This study captured the components of Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (EGARCH-in-mean) framework; conditional variance (volatility), asymmetric effect and volatility persistence and interest rate in Nigeria. This is because ofthe usefulness of interest rates in measuring the financial conditions, also are major instrument of monetary policy and volatility being one of the most important concepts in finance. The study used real interest rate obtained from Central Bank of Nigeria and National Bureau of Statistic from 1970 to 2018 inclusive. The accommodating EGARCH-in-mean framework was employed in the estimation of the model. The following were found; conditional volatility is negatively and significantly related to interest rate. Also that interest rate volatility in Nigeria is not persistent. Again, there is existence of leverage effect, implying existence of asymmetric effect in the Nigerian financial market due to interest rate volatility. Consequently, the researchers suggest as follows; due to the presence of asymmetry effect, the Bankers’ Committee tightens their seat belt to forestall subsequent volatility in interest rate in Nigeria by consistently and regularly reviewing interest rate to accommodate the dynamism of the economy. Again adequate palliative measures be made available to enable investors continue with their economic activity in any business cycle in Nigeria.
Published in | Mathematics Letters (Volume 6, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12 |
Page(s) | 36-41 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Real Interest Rate, Volatility, Volatility Persistence, Asymmetric Effect, EGARCH
[1] | Black, F. (1976). Studies of stock market volatility changes. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business and economics Section. 177-181. |
[2] | Brooks, C. (2008). Introductory econometrics for finance (2nd ed). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[3] | Chan, K. C., Karolyi, G. A., Longstaff, F. A. & Sanders, A. B. (1992). An empirical comparison ofalternative models of the short-term interest rate. Journal of Finance, 47, 1209-1227. |
[4] | Christie, A. A. (1982). The stochastic behavior of common stock variance-value, leverage and interest rate effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 10 (4), 407-423. |
[5] | Ejem, C. A., Ogbulu, O. M., Ogbonna, U. G, &Fijoh, K. O.(2020). Financial management and policy: An analytical approach. Aba: Onemec Publishers. |
[6] | Emenike, K. O. &Aleke, S. F (2012). Modeling asymmetric volatility in the Nigerian stock exchange. European Journal of Business and Management, 4 (12), 52-59. |
[7] | Engle, R. F. & Ng, V. K. (1993). Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. Journal of Finance, 48 (1), 1749-1778. |
[8] | Ezirim, C. B. (2005). Finance Dynamics: Principles, techniques and applications (3rd ed). Portharcourt: Markowitz Centre for Research and Development. |
[9] | Ezirim, C. B., Ejem, C. A., Ogbonna, U. & Chukwu, U. O. (2019). Do interest rates and savings cause domestic investments in developing economisc? Macrofinamatric evidence fromNigeria. International Journal of Business and Economics Perspectives, 14 (1), 1-21. |
[10] | Graham, J. K & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidencefrom the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 187-243. |
[11] | Kuepper, J.(2020). Defiinition of Volatility. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/volatility.asp. |
[12] | Levacic, R. &Rebmann, A. (1982). Macroeconomics: An introduction to Keynesian-Neoclassicalcontroversies. New York: Macmillian. |
[13] | Nelson, D. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Journal of Econometrics, 59 (2), 347-370. |
[14] | Ngugi, R. W. & Kabubo, J. W. (1998). Financial sector reforms and interest rate liberalization: The Kenya experience. AERC Research Paper 72; African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi. |
[15] | Nzotta, S. M. (2004). Money, banking and finance: Theory and practice (2nd ed). Owerri: Hudson Jude Nig Publishers. |
[16] | Okpara G. C. (2012). Volatility modeling and the Nigerian stock return relationship in EGARCH-in-mean framework. International Journal of Current Research, 3 (8), 176-185. |
[17] | Okpara, G. C. (2015). Mathematics of finance: An introductory survey (2nd ed). Enugu: De-Sanctity Publications. |
[18] | Olan, T. H. & Sandy, S. (2005). Testing for asymmetry in interest rate volatility in the presence ofa neglected level effect. The University of Melbourne &The University of Queensland. |
[19] | Olwenyi, T. (2011). Modeling volatility of short-term interest rates in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (7), 289-303. |
[20] | Ritter, L. S. & Silber, W. L. (1977). Principles of money, banking and financial markets (2nd ed). New York: Basic Books, Inc Publishers. |
[21] | Shaihk, S. (2020). Top 7 theories of interest with diagram https://www.economicsdiscussion.net/theories-of-interest/top-7-theories-of-interest-with-diagram/13937. Available at www.google.com. Accessed on April 30, 2020. |
[22] | Wanger, H.(2020). Why volatility is important to investors. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/08/volatility.asp. |
APA Style
Ejem Chukwu Agwu, Ogbonna Udochukwu Godfrey. (2020). Conditional Variance and Interest Rates in Nigeria: Evidence from the Egarch-in-Mean Framework. Mathematics Letters, 6(3), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12
ACS Style
Ejem Chukwu Agwu; Ogbonna Udochukwu Godfrey. Conditional Variance and Interest Rates in Nigeria: Evidence from the Egarch-in-Mean Framework. Math. Lett. 2020, 6(3), 36-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12
AMA Style
Ejem Chukwu Agwu, Ogbonna Udochukwu Godfrey. Conditional Variance and Interest Rates in Nigeria: Evidence from the Egarch-in-Mean Framework. Math Lett. 2020;6(3):36-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12
@article{10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12, author = {Ejem Chukwu Agwu and Ogbonna Udochukwu Godfrey}, title = {Conditional Variance and Interest Rates in Nigeria: Evidence from the Egarch-in-Mean Framework}, journal = {Mathematics Letters}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, pages = {36-41}, doi = {10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ml.20200603.12}, abstract = {This study captured the components of Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (EGARCH-in-mean) framework; conditional variance (volatility), asymmetric effect and volatility persistence and interest rate in Nigeria. This is because ofthe usefulness of interest rates in measuring the financial conditions, also are major instrument of monetary policy and volatility being one of the most important concepts in finance. The study used real interest rate obtained from Central Bank of Nigeria and National Bureau of Statistic from 1970 to 2018 inclusive. The accommodating EGARCH-in-mean framework was employed in the estimation of the model. The following were found; conditional volatility is negatively and significantly related to interest rate. Also that interest rate volatility in Nigeria is not persistent. Again, there is existence of leverage effect, implying existence of asymmetric effect in the Nigerian financial market due to interest rate volatility. Consequently, the researchers suggest as follows; due to the presence of asymmetry effect, the Bankers’ Committee tightens their seat belt to forestall subsequent volatility in interest rate in Nigeria by consistently and regularly reviewing interest rate to accommodate the dynamism of the economy. Again adequate palliative measures be made available to enable investors continue with their economic activity in any business cycle in Nigeria.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Conditional Variance and Interest Rates in Nigeria: Evidence from the Egarch-in-Mean Framework AU - Ejem Chukwu Agwu AU - Ogbonna Udochukwu Godfrey Y1 - 2020/12/31 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12 T2 - Mathematics Letters JF - Mathematics Letters JO - Mathematics Letters SP - 36 EP - 41 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5056 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ml.20200603.12 AB - This study captured the components of Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (EGARCH-in-mean) framework; conditional variance (volatility), asymmetric effect and volatility persistence and interest rate in Nigeria. This is because ofthe usefulness of interest rates in measuring the financial conditions, also are major instrument of monetary policy and volatility being one of the most important concepts in finance. The study used real interest rate obtained from Central Bank of Nigeria and National Bureau of Statistic from 1970 to 2018 inclusive. The accommodating EGARCH-in-mean framework was employed in the estimation of the model. The following were found; conditional volatility is negatively and significantly related to interest rate. Also that interest rate volatility in Nigeria is not persistent. Again, there is existence of leverage effect, implying existence of asymmetric effect in the Nigerian financial market due to interest rate volatility. Consequently, the researchers suggest as follows; due to the presence of asymmetry effect, the Bankers’ Committee tightens their seat belt to forestall subsequent volatility in interest rate in Nigeria by consistently and regularly reviewing interest rate to accommodate the dynamism of the economy. Again adequate palliative measures be made available to enable investors continue with their economic activity in any business cycle in Nigeria. VL - 6 IS - 3 ER -