Chest CT has proven to be a fundamental tool in COVID-19, with variable findings. The aim of this article is to analyze the prevalence of chest CT patterns in COVID-19 according to the evolution time of the pathology, and to define if there are dominant patterns in each phase. CT studies of COVID-19 patients performed in local clinics over a 3-month period were retrospectively reviewed. The studies were classified as: phase 1 (0-4 days), phase 2 (5-8), phase 3 (9-13) and phase 4 (≥14), and CT findings as: normal study, ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidations, crazy paving and architectural distortion. The predominant finding was identified as single or combined pattern. The results included 463 CT studies, 266 men (57.4%), aged 19–96 years. 18.1% of CT scans were normal (n=84), with a predominance in phase 1 (p<0.001). In relation to pathological CT, male patients predominated (p<0.006), with an age older than in normal CT (p<0.001). In all stages, GGO pattern predominated as the single pattern, similar in all phases (p=0.545), and always above 65%. In combinations of patterns, GGO with consolidation was the prevalent one, with a peak in phase 3 (63.3%). In conclusion, in all the phases of COVID-19, GGO prevail over other CT patterns. Initial CT phase may also be presented with a normal CT; intermediate stages (phase 2 and 3) with GGO in combination with consolidation; and phase 4 with a combination of GGO and architectural distortion.
Published in | Radiation Science and Technology (Volume 7, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11 |
Page(s) | 83-90 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
COVID-19, Tomography, Lung Diseases, Thorax
[1] | World Health Organization Health Emergency Dashboard (COVID-19). https://covid19.who.int/table WHO. |
[2] | Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock S J, Prescott HC: Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), A Review. JAMA 2020; 324 (8): 782-793. |
[3] | Revzin MV, Raza S, Warshawsky R, et al: Multisystem Imaging Manifestations of COVID-19, Part 1: Viral Pathogenesis and Pulmonary and Vascular System Complications. Radio Graphics 2020; 40: 1574–1599. |
[4] | Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 727–33. |
[5] | Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, et al: Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20: 425–34. |
[6] | Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati L, et al: The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2020; 296: 172–180. |
[7] | ACR Recommendations for the use of Chest Radiography and Computed Tomography (CT) for Suspected COVID-19 Infection. https://www.acr.org/Advocacy-and-Economics/ACR-Position-Statements/Recommendations-for-Chest-Radiography-and-CT-for-Suspected-COVID19-Infection. |
[8] | Simpson S, Kay FU, Abbara S, et al: Radiological Society of North America Expert Consensus Statement on Reporting Chest CT Findings Related to COVID-19. Endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Radiology, the American College of Radiology, and RSNA. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020; 2 (2): e200152. |
[9] | Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, et al: Time Course of Lung Changes at Chest CT during Recovery from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology 2020; 295: 715–721. |
[10] | Kanne JP, Bai H, Bernheim A, et al: COVID-19 Imaging: What We Know Now and What Remains Unknown. Radiology 2021; 299: E262–E279. |
[11] | Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J: Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging. Radiology 2008; 246 (3): 697-722. |
[12] | Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review of Imaging Findings in 919 Patients. AJR 2020; 215: 87–93. |
[13] | Soriano Aguadero I, Ezponda Casajús A, Mendoza Ferradas F, et al: Hallazgos en la tomografía computarizada de tórax en las fases evolutivas de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Radiología 2021; 63: 218-227. |
[14] | Xu Xi, Yu C, Qu J, et al: Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2020; 47: 1275–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04735-9. |
[15] | Guan CS, Zhi Bin L, Yan S, et al: Imaging Features of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evaluation on Thin-Section CT. Academic Radiology 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.002. |
[16] | Cheng Z, Lu Y, Cao Q, et al: Clinical Features and Chest CT Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Single Center Study in Shanghai, China. AJR 2020; 215: 121–126. |
[17] | Lei P: The Progression of Computed Tomographic (CT) Images in Patients with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pneumonia. Journal of Infection 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.020. |
[18] | Parekh M, Donuru A, Balasubramanya R, Kapur S: Review of the Chest CT Differential Diagnosis of Ground-Glass Opacities in the COVID Era. Radiology 2020: 202504. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202504. |
[19] | Kanne JP: Chest CT Findings in 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Infections from Wuhan, China: Key Points for the Radiologist. Radiology 2020; 295: 16–17. |
[20] | Pan Y, Guan H, Zhou S, et al: Initial CT findings and temporal changes in patients with the novel coronavirus pneumonia (2019-nCoV): a study of 63 patients in Wuhan, China. European Radiology 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06731-x. |
[21] | Ming-Yen N, Lee E, Yang J, et al: Imaging Profile of the COVID-19 Infection: Radiologic Findings and Literature Review. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020; 2 (1): e200034. |
[22] | Yu M, Xu D, Lan L, et al: Thin-Section Chest CT Imaging of COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Comparison Between Patients with Mild and Severe Disease. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020; 2 (2): e200126. |
[23] | Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, Cao Y, Alwalid O, Gu J, et al: Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20: 425–34. |
[24] | Wang Y, Dong C, Hu Y, et al: Temporal Changes of CT Findings in 90 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Longitudinal Study. Radiology 2020; 296: E55–E64. |
[25] | Kwee TC, Kwee RM: Chest CT in COVID-19: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. RadioGraphics 2020; 40: 1848–1865 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200159. |
[26] | Adams HJA, Kwee TC, Yakar D, Hope MD, Kwee RM: Chest CT imaging signature of COVID-19 infection: in pursuit of the scientific evidence. CHEST 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.025. |
[27] | Ling Z, Xu X, Lieguang Zhang Q, Luo L, Tang X, Liu J: Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with persistent negative CT findings. European Journal of Radiology 2020; 126: 108956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108956. |
[28] | Ding X, Xu J, Zhou J, Long Q: Chest CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia by duration of symptoms. European Journal of Radiology 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109009. |
[29] | Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, et al: Chest CT Findings in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Relationship to Duration of Infection. Radiology 2020; 295: 685–691. |
APA Style
Jimena Mariano, Ignacio Agustín Iturbide, Elber Eduardo Inclán, Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez, Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez, et al. (2022). Chest Computed Tomography Patterns in Patients with COVID-19 According to Evolution Phases: Multicenter Study with 463 Patients. Radiation Science and Technology, 7(4), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11
ACS Style
Jimena Mariano; Ignacio Agustín Iturbide; Elber Eduardo Inclán; Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez; Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez, et al. Chest Computed Tomography Patterns in Patients with COVID-19 According to Evolution Phases: Multicenter Study with 463 Patients. Radiat. Sci. Technol. 2022, 7(4), 83-90. doi: 10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11
AMA Style
Jimena Mariano, Ignacio Agustín Iturbide, Elber Eduardo Inclán, Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez, Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez, et al. Chest Computed Tomography Patterns in Patients with COVID-19 According to Evolution Phases: Multicenter Study with 463 Patients. Radiat Sci Technol. 2022;7(4):83-90. doi: 10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11
@article{10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11, author = {Jimena Mariano and Ignacio Agustín Iturbide and Elber Eduardo Inclán and Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez and Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez and Julia De Antoni and Marcos Raúl Álvarez and Emiliano Néstor Mayor and Carlos Patricio O´lery and Santiago Miraglia and María Soledad Nardo and María Lurdes Retontaro and Santiago Castilla and Belen Hessy and Juan Ignacio Cuesta and Antonio Alejandro Zurzolo and Romina Daiana Vaccaro and Leopoldina Tevez Craise and Carlos Adrián Paiva and Yamila Hebe Luna and Sergio Gabriel Moszenberg and Ana Emilia Casado and Julio Alejandro Muiño and Silvia Patricia Ortiz Polanco and Diego Armando Viafara Paz and Guadalupe Irastorza and Jorgelina Hebe Albanese and Pablo José Giuliani and Natalia Yanina Aristegui and Juan Enrique Angulo}, title = {Chest Computed Tomography Patterns in Patients with COVID-19 According to Evolution Phases: Multicenter Study with 463 Patients}, journal = {Radiation Science and Technology}, volume = {7}, number = {4}, pages = {83-90}, doi = {10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rst.20210704.11}, abstract = {Chest CT has proven to be a fundamental tool in COVID-19, with variable findings. The aim of this article is to analyze the prevalence of chest CT patterns in COVID-19 according to the evolution time of the pathology, and to define if there are dominant patterns in each phase. CT studies of COVID-19 patients performed in local clinics over a 3-month period were retrospectively reviewed. The studies were classified as: phase 1 (0-4 days), phase 2 (5-8), phase 3 (9-13) and phase 4 (≥14), and CT findings as: normal study, ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidations, crazy paving and architectural distortion. The predominant finding was identified as single or combined pattern. The results included 463 CT studies, 266 men (57.4%), aged 19–96 years. 18.1% of CT scans were normal (n=84), with a predominance in phase 1 (p<0.001). In relation to pathological CT, male patients predominated (p<0.006), with an age older than in normal CT (p<0.001). In all stages, GGO pattern predominated as the single pattern, similar in all phases (p=0.545), and always above 65%. In combinations of patterns, GGO with consolidation was the prevalent one, with a peak in phase 3 (63.3%). In conclusion, in all the phases of COVID-19, GGO prevail over other CT patterns. Initial CT phase may also be presented with a normal CT; intermediate stages (phase 2 and 3) with GGO in combination with consolidation; and phase 4 with a combination of GGO and architectural distortion.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Chest Computed Tomography Patterns in Patients with COVID-19 According to Evolution Phases: Multicenter Study with 463 Patients AU - Jimena Mariano AU - Ignacio Agustín Iturbide AU - Elber Eduardo Inclán AU - Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez AU - Carlos Enrique Leiva Sisnieguez AU - Julia De Antoni AU - Marcos Raúl Álvarez AU - Emiliano Néstor Mayor AU - Carlos Patricio O´lery AU - Santiago Miraglia AU - María Soledad Nardo AU - María Lurdes Retontaro AU - Santiago Castilla AU - Belen Hessy AU - Juan Ignacio Cuesta AU - Antonio Alejandro Zurzolo AU - Romina Daiana Vaccaro AU - Leopoldina Tevez Craise AU - Carlos Adrián Paiva AU - Yamila Hebe Luna AU - Sergio Gabriel Moszenberg AU - Ana Emilia Casado AU - Julio Alejandro Muiño AU - Silvia Patricia Ortiz Polanco AU - Diego Armando Viafara Paz AU - Guadalupe Irastorza AU - Jorgelina Hebe Albanese AU - Pablo José Giuliani AU - Natalia Yanina Aristegui AU - Juan Enrique Angulo Y1 - 2022/01/28 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11 DO - 10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11 T2 - Radiation Science and Technology JF - Radiation Science and Technology JO - Radiation Science and Technology SP - 83 EP - 90 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5943 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rst.20210704.11 AB - Chest CT has proven to be a fundamental tool in COVID-19, with variable findings. The aim of this article is to analyze the prevalence of chest CT patterns in COVID-19 according to the evolution time of the pathology, and to define if there are dominant patterns in each phase. CT studies of COVID-19 patients performed in local clinics over a 3-month period were retrospectively reviewed. The studies were classified as: phase 1 (0-4 days), phase 2 (5-8), phase 3 (9-13) and phase 4 (≥14), and CT findings as: normal study, ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidations, crazy paving and architectural distortion. The predominant finding was identified as single or combined pattern. The results included 463 CT studies, 266 men (57.4%), aged 19–96 years. 18.1% of CT scans were normal (n=84), with a predominance in phase 1 (p<0.001). In relation to pathological CT, male patients predominated (p<0.006), with an age older than in normal CT (p<0.001). In all stages, GGO pattern predominated as the single pattern, similar in all phases (p=0.545), and always above 65%. In combinations of patterns, GGO with consolidation was the prevalent one, with a peak in phase 3 (63.3%). In conclusion, in all the phases of COVID-19, GGO prevail over other CT patterns. Initial CT phase may also be presented with a normal CT; intermediate stages (phase 2 and 3) with GGO in combination with consolidation; and phase 4 with a combination of GGO and architectural distortion. VL - 7 IS - 4 ER -