Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic; Amra Mujcic

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic, Amra Mujcic

Published in Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care (Volume 6, Issue 4)

Received: 11 November 2020 Accepted: 1 December 2020 Published: 8 December 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The pregnancy is a special time in a woman’s life with important physical and emotional changes. These normal changes and their interactions with socio-demographic factors may affect women’s health. This consequently affects the quality of a pregnant woman’s life. The aim of the present study was to investigate the quality of life of pregnant women and its relationship with socio-demographic factors. This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Centre for Women’s Health of Canton Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study included 150 pregnant women. The respondents were supposed to fill out a questionnaire that included questions about their socio-demographic characteristics (age, marital status, number of family members, formal education level, self-perceived financial status and number of pregnancies). The SF-36 questionnaire was used to measure the self-reported quality of life in the areas of physical and mental health. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between socio-demographic factors and self-reported physical and mental health. The pregnant women had moderate total mean scores on SF-36 scale (61.8±17.8). The pregnant women rated their mental health (MCS) better than their physical health (PCS). The mean values for the physical component summary (PCS) was 59.9±17.2 and for the mental component summary (MCS) 63.6±21.7. Younger maternal age (p=0.026), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.003), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.044) were positively associated with better quality of physical health (PCS). Older maternal age (p=0.022), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.026), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.025) were positively associated with a better quality of mental health (MCS). Thus, individualized assistance for the pregnant woman focusing on the sociodemographic factors provides the basis for the planning and implementation of actions aimed at improving quality of life.

Published in	Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12
Page(s)	113-117
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Quality of Life, Physical Health, Mental Health, Pregnancy, Parity, Social Class

References

[1]	Pradeep B, Swati C. Physiological and anatomical changes of pregnancy: implications for anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2018; 62: 651–67.
[2]	Haas JS, Jackson RA, Fuentes-Afflick E, Stewart AL, Dean ML, Brawarsky P, Escobar J. Changes in the health status of women during and after pregnancy. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 45–51.
[3]	Vachkova E, Jezek S, Mares J, Moravcova M. The evaluation of the psychometric properties of a specific quality of life questionnaire for physiological pregnancy. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 214.
[4]	Mogos M, August E, Salinas-Miranda A, Sultan D, Salihu H. A systematic review of quality of life measures in pregnant and postpartum mothers. Appl Res Qual Life 2013; 8: 219–50.
[5]	Lau Y. The effect of maternal stress and health-related quality of life on birth outcomes among Macao Chinese pregnant women. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2013; 27: 14–24.
[6]	Pinto F, Fernandes E, Virella D, Abrantes A, Neto MT. Born preterm: a public health issue. Port J Public Health 2019; 37: 38–49.
[7]	Allen MC, Cristofalo EA, Kim C. Outcomes of preterm infants: morbidity replaces mortality. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 441–54.
[8]	Rüegger C, Hegglin M, Adams M, Bucher HU; Swiss Neonatal Network. Population based trends in mortality, morbidity and treatment for very preterm-and very low birth weight infants over 12 years. BMC Pediatr 2012; 12: 17.
[9]	WHOQoLGroup. Development of the WHOQoL: rational and current status. In J Mental Helath 1994; 23: 24–56.
[10]	Symon A, MacKay A, Ruta D. Postnatal quality of life: a pilot study using the mother-generated index. J Adv Nurs 2003; 42: 21–9.
[11]	Marchetti D, Carrozzino D, Fraticelli F, Fulcheri M, Vitacolonna E. Quality of life in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. J Diabetes Res 2017: 7058082.
[12]	Stern C, Trapp EM, Mautner E, Deutsch M, Lang U, Cervar-Zivkovic M. The impact of severe preeclampsia on maternal quality of life. Qual Life Res 2014; 23: 1019–26.
[13]	Mortazavi F, Mousavi S, Chaman R, Khosravi A. Maternal quality of life during the transition to motherhood. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16: 5.
[14]	Park S, Choi NK. The relationships between timing of ﬁrst childbirth, parity, and health-related quality of life. Qual. Life Res 2018; 27: 937–43.
[15]	Lagadec N, Steinecker M, Kapassi A, Magnier AM, Chastang J, Robert S, Gaouaou N, Ibanez G. Factors influencing the quality of life of pregnant women: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18: 455.
[16]	Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: a user manual and interpretation guide. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.
[17]	McDowell I. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[18]	Shishehgar S, Dolatian M, Majd HA, Bakhtiary M. Perceived pregnancy stress and quality of life amongst Iranian women. Glob J Health Sci 2014; 6: 270–7.
[19]	Bai G, Raat H, Jaddoe VWV, Mautner E, Korfage IJ. Trajectories and predictors of women’s health-related quality of life during pregnancy: a large longitudinal cohort study. PLoS ONE 2018; 13: e0194999.
[20]	Da Costa D, Dritsa M, Verreault N, Balaa C, Kudzman J, Khalifé S. Sleep problems and depressed mood negatively impact health-related quality of life during pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health 2010; 13: 249–57.
[21]	Ramírez-Vélez R. Pregnancy and health-related quality of life: A cross sectional study. Colomb Med 2011; 42: 476-81.
[22]	Tendais I, Figueiredo B, Mota J, Conde A. Physical activity, health-related quality of life and depression during pregnancy. Cad Saude Publica 2011; 27: 219–28.
[23]	Lau Y. Traditional Chinese pregnancy restrictions, health-related quality of life and perceived stress among pregnant women in Macao, China. Asian Nurs Res 2012; 6: 27-34.
[24]	Kurspahić Mujčić A, Mujčić A. Preventive health services utilization in patients treated by family physicians. Med Glas (Zenica) 2019; 16 (2): 344-50.
[25]	Kurspahić Mujčić A, Mujčić A. The relationship between education and self-reported mental and physical health. Med Glas (Zenica) 2019; 16 (1): 102-7.
[26]	Henderson AS, Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb P, Christensen H, Rodgers B. Symptoms of depression and anxiety during adult life: evidence for a decline in prevalence with age. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 1321-8.
[27]	Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Adler N, Kawachi I. Prospective change in health-related quality of life and subsequent mortality among middle-aged and older women. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 2085-91.
[28]	Miller-Lewis LR, Wade TD. Lee C. Risk factors for pregnancy and childbearing in single young women: evidence from the Australian longitudinal study on women’s health. Int J Behav Dev 2005; 29: 292-303.
[29]	Abbaszadeh F, Baghery A, Mehran N. Quality of life among pregnant women. Hayat 2009; 15: 41-8.
[30]	Abbaszadeh F, Bagheri A, Nahid M. Quality of life in pregnant women results of a study from Kashan, Iran. Pak J Med Sci 2010; 26: 692-7.
[31]	Chang SR, Chen KH, Lin MI, Lin HH, Huang LH, Lin WA. A repeated measures study of changes in health-related quality of life during pregnancy and the relationship with obstetric factors. J Adv Nurs 2014; 70: 2245-56.
[32]	Abujilban S, Abuidhail J, Mrayan L, Hatamleh R. Characteristics of pregnant Jordanian women dissatisfied with life: a comparison between satisfied and dissatisfied women’s demographics. Health Care Women Int 2017; 38: 556–70.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic, Amra Mujcic. (2020). Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care, 6(4), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic; Amra Mujcic. Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. J. Fam. Med. Health Care 2020, 6(4), 113-117. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic, Amra Mujcic. Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Fam Med Health Care. 2020;6(4):113-117. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12,
  author = {Amira Kurspahic Mujcic and Amra Mujcic},
  title = {Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina},
  journal = {Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {113-117},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfmhc.20200604.12},
  abstract = {The pregnancy is a special time in a woman’s life with important physical and emotional changes. These normal changes and their interactions with socio-demographic factors may affect women’s health. This consequently affects the quality of a pregnant woman’s life. The aim of the present study was to investigate the quality of life of pregnant women and its relationship with socio-demographic factors. This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Centre for Women’s Health of Canton Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study included 150 pregnant women. The respondents were supposed to fill out a questionnaire that included questions about their socio-demographic characteristics (age, marital status, number of family members, formal education level, self-perceived financial status and number of pregnancies). The SF-36 questionnaire was used to measure the self-reported quality of life in the areas of physical and mental health. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between socio-demographic factors and self-reported physical and mental health. The pregnant women had moderate total mean scores on SF-36 scale (61.8±17.8). The pregnant women rated their mental health (MCS) better than their physical health (PCS). The mean values for the physical component summary (PCS) was 59.9±17.2 and for the mental component summary (MCS) 63.6±21.7. Younger maternal age (p=0.026), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.003), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.044) were positively associated with better quality of physical health (PCS). Older maternal age (p=0.022), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.026), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.025) were positively associated with a better quality of mental health (MCS). Thus, individualized assistance for the pregnant woman focusing on the sociodemographic factors provides the basis for the planning and implementation of actions aimed at improving quality of life.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina
AU  - Amira Kurspahic Mujcic
AU  - Amra Mujcic
Y1  - 2020/12/08
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12
T2  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
JF  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
JO  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
SP  - 113
EP  - 117
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-8342
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12
AB  - The pregnancy is a special time in a woman’s life with important physical and emotional changes. These normal changes and their interactions with socio-demographic factors may affect women’s health. This consequently affects the quality of a pregnant woman’s life. The aim of the present study was to investigate the quality of life of pregnant women and its relationship with socio-demographic factors. This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Centre for Women’s Health of Canton Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study included 150 pregnant women. The respondents were supposed to fill out a questionnaire that included questions about their socio-demographic characteristics (age, marital status, number of family members, formal education level, self-perceived financial status and number of pregnancies). The SF-36 questionnaire was used to measure the self-reported quality of life in the areas of physical and mental health. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between socio-demographic factors and self-reported physical and mental health. The pregnant women had moderate total mean scores on SF-36 scale (61.8±17.8). The pregnant women rated their mental health (MCS) better than their physical health (PCS). The mean values for the physical component summary (PCS) was 59.9±17.2 and for the mental component summary (MCS) 63.6±21.7. Younger maternal age (p=0.026), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.003), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.044) were positively associated with better quality of physical health (PCS). Older maternal age (p=0.022), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.026), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.025) were positively associated with a better quality of mental health (MCS). Thus, individualized assistance for the pregnant woman focusing on the sociodemographic factors provides the basis for the planning and implementation of actions aimed at improving quality of life.
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic

Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Amra Mujcic

Secondary Medical School, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic, Amra Mujcic. (2020). Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care, 6(4), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic; Amra Mujcic. Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. J. Fam. Med. Health Care 2020, 6(4), 113-117. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Amira Kurspahic Mujcic, Amra Mujcic. Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Fam Med Health Care. 2020;6(4):113-117. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12,
  author = {Amira Kurspahic Mujcic and Amra Mujcic},
  title = {Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina},
  journal = {Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {113-117},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfmhc.20200604.12},
  abstract = {The pregnancy is a special time in a woman’s life with important physical and emotional changes. These normal changes and their interactions with socio-demographic factors may affect women’s health. This consequently affects the quality of a pregnant woman’s life. The aim of the present study was to investigate the quality of life of pregnant women and its relationship with socio-demographic factors. This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Centre for Women’s Health of Canton Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study included 150 pregnant women. The respondents were supposed to fill out a questionnaire that included questions about their socio-demographic characteristics (age, marital status, number of family members, formal education level, self-perceived financial status and number of pregnancies). The SF-36 questionnaire was used to measure the self-reported quality of life in the areas of physical and mental health. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between socio-demographic factors and self-reported physical and mental health. The pregnant women had moderate total mean scores on SF-36 scale (61.8±17.8). The pregnant women rated their mental health (MCS) better than their physical health (PCS). The mean values for the physical component summary (PCS) was 59.9±17.2 and for the mental component summary (MCS) 63.6±21.7. Younger maternal age (p=0.026), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.003), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.044) were positively associated with better quality of physical health (PCS). Older maternal age (p=0.022), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.026), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.025) were positively associated with a better quality of mental health (MCS). Thus, individualized assistance for the pregnant woman focusing on the sociodemographic factors provides the basis for the planning and implementation of actions aimed at improving quality of life.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Socio-demographic Factors Associated with Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Sarajevo Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina
AU  - Amira Kurspahic Mujcic
AU  - Amra Mujcic
Y1  - 2020/12/08
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12
T2  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
JF  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
JO  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
SP  - 113
EP  - 117
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-8342
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200604.12
AB  - The pregnancy is a special time in a woman’s life with important physical and emotional changes. These normal changes and their interactions with socio-demographic factors may affect women’s health. This consequently affects the quality of a pregnant woman’s life. The aim of the present study was to investigate the quality of life of pregnant women and its relationship with socio-demographic factors. This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Centre for Women’s Health of Canton Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study included 150 pregnant women. The respondents were supposed to fill out a questionnaire that included questions about their socio-demographic characteristics (age, marital status, number of family members, formal education level, self-perceived financial status and number of pregnancies). The SF-36 questionnaire was used to measure the self-reported quality of life in the areas of physical and mental health. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between socio-demographic factors and self-reported physical and mental health. The pregnant women had moderate total mean scores on SF-36 scale (61.8±17.8). The pregnant women rated their mental health (MCS) better than their physical health (PCS). The mean values for the physical component summary (PCS) was 59.9±17.2 and for the mental component summary (MCS) 63.6±21.7. Younger maternal age (p=0.026), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.003), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.044) were positively associated with better quality of physical health (PCS). Older maternal age (p=0.022), being married (p=0.000), better financial status than average (p=0.026), ﬁrst pregnancy (p=0.025) were positively associated with a better quality of mental health (MCS). Thus, individualized assistance for the pregnant woman focusing on the sociodemographic factors provides the basis for the planning and implementation of actions aimed at improving quality of life.
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download