 0.0381 | |
C-CMC | 0.6931 | 1 | 0.6931 | 0.1858 | 0.6756 | |
AB | 0.0561 | 1 | 0.0561 | 0.0150 | 0.9048 | |
AC | 13.08 | 1 | 13.08 | 3.51 | 0.0906 | |
BC | 9.97 | 1 | 9.97 | 2.67 | 0.1331 | |
A2 | 1.19 | 1 | 1.19 | 0.3199 | 0.5841 | |
B2 | 13.34 | 1 | 13.34 | 3.58 | 0.0879 | |
C2 | 26.46 | 1 | 26.46 | 7.10 | 0.0237 | |
Residual | 37.30 | 10 | 3.73 | |||
Lack of Fit | 37.30 | 5 | 7.46 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 125.40 | 19 |
Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 563.07 | 9 | 62.56 | 2.27 | 0.0109 | significant |
A-Temp | 33.03 | 1 | 33.03 | 1.20 | 0.2994 | |
B-Egg | 92.79 | 1 | 92.79 | 3.36 | 0.0965 | |
C-CMC | 1.88 | 1 | 1.88 | 0.0683 | 0.7991 | |
AB | 10.47 | 1 | 10.47 | 0.3795 | 0.5516 | |
AC | 10.06 | 1 | 10.06 | 0.3647 | 0.5594 | |
BC | 8.97 | 1 | 8.97 | 0.3252 | 0.5811 | |
A2 | 128.81 | 1 | 128.81 | 4.67 | 0.0560 | |
B2 | 25.57 | 1 | 25.57 | 0.9271 | 0.3583 | |
C2 | 349.28 | 1 | 349.28 | 12.66 | 0.0052 | |
Residual | 275.78 | 10 | 27.58 | |||
Lack of Fit | 275.78 | 5 | 55.16 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 838.86 | 19 |
Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 118.80 | 9 | 13.20 | 10.86 | 0.0004 | Significant |
A-Temp | 10.56 | 1 | 10.56 | 8.69 | 0.0146 | |
B-Egg | 7.56 | 1 | 7.56 | 6.22 | 0.0317 | |
C-CMC | 10.56 | 1 | 10.56 | 8.69 | 0.0146 | |
AB | 0.1250 | 1 | 0.1250 | 0.1029 | 0.7550 | |
AC | 6.12 | 1 | 6.12 | 5.04 | 0.0486 | |
BC | 3.13 | 1 | 3.13 | 2.57 | 0.1399 | |
A2 | 29.30 | 1 | 29.30 | 24.11 | 0.0006 | |
B2 | 62.73 | 1 | 62.73 | 51.62 | < 0.0001 | |
C2 | 17.30 | 1 | 17.30 | 14.24 | 0.0036 | |
Residual | 12.15 | 10 | 1.22 | |||
Lack of Fit | 12.15 | 5 | 2.43 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 130.95 | 19 |
Response Variable | Model F-value | Model p-value | Lack-of-Fit p-value | Adjusted R2 | R2 | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bulk Density | 4.28 | 0.0165 | < 0.05 | 0.61 | 0.79 | Significant |
pH | 2.52 | 0.0434 | < 0.05 | 0.72 | 0.89 | Significant |
Water Absorption Capacity | 9.05 | 0.0010 | < 0.05 | 0.79 | 0.89 | Significant |
Lightness (L*) | 1.54 | 0.0256 | < 0.05 | 0.75 | 0.78 | Significant |
Redness (a*) | 2.62 | 0.0444 | < 0.05 | 0.69 | 0.70 | Significant |
Yellowness (b*) | 2.27 | 0.0109 | < 0.05 | 0.79 | 0.81 | Significant |
Wettability | 10.86 | 0.0004 | < 0.05 | 0.82 | 0.91 | Significant |
FMD | Foam Mat Drying |
WAC | Water Absorption Capacity |
TSS | Total Soluble Solid |
BD | Bulk Density |
RSM | Response Surface Methodology |
MC | Methylcellulose |
EA | Egg Albumin |
SD | Standard Deviation |
| [1] | L. S. Chang, R. Karim, S. M. Abdulkarim, and H. M. Ghazali, “Production and characterization of enzyme-treated spraydried soursop (Annona muricata L.) powder,” Journal of Food Process Engineering, vol. 41, pp. 1-12, 2018. |
| [2] | E. G. T. Menezes, E. R. Oliveira, G. R. Carvalho, I. C. Guimaraes, and F. Queiroz, “Assessment of chemical, nutritional and bioactive properties of Annona crassiflora and Annona muricata wastes,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 39, pp. 662-672, 2019. |
| [3] | V. C. George, D. R. N. Kumar, P. K. Suresh, and R. A. Kumar, “Antioxidant, DNA protective efficacy and HPLC analysis of Annona muricata (soursop) extracts,” Journal of Food Science & Technology, vol. 52, pp. 2328-2335, 2015. |
| [4] | N. Badrie and A. G. Schauss, “Soursop (Annona muricata L.): composition, nutritional value, medicinal uses and toxicology,” Bioactive Foods in Promoting Health- foods and vegetables, pp. 621-643. 2010. Available at: |
| [5] | A. Joshi, M. Bhobe and A. Saatarkar, “Phytochemical investigation of the roots of Grewia microcos Linn,” J. Chem. Pharm. Res, vol. 5, pp. 80-87, 2013. |
| [6] | W. C. Evans, “Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy,” Elsevier Health Sciences, New York, USA, (16th ed), 2009. |
| [7] | E. A. Sofowara, “Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa,” Spectrum Books Ltd, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 289, 1993. |
| [8] | S. Rohit, J. Pallavi, S. S. Bhagwan and T. S. Gulab, “Conventional method for saponin extraction from chlorophytum,” Global Journal of Research on Medicinal Plant& Indigenous Medicine, vol. 3, pp. 33-39, 2014. |
| [9] | O. Paulina, A. Diego and G. M. Elvira, “Extraction techniquues and analyss of anthocyanins from food sources by mass spectrometry,” 2018. Available at: |
| [10] | AACC (American Association of Cereal Chemist). Laboratory Methods, (10thed), St Paul, MN, USA, 2000. |
| [11] | K. O. Falade and A. O. Olugbuyi, “Effects of maturity and drying method on the physico-chemical and reconstitution properties of plantain flour.” Int. Journal of Food Science & Tech, vol. 45, pp. 170-178, 2010. |
| [12] | A. P. Sharma, H. S. Gujral and C. M. R. Rosell, “Effects of roasting on barley b-glucan, thermal, textural and pasting properties,” Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 53, pp. 25-30, 2011. |
| [13] | N. L. Tze, C. P. Han, Y. A. Yusof and M. G. Aziz, “Physicochemical and nutritional properties of spray dried pitaya fruit powder as natural colorant,” Food Science and Biotechnology, vol. 21, pp. 675-682, 2012. |
| [14] | Nur Atiqah Shaari., Rabiha Sulaiman. and Russly Abdul Raham., Production of pineapple fruit (Ananas comosus powder using foam mat drying: Effect of whipping time and egg albumen concentration. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2017. Available at: |
| [15] | K. L. Yam and S. E. Papadakis, “A simple digital imaging method for measuring and analyzing colour of food surfaces,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 61, pp. 137-142, 2004. |
| [16] | M. C. Kolla, A. Laya, J. P. Bayang and B. B. Koubala, “Effect of different drying methods and storage conditions on physical, nutritional, bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties of doum (Hyphaene thebaica) fruits” (2021). Available at: |
| [17] | P. S. Negi, “Plant extracts for the control of bacterial growth: efficacy, stability and safety issues for food application,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 156, pp. 7-17, 2012. |
| [18] | V. T. Nguyen and M. D. Le, “influence of various drying conditions on phytochemical compounds and antioxidant activity of carrot peel,” Beverages, vol. 4, pp. 80, 2018. |
| [19] | A. Ippolito and F. Nigro, “Natural antimicrobials for preserving fresh fruit and vegetables,” Improving the safety of fresh fruit and vegetables, vol. 17, pp. 513-555, 2005. Available at: |
| [20] | M. Tajkarimi and S. A. Ibrahim, “Phytochemicals as anti‐microbial food preservatives,” Dietary Phytochemicals and Microbes, chp. 7, pp. 207-225, 2012. Available at: |
| [21] | K. C. Agu and P. N. Okolie, “Proximate composition, phytochemical analysis, and in vitro antioxidant potentials of extracts of Annona muricata (Soursop).” Food Science & Nutrition; vol. 5, pp. 1029-1036, 2017. |
| [22] | Prasetyorini Moerfiah, Erni Rustiani and Sri Wardatun, “Development of soursop fruit instant granules (Annona Muricata L.) from fruit juice, ethyl acetate and ethanol extract as lowering uric acid and blood pressure,” Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Science, vol. 17, pp. 341-347, 2015. |
| [23] | GEA Niro Research Laboratory. Analytical methods dry milk products (Niro Analytical Methods, No. 15a). Soeborg, 2003. |
| [24] | Costa de Paula, Rocha de Freitas and Costa, Jose Maria, “Study of the physicochemical characteristics of soursop powder obtained by spray drying,” Food Science and Technology, Campinas, vol. 34, pp. 663-666, 2014. Available at: |
| [25] | K. Johanson, “Powder flow properties”, Encapsulation and powdered foods, pp. 331-361, 2005. Boca Raton: CRC Press. |
| [26] | D. L. Nelson and M. M. Cox, “Principles of Biochemistry,” (4th ed), 2004. Available at: |
| [27] | N. Vasudevan, R. Sulaiman, and N. A. Shaari, “ Development of foam mat dried soursop powder using arabic gum and fish gelatin as foaming agent,” Food Research, vol. 4, pp. 237 - 243, 2020. |
| [28] | E. Abbasi and M. Azizpour, “Evaluation of physicochemical properties of foam mat dried sour cherry powder,” LWT - Food Science and Technology, vol. 68, pp. 105-110, 2016. Available at: |
| [29] |
R. R. Moraes, “Refractometry,” 2006. Available at:
http://www.fapepi.pi.gov.br/novafapepi/ciencia/documentos/REFRAT%D4METRO.PD Accessed: May 2, 2023. |
| [30] | M. M. Nascimento, Raildo Mota de Jesus and H. M. Santos, “Quality pattern evaluation of frozen soursop pulps based on chemometric analysis,” Food Science and Technology, Campinas, vol. 40, pp. 508-516, 2020. |
| [31] | Brazil Ministry of Agriculture and Supply. Approve the General Technical Regulation for establishing Identity Standards and Quality for Fruit Pulp (Normative Instruction nº 1, of 07 January 2000). Official Gazette of the Federative Republic of Brazil (original title in Portuguese). |
| [32] | M. S. R. Bastos, M. E. B. Oliveira and T. Feitosa. Diagnosis sector of the fruit pulp agroindustry in the northeast region (Bulletin of research), 1998. Fortaleza: Embrapa-CNPAT. |
| [33] | P. D Alamar, E. T. S. Caramês, R. J. Poppi and J. A. L. “Pallone, Quality evaluation of frozen guava and yellow passion fruit pulps by NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics,” Food Research International, vol. 85, pp. 209-214, 2016. |
| [34] | S. Damodaran, K. L. Parkin and O. R. Fennema, Fennema’s food chemistry (4th ed), 2010. London: CRC Press. |
| [35] | S. Y. Quek, N. K Chok and P. Swedlund, “The physiochemical properties of spray-dried watermelon powders,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 46, pp. 386-392, 2007. |
| [36] |
NIRO. Niro Method, (Wettability), 2005d. Available at:
http://www.niro.com/ndk_website/NIRO/cmsdoc.nsf/WebDoc/ndkw6u9bbd |
| [37] | A. M. Ceballos, G. I. Giraldo and C. E. Orrego C. E, “Effect of freezing rate on quality parameters of freeze dried soursop fruit pulp,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 111, pp. 360-365, 2012. |
APA Style
Tola-Winjobi, B., Adewumi, B., Dairo, U., Sobukola, P. (2026). Foam Mat Drying of Soursop Pulp: Evaluation of Phytochemicals and Physico-chemical Properties of Powder Obtained. Science Discovery Nutrition, 1(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15
ACS Style
Tola-Winjobi, B.; Adewumi, B.; Dairo, U.; Sobukola, P. Foam Mat Drying of Soursop Pulp: Evaluation of Phytochemicals and Physico-chemical Properties of Powder Obtained. Sci. Discov. Nutr. 2026, 1(1), 51-67. doi: 10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15
AMA Style
Tola-Winjobi B, Adewumi B, Dairo U, Sobukola P. Foam Mat Drying of Soursop Pulp: Evaluation of Phytochemicals and Physico-chemical Properties of Powder Obtained. Sci Discov Nutr. 2026;1(1):51-67. doi: 10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15
@article{10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15,
author = {Bridget Tola-Winjobi and Babatunde Adewumi and Usman Dairo and Philip Sobukola},
title = {Foam Mat Drying of Soursop Pulp: Evaluation of Phytochemicals and Physico-chemical Properties of Powder Obtained},
journal = {Science Discovery Nutrition},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {51-67},
doi = {10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sdnutr.20260101.15},
abstract = {Foam mat drying (FMD) was employed to dry soursop pulp, with the objective of assessing the powder quality parameters. Egg albumen was applied at 3%, 6%, 9%, 12%, and 15% wt/wt and methylcellulose at 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2%, 1.6%, and 2% wt/wt as foaming and stabilizing agents, respectively. The samples were air-dried at different temperatures of 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75°C. The experimental design was determined using central composite. Physicochemical properties of the powders [hygroscopicity, bulk density (BD), pH, water absorption capacity (WAC), total soluble solids (TSS) and color], were evaluated. Additionally, qualitative analysis of the phytochemicals present, such as tannins, alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, and anthocyanins, was conducted. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of tannins, alkaloids, saponins, and flavonoids in soursop powder; anthocyanins were detected at selected drying temperatures indicating their retention under certain drying conditions. Identification of these phytochemicals is important for their potential application in functional foods. pH value ranged from 4.5 to 5.3, and TSS ranged from 3.9 to 6.95 brix. Hygroscopicity increased with increasing methylcellulose content, whereas the color parameters (L*, a*, and b*) were affected by the drying temperature, leading to discoloration during the process. BD, WAC, color, and wettability were significantly affected by drying temperature (p < 0.05). Based on these data, FMD may be considered a viable method for dehydrating soursop pulp; the resulting powder can be readily reconstituted for food formulations. Thus, soursop powder has significant potential for the development of functional foods.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Foam Mat Drying of Soursop Pulp: Evaluation of Phytochemicals and Physico-chemical Properties of Powder Obtained AU - Bridget Tola-Winjobi AU - Babatunde Adewumi AU - Usman Dairo AU - Philip Sobukola Y1 - 2026/10/09 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15 DO - 10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15 T2 - Science Discovery Nutrition JF - Science Discovery Nutrition JO - Science Discovery Nutrition SP - 51 EP - 67 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdnutr.20260101.15 AB - Foam mat drying (FMD) was employed to dry soursop pulp, with the objective of assessing the powder quality parameters. Egg albumen was applied at 3%, 6%, 9%, 12%, and 15% wt/wt and methylcellulose at 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2%, 1.6%, and 2% wt/wt as foaming and stabilizing agents, respectively. The samples were air-dried at different temperatures of 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75°C. The experimental design was determined using central composite. Physicochemical properties of the powders [hygroscopicity, bulk density (BD), pH, water absorption capacity (WAC), total soluble solids (TSS) and color], were evaluated. Additionally, qualitative analysis of the phytochemicals present, such as tannins, alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, and anthocyanins, was conducted. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of tannins, alkaloids, saponins, and flavonoids in soursop powder; anthocyanins were detected at selected drying temperatures indicating their retention under certain drying conditions. Identification of these phytochemicals is important for their potential application in functional foods. pH value ranged from 4.5 to 5.3, and TSS ranged from 3.9 to 6.95 brix. Hygroscopicity increased with increasing methylcellulose content, whereas the color parameters (L*, a*, and b*) were affected by the drying temperature, leading to discoloration during the process. BD, WAC, color, and wettability were significantly affected by drying temperature (p < 0.05). Based on these data, FMD may be considered a viable method for dehydrating soursop pulp; the resulting powder can be readily reconstituted for food formulations. Thus, soursop powder has significant potential for the development of functional foods. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -