A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing

Ruyi Huang; Zili Mei; Jiang Li; Enshen Long; Ting Guo; Tao Luo; Yan Long

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13

| Peer-Reviewed

A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing

Ruyi Huang, Zili Mei, Jiang Li, Enshen Long, Ting Guo, Tao Luo, Yan Long

Published in Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 2)

Received: 6 August 2018 Accepted: 1 September 2018 Published: 8 October 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Mixed agitation can significantly improve the efficiency of anaerobic fermentation, which is shown by the remarkable improvement of biogas production and pollutant removal rate, so it has become an indispensable auxiliary process in modern biogas engineering. However, the internal mechanism of how agitation improves the fermentation efficiency is not clear, so it is difficult to find the best agitation form under complex conditions. However, in recent years, more research results have been obtained in this field. The effects of various agitation forms have been continuously verified on different feedstock characteristics under different fermentation and operating conditions, and the mechanism has been gradually clarified. The most important achievement is that in the 1990s it was clear that continuous agitation would impact the fermentation system, so batch agitation is the correct way to improve the fermentation efficiency. Since the 21st century, the latest research has focused on setting the operating parameters of batch agitation. Researchers have made greatly progress in all the aspects of medium, mode, power, speed and duration of agitation, and optimized the mixing scheme. Some studies have also revealed that stirring will affect the temperature field, impurity removal, toxicity accumulation and so on, and the optimal design of mixing scheme should take into account the comprehensive effects of all aspects. In this paper, the main worldwide research achievements in this field made in recent years are reviewed, and the internal mechanism that agitation can improve the anaerobic fermentation efficiency of biogas is clarified to a certain extent, and the suitable agitation forms under certain conditions are suggested.

Published in	Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13
Page(s)	32-39
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biogas, Fermentation Efficiency, Mixing, Agitation, Flow Pattern

References

[1]	Mcmahon K D.; Stroot P G.; Mackie R I. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions—II: microbial population dynamics [J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(7):1817–1827.
[2]	Gómez X.; Cuetos M J.; Cara J., Anaerobic co-digestion of primary sludge and the fruit and vegetable fraction of the municipal solid wastes [J]. Renewable Energy, 2006, 31(12):2017-2024.
[3]	Swapnavahini K.; Srinivas T.; Kumar P L. Feasibility study of anaerobic digestion of ocimum sanctum leaf waste generated from sanctum sanctorum [J]. Bioresources, 2010, 5(1):389-396.
[4]	Liu, Y.; Wang, ZY.; Kong, CX. Research Progress of Mixing and Stirring Process in Biogas Fermentation [J]. China Biogas, 2009, 27(3):26-30.
[5]	Yang, H.;, Deng, LW.; Liu, Y. A Review OH Effects of Stirring Oil Biogas Production of Anaerobic Digestio [J]. China Biogas, 2010, 28(4):3-9.
[6]	Karim K.; Thomas K K.; Hoffmann R. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mixing [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(14):1607-1612.
[7]	Huang Z. Design of Small Tank Biogas Digester [J]. China Biogas, 2000, 18(4):33-34.
[8]	Luan D.; Qiao C.; Zhou S. Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Power Consumption and Metzner-Otto Constant for Impeller of 6PBT [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 27(3):635-640.
[9]	Song Z, Zhang C, Yang G, et al. Comparison of biogas development from households and medium and large-scale biogas plants in rural China [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 33(2):204-213.
[10]	Chen Q, Liu T. Biogas system in rural China: Upgrading from decentralized to centralized? [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 78:933-944.
[11]	D BalussouaR,McKennaaD,MöstbW Fichtnera. A model-based analysis of the future capacity expansion for German biogas plants under different legal frameworks [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018,96:119-131.
[12]	Ruyi Huang, Zili Mei, Yan Long, et al. Impact of Optimized Flow Pattern on Pollutant Removal and Biogas Production Rate Using Wastewater Anaerobic Fermentation. Bioresources 2015; 10(3):4826-4842.
[13]	Ruyi Huang, Xin Zhao, Jiang Li. A Review on Optimization of Flow Pattern in Biogas Anaerobic Degester by CFD Method [J]. China biogas, 2018, 36(4):23-28.
[14]	Chen L, Cong R G, Shu B, et al. A sustainable biogas model in China: The case study of Beijing Deqingyuan biogas project [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 78:773-779.
[15]	Davide Dapelo, JohnBridgeman. Assessment of mixing quality in full-scale, biogas-mixed anaerobic digestion using CFD [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 265(10):480-489.
[16]	Yang, H. Study on mass tranfer property and optimization of stirring form for high solids anaerobic digestion [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Siences, 2011.
[17]	Monlau F, Sambusiti C, Ficara E, et al. New opportunities for agricultural digestate valorization: current situation and perspectives. [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015, 8(9):2600-2621.
[18]	Kougias P G, Angelidaki I. Biogas and its opportunities—A review [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2018, 12(3):14.
[19]	Ghaly A E.; Ben-Hassan R M. Continuous production of biogas from dairy manure using an innovative no-mix reactor [J]. Applied Biochemistry & Biotechnology, 1989, 20-21(1):541-559.
[20]	Ghaly A E. Biogas Production from Dairy Manure Using Continuous Mix and No-Mix Mesophilic Reactors [J]. Energy Sources, 1989, 11(4):221-235.
[21]	Yang, BL. Sludge Agitation in Bio-digester [J]. China Water & Waste Water, 1992, (2):47-51.
[22]	Zaiat M.; Rodrigues J A D.; Ratusznei S M. Anaerobic sequencing batch reactors for wastewater treatment: a developing technology [J]. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2001, 55(1):29-35.
[23]	Jarvis P.; Jefferson B.; Gregory J. A review of floc strength and breakage. [J]. Water Research, 2005, 39(14):3121–3137.
[24]	Ruyi Huang, Lin Feng, Ting Guo. Research Progress in Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by strring [J]. China biogas, 2017, 35(5):43-49.
[25]	Karim Khursheed.; Klasson Kjell Thomas.; Hoffmann Rebecca. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: Effect of mixing [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(14):1607–1612.
[26]	Karim K.; Hoffmann R.; Klasson T. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: Waste strength versus impact of mixing [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(16):1771–1781.
[27]	Qin, F. Pilot Research on Sludge Agitatoin for Anaerobic Digestion [D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 1995.
[28]	Karim K.; Klasson KT.; Drescher SR.; Ridenour W, Borole AP,Al-Dahhan MH. Mesophilic Digestion Kinetics of Manure Slurry [J]. Applied Biochemistry & Biotechnology, 2007, 142(3):231–242.
[29]	Borole A P.; Klasson K T.; Ridenour W. Methane Production In A 100-L Upflow Bioreactor By Anaerobic Digestion Of Farm Waste [J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2006, 129-132(131):887-896.
[30]	Nishio N.; Nakashimada Y. Recent development of anaerobic digestion processes for energy recovery from wastes [J]. Journal of Bioscience & Bioengineering, 2007, 103(2):105–112.
[31]	Hashimoto A G. Effect of mixing duration and vacuum on methane production rate from beef cattle waste [J]. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 1982, 24(1):9–23.
[32]	RM Ben-Hassan.; AE Ghaly.; RK Singh. Design and evaluation of no-mix energy efficient anaerobic digester [C]. Proceedings of Annual Meeting, Canadian Society of Agricultural Engineering, 1985, 71:121–130.
[33]	Qin, F. Pilot Research on Sludge Agitatoin for Anaerobic Digestion [J]. Water & Waste Water, 1996, 22(2):61-62.
[34]	Hopfner-Sixt K.; Amon T.; Bodiroza V. State of the art of biogas technology in Austria. [J]. Landtechnik, 2006, 61(1):30-31.
[35]	Zhang, H. The research on pollution prevention technique of industrialized piggery [D]. Shenyang: Northeast University, 2005.
[36]	Peng, XY. Study on biogas technology adoption behavior and green subsidy policy of livestock farming pollution prevention evidence from specialized pig breeding households [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Siences, 2007.
[37]	Su, LS. An Analysis on determinants of waste disposal behavior in pig farming: the case of Wuxue City [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2010.
[38]	Guo, X. Research on subsidy policy of external environment cost control in scale livestock and poultry breeding [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2012.
[39]	Li, P. Study on agricultural waste recycling efficiency evaluation and industrial development mechanism [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2014.
[40]	Ruiz D, San G M, Corona B, et al. Environmental and economic analysis of power generation in a thermophilic biogas plant. [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 633:1418-1428.
[41]	Yakahiro Hiraoka. Sludge Treatment Process [M]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology Press, 1990.
[42]	Youngsukkasem S.; Rakshit SK.; Taherzadeh MJ. Biogas production by encapsulated methane-producing bacteria [J]. Bioresources, 2012, 7(1):56-65.
[43]	Sriroth K.; Chollakup R.; Chotineeranat S. Processing of cassava waste for improved biomass utilization [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 71(1):63–69.
[44]	Stephan, Tait.; Jelmer, Tamis.; Bruce, Edgerton. Anaerobic digestion of spent bedding from deep litter piggery housing [J]. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100(7):2210-2218.
[45]	Krzystek, L.; Ledakowicz, S.; Kahle, HJ. Degradation of household biowaste in reactors [J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2001, 92(2):103–112.
[46]	Lehtomäki A.; Huttunen S.; Rintala JA. Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio [J]. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 2007, 51(3):591–609.
[47]	Kristian Fjørtoft.; Morken J.; Hanssen J F. Methane production and energy evaluation of a farm scaled biogas plant in cold climate area [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 169(5):72-79.
[48]	Martí-Herrero J.; Alvarez R.; Rojas MR. Improvement through low cost biofilm carrier in anaerobic tubular digestion in cold climate regions [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 167c(3):87–93.
[49]	Lee, SR.; Cho, NK.; Maeng, WJ. Using the pressure of biogas created during anaerobic digestion as the source of mixing power [J]. Journal of Fermentation & Bioengineering, 1995, 80(95):415-417.
[50]	Liu, XF.; Liao, YZ. The study on anaerobic dry fermentation of municipal organic wastes [J]. Journal of Solar Energy, 1995, 16(2):170-173.
[51]	Li, D.; Sun, Y.M.; Yuan, ZH. Methane production by anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste paper [J] . Acta Scientiae Circum stantiae, 2009, 29( 3 ): 577-583.
[52]	Li, D.; Sun, Y.M.; Yuan, ZH. Influences of Feedstock Proportion and pH Value on Anaerobic Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste and Waste Paper [J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2009, 9(1):53-58.
[53]	Li, RP.; Liu, YP.; Li, XJ. Biogasification performance of anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen residues and cattle manure [J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2008, 26(2):64-68.
[54]	Li, RP. Biogas pruduction performance of anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cattle manure and the optimization study on operating parameters [D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2008.
[55]	Li, R.; Chen, S.; Li, X. Anaerobic Codigestion of Kitchen Waste with Cattle Manure for Biogas Production [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(4):2225-2228.
[56]	Li, R.; Li, SC. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste and Cattle Manure for Methane Production [J]. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization & Environmental Effects, 2009, 31(20):1848-1856.
[57]	Qin, WJ.; Zhang, WY.; Lin, L. Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen garbage and urban anaerobic sludge with different organic loads [J]. Environment Science and Management, 2011, 36(9):99-103.
[58]	Wang, T.; Zhang, WY. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Refuse Leachate and Kitchen Waste [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 24(3):212-220.
[59]	Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liu, X. Evaluating Methane Production from Anaerobic Mono- and Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste, Corn Stover, and Chicken Manure [J]. Energy Fuels, 2013, 27(4):2085-2091.
[60]	Chen, QS.; Liu, J.; Pan, JY.; Hu, ZH.; Yan, YL.; Zhang, XL.; Pang, GC. Studies on utilizing the muti-strains co-fermentation for biotransformation of corn straw [J]. Biotechnology, 1999, 9(4):15-20.
[61]	Chen, QS.; Liu, J.; Pan, JY.; Hu, ZH.; Yan, YL.; Zhang, XL.; Pang, GC. Study on the bio-conversion of corn straws by multi-strain co-fermentation [J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 1999, 25(5):1-6.
[62]	Li, SL.; Mei, ZL.; Chang, MQ.; Zhang, GZ.; Liu, JM. Gas pruduction potential of scum from different height of digester [J]. China Biogas, 2014, 32(5):33-35.
[63]	Jiang, L.; Wei, L.; Duan, Q. Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with three crop residues for biogas production [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 156(2):307–313.
[64]	Wang, YH.; Wang, QS.; Wu, YA.; An, Y.; Peng, XH. Morphological Characteristics of Algae Floc and Its Relation with Flotatio [J]. Environmental Science, 2008, 29(3):688-695. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2008.03.025.
[65]	Li, Y.; Deng, LW.; Xin, X.; Chen, C.; Zheng, D.; Wei, BP. Effects of gravitational on separation of swine wastewater and biogas fermentation [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2013, 33(7):1912-1917.
[66]	Luo, T.; Long, Y.; Li, J. Performance of a novel downward plug-flow anaerobic digester for methane production from chopped straw. [J]. Bioresources, 2015, 10(1):943-955.
[67]	Huang, RY.; Long, Y.; Luo, T. The research on optimization of the multiphase flow field of biogas plant by using CFD software [J]. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 2014, 8(3):1038-1046.
[68]	Liu, JT.; Fu, ZG.; Mei, ZL.; Kong, CX.; Li, H.; Xiong, X. Comparative analysis on three kinds of biofilm growth efficiencies of biofilm carriers in wastewater treatment [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2012, 32(11):21-24.
[69]	Zhao, QL.; Huang, RC. Biofilm characteristics in hybrid biological reactor [J]. Environmental pollution & Prevention, 2000, 22(1):4-7.
[70]	Li, WG.; Zhao, QL.; Ma, F. Sequential Batch Bio-Membrane Reactor for Slaughtering Wastewater Treatment [J]. China Water & Waste Water, 2000, 16(10):59-60.
[71]	Yang, P.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Fang, ZH. Biofilm Detachment in an Anaerobic Fluidized Bed with Polymer Porous Carriers [J]. Journal Of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2000, 32(3):112-115.
[72]	Tavares CRG.; Jr GLS.; Capdeville B. The effect of air superficial velocity on biofilm accumulation in a three-phase fluidized-bed reactor [J]. Water Research, 1995, 29(10):2293–2298.
[73]	Kou, W.; Zheng, L.; Qu, JX. Engineering design of solar and power waste energy heating system for biogas project [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2013, 29(24):211-217.
[74]	Luo, T.; Mei, ZL.; Long, T. Effect of Feeding on Temperature Contour and Biogas Production [J]. China Biogas, 2015, 33(1):3-6.
[75]	Shi, HX.; Rong, L.; Zhu, HG. The influence on heating process and energy consumption under different stirring intensities in CSTR [J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2011, 29:62-65.
[76]	Bi, JW.; Zhu, HG.; Shi, HX. CFD simulation and temperature field validation of biogas digester mixing [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(10):283-289.
[77]	Li, DY.; Li, SJ.; Liu, TS. Effect of Mixing on Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure [J]. Transactions of The Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(2):117-120.
[78]	Hu, P.; Yan, Q.; Song, RT. Biogas production through anaerobic digestion from the mixture of blue algae and sludge [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 3(3):559-563.
[79]	Xu, LJ.; Zhu, GC.; Lv, XW.; Zhao, JW. Biogas production through anaerobic digestion from the mixture of decomposed cyanobacteria and anaerobic sludge [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(9):3345-3350.
[80]	Zhang, LG.; Li, JZ.; Ban, QY.; Xu, YP. Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency and the Methanogens Composition in Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket and Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor [J]. Science & Technology Review, 2012, 30(31):23-27.
[81]	Zhou, HB.; Chen, J.; Zhao, YC.; Zhou, Q. Methanogenic activity of anaerobic granular sludge by long-chain fatty acids [J]. Technology Of Water Treatment, 2002, 28(2):93-97.
[82]	He, MN. Effect of temperatures on hydrolysis acidification of food waste and methane conversion of the acidified products [D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology. 2013.
[83]	Duan, XR.; Li, Y.; Yuan, HY. Effect of stirring speed on anaerobic hydrolytic acidification of excess sludge [J]. Industrial China Water & Waste Water, 2011, 42(2):87-89.
[84]	Du, LZ.; Chen, L.; Zhang, KQ.; Liang, JF. Effect of low intensity air-stirring on solid acidogenic digestion with pig manure and straw as feedstock [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2011, 05(1):209-213.
[85]	Chen, JJ.; Li, XJ.; Liu, YP. Chen Jiajia, Li Xiujin, Liu Yanping, et al. Effect of mixing rates on anaerobic digestion performance of rice straw [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 30(S2):144-148.
[86]	Chen, JJ.; Yuan, HR.; Wang, KS. Effect of mechanical agitation speed on the anaerobic digestion performance of rice straw [J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2012, 30(2).
[87]	Hansen, KH.; Angelidaki I.; Birgitte, KA. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: inhibition by ammonia [J]. Water Research, 1998, 32(97):5-12.
[88]	He, SJ.; Wang, JL.; Zhao, X. Effect of ammonium concentration on the methanogenic activity of anaerobic granular sludge [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2005, 45(9):1294-1296.
[89]	Zhao, QL.; Li, XZ. Inhibition of microbial activity by ammonia-nitrogen in landfill leachate [J]. Environmental pollution & Prevention, 1998, 20(6):1-4.
[90]	Yu, FF.; Wu, JD. Toxicity Study of Ammonium on Methanogenic Bacteria in Anaerobic Granular Sludge [J]. Chemistry & Bioengineering, 2008, 25(4):75-78.
[91]	Li, YF.; Zhang, XN.; Chen, WT.; Liu, HT.; Wang, T. Study on the impact of carbon source on nitrogen removal of anammox [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2013, 31(1):35-38.
[92]	Zhang, B.; Xu, JB.; Cai, WM. Review on the ammonia inhibition for anaerobic digestion [J]. China Biogas, 2003, 21(3):26-28.
[93]	Jia, CX.; Peng, XY.; Liu, GT. Establishment of total ammonia-nitrogen accumulation prediction model in two- phase anaerobic digestion of OFMSW and its verification [J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2011, 34(1):121-127.
[94]	Gao, YN.; Liu, ZJ.; Furukawa, K. Study on nitrogen removal pruperties of a high-rate hybrid anammox reactor [J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2011, (7):75-78.
[95]	Gao, YN.; Liu, ZJ.; Furukawa, K. Study on the performance of the hybrid anammox reactor for biological nitrogen removel [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2011, 31(11):2361-2367.
[96]	Gao, YN. Study on Nitrogen removal performances and kinetics of hybrid anammox reactor [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2011.
[97]	Guo, Y.; Yang, P.; Wu, Y. Study on nitrogen removal of leachate by anaerobic ammonium oxidation process in an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor [J]. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2004, 5(8):19-22.
[98]	Sui, JC.; Jiang, JG.; Wu, SY.; Zhao, ZZ. Start-up research of single phase high anaerobic digestion for technology organic waste [J]. Environmental Science, 2007, 28(3):684-688.
[99]	Jiang, JG.; Wu, SY.; Sui, JC.; Wang, Y. Research on single phase high solid anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid wastes [J]. Environmental Science, 2008, 29(4):1104-1108.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ruyi Huang, Zili Mei, Jiang Li, Enshen Long, Ting Guo, et al. (2018). A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing. Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, 3(2), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ruyi Huang; Zili Mei; Jiang Li; Enshen Long; Ting Guo, et al. A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing. J. Energy Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 3(2), 32-39. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ruyi Huang, Zili Mei, Jiang Li, Enshen Long, Ting Guo, et al. A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing. J Energy Environ Chem Eng. 2018;3(2):32-39. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13,
  author = {Ruyi Huang and Zili Mei and Jiang Li and Enshen Long and Ting Guo and Tao Luo and Yan Long},
  title = {A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing},
  journal = {Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {32-39},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeece.20180302.13},
  abstract = {Mixed agitation can significantly improve the efficiency of anaerobic fermentation, which is shown by the remarkable improvement of biogas production and pollutant removal rate, so it has become an indispensable auxiliary process in modern biogas engineering. However, the internal mechanism of how agitation improves the fermentation efficiency is not clear, so it is difficult to find the best agitation form under complex conditions. However, in recent years, more research results have been obtained in this field. The effects of various agitation forms have been continuously verified on different feedstock characteristics under different fermentation and operating conditions, and the mechanism has been gradually clarified. The most important achievement is that in the 1990s it was clear that continuous agitation would impact the fermentation system, so batch agitation is the correct way to improve the fermentation efficiency. Since the 21st century, the latest research has focused on setting the operating parameters of batch agitation. Researchers have made greatly progress in all the aspects of medium, mode, power, speed and duration of agitation, and optimized the mixing scheme. Some studies have also revealed that stirring will affect the temperature field, impurity removal, toxicity accumulation and so on, and the optimal design of mixing scheme should take into account the comprehensive effects of all aspects. In this paper, the main worldwide research achievements in this field made in recent years are reviewed, and the internal mechanism that agitation can improve the anaerobic fermentation efficiency of biogas is clarified to a certain extent, and the suitable agitation forms under certain conditions are suggested.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing
AU  - Ruyi Huang
AU  - Zili Mei
AU  - Jiang Li
AU  - Enshen Long
AU  - Ting Guo
AU  - Tao Luo
AU  - Yan Long
Y1  - 2018/10/08
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13
T2  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
JF  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
JO  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
SP  - 32
EP  - 39
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-434X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13
AB  - Mixed agitation can significantly improve the efficiency of anaerobic fermentation, which is shown by the remarkable improvement of biogas production and pollutant removal rate, so it has become an indispensable auxiliary process in modern biogas engineering. However, the internal mechanism of how agitation improves the fermentation efficiency is not clear, so it is difficult to find the best agitation form under complex conditions. However, in recent years, more research results have been obtained in this field. The effects of various agitation forms have been continuously verified on different feedstock characteristics under different fermentation and operating conditions, and the mechanism has been gradually clarified. The most important achievement is that in the 1990s it was clear that continuous agitation would impact the fermentation system, so batch agitation is the correct way to improve the fermentation efficiency. Since the 21st century, the latest research has focused on setting the operating parameters of batch agitation. Researchers have made greatly progress in all the aspects of medium, mode, power, speed and duration of agitation, and optimized the mixing scheme. Some studies have also revealed that stirring will affect the temperature field, impurity removal, toxicity accumulation and so on, and the optimal design of mixing scheme should take into account the comprehensive effects of all aspects. In this paper, the main worldwide research achievements in this field made in recent years are reviewed, and the internal mechanism that agitation can improve the anaerobic fermentation efficiency of biogas is clarified to a certain extent, and the suitable agitation forms under certain conditions are suggested.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ruyi Huang

Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture & Key Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, China
Zili Mei

Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture & Key Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, China
Jiang Li

Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture & Key Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, China
Enshen Long

College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Ting Guo

Rural Energy Office of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
Tao Luo

Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture & Key Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, China
Yan Long

Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture & Key Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ruyi Huang, Zili Mei, Jiang Li, Enshen Long, Ting Guo, et al. (2018). A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing. Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, 3(2), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ruyi Huang; Zili Mei; Jiang Li; Enshen Long; Ting Guo, et al. A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing. J. Energy Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 3(2), 32-39. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ruyi Huang, Zili Mei, Jiang Li, Enshen Long, Ting Guo, et al. A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing. J Energy Environ Chem Eng. 2018;3(2):32-39. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13,
  author = {Ruyi Huang and Zili Mei and Jiang Li and Enshen Long and Ting Guo and Tao Luo and Yan Long},
  title = {A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing},
  journal = {Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {32-39},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeece.20180302.13},
  abstract = {Mixed agitation can significantly improve the efficiency of anaerobic fermentation, which is shown by the remarkable improvement of biogas production and pollutant removal rate, so it has become an indispensable auxiliary process in modern biogas engineering. However, the internal mechanism of how agitation improves the fermentation efficiency is not clear, so it is difficult to find the best agitation form under complex conditions. However, in recent years, more research results have been obtained in this field. The effects of various agitation forms have been continuously verified on different feedstock characteristics under different fermentation and operating conditions, and the mechanism has been gradually clarified. The most important achievement is that in the 1990s it was clear that continuous agitation would impact the fermentation system, so batch agitation is the correct way to improve the fermentation efficiency. Since the 21st century, the latest research has focused on setting the operating parameters of batch agitation. Researchers have made greatly progress in all the aspects of medium, mode, power, speed and duration of agitation, and optimized the mixing scheme. Some studies have also revealed that stirring will affect the temperature field, impurity removal, toxicity accumulation and so on, and the optimal design of mixing scheme should take into account the comprehensive effects of all aspects. In this paper, the main worldwide research achievements in this field made in recent years are reviewed, and the internal mechanism that agitation can improve the anaerobic fermentation efficiency of biogas is clarified to a certain extent, and the suitable agitation forms under certain conditions are suggested.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Review on the Research of Promoting Biogas Fermentation Efficiency by Mixing
AU  - Ruyi Huang
AU  - Zili Mei
AU  - Jiang Li
AU  - Enshen Long
AU  - Ting Guo
AU  - Tao Luo
AU  - Yan Long
Y1  - 2018/10/08
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13
T2  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
JF  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
JO  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
SP  - 32
EP  - 39
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-434X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20180302.13
AB  - Mixed agitation can significantly improve the efficiency of anaerobic fermentation, which is shown by the remarkable improvement of biogas production and pollutant removal rate, so it has become an indispensable auxiliary process in modern biogas engineering. However, the internal mechanism of how agitation improves the fermentation efficiency is not clear, so it is difficult to find the best agitation form under complex conditions. However, in recent years, more research results have been obtained in this field. The effects of various agitation forms have been continuously verified on different feedstock characteristics under different fermentation and operating conditions, and the mechanism has been gradually clarified. The most important achievement is that in the 1990s it was clear that continuous agitation would impact the fermentation system, so batch agitation is the correct way to improve the fermentation efficiency. Since the 21st century, the latest research has focused on setting the operating parameters of batch agitation. Researchers have made greatly progress in all the aspects of medium, mode, power, speed and duration of agitation, and optimized the mixing scheme. Some studies have also revealed that stirring will affect the temperature field, impurity removal, toxicity accumulation and so on, and the optimal design of mixing scheme should take into account the comprehensive effects of all aspects. In this paper, the main worldwide research achievements in this field made in recent years are reviewed, and the internal mechanism that agitation can improve the anaerobic fermentation efficiency of biogas is clarified to a certain extent, and the suitable agitation forms under certain conditions are suggested.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download