In this paper, the characteristics of air quality index, air quality grade, pollutant concentration and the type of primary pollutant were tested, and the forecast result was analyzed by the daily observe and forecast data of air quality index, concentration of pollutants, primary pollutant types in Yinchuan from January 1st 2015 to December 31th 2018. The results showed that the forecast result was not satisfactory for the air quality grades. The annual TS of air quality grade forecast in Yinchuan were increased year by year, which between 20% and 40%,but the point out rates (PO) and the not hit rates (NH) were high, which showed a decreasing trend. For the weather with a good air quality grade, the TS were significantly higher than that of other grades. The average absolute error of the air quality index (AQI) forecast decreased over the year, and presented seasonal fluctuation characteristics, but increased with the pollution grades. The model was good at predictive capacity of primary pollutant types, which TS generally reached 40%-60%. There was little difference in the forecast results of each predictable scale by the simple and objective revise, that was to say, the forecast capability of the product had not been improved obviously with the variation of forecast timeliness, so that the forecast product should strive for more room for its improvement, which still has a long way to go.
Published in | Science Discovery (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14 |
Page(s) | 108-113 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Air Quality Index, Pollutant Concentration, Primary Pollutant, Predictive Capacity
[1] | 周丽,徐祥德,丁国安,等.北京地区气溶胶PM2.5粒子浓度的相关因子及其估算模型[J].气象学报,2003,61(6):761-768. |
[2] | 魏玉香,童尧青,银燕,等.南京SO2、NO2和PM10变化特征及其与气象条件的关系[J].大气科学学报,2009,32(3):451-457. |
[3] | 李晓岚,马雁军,王扬锋,等.基于CUACE系统沈阳地区春季空气质量预报的检验及修正[J].气象与环境学报,2016,32(6):10-18. |
[4] | 麦健华,于玲玲,邓涛.等.基于GRAPES-CMAQ的中山市空气质量预报系统预报效果评估[J].热带气象学报,2018,34(1):78-86. |
[5] | 冯震,谷新波.呼和浩特市2015年冬季空气质量指导预报检验分析[J].内蒙古气象,2018,(2):17-29. |
[6] | 刘慧,饶晓琴,张恒德,等.环境气象业务数值模式预报效果对比检验[J].气象与环境学报,2017,33(5):17-24. |
[7] | 张珺,王式功,杜亮亮,等.基于BP神经网络的河北中南部空气质量预报研究[J].江西农业学报,2019,31(5):96-102. |
[8] | 杨关盈,邓学良,吴必文,等.基于CUACE模式的合肥地区空气质量预报效果检验[J].气象与环境学报,2017,33(1):51-57. |
[9] | 张璘,张祥志,茅晶晶,等.江苏省空气质量预报准确度及改进方法分析[J].中国环境监测,2017,33(6):17-24. |
[10] | 岳旭,蒋璐君,吴琼.2018.南昌市空气质量预报产品检验分析及统计订正试验[J].气象与减灾研究,41(3):212-218。 |
[11] | 王晓敏,陈静,钤伟妙,等.新标准下空气质量预报指导产品对比检验[J].气象与环境科学,2016,39(3):97-103. |
[12] | 李媛.银川市空气污染指数的分析与预测[J].宁夏大学学报(自然版),2012,33(4):416-419. |
[13] | 宋丹,夏晓玲,何玉龙,等.贵阳市空气质量预报方法与效果检验[J].气象与环境科学,2019,42(1):93-100. |
[14] | 米文宝,樊新刚.宁夏城市污染的现状、趋势及对策[J].中国地质大学学报,2007,7(3):23-26. |
[15] | 姜玲.银川市城市环境质量状况及污染防治[J].宁夏工程技术,2003,2(1):16-18. |
[16] | 中国环境科学研究院,中国环境监测总站.CB3095 -2012,环境空气质量标准[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2016. |
APA Style
Shao Jian, Yang Yuanyuan, Chen Min, Du QingYang. (2021). Inspection and Analysis of Air Quality Forecast Effect by Using 4 Years Data in Ningxia Base on the Newest National Standard. Science Discovery, 9(3), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14
ACS Style
Shao Jian; Yang Yuanyuan; Chen Min; Du QingYang. Inspection and Analysis of Air Quality Forecast Effect by Using 4 Years Data in Ningxia Base on the Newest National Standard. Sci. Discov. 2021, 9(3), 108-113. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14
AMA Style
Shao Jian, Yang Yuanyuan, Chen Min, Du QingYang. Inspection and Analysis of Air Quality Forecast Effect by Using 4 Years Data in Ningxia Base on the Newest National Standard. Sci Discov. 2021;9(3):108-113. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14
@article{10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14, author = {Shao Jian and Yang Yuanyuan and Chen Min and Du QingYang}, title = {Inspection and Analysis of Air Quality Forecast Effect by Using 4 Years Data in Ningxia Base on the Newest National Standard}, journal = {Science Discovery}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {108-113}, doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20210903.14}, abstract = {In this paper, the characteristics of air quality index, air quality grade, pollutant concentration and the type of primary pollutant were tested, and the forecast result was analyzed by the daily observe and forecast data of air quality index, concentration of pollutants, primary pollutant types in Yinchuan from January 1st 2015 to December 31th 2018. The results showed that the forecast result was not satisfactory for the air quality grades. The annual TS of air quality grade forecast in Yinchuan were increased year by year, which between 20% and 40%,but the point out rates (PO) and the not hit rates (NH) were high, which showed a decreasing trend. For the weather with a good air quality grade, the TS were significantly higher than that of other grades. The average absolute error of the air quality index (AQI) forecast decreased over the year, and presented seasonal fluctuation characteristics, but increased with the pollution grades. The model was good at predictive capacity of primary pollutant types, which TS generally reached 40%-60%. There was little difference in the forecast results of each predictable scale by the simple and objective revise, that was to say, the forecast capability of the product had not been improved obviously with the variation of forecast timeliness, so that the forecast product should strive for more room for its improvement, which still has a long way to go.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Inspection and Analysis of Air Quality Forecast Effect by Using 4 Years Data in Ningxia Base on the Newest National Standard AU - Shao Jian AU - Yang Yuanyuan AU - Chen Min AU - Du QingYang Y1 - 2021/05/24 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14 DO - 10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14 T2 - Science Discovery JF - Science Discovery JO - Science Discovery SP - 108 EP - 113 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0650 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20210903.14 AB - In this paper, the characteristics of air quality index, air quality grade, pollutant concentration and the type of primary pollutant were tested, and the forecast result was analyzed by the daily observe and forecast data of air quality index, concentration of pollutants, primary pollutant types in Yinchuan from January 1st 2015 to December 31th 2018. The results showed that the forecast result was not satisfactory for the air quality grades. The annual TS of air quality grade forecast in Yinchuan were increased year by year, which between 20% and 40%,but the point out rates (PO) and the not hit rates (NH) were high, which showed a decreasing trend. For the weather with a good air quality grade, the TS were significantly higher than that of other grades. The average absolute error of the air quality index (AQI) forecast decreased over the year, and presented seasonal fluctuation characteristics, but increased with the pollution grades. The model was good at predictive capacity of primary pollutant types, which TS generally reached 40%-60%. There was little difference in the forecast results of each predictable scale by the simple and objective revise, that was to say, the forecast capability of the product had not been improved obviously with the variation of forecast timeliness, so that the forecast product should strive for more room for its improvement, which still has a long way to go. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -