Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government

Amir Hossein Tabatabaie; Negar Amiri; Seyedeh Mohadeseh Alavimehr

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12

Review Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government

Amir Hossein Tabatabaie^*

, Negar Amiri

, Seyedeh Mohadeseh Alavimehr

Published in Science Discovery Health (Volume 1, Issue 1)

Received: 14 December 2025 Accepted: 25 December 2025 Published: 25 February 2026

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Introduction: The global escalation of childhood obesity necessitates a critical review of prevention strategies that have historically focused on single agents of change. This article argues that individual interventions by families, schools, or governments are not sufficient to address the multifaceted drivers of this epidemic. Instead, effective prevention requires an integrated and synergistic approach across all three domains. Discussion: Families establish essential health behaviors, but they are often undermined by structural and environmental inequalities that drive obesity and limit healthy choices. Schools provide a central context for population-level intervention through education and the environment, but their impact is limited without broader policy and community support. Government regulation and fiscal policies are essential to create healthier assumptions, from restricting the marketing of harmful foods to ensuring equitable access to nutritious foods and safe spaces for physical activity. Conclusion: Drawing on international comparisons and evidence from socioecological models, this analysis concludes that only through coordinated action in which policy activates school-based programs and structurally supports families can a sustainable and equitable path to reducing childhood obesity be achieved. In this model, regulation protects children from harmful influences, schools operationalize health promotion daily, and families are supported in making healthier choices for their children. Ultimately, defeating this epidemic requires not just multiple players, but a unified system working in concert.

Published in	Science Discovery Health (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12
Page(s)	11-15
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Childhood Obesity, Equitable, Physical Activity, Socioecological Models

1. Introduction

Childhood obesity has become a global public health crisis, with nearly one in four children in the World Health Organization's European Region living with overweight or obesity. By 2022, 6.9% of girls and 9.3% of boys worldwide were living with obesity, up from just 1.7% and 2.1%, respectively, in 1990. (Figures 1, 2) This three-decade trend follows a significant rise in prevalence among all age groups of young people, including preschoolers (2–5 years), children (6–11 years), and adolescents. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which is the main tool for tracking progress in reducing overweight and obesity, estimated that 17% of U.S. children and adolescents were obese during the 2007-2008 period. Its complex causes, rooted in genetic, behavioral, and environmental factors, have sparked an important debate: Who is primarily responsible for preventing it? Is it the family through daily habits, schools through education, the environment, or the government through policies and regulations? While each of these actors often works independently, emerging evidence suggests that assigning responsibility to any one group is a recipe for failure. Effectively fighting childhood obesity requires a collaborative approach where families, schools, and governments each have distinct but interconnected roles within a comprehensive, multi-level strategy.

[1, 2]

2. The Family's Role: Foundational, yet Insufficient Alone

The family environment is the foundational frontier in shaping a child’s lifelong health trajectory. Within the home, parents and caregivers serve as the primary architects of early habits: they establish initial dietary preferences through the foods they provide, model physical activity behaviors, and set critical routines around sleep and screen time. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention underscores this pivotal role, emphasizing that families can actively model healthy eating patterns, integrate movement into daily life, and enforce consistent sleep schedules to help children maintain a healthy weight. Empirical research corroborates this, confirming that parental knowledge, attitudes, and practices, such as food responsiveness and the home food environment, significantly influence children's body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage. However, the capacity of parents to enact these healthy practices is not distributed equally; it is profoundly mediated by parental socioeconomic status, which determines access to resources, time, and supportive environments. Consequently, interventions that place the entire onus on the family unit have shown stark limitations. A comprehensive meta-analysis revealed that childhood obesity prevention programs focused solely on parents are largely ineffective for young children, with further studies finding no significant evidence that parent-focused behavioral interventions impact the BMI of toddlers. This ineffectiveness is not a reflection of parental failure but rather a testament to the immense and often overwhelming structural pressures they confront. Individual agency is powerfully constrained by broader determinants. Childhood obesity is primarily shaped by forces within the socioeconomic landscape and built environment—realities over which individual families have minimal control. Stressed and resource-limited parents, particularly those navigating poverty, food insecurity, or unsafe neighborhoods, are systematically pitted against a ubiquitous "obesogenic environment." This environment is characterized by the relentless marketing of unhealthy foods, the higher affordability and accessibility of ultra-processed options compared to fresh produce, and communities lacking safe spaces for play and active transportation. In this context, asking parents to consistently "choose better" against a systemic current that makes unhealthy choices the path of least resistance is an inadequate public health strategy. Isolated family-level education, without concurrent efforts to alter the structural conditions that undermine healthy living, places an unjust and impractical burden on households. Therefore, empowering families requires a dual approach: providing them with supportive skills and knowledge while concurrently using policy and investment to reshape the external environment so that their healthy efforts are possible, sustainable, and reinforced rather than thwarted.

[3, 4]

3. The School's Role: A Critical Venue for Intervention

Schools represent a powerful setting for intervention, reaching children during formative years and accounting for a significant portion of their daily food intake and activity. Effective school-based programs can create a supportive micro-environment that reinforces healthy choices. A cluster-randomized controlled trial in China demonstrated the efficacy of a comprehensive, school-based program. The intervention, which included a health education curriculum, enhanced physical activity, BMI monitoring, and family engagement, led to a statistically significant reduction in BMI and obesity prevalence among participants. The study underscores that multi-component programs targeting both the child and their environment are most effective. The success of Japan's national approach further highlights the potential of integrating schools into a broader public health strategy. The country's Shokuiku (food education) program, institutionalized by law, combines strict nutritional standards for school lunches with an integrated curriculum and a culture of shared meal responsibilities. This contrasts with challenges faced by programs like the U.S. National School Lunch Program, which, despite its goals, grapples with inconsistent implementation, reliance on processed foods, and disparities in meal quality between wealthy and under-resourced districts. Beyond food, studies from Indonesia point to additional barriers within school environments, including the pervasive marketing of unhealthy foods, limited teacher capacity, and weak referral systems to community health services. This indicates that schools cannot operate as isolated islands of health but require systemic support to be effective.

[5-8]

4. The Government's Role: Shaping the Landscape of Choice

Government action is essential to address the upstream and systemic drivers of the global obesity epidemic. Without decisive public policies, the commendable efforts of individuals, families, and schools are continually undermined by an environment saturated with aggressive marketing of unhealthy foods, economically and geographically inaccessible healthy options, and infrastructural barriers to active living. However, governments have a unique set of tools at their disposal to fundamentally change this obesity landscape through coordinated regulation, fiscal policy, and strategic public investment. International health authorities provide a clear roadmap for action. The World Health Organization (WHO) explicitly recommends a range of evidence-based policies, including fiscal measures such as taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages; comprehensive restrictions on the marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages, with specific protections for children; transparent consumer information systems such as mandatory nutrition labeling on packaging; improving the nutritional standards of meals served to the public, especially in schools; and policies that promote physical activity through active transport and accessible recreational spaces. The main aim of these interventions is to change environmental defaults and make healthy choices easier, more accessible, and more affordable for all populations, regardless of socioeconomic status. This systems perspective is supported by institutions such as the European Union, which advocates an integrated “whole of life” approach in its policy guidance. The strategy recognizes the need to address different aspects of the environment simultaneously—from digital marketing to urban planning, housing, and education—to prevent health inequalities and social exclusion, thereby ensuring that the most vulnerable children are protected. Such a high level of cross-sectoral coordination is crucial, as the rise in obesity is exacerbated by complex and interconnected factors that transcend national boundaries and overwhelm individual willpower alone. The stark contrast in national outcomes highlights the profound impact of policy choices. A comparative analysis of Japan and the United States illustrates this point. Japan’s low childhood obesity rate is no coincidence; it is the direct result of long-term, prevention-focused public policies. These include the food education law, national nutrition guidelines that are embedded in public life, mandatory annual health check-ups for children and employees, and social norms that are aligned with and supported by government strategy. This creates a coherent and reinforcing framework for population health. In contrast, the United States struggles with significantly higher obesity rates that result from a combination of systemic barriers. These include significant socioeconomic inequalities in access to food and health care, a cultural and political landscape that often prioritizes individual choice over collective well-being, and a historically fragmented and underfunded approach to public health policy that ceded significant influence to business interests. This comparison shows that while biology is universal, the social environments that governments help create are crucial in determining the trajectory of population health. Treating obesity solely as a personal flaw is therefore not only stigmatizing but also scientifically shortsighted. Effective prevention requires courageous and sustained government leadership to implement integrated policies that can reengineer our environments, protect future generations, and ensure that public health is not sacrificed for private profit. The evidence, tools, and international models are there; what is needed is the political will to act on them.

[9-11]

5. The Path Forward: A Multi-level, Integrated Approach

Although childhood obesity has reached epidemic levels, sustainable interventions that help children lose weight or maintain a healthy growth trajectory remain elusive. Identifying effective strategies is critical, as one in three children is now overweight or obese, placing them at significant risk for future health complications. The evidence is clear: no single actor can single-handedly reverse the childhood obesity epidemic. The solution lies in integrated, multi-level strategies that consciously create synergy between the family, school, and government. Integrated obesity prevention, involving both child and parent at multicomponent levels (individual, within the family, school, community, and socioeconomic), is needed. Community-based strategies and socioeconomic factors are important influencers in achieving effective preventive approaches. Successful frameworks, such as the socio-ecological model (SEM), guide interventions that operate simultaneously at the individual, interpersonal, community, and policy levels. In practice, governments must provide the political will and regulatory backbone to create a healthier food and activity environment. Schools must be equipped and mandated to serve as pillars of health promotion, providing consistent education, nutritious meals, and opportunities for physical activity. Families, supported by these larger structures, can then be empowered with the knowledge, resources, and time to foster healthy habits at home. Breaking down the silos between these sectors is paramount. This includes strengthening coordination between schools and community health services for early detection, referral, and designing family programs that are mindful of the immense social and economic pressures parents face.

[12-18]

6. Conclusion

Source: NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. ncdrisc. org

Download: Download full-size image

Figure 1. Worldwide Trends in Obesity Among Boys.

Source: NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. ncdrisc. org

Download: Download full-size image

Figure 2. Worldwide Trends in Obesity Among Girls.

Addressing childhood obesity requires moving beyond the search for a single responsible party. The true question is how the distinct roles of families, schools, and governments can be woven together into an effective, unified response. Families form the primary environment where early eating habits and attitudes toward physical activity are established. They manage the daily decisions around food and activity. However, their capacity to make healthy choices is often constrained by factors like financial limitations, time constraints, and the accessibility of nutritious options in their community. Placing the entire burden on parents ignores these powerful systemic barriers. Schools represent a critical and universal setting for intervention, influencing children for a significant portion of their day. Beyond academics, they function as key public health venues where curriculum lessons can be practiced through healthy meals, physical education, and consistent wellness policies. While they hold great potential to shape behaviors and even reach families, schools are frequently limited by tight budgets, competing priorities, and external regulations. This is where government becomes indispensable. Only public policy possesses the broad authority to reshape the environmental and economic landscape that drives the epidemic. Through strategic legislation, funding, and regulation—such as improving food labeling, restricting child-targeted marketing, supporting healthy food systems, and ensuring safe recreational spaces—governments can create a foundation that makes healthier choices more feasible for everyone. The alarming prevalence and severe lifelong consequences of childhood obesity demand a strategy as multifaceted as its causes. A child's choice is never made in isolation; it is the product of overlapping influences from home, school, and the broader societal framework. Therefore, framing the solution as a choice between individual and societal responsibility is a false dichotomy. The real choice is between a fragmented approach, where the efforts of one sector are undone by the realities of another, and a deliberately coordinated one. Success lies in creating synergy: where government policy fosters supportive environments for schools, schools empower and educate children and families, and informed families advocate for healthier communities. It is this integrated, collective effort that offers a genuine path toward a healthier future for all children.

Abbreviations

NHANES	National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
BMI	Body Mass Index
WHO	World Health Organization
SEM	Socio-Ecological Model

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2024 Mar 16; 403(10431): 1027-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2
[2]	Karnik S, Kanekar A. Childhood obesity: a global public health crisis. Int J Prev Med. 2012 Jan; 3(1): 1-7.
[3]	Alqahtani YA. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Parents Towards Obesity in Children in Aseer Region, Southern Saudi Arabia. Int J Gen Med. 2025; 18: 4391-4401 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S520120
[4]	Hunter KE, Nguyen D, Libesman S, Williams JG. Parent-focused behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity (TOPCHILD): a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2025 Sep 20; 406(10509): 1235-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01144-4
[5]	Li, XH., Lin, S., Guo, H., et al. Effectiveness of a school-based physical activity intervention on obesity in schoolchildren: a nonrandomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 14, 1282 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1282
[6]	Lange, K. W., and Nakamura, Y. (2025). Preventing childhood obesity—what we can learn from Japan. J. Dis. Prev. Health Promot. 9, 3–5. https://doi.org/10.5283/jdphp.53
[7]	Story M. The third School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study: findings and policy implications for improving the health of US children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Feb; 109(2 Suppl): S7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.005
[8]	Colozza D, Padmita AC, Ndiaye M, Tarmizi SN, Widiastuti E, Kekalih A, Pramesthi IL, Wiradnyani LA. Barriers to childhood obesity prevention in the school food environment: a qualitative study from Indonesia. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Nov 4; 9(1): e003980. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003980
[9]	Taillie, Lindsey Smith, et al. “Governmental policies to reduce unhealthy food marketing to children.” Nutrition Reviews 77, 11 (2019): 787-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuz021
[10]	Zdunek K, Schröder-Bäck P, Alexander D, Rigby M, Blair M. Contextual determinants of CHILDREN'S health care and policy in Europe. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 27; 19(1): 839. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7164-8
[11]	Oudat Q, Messiah SE, Ghoneum AD. A Multi-Level Approach to Childhood Obesity Prevention and Management: Lessons from Japan and the United States. Nutrients. 2025 Feb 28; 17(5): 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17050838
[12]	Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2006; 295(13): 1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.13.1549
[13]	Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003-2006. Jama. 2008; 299(20): 2401–2405. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.20.2401
[14]	Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH. Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997; 337(13): 869–873. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199709253371301
[15]	Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T. Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature Preventive medicine. 1993; 22(2): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1993.1014
[16]	Daniels SR, Jacobson MS, McCrindle BW, Eckel RH, Sanner BM. American Heart Association Childhood Obesity Research Summit Executive Summary. Circulation. 2009; 119(15): 2114–2123. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192215
[17]	Verduci E, Di Profio E, Fiore G, Zuccotti G. Integrated Approaches to Combatting Childhood Obesity. Ann Nutr Metab. 2022; 78 Suppl 2: 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000524962
[18]	Pereira, M. M. C. e., Padez, C. M. P. & Nogueira, H. G. d. S. M. Describing studies on childhood obesity determinants by Socio-Ecological Model level: a scoping review to identify gaps and provide guidance for future research. Int J Obes 43, 1883–1890 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0411-3

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tabatabaie, A. H., Amiri, N., Alavimehr, S. M. (2026). Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government. Science Discovery Health, 1(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tabatabaie, A. H.; Amiri, N.; Alavimehr, S. M. Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government. Sci. Discov. Health 2026, 1(1), 11-15. doi: 10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tabatabaie AH, Amiri N, Alavimehr SM. Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government. Sci Discov Health. 2026;1(1):11-15. doi: 10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12,
  author = {Amir Hossein Tabatabaie and Negar Amiri and Seyedeh Mohadeseh Alavimehr},
  title = {Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government},
  journal = {Science Discovery Health},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {11-15},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sdh.20260101.12},
  abstract = {Introduction: The global escalation of childhood obesity necessitates a critical review of prevention strategies that have historically focused on single agents of change. This article argues that individual interventions by families, schools, or governments are not sufficient to address the multifaceted drivers of this epidemic. Instead, effective prevention requires an integrated and synergistic approach across all three domains. Discussion: Families establish essential health behaviors, but they are often undermined by structural and environmental inequalities that drive obesity and limit healthy choices. Schools provide a central context for population-level intervention through education and the environment, but their impact is limited without broader policy and community support. Government regulation and fiscal policies are essential to create healthier assumptions, from restricting the marketing of harmful foods to ensuring equitable access to nutritious foods and safe spaces for physical activity. Conclusion: Drawing on international comparisons and evidence from socioecological models, this analysis concludes that only through coordinated action in which policy activates school-based programs and structurally supports families can a sustainable and equitable path to reducing childhood obesity be achieved. In this model, regulation protects children from harmful influences, schools operationalize health promotion daily, and families are supported in making healthier choices for their children. Ultimately, defeating this epidemic requires not just multiple players, but a unified system working in concert.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government
AU  - Amir Hossein Tabatabaie
AU  - Negar Amiri
AU  - Seyedeh Mohadeseh Alavimehr
Y1  - 2026/02/25
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12
T2  - Science Discovery Health
JF  - Science Discovery Health
JO  - Science Discovery Health
SP  - 11
EP  - 15
PB  - Science Publishing Group
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12
AB  - Introduction: The global escalation of childhood obesity necessitates a critical review of prevention strategies that have historically focused on single agents of change. This article argues that individual interventions by families, schools, or governments are not sufficient to address the multifaceted drivers of this epidemic. Instead, effective prevention requires an integrated and synergistic approach across all three domains. Discussion: Families establish essential health behaviors, but they are often undermined by structural and environmental inequalities that drive obesity and limit healthy choices. Schools provide a central context for population-level intervention through education and the environment, but their impact is limited without broader policy and community support. Government regulation and fiscal policies are essential to create healthier assumptions, from restricting the marketing of harmful foods to ensuring equitable access to nutritious foods and safe spaces for physical activity. Conclusion: Drawing on international comparisons and evidence from socioecological models, this analysis concludes that only through coordinated action in which policy activates school-based programs and structurally supports families can a sustainable and equitable path to reducing childhood obesity be achieved. In this model, regulation protects children from harmful influences, schools operationalize health promotion daily, and families are supported in making healthier choices for their children. Ultimately, defeating this epidemic requires not just multiple players, but a unified system working in concert.
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Amir Hossein Tabatabaie

Medical Education and Research Center, Petroleum Industry Health Organization, Shiraz, Iran

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6277-7659
Negar Amiri

Medical Education and Research Center, Petroleum Industry Health Organization, Shiraz, Iran

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1933-6516
Seyedeh Mohadeseh Alavimehr

Medical Education and Research Center, Petroleum Industry Health Organization, Shiraz, Iran

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8932-5042

Download PDF

Submit an Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tabatabaie, A. H., Amiri, N., Alavimehr, S. M. (2026). Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government. Science Discovery Health, 1(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tabatabaie, A. H.; Amiri, N.; Alavimehr, S. M. Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government. Sci. Discov. Health 2026, 1(1), 11-15. doi: 10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tabatabaie AH, Amiri N, Alavimehr SM. Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government. Sci Discov Health. 2026;1(1):11-15. doi: 10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12,
  author = {Amir Hossein Tabatabaie and Negar Amiri and Seyedeh Mohadeseh Alavimehr},
  title = {Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government},
  journal = {Science Discovery Health},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {11-15},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sdh.20260101.12},
  abstract = {Introduction: The global escalation of childhood obesity necessitates a critical review of prevention strategies that have historically focused on single agents of change. This article argues that individual interventions by families, schools, or governments are not sufficient to address the multifaceted drivers of this epidemic. Instead, effective prevention requires an integrated and synergistic approach across all three domains. Discussion: Families establish essential health behaviors, but they are often undermined by structural and environmental inequalities that drive obesity and limit healthy choices. Schools provide a central context for population-level intervention through education and the environment, but their impact is limited without broader policy and community support. Government regulation and fiscal policies are essential to create healthier assumptions, from restricting the marketing of harmful foods to ensuring equitable access to nutritious foods and safe spaces for physical activity. Conclusion: Drawing on international comparisons and evidence from socioecological models, this analysis concludes that only through coordinated action in which policy activates school-based programs and structurally supports families can a sustainable and equitable path to reducing childhood obesity be achieved. In this model, regulation protects children from harmful influences, schools operationalize health promotion daily, and families are supported in making healthier choices for their children. Ultimately, defeating this epidemic requires not just multiple players, but a unified system working in concert.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Case for Synergistic Action Across Family, School, and Government
AU  - Amir Hossein Tabatabaie
AU  - Negar Amiri
AU  - Seyedeh Mohadeseh Alavimehr
Y1  - 2026/02/25
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12
T2  - Science Discovery Health
JF  - Science Discovery Health
JO  - Science Discovery Health
SP  - 11
EP  - 15
PB  - Science Publishing Group
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdh.20260101.12
AB  - Introduction: The global escalation of childhood obesity necessitates a critical review of prevention strategies that have historically focused on single agents of change. This article argues that individual interventions by families, schools, or governments are not sufficient to address the multifaceted drivers of this epidemic. Instead, effective prevention requires an integrated and synergistic approach across all three domains. Discussion: Families establish essential health behaviors, but they are often undermined by structural and environmental inequalities that drive obesity and limit healthy choices. Schools provide a central context for population-level intervention through education and the environment, but their impact is limited without broader policy and community support. Government regulation and fiscal policies are essential to create healthier assumptions, from restricting the marketing of harmful foods to ensuring equitable access to nutritious foods and safe spaces for physical activity. Conclusion: Drawing on international comparisons and evidence from socioecological models, this analysis concludes that only through coordinated action in which policy activates school-based programs and structurally supports families can a sustainable and equitable path to reducing childhood obesity be achieved. In this model, regulation protects children from harmful influences, schools operationalize health promotion daily, and families are supported in making healthier choices for their children. Ultimately, defeating this epidemic requires not just multiple players, but a unified system working in concert.
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download