Bioactive glass is a prominent biomaterial that can bind with both soft and hard tissues when in contact with body fluid. This study aims to find out how silicon concentration affects the cytotoxicity and bioactivity of bioactive glass. The 58S, 68S, and 76S BG particles were synthesized using a spray pyrolysis method. XRD, SEM, FTIR, and BET were used to examine the phase composition, morphology, chemical identity, and specific surface area of BG powders. The ability of the specimens to generate apatite on their surface after being soaked in the simulated body fluid (SBF) was determined using an in vitro test to measure their bioactivity. To evaluate the bioactivity of the BG powders, the in vitro apatite formation was investigated using XRD, FTIR, and SEM. Also, an in vitro cytotoxicity test was done using (MTT assay). A cell-growing environment was used to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity test based on different extraction concentrations of glass particles. The experimental results suggested that as silicon concentration in the BG increased, cell viability increased whereas bioactivity was reduced. Finally, the correlation between silicon content and cell viability and bioactivity was explored.
Published in | Journal of Biomaterials (Volume 7, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11 |
Page(s) | 1-7 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bioactive Glass, Bioactivity, Cytotoxicity, Silicon Concentration, Spray Pyrolysis
[1] | Anand A, Kundu B, Balla VK, Nandi SK. Synthesis and physico-chemical characterization of different mesoporous bioactive glass nanopowders: in-vitro SBF activity and cytotoxicity. Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society. 2018; 77: 106-17. |
[2] | Skallevold HE, Rokaya D, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS. Bioactive glass applications in dentistry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20: 5960. |
[3] | Hench LL. The story of Bioglass®. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2006; 17: 967-78. |
[4] | Ansari M. Bone tissue regeneration: biology, strategies and interface studies. Progress in biomaterials. 2019; 8: 223-37. |
[5] | Bakare FF, Chou YJ, Huang YH, Tesfay AH, Moriga T, Shih SJ. Correlation of Morphology and In-Vitro Degradation Behavior of Spray Pyrolyzed Bioactive Glasses. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12. |
[6] | Lei B, Chen X, Koh Y-H. Effects of acidic catalysts on the microstructure and biological property of sol–gel bioactive glass microspheres. Journal of sol-gel science and technology. 2011; 58: 656-63. |
[7] | Hong B-J, Hsiao C-W, Bakare FF, Sun J-T, Shih S-J. Effect of Acetic Acid Concentration on Pore Structure for Mesoporous Bioactive Glass during Spray Pyrolysis. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11: 963. |
[8] | Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science. 2002; 295: 1014-7. |
[9] | Deshmukh K, Kovářík T, Křenek T, Docheva D, Stich T, Pola J. Recent advances and future perspectives of sol–gel derived porous bioactive glasses: a review. RSC advances. 2020; 10: 33782-835. |
[10] | Serra J, Gonzalez P, Liste S, Chiussi S, Leon B, Pérez-Amor M, et al. Influence of the non-bridging oxygen groups on the bioactivity of silicate glasses. Journal of Materials science: Materials in medicine. 2002; 13: 1221-5. |
[11] | Karlsson KH, Fröberg K, Ringbom T. A structural approach to bone adhering of bioactive glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1989; 112: 69-72. |
[12] | Hadush Tesfay A, Chou Y-J, Tan C-Y, Fufa Bakare F, Tsou N-T, Huang E-W, et al. Control of dopant distribution in yttrium-doped bioactive glass for selective internal radiotherapy applications using spray pyrolysis. Materials. 2019; 12: 986. |
[13] | Pouroutzidou GK, Liverani L, Theocharidou A, Tsamesidis I, Lazaridou M, Christodoulou E, et al. Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous mg-and sr-doped nanoparticles for moxifloxacin drug delivery in promising tissue engineering applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 577. |
[14] | Vernè E, Miola M, Renzi E. Synthesis and characterization of innovative silica-based bioactive glass doped with tellurium. 2019. |
[15] | Fiume E, Migneco C, Verné E, Baino F. Comparison between bioactive sol-gel and melt-derived glasses/glass-ceramics based on the multicomponent SiO2–P2O5–CaO–MgO–Na2O–K2O system. Materials. 2020; 13: 540. |
[16] | Sarkar SK, Sadiasa A, Lee BT. Synthesis of a novel bioactive glass using the ultrasonic energy assisted hydrothermal method and their biocompatibility evaluation. Journal of Materials Research. 2014; 29: 1781-9. |
[17] | Montazerian M, Zanotto ED. A guided walk through Larry Hench’s monumental discoveries. Journal of Materials Science. 2017; 52: 8695-732. |
[18] | Lei B, Chen X, Wang Y, Zhao N. Synthesis and in vitro bioactivity of novel mesoporous hollow bioactive glass microspheres. Materials Letters. 2009; 63: 1719-21. |
[19] | Sumida K, Liang K, Reboul J, Ibarra IA, Furukawa S, Falcaro P. Sol–gel processing of metal–organic frameworks. Chemistry of Materials. 2017; 29: 2626-45. |
[20] | Lei Q, Guo J, Noureddine A, Wang A, Wuttke S, Brinker CJ, et al. Sol–gel-based advanced porous silica materials for biomedical applications. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020; 30: 1909539. |
[21] | Molino G, Bari A, Baino F, Fiorilli S, Vitale-Brovarone C. Electrophoretic deposition of spray-dried Sr-containing mesoporous bioactive glass spheres on glass–ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. Journal of Materials Science. 2017; 52: 9103-14. |
[22] | Chou Y-J, Hsiao C-W, Tsou N-T, Wu M-H, Shih S-J. Preparation and in vitro bioactivity of micron-sized bioactive glass particles using spray drying method. Applied Sciences. 2018; 9: 19. |
[23] | Hayakawa S, Tsuru K, Ohtsuki C, Osaka A. Mechanism of apatite formation on a sodium silicate glass in a simulated body fluid. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1999; 82: 2155-60. |
[24] | Maeno S, Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Morioka H, Yatabe T, Funayama A, et al. The effect of calcium ion concentration on osteoblast viability, proliferation and differentiation in monolayer and 3D culture. Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 4847-55. |
[25] | Chuni T, Dachasa K, Gochole F, Hunde T, Bakare FF. Effect of Morphology on the In Vitro Bioactivity and Biocompatibility of Spray Pyrolyzed Bioactive Glass. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2023; 2023. |
[26] | Mehrabi T, Mesgar AS, Mohammadi Z. Bioactive glasses: a promising therapeutic ion release strategy for enhancing wound healing. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2020; 6: 5399-430. |
[27] | Kokubo T, Shigematsu M, Nagashima Y, Tashiro M, Nakamura T, Yamamuro T, et al. Apatite-and wollastonite-containg glass-ceramics for prosthetic application. Bulletin of the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University. 1982; 60: 260-8. |
[28] | Zhu H, Zheng K, Boccaccini AR. Multi-functional silica-based mesoporous materials for simultaneous delivery of biologically active ions and therapeutic biomolecules. Acta Biomaterialia. 2021; 129: 1-17. |
[29] | Hench LL. An introduction to bioceramics: World scientific; 1993. |
APA Style
Chuni Aklilu, T., Gashaw Ewnete, B., Aboneh Mekuria, M., Aberra Tessema, A., Hadish, F., et al. (2023). Investigation of the Effect of Silicon Concentration on Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Spray Pyrolyzed Bioactive Glass. Journal of Biomaterials, 7(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11
ACS Style
Chuni Aklilu, T.; Gashaw Ewnete, B.; Aboneh Mekuria, M.; Aberra Tessema, A.; Hadish, F., et al. Investigation of the Effect of Silicon Concentration on Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Spray Pyrolyzed Bioactive Glass. J. Biomater. 2023, 7(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11
AMA Style
Chuni Aklilu T, Gashaw Ewnete B, Aboneh Mekuria M, Aberra Tessema A, Hadish F, et al. Investigation of the Effect of Silicon Concentration on Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Spray Pyrolyzed Bioactive Glass. J Biomater. 2023;7(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11
@article{10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11, author = {Tsion Chuni Aklilu and Bethelhem Gashaw Ewnete and Megersa Aboneh Mekuria and Aster Aberra Tessema and Filimon Hadish and Fetene Fufa Bakare}, title = {Investigation of the Effect of Silicon Concentration on Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Spray Pyrolyzed Bioactive Glass}, journal = {Journal of Biomaterials}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, pages = {1-7}, doi = {10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jb.20230701.11}, abstract = {Bioactive glass is a prominent biomaterial that can bind with both soft and hard tissues when in contact with body fluid. This study aims to find out how silicon concentration affects the cytotoxicity and bioactivity of bioactive glass. The 58S, 68S, and 76S BG particles were synthesized using a spray pyrolysis method. XRD, SEM, FTIR, and BET were used to examine the phase composition, morphology, chemical identity, and specific surface area of BG powders. The ability of the specimens to generate apatite on their surface after being soaked in the simulated body fluid (SBF) was determined using an in vitro test to measure their bioactivity. To evaluate the bioactivity of the BG powders, the in vitro apatite formation was investigated using XRD, FTIR, and SEM. Also, an in vitro cytotoxicity test was done using (MTT assay). A cell-growing environment was used to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity test based on different extraction concentrations of glass particles. The experimental results suggested that as silicon concentration in the BG increased, cell viability increased whereas bioactivity was reduced. Finally, the correlation between silicon content and cell viability and bioactivity was explored. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Investigation of the Effect of Silicon Concentration on Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Spray Pyrolyzed Bioactive Glass AU - Tsion Chuni Aklilu AU - Bethelhem Gashaw Ewnete AU - Megersa Aboneh Mekuria AU - Aster Aberra Tessema AU - Filimon Hadish AU - Fetene Fufa Bakare Y1 - 2023/12/06 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11 T2 - Journal of Biomaterials JF - Journal of Biomaterials JO - Journal of Biomaterials SP - 1 EP - 7 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2629 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jb.20230701.11 AB - Bioactive glass is a prominent biomaterial that can bind with both soft and hard tissues when in contact with body fluid. This study aims to find out how silicon concentration affects the cytotoxicity and bioactivity of bioactive glass. The 58S, 68S, and 76S BG particles were synthesized using a spray pyrolysis method. XRD, SEM, FTIR, and BET were used to examine the phase composition, morphology, chemical identity, and specific surface area of BG powders. The ability of the specimens to generate apatite on their surface after being soaked in the simulated body fluid (SBF) was determined using an in vitro test to measure their bioactivity. To evaluate the bioactivity of the BG powders, the in vitro apatite formation was investigated using XRD, FTIR, and SEM. Also, an in vitro cytotoxicity test was done using (MTT assay). A cell-growing environment was used to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity test based on different extraction concentrations of glass particles. The experimental results suggested that as silicon concentration in the BG increased, cell viability increased whereas bioactivity was reduced. Finally, the correlation between silicon content and cell viability and bioactivity was explored. VL - 7 IS - 1 ER -