Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province

Zeng Liyun; Mao Yunyi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17

| Peer-Reviewed

Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province

Zeng Liyun, Mao Yunyi

Published in Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 24 April 2020 Accepted: 4 June 2020 Published: 15 June 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Under the macro background of the continuous deterioration of the international trade environment, the policy of “One Belt and One Road” is deeply constructed, and new industrialization and urbanization are highly integrated [1]. According to the single model of eastward opening-up, the purpose is to eliminate some unfavorable effects, including the aggravated trade frictions, the recessional resource-based industries, the extensive promotion between informatization and industrialization and the uneven regional economic development [2]. Under this circumstance, Sichuan has successively launched a series of major countermeasures for the implementation of regional openness, undertaking of industry transition, and the international cooperation on production capacity. In light of the internal relationship between “going global” and “bringing in” strategy, the research analyzes the necessity, feasibility and regularity of the transition from the Inland Resource Economy (IRE) to the Inland Open Economy (IOE). It reveals that the basic connotation and formative mechanism of the "going global" IOE. The research method is comparative analysis of two regional development models, including the basic conditions, main objectives, core contents, industrial patterns and realizable way. This article demonstrates that rationality of the stages and applicability of regions, how the output of production capacity replaces output of factors, and how a resource-driven mode changes to an openness-driven mode.

Published in	Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17
Page(s)	108-112
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Regional Openness, Industrial Undertaking, Capacity Cooperation, Realization Way

References

[1]	Liu Zhibiao, Wu Fuxiang. Double embedding of global value chain under the “Belt and Road Initiative“. Chinese Social Sciences, 2018 (08): 17-32.
[2]	Hu Ying. Research on China's regional economic development model. Commercial Economic Research, 2019 (15): 160-163.
[3]	Wu Qi. A review of the research on the open economy of inland China. New West, 2019 (15): 73-74.
[4]	Li Hongbing, Wen Lei, Lin Xuedong. The strategy of "excellent entry and superior exit" of China's foreign trade: a study based on the perspective of product quality and value added rate.
[5]	Chen Anna. Research on the development model of the Chinese railway “going global” in the new era. Business Economics Research, 2019 (14): 176-178.
[6]	Feng Xiaoyang. Research on the Necessity of Building an Inland Open Economic Highland in Chengdu. Cooperative Economy and Science and Technology, 2019 (15): 4-7.
[7]	Shen Jiayan, Wang Fang, Liu Zhenze. Global Opening, Industrial Undertaking and Policy Coordination—Taking the Construction of Open Inland Highlands in Sichuan as an Example. Agricultural Economics and Science and Technology, 2016 (17): 266-267.
[8]	Huang Zhuoli. The main path of China ’s foreign trade opening and its current characteristics [J]. Modern Marketing (Management Edition), 2020 (01): 70. X.
[9]	Fu Xiaodong, Wang Jingtian, Cui Xiaoyu. Regional economic policy practice and theoretical research since the founding of New China [J]. Regional Economic Review, 2019 (04): 8-24. X.
[10]	Wang Wenyu. Globalization and the transformation of China ’s regional industrial structure [C]. Economic Geography Committee of the Chinese Geographical Society. Summary of the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Economic Geography Committee of the Chinese Geographical Society. Professional Committee of Economic Geography of the Chinese Geographical Society: China Geography Learn, 2019: 13. X.
[11]	Li Haiyue. International Economic and Trade Development and my country's Foreign Trade Strategic Choice [J]. China Business Review, 2019 (10): 92-93. X.
[12]	Liu Huajun, Jia Wenxing, Peng Ying, Pei Yanfeng. Has the spatial spillover of regional economy narrowed the regional gap? —— Empirical evidence from the paradigm of relational data analysis [J]. Economic and Management Review, 2019, 35 (01): 122-133. X.
[13]	Si Zengchuo, Zhou Kun, Shao Jun. China's foreign trade upgrade: efficiency improvement and potential realization [J]. Shanghai Economic Research, 2019 (01): 113-128.
[14]	Kuang Cuifen. Analysis of my country's foreign trade strategy formulation from the perspective of international economic and trade [J]. Modern Economic Information, 2019 (01): 146.
[15]	Li Yinghui, Li Jing. The practice of inland opening in China: mechanism analysis and economic growth effect [J / OL]. Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University (Social Science Edition): 1-13 [2020-06-01]. http: //kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1154.C.20191227.0922.002.html.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Zeng Liyun, Mao Yunyi. (2020). Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 5(2), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Zeng Liyun; Mao Yunyi. Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2020, 5(2), 108-112. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Zeng Liyun, Mao Yunyi. Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province. J Bus Econ Dev. 2020;5(2):108-112. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17,
  author = {Zeng Liyun and Mao Yunyi},
  title = {Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province},
  journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {108-112},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20200502.17},
  abstract = {Under the macro background of the continuous deterioration of the international trade environment, the policy of “One Belt and One Road” is deeply constructed, and new industrialization and urbanization are highly integrated [1]. According to the single model of eastward opening-up, the purpose is to eliminate some unfavorable effects, including the aggravated trade frictions, the recessional resource-based industries, the extensive promotion between informatization and industrialization and the uneven regional economic development [2]. Under this circumstance, Sichuan has successively launched a series of major countermeasures for the implementation of regional openness, undertaking of industry transition, and the international cooperation on production capacity. In light of the internal relationship between “going global” and “bringing in” strategy, the research analyzes the necessity, feasibility and regularity of the transition from the Inland Resource Economy (IRE) to the Inland Open Economy (IOE). It reveals that the basic connotation and formative mechanism of the "going global" IOE. The research method is comparative analysis of two regional development models, including the basic conditions, main objectives, core contents, industrial patterns and realizable way. This article demonstrates that rationality of the stages and applicability of regions, how the output of production capacity replaces output of factors, and how a resource-driven mode changes to an openness-driven mode.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province
AU  - Zeng Liyun
AU  - Mao Yunyi
Y1  - 2020/06/15
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17
T2  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
JF  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
JO  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
SP  - 108
EP  - 112
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-3874
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17
AB  - Under the macro background of the continuous deterioration of the international trade environment, the policy of “One Belt and One Road” is deeply constructed, and new industrialization and urbanization are highly integrated [1]. According to the single model of eastward opening-up, the purpose is to eliminate some unfavorable effects, including the aggravated trade frictions, the recessional resource-based industries, the extensive promotion between informatization and industrialization and the uneven regional economic development [2]. Under this circumstance, Sichuan has successively launched a series of major countermeasures for the implementation of regional openness, undertaking of industry transition, and the international cooperation on production capacity. In light of the internal relationship between “going global” and “bringing in” strategy, the research analyzes the necessity, feasibility and regularity of the transition from the Inland Resource Economy (IRE) to the Inland Open Economy (IOE). It reveals that the basic connotation and formative mechanism of the "going global" IOE. The research method is comparative analysis of two regional development models, including the basic conditions, main objectives, core contents, industrial patterns and realizable way. This article demonstrates that rationality of the stages and applicability of regions, how the output of production capacity replaces output of factors, and how a resource-driven mode changes to an openness-driven mode.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Zeng Liyun

Rattanakosin International College of Creative Entrepreneurship, Rajamangala University of Technology, Rattanakosin – RICE, Bangkok, Thailand
Mao Yunyi

Economics and Management School, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Zeng Liyun, Mao Yunyi. (2020). Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 5(2), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Zeng Liyun; Mao Yunyi. Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2020, 5(2), 108-112. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Zeng Liyun, Mao Yunyi. Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province. J Bus Econ Dev. 2020;5(2):108-112. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17,
  author = {Zeng Liyun and Mao Yunyi},
  title = {Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province},
  journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {108-112},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20200502.17},
  abstract = {Under the macro background of the continuous deterioration of the international trade environment, the policy of “One Belt and One Road” is deeply constructed, and new industrialization and urbanization are highly integrated [1]. According to the single model of eastward opening-up, the purpose is to eliminate some unfavorable effects, including the aggravated trade frictions, the recessional resource-based industries, the extensive promotion between informatization and industrialization and the uneven regional economic development [2]. Under this circumstance, Sichuan has successively launched a series of major countermeasures for the implementation of regional openness, undertaking of industry transition, and the international cooperation on production capacity. In light of the internal relationship between “going global” and “bringing in” strategy, the research analyzes the necessity, feasibility and regularity of the transition from the Inland Resource Economy (IRE) to the Inland Open Economy (IOE). It reveals that the basic connotation and formative mechanism of the "going global" IOE. The research method is comparative analysis of two regional development models, including the basic conditions, main objectives, core contents, industrial patterns and realizable way. This article demonstrates that rationality of the stages and applicability of regions, how the output of production capacity replaces output of factors, and how a resource-driven mode changes to an openness-driven mode.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province
AU  - Zeng Liyun
AU  - Mao Yunyi
Y1  - 2020/06/15
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17
T2  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
JF  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
JO  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
SP  - 108
EP  - 112
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-3874
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17
AB  - Under the macro background of the continuous deterioration of the international trade environment, the policy of “One Belt and One Road” is deeply constructed, and new industrialization and urbanization are highly integrated [1]. According to the single model of eastward opening-up, the purpose is to eliminate some unfavorable effects, including the aggravated trade frictions, the recessional resource-based industries, the extensive promotion between informatization and industrialization and the uneven regional economic development [2]. Under this circumstance, Sichuan has successively launched a series of major countermeasures for the implementation of regional openness, undertaking of industry transition, and the international cooperation on production capacity. In light of the internal relationship between “going global” and “bringing in” strategy, the research analyzes the necessity, feasibility and regularity of the transition from the Inland Resource Economy (IRE) to the Inland Open Economy (IOE). It reveals that the basic connotation and formative mechanism of the "going global" IOE. The research method is comparative analysis of two regional development models, including the basic conditions, main objectives, core contents, industrial patterns and realizable way. This article demonstrates that rationality of the stages and applicability of regions, how the output of production capacity replaces output of factors, and how a resource-driven mode changes to an openness-driven mode.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download