International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and European Union (EU) have made significant efforts to restore the credibility, information, accuracy, and independence of the audit report by requiring disclosure of the audit partner's name and/or the audit partner's signature on the audit report. This research aims to study and examine the relationship between the audit partner's voluntary disclosure and earnings management. In precise, examine whether the audit partner's disclosure leads to lower level of earnings management. The research has also aimed for examining the impact of the audit partner quality on the aforementioned relationship, using a sample from the companies listed in the Egyptian Stock Exchange for the period starting from 2014 to 2018. The results indicated that: (1) there is a statistically significant negative effect for the audit partner disclosure on the absolute value of earnings management proxied by Miller Ratio; which in turn means that the audit partner disclosure increases the earnings quality. (2) There is no effect for the audit partner quality proxied by his industrial specialization on the relationship between audit partner disclosure and the earnings quality. The findings of this research have important consequences for regulators in determining whether the actual effects of a disclosure requirement are as expected, for investors in reducing costs of obtaining information, and for audit committees in making better decisions when hiring auditors.
Published in | Journal of Finance and Accounting (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11 |
Page(s) | 1-11 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Audit Partner Disclosure, Earnings Management, Audit Partner Quality
[1] | Abbott, L., Buslepp, W. L., Gunny, K., and Mandell, A. 2019. The Effect of US Audit Partner Identification on Real Earnings Management. Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3448800 |
[2] | Aobdia, D., Lin, C. J., and Petacchi, R. 2015. Capital Market Consequences of Audit Partner Quality. The Accounting Review, 90 (6): 2143-2176. |
[3] | Bailey, R. L., Dickins, D., and Reisch, J. T. 2010. A Discussion of Public Identification of US Audit Engagement Partners: Who Benefits? Who Pays? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7 (4): 334-343. |
[4] | Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., and Yang, J. S. 2003. Auditor Industry Specialization and Earnings Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22 (2): 71-97. |
[5] | Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., and Subramanyam, K. R. 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15 (1): 1-24. |
[6] | Behn, B. K., Choi, J. H., and Kang, T. 2008. Audit Quality and Properties of Analyst Earnings Forecasts. The Accounting Review, 83 (2): 327-349. |
[7] | Bell, J. A. 2019. The Impact of Audit Engagement Partner Disclosure on Audit Outcomes in the United States. PhD in Business Administration Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/phdba_etd/2 |
[8] | Blay, A. D., Notbohm, M., Schelleman, C., and Valencia, A. 2014. Audit Quality Effects of an Individual Audit Engagement Partner Signature Mandate. International Journal of Auditing, 18 (3): 172-192. |
[9] | Blay, A. D., Gooden, E. S., Mellon, M. J., and Stevens, D. E. 2019. The Effect of an Auditor Identity Disclosure Requirement on Audit Quality: An Experimental Examination Incorporating the Incremental Effect of a Signature Requirement. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. In-Press. |
[10] | Brown, V. L., Gissel, J. L., and Vitalis, A. 2019. Mandatory Disclosure of Audit Engagement Partners: Insights from Practice. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2831730 |
[11] | Burke, J. J., Hoitash, R., and Hoitash, U. 2019. Audit Partner Identification and Characteristics: Evidence from US Form AP Filings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 38 (3): 71-94. |
[12] | Carcello, J. V., and Li, C. 2013. Costs and Benefits of Requiring an Engagement Partner Signature: Recent Experience in the United Kingdom. The Accounting Review, 88 (5): 1511-1546. |
[13] | Carcello, J. V., and Santore, R. 2015. Engagement Partner Identification: A Theoretical Analysis. Accounting Horizons, 29 (2): 297-311. |
[14] | Chi, W., Lisic, L. L., Myers, L. A., Pevzner, M., and Seidel, T. A. 2019. The Consequences of Providing Lower Quality Audits at the Engagement Partner Level. Journal of International Accounting Research. In-Press. |
[15] | Choi, J. H., Kim, S., and Raman, K. K. 2017. Did the 1998 Merger of Price Waterhouse and Coopers & Lybrand increase audit quality?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34 (2): 1071-1102. |
[16] | Cianci, A. M., Houston, R. W., Montague, N. R., and Vogel, R. 2017. Audit Partner Identification: Unintended Consequences on Audit Judgment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36 (4): 135-149. |
[17] | Cunningham, L. M., Li, C., Stein, S. E., and Wright, N. S. 2019a. What's in a Name? Initial Evidence of US Audit Partner Identification Using Difference-in-Differences Analyses. The Accounting Review, In-Press. |
[18] | Cunningham, L. M., Stein, S. E., and Wright, N. S. 2019b. Practitioner Summary Initial Evidence of US Audit Partner Identification in Form AP Shows Limited Impact on Audit Quality. Current Issues in Auditing. In-Press. |
[19] | Dao, M., Xu, H., and Liu, L. 2019. Impact of the Disclosure of Audit Engagement Partners on Audit Quality: Evidence from the USA. International Journal of Auditing, 23 (1): 112 124. |
[20] | Demek, K. C., Kaplan, S. E., and Winn, A. 2019. Who Really Performs the Audit? Examining the Effects of Voluntary Disclosure of the Use of Other Auditors on Investors' Perceptions of Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. In-Press. |
[21] | Deng, M., Kim, E., and Ye, M. 2019. Audit Partner Identification, Assignment, and the Market for Audit Talent. In 2019 Conference on the Convergence of Financial and Managerial Accounting Research. |
[22] | DeZoort, T., Harrison, P., and Taylor, M. 2006. Accountability and Auditors’ Materiality Judgments: The Effects of Differential Pressure Strength on Conservatism, Variability, and Effort. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 31 (4-5): 373-390. |
[23] | Dhole, S., Manchiraju, H., and Suk, I. 2016. CEO Inside Debt and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 31 (4): 515-550. |
[24] | Doxey, M., Lawson, J., Lopez, T. J., and Swanquist, Q. T. 2019. Do Investors Care Who Did the Audit? Early Evidence on the Informativeness of Form AP. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3221383 |
[25] | Fouda, E. A. 2017. The Relationship between Share Liquidity and Earnings Management: An Empirical Study on Companies Listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange. Accounting Research Journal, Accounting Department, Faculty of Commerce - Tanta University, 2, 339-262. |
[26] | Francis, J. R., and Michas, P. N. 2013a. The Contagion Effect of Low-Quality Audits. The Accounting Review, 88 (2): 521-552. |
[27] | Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., and Yu, M. D. 2013b. Office Size of Big 4 Auditors and Client Restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30 (4): 1626-1661. |
[28] | Gul, F. A., Wu, D., and Yang, Z. 2013. Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data. The Accounting Review, 88 (6): 1993-2023. |
[29] | International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2015. Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 700. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. |
[30] | International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2012. Improving the Auditor’s Report. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. |
[31] | Jiang, H., Habib, A., and Zhou, D. (2015). Accounting restatements and audit quality in China. Advances in Accounting, 31 (1), 125-135. |
[32] | Knechel, W. R., and Vanstraelen, A., and Zerni, M. 2015. Does the Identity of Engagement Partners Matter? An analysis of Audit Partner Reporting Decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32 (4): 1443-1478. |
[33] | Lambert, T. A., B. L. Luippold, and C. M. Stefaniak. 2013. Audit Partner Disclosure: Potential Implication for Investor Reaction and Auditor Independence. Working Paper. University of Massachusetts Amherst. |
[34] | Lee, H. S., Nagy, A. L., and Zimmerman, A. B. 2019. Audit Partner Assignments and Audit Quality in the United States. The Accounting Review. 94 (2): 297-323. |
[35] | Lee, K., and Levine, C. 2019. Audit Partner Identification and Audit Quality. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3450746. |
[36] | Liu, S. 2017. Does the Requirement of an Engagement Partner Signature Improve Financial Analysts’ Information Environment in the United Kingdom? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49 (1): 263-281. |
[37] | Mandour, M. M. 2016. The Impact of Voluntary Activation of the Joint Auditing Approach on Earnings Management Practices: An Empirical Study on Companies Listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting Thought, Accounting Department, Faculty of Commerce - Ain Shams University, 20 (2), 1119-1172. |
[38] | Miller, James E. 2007. Detecting Earnings Management: A Tool for Practitioners and Regulators. Published Doctoral Dissertation: Anderson University. |
[39] | Nomir, A. R. 2017. The Effect of Managing the Level of the Auditor's Business Risk on the Relationship of the Level of this Risk to the Extent of Delay in Issuing the Audit Report: An Empirical Study on Companies Listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange. Accounting Research Journal, Accounting Department, Faculty of Commerce - Tanta University, 1, 338-392. |
[40] | Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2011. Improving the Transparency of Audits: Proposed Amendments to PCAOB Auditing Standards and form 2. Concept release no. 2011–2007. Available at: https://pcaobus.org//Rulemaking/Docket029/PCAOB_Release_2011-007.pdf |
[41] | Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2008. Signing the Auditor’s Report. Standing Advisory Group Meeting, Panel Discussion. Available at: https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket029/10232008_SAG_Tran script.pdf |
[42] | Rusmin, R. 2010. Auditor Quality and Earnings Management: Singaporean Evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25 (7): 618-638. |
[43] | Schlueter, J. K., and Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V. 2019. Audit Partner Signature Disclosure Effects on Non-Professional Investors’ Credibility Assessments and Liability Perceptions. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3442568 |
[44] | Wang, Y., Yu, L., and Zhao, Y. 2015. The Association between Audit-Partner Quality and Engagement Quality: Evidence from Financial Report Misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 34 (3): 81-111. |
[45] | Wilson, A. B., Chapman, M., and Stott, D. M. 2019. The Effect of Audit Opinion Signature on a Jury's Perception of Negligence. International Journal of Auditing, 23 (1): 45-56. |
[46] | Zerni, M. 2012. Audit Partner Specialization and Audit Fees: Some Evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29 (1): 312-340. |
APA Style
Mohamed Khamis Zaytoun, Mohamed Mahmoud Elhousy. (2023). An Investigation of the Effect of Audit Partner’s Disclosure on Earnings Management for Egyptian Companies. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11
ACS Style
Mohamed Khamis Zaytoun; Mohamed Mahmoud Elhousy. An Investigation of the Effect of Audit Partner’s Disclosure on Earnings Management for Egyptian Companies. J. Finance Account. 2023, 11(1), 1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11
AMA Style
Mohamed Khamis Zaytoun, Mohamed Mahmoud Elhousy. An Investigation of the Effect of Audit Partner’s Disclosure on Earnings Management for Egyptian Companies. J Finance Account. 2023;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11
@article{10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11, author = {Mohamed Khamis Zaytoun and Mohamed Mahmoud Elhousy}, title = {An Investigation of the Effect of Audit Partner’s Disclosure on Earnings Management for Egyptian Companies}, journal = {Journal of Finance and Accounting}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {1-11}, doi = {10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfa.20231101.11}, abstract = {International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and European Union (EU) have made significant efforts to restore the credibility, information, accuracy, and independence of the audit report by requiring disclosure of the audit partner's name and/or the audit partner's signature on the audit report. This research aims to study and examine the relationship between the audit partner's voluntary disclosure and earnings management. In precise, examine whether the audit partner's disclosure leads to lower level of earnings management. The research has also aimed for examining the impact of the audit partner quality on the aforementioned relationship, using a sample from the companies listed in the Egyptian Stock Exchange for the period starting from 2014 to 2018. The results indicated that: (1) there is a statistically significant negative effect for the audit partner disclosure on the absolute value of earnings management proxied by Miller Ratio; which in turn means that the audit partner disclosure increases the earnings quality. (2) There is no effect for the audit partner quality proxied by his industrial specialization on the relationship between audit partner disclosure and the earnings quality. The findings of this research have important consequences for regulators in determining whether the actual effects of a disclosure requirement are as expected, for investors in reducing costs of obtaining information, and for audit committees in making better decisions when hiring auditors.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Investigation of the Effect of Audit Partner’s Disclosure on Earnings Management for Egyptian Companies AU - Mohamed Khamis Zaytoun AU - Mohamed Mahmoud Elhousy Y1 - 2023/01/10 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11 T2 - Journal of Finance and Accounting JF - Journal of Finance and Accounting JO - Journal of Finance and Accounting SP - 1 EP - 11 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7323 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20231101.11 AB - International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and European Union (EU) have made significant efforts to restore the credibility, information, accuracy, and independence of the audit report by requiring disclosure of the audit partner's name and/or the audit partner's signature on the audit report. This research aims to study and examine the relationship between the audit partner's voluntary disclosure and earnings management. In precise, examine whether the audit partner's disclosure leads to lower level of earnings management. The research has also aimed for examining the impact of the audit partner quality on the aforementioned relationship, using a sample from the companies listed in the Egyptian Stock Exchange for the period starting from 2014 to 2018. The results indicated that: (1) there is a statistically significant negative effect for the audit partner disclosure on the absolute value of earnings management proxied by Miller Ratio; which in turn means that the audit partner disclosure increases the earnings quality. (2) There is no effect for the audit partner quality proxied by his industrial specialization on the relationship between audit partner disclosure and the earnings quality. The findings of this research have important consequences for regulators in determining whether the actual effects of a disclosure requirement are as expected, for investors in reducing costs of obtaining information, and for audit committees in making better decisions when hiring auditors. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -