Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia

Dulo Husen; Anbese Ambomsa; Zelalem Shelemew

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia

Dulo Husen^*, Anbese Ambomsa, Zelalem Shelemew

Published in Research and Innovation (Volume 2, Issue 2)

Received: 11 November 2025 Accepted: 22 November 2025 Published: 26 December 2025

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Mulching conserve water and improve irrigation efficiency in agriculture, especially in the areas where water resources are limited and regulated. The objectives of this research were to examine the effect deficit irrigation and levels of wheat straw mulch on yield, yield components and water productivity of maize in Dugda district of East shewa zone of Oromia Regional state. The experimental design consisted two (irrigation levels and straw mulch) factors arranged in factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The two factors were the four irrigation levels (55% ETc, 85% ETc, 70% ETc and 100% ETc) and three levels (no mulch, 3t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch) of wheat straw mulch. According to USDA soil textural classification, the soil of experimental site was classified as sandy loam soil. The highest and minimum plant height were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively. Moreover, the mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha improved plant height by 7.5% than 55% ETc with no mulch. Statistically there was significant difference (P<0.05) between the treatments on cob length, cob diameter and thousand seeds weight. The highest and minimum cob length, and cob diameter and thousand seeds weight were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc with no mulch respectively over the others. Statistically there was significant difference (p<0.05) between the treatments on the yield and water productivity. The mean of highest and minimum yield were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively over the others. The highest and minimum water productivity were recorded from the treatment of 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 100% ETc (control) with no mulch respectively over the others. The plot mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha and 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch improved yield and water productivity by 33.94% and 43.63% than 55% ETc with no mulch respectively. Therefore, it could be concluded that the critical depth of water application for moisture stress area should not be below 85% ETc with 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch of full maize water requirement for obtaining relatively good grain yield with a better improvement on water productivity and economically viable in study area and similarly agro ecology.

Published in	Research and Innovation (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14
Page(s)	72-84
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Irrigation Level, Mulching Level, Yield, Yield Component, Water Use Efficiency

References

[1]	Abd El-Mageed, et., el-Samnoudi, I. M., Ibrahim, A. E.-A M., & Abd el Tawwab, A. R. (2018). Compost and mulching modulates morphological, physiological responses and water use efficiency in sorghum (bicolor l. Moench) under low moisture regime. Agricultural Water Management, 208, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.06.042
[2]	Addis Hailu Demo & Kibebew Kibret Tsehai (2024) Effect of irrigation andmulch levels on growth and yield components, yield, and water use efficiency of hot pepper (capsicum annuum L) in Eastern Ethiopia, Cogent Food & Agriculture, 10: 1, 2347913, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2347913
[3]	Allen R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M.(1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO.
[4]	Awal MA, Khan MAH (2000) Mulch induced eco-physiological growth and yield of maize. Pak J Biol Sci 3: 61-64.
[5]	Belachew M. M. (2022). Evaluating the effects of deficit irrigation and mulch type on yield of onion and tomato and water productivity in Fogera, Ethiopia. International Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences, 9(1), 36–48.
[6]	Berihun, B. (2011). Effect of mulching and amount of water on the yield of tomato under drip irrigation. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 3(7), 200–206.
[7]	Blake G R and KH Hartage. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis: Bulck Density. 2nd ed. ed. Klute A. Madison Wisconsin USA: American society of agronomy Inc. and soil science society of America Inc. 363-375.
[8]	Bosland, p. W., & peppers, V. e. J. (2000). Vegetable and spice capsicums. Cabi Bookshop, 2, 14-39.
[9]	Bouwer H. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis: Intake Rate in Cylinder Infiltrometer. 2nd ed. ed. Klute A. Madison Wisconsin USA: American society of agronomy Inc. and soil science society of America Inc. 825-843.
[10]	Bouyoucos, G. J. (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils 1. Agronomy Journal, 54(5), 464-465. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj19 62.00021962005400050028x
[11]	Cai, T. Y., Jia, Z. K., Huang, Y. W., Huang, H. J., Meng, L, Yang, B. P. and Li, H. (2011). Effects of different straw mulch rates on soil water conservation and water-saving benefits in spring maize field. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 27: 238-243.
[12]	Choudhary, V. K., Bhambri, M. C., pandey, n., & Sharma, h. G. (2012). eﬀect of drip irrigation and mulches on physiological parameters, soil temperature, picking patterns and yield in capsicum (Capsicum annuum l.) Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 58(3), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2010.517197
[13]	Cimmity (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). (1988). from Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Completely Revised Edition. Mexico. D. F.
[14]	Dagdelen N, Yilmaz E, Sezgin F, Gurbuz T (2006). Water-yield relation and water use efficiency of cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) and second crop corn (Zea mays L.) in western Turkey. Agric Water Manage 82(1- 2): 63-85.
[15]	Debelle T, Friessen D K (2001). Effect of enriching farmyard manure with mineral fertilizer on grain yield of maize at Bako, western Ethiopia. Seventh Eastern and Southern African Maize conference 11^th -15th February. pp. 335-337.
[16]	Dehkordi N, Farhadi R (2016) Mulch Treatment with Mulch Planter and its Effects on Maize Production. Agric Conspec Sci 80: 247-252.
[17]	Dossou-Yovo, E. R., Ampofo, E., Igue, A. M., Sintondji, L. O., Jesse, N., Huat, J., Agbossou, E. K., Environnement, E., & Recherche, I. N. (2016). Improving soil quality and upland rice yield in northern Benin with no-tillage, rice straw mulch and nitrogen fertilization. 9(1), 117-131.
[18]	FAO (2008). Food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations.
[19]	FAO (1977). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Laboratory Manual Food and Agriculture.
[20]	FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 2002. Financial and economic appraisal of irrigation projects: Irrigation Manual Module 11. FAO, Harare.
[21]	FAO. (1985). Water quality for agriculture. Food and agriculture organization of the United nations Rome.
[22]	Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). (2016). State of food and agriculture: Climate change. Agriculture and Food Security.
[23]	Hunt, N., & Gilkes, R. (1992). Farm monitoring handbook.
[24]	Illiassou, N., Leonor, R. S. and Raúl, S. C. 2014. Water use efficiency and water productivity in the Spanish irrigation district “Río Adaja”. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 2(12): 484-491.
[25]	Kar G, Verma HN (2005) Phenology based irrigation scheduling and determination of crop coefficient of winter maize in rice fallow of Eastern India. Agric Water Manage 75(3): 169-183.
[26]	Karasu, a., Kuşcu, h., Öz, M., & Bayram, G. (2015). The eﬀect of diﬀerent irrigation water levels on grain yield, yield components, and some quality parameters of silage maize (Zea mays indentata Sturt.) in Marmara region of Turkey. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Clujeană-Napoca, 43(1), 138-145.
[27]	Kipkorir, E. C., Raes, D., & Labadie, J. (2001). Optimal allocation of short-term irrigation supply. Irrig. Drain Syst., 15, 247-267.
[28]	Kirda C. 2002. Deficit Irrigation Scheduling Based on Plant Growth Stages Showing Water Stress Tolerance. Water Reports,(FAO): 3-10.
[29]	Klute, A., and C. Dirksen. (1986). Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory.
[30]	Leskovar, D. (2010). Scientists Complete Two-Year Study on Short-Day Onions. Science Daily 2010.
[31]	Li, R., Hou, X. Q., Jia, Z. K., Han, Q. F. and Yang, B. P. (2012). Effects of rainfall harvesting and mulching technologies on soil water, temperature, and maize yield in Loess Plateau region of China. Soil Research, 50: 105-113,
[32]	Liu, Y., Li, S. Q., Chen, F. and Yang, S. J. and Chen, X. P. (2010). Soil water dynamics and water use efficiency in spring maize (Zea mays L.) fields subjected to different water manag-ement practices on the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Mg’t, 97: 769-775.
[33]	Mansouri, C., Modarres, S. A., & Saberali, S. F. (2010). Maize yield response to deficit irrigation during low-sensitive growth stages and nitrogen rate under semiarid climatic conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 97(1), 12-22.
[34]	Mengü GP, Ozgürel M (2008). Evaluation water-yield relations in maize (Zea mays L.) in Turkey. Pak J Biol Sci 11(4): 517-524.
[35]	Meskelu E, Tesfaye H, Debebe A, Mohammed M (2018) Integrated Effect of Mulching and Furrow Methods on Maize Yield and Water Productivity at Koka, Ethiopia. Irrigat Drainage Sys Eng 7: 207. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9768.1000207 methods. p. 687-734. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
[36]	Mo F, Wang JY, Li FM, Nguluu SN, Ren HX, et al. (2017) Yield-phenology relations and water use effciency of maize (Zea mays L.) in ridge-furrow mulching system in semiarid east African Plateau. Scientifc Reports 7: 3260.
[37]	Mubarak, I. (2020). Improving water productivity and yield of onion crop by combining early planting and straw mulch under diﬀerent irrigation levels in dry Mediterranean region. Advances in Horticultural Science, 34(1), 49-60.
[38]	Mulugeta and Kannan. 2015. Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Maize under Conventional, Fixed and Alternate Furrow Irrigation Systems at Melkassa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology.
[39]	Nikolaou, G., Neocleous, D., Christou, A., Kitta, E., & Katsoulas, N. (2020). Implementing sustainable irrigation in water-scarceregions under the impact of climate change. Agronomy, 10(8), 1120.
[40]	Pereira, L. S., T. Oweis and A. Zairi, 2002. irrigation management under scarcity. Agricultural Water Management, 57: 175- 206.
[41]	Ramada, S., & Ramanathan, S. p. (2017). evaluation of drip fertigation in aerobic rice-onion cropping system. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(4), 2623-2628.
[42]	Robel, Admasu, Abraham W Michael, Tilahun Hordofa (2019). Eﬀect of Moisture Stress on Maize (Zea Mays L.) Yield and Water Productivity. Int J Environ Sci Nat Res. 16(4): 555945.
[43]	Sadek, I. I., Youssef, M. a., Solieman, n. Y., & alyafei, M. a. M. (2019). Response of soil properties, growth, yield and fruit quality of cantaloupe plants (Cucumis melo l.) to organic mulch. Merit Res. J. Agric. Sci. Soil Sci, 7(9), 106-122.
[44]	Singh G, Joshi VK, Chandra S, Bhatnagar A, Dass A (2016) Spring maize (Zea mays L.) response to different crop establishment and moisture management practices in north-west plains of India. ROC 17.
[45]	Tadesse B., Tilahun Y., Bekele T., Mekonen G. (2021). Heliyon Assessment of challenges of crop production and marketing in Bench-Sheko, Kaffa, Sheka, and West-Omo zones of southwest Ethiopia. Heliyon, 7, Article 07319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07319
[46]	Tadesse, et. al. (1991). Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure\& compost analysis manual.
[47]	Vincent-Caboud L, Vereecke L, Silva E, Peigné J (2019). Cover Crop Effectiveness Varies in Cover Crop-Based Rotational Tillage Organic Soybean Systems Depending on Species and Environment. Agronomy 9: 319.
[48]	Wang, X. and Xing, Y (2017). Effects of mulching and nitrogen on soil nitrate-N distribution, leaching and nitrogen use efficiency of maize (Zea mays L.). PLoS one, 11(8): 1371-1376.
[49]	Yadeta B., Ayana M., Yitayew M., Hordofa T. (2022). Performance evaluation of furrow irrigation water management practice under Wonji Shoa Sugar Estate condition, in Central Ethiopia. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 69(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00071-x
[50]	Yemane et, al. (2019). Effect of different type of mulching and furrow irrigation methods on maize (zea mays l.) yield and water productivity at raya valley, northern Ethiopia. Journal of Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 20(9).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Husen, D., Ambomsa, A., Shelemew, Z. (2025). Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia. Research and Innovation, 2(2), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Husen, D.; Ambomsa, A.; Shelemew, Z. Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia. Res. Innovation 2025, 2(2), 72-84. doi: 10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Husen D, Ambomsa A, Shelemew Z. Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia. Res Innovation. 2025;2(2):72-84. doi: 10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14,
  author = {Dulo Husen and Anbese Ambomsa and Zelalem Shelemew},
  title = {Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia},
  journal = {Research and Innovation},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {72-84},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ri.20260202.14},
  abstract = {Mulching conserve water and improve irrigation efficiency in agriculture, especially in the areas where water resources are limited and regulated. The objectives of this research were to examine the effect deficit irrigation and levels of wheat straw mulch on yield, yield components and water productivity of maize in Dugda district of East shewa zone of Oromia Regional state. The experimental design consisted two (irrigation levels and straw mulch) factors arranged in factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The two factors were the four irrigation levels (55% ETc, 85% ETc, 70% ETc and 100% ETc) and three levels (no mulch, 3t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch) of wheat straw mulch. According to USDA soil textural classification, the soil of experimental site was classified as sandy loam soil. The highest and minimum plant height were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively. Moreover, the mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha improved plant height by 7.5% than 55% ETc with no mulch. Statistically there was significant difference (P<0.05) between the treatments on cob length, cob diameter and thousand seeds weight. The highest and minimum cob length, and cob diameter and thousand seeds weight were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc with no mulch respectively over the others. Statistically there was significant difference (p<0.05) between the treatments on the yield and water productivity. The mean of highest and minimum yield were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively over the others. The highest and minimum water productivity were recorded from the treatment of 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 100% ETc (control) with no mulch respectively over the others. The plot mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha and 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch improved yield and water productivity by 33.94% and 43.63% than 55% ETc with no mulch respectively. Therefore, it could be concluded that the critical depth of water application for moisture stress area should not be below 85% ETc with 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch of full maize water requirement for obtaining relatively good grain yield with a better improvement on water productivity and economically viable in study area and similarly agro ecology.},
 year = {2025}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia
AU  - Dulo Husen
AU  - Anbese Ambomsa
AU  - Zelalem Shelemew
Y1  - 2025/12/26
PY  - 2025
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14
T2  - Research and Innovation
JF  - Research and Innovation
JO  - Research and Innovation
SP  - 72
EP  - 84
PB  - Science Publishing Group
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14
AB  - Mulching conserve water and improve irrigation efficiency in agriculture, especially in the areas where water resources are limited and regulated. The objectives of this research were to examine the effect deficit irrigation and levels of wheat straw mulch on yield, yield components and water productivity of maize in Dugda district of East shewa zone of Oromia Regional state. The experimental design consisted two (irrigation levels and straw mulch) factors arranged in factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The two factors were the four irrigation levels (55% ETc, 85% ETc, 70% ETc and 100% ETc) and three levels (no mulch, 3t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch) of wheat straw mulch. According to USDA soil textural classification, the soil of experimental site was classified as sandy loam soil. The highest and minimum plant height were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively. Moreover, the mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha improved plant height by 7.5% than 55% ETc with no mulch. Statistically there was significant difference (P<0.05) between the treatments on cob length, cob diameter and thousand seeds weight. The highest and minimum cob length, and cob diameter and thousand seeds weight were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc with no mulch respectively over the others. Statistically there was significant difference (p<0.05) between the treatments on the yield and water productivity. The mean of highest and minimum yield were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively over the others. The highest and minimum water productivity were recorded from the treatment of 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 100% ETc (control) with no mulch respectively over the others. The plot mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha and 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch improved yield and water productivity by 33.94% and 43.63% than 55% ETc with no mulch respectively. Therefore, it could be concluded that the critical depth of water application for moisture stress area should not be below 85% ETc with 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch of full maize water requirement for obtaining relatively good grain yield with a better improvement on water productivity and economically viable in study area and similarly agro ecology.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Dulo Husen

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

Contact Email
Anbese Ambomsa

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia
Zelalem Shelemew

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Submit an Article

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Husen, D., Ambomsa, A., Shelemew, Z. (2025). Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia. Research and Innovation, 2(2), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Husen, D.; Ambomsa, A.; Shelemew, Z. Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia. Res. Innovation 2025, 2(2), 72-84. doi: 10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Husen D, Ambomsa A, Shelemew Z. Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia. Res Innovation. 2025;2(2):72-84. doi: 10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14,
  author = {Dulo Husen and Anbese Ambomsa and Zelalem Shelemew},
  title = {Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia},
  journal = {Research and Innovation},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {72-84},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ri.20260202.14},
  abstract = {Mulching conserve water and improve irrigation efficiency in agriculture, especially in the areas where water resources are limited and regulated. The objectives of this research were to examine the effect deficit irrigation and levels of wheat straw mulch on yield, yield components and water productivity of maize in Dugda district of East shewa zone of Oromia Regional state. The experimental design consisted two (irrigation levels and straw mulch) factors arranged in factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The two factors were the four irrigation levels (55% ETc, 85% ETc, 70% ETc and 100% ETc) and three levels (no mulch, 3t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch) of wheat straw mulch. According to USDA soil textural classification, the soil of experimental site was classified as sandy loam soil. The highest and minimum plant height were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively. Moreover, the mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha improved plant height by 7.5% than 55% ETc with no mulch. Statistically there was significant difference (P<0.05) between the treatments on cob length, cob diameter and thousand seeds weight. The highest and minimum cob length, and cob diameter and thousand seeds weight were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc with no mulch respectively over the others. Statistically there was significant difference (p<0.05) between the treatments on the yield and water productivity. The mean of highest and minimum yield were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively over the others. The highest and minimum water productivity were recorded from the treatment of 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 100% ETc (control) with no mulch respectively over the others. The plot mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha and 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch improved yield and water productivity by 33.94% and 43.63% than 55% ETc with no mulch respectively. Therefore, it could be concluded that the critical depth of water application for moisture stress area should not be below 85% ETc with 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch of full maize water requirement for obtaining relatively good grain yield with a better improvement on water productivity and economically viable in study area and similarly agro ecology.},
 year = {2025}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effects of Irrigation and Mulching Levels on Yield, Yield Component and Water Productivity of Maize in Dugda District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia
AU  - Dulo Husen
AU  - Anbese Ambomsa
AU  - Zelalem Shelemew
Y1  - 2025/12/26
PY  - 2025
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14
T2  - Research and Innovation
JF  - Research and Innovation
JO  - Research and Innovation
SP  - 72
EP  - 84
PB  - Science Publishing Group
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20260202.14
AB  - Mulching conserve water and improve irrigation efficiency in agriculture, especially in the areas where water resources are limited and regulated. The objectives of this research were to examine the effect deficit irrigation and levels of wheat straw mulch on yield, yield components and water productivity of maize in Dugda district of East shewa zone of Oromia Regional state. The experimental design consisted two (irrigation levels and straw mulch) factors arranged in factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The two factors were the four irrigation levels (55% ETc, 85% ETc, 70% ETc and 100% ETc) and three levels (no mulch, 3t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch) of wheat straw mulch. According to USDA soil textural classification, the soil of experimental site was classified as sandy loam soil. The highest and minimum plant height were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively. Moreover, the mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha improved plant height by 7.5% than 55% ETc with no mulch. Statistically there was significant difference (P<0.05) between the treatments on cob length, cob diameter and thousand seeds weight. The highest and minimum cob length, and cob diameter and thousand seeds weight were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc with no mulch respectively over the others. Statistically there was significant difference (p<0.05) between the treatments on the yield and water productivity. The mean of highest and minimum yield were recorded from the treatment of 100% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 55% ETc without mulch respectively over the others. The highest and minimum water productivity were recorded from the treatment of 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch and 100% ETc (control) with no mulch respectively over the others. The plot mulching with 100% ETc*5t/ha and 55% ETc*5t/ha of wheat straw mulch improved yield and water productivity by 33.94% and 43.63% than 55% ETc with no mulch respectively. Therefore, it could be concluded that the critical depth of water application for moisture stress area should not be below 85% ETc with 5t/ha of wheat straw mulch of full maize water requirement for obtaining relatively good grain yield with a better improvement on water productivity and economically viable in study area and similarly agro ecology.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download