An unbelievable revolution happened in medical science during the late '60s. A casual conversation with a colonel led Larry Hench to the invention of a biomaterial that is more biocompatible, biodegradable, and bioactive, which was named as Bioglass. The material started its journey with its application in the replacement of ossicles in the middle ear, and today Bioglass is dominating in major medical fields like bone tissue engineering, drug delivery, dentistry, and so on. The wide range of applications and such bio-friendly properties of the material also convey a message that this material is a promising area to work in the field of research. Bioglass is synthesized by two methods i) melt quenching and ii) sol-gel. We aim to help new optimistic researchers in uplifting their interest to conduct researches with this auspicious biomaterial. This paper provides a bird's eye view of the history, preparation process, composition of different bioactive glasses and their biological feedback, biocompatibility mechanism, fundamental properties, noteworthy applications, possibilities along with the shortcomings of Bioglass. The shortcomings of Bioglass are elaborated so that the researchers can explore more about those limitations. We have also depicted the chronological advancements of bioglasses over the years. We believe that the prospects of more advanced researches with Bioglass can bring more success in the modern biomedical world.
| Published in | Journal of Biomaterials (Volume 4, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11 |
| Page(s) | 23-38 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bioglass, Properties, Diseases, Applications, Challenges
| [1] | Hench LL. Chronology of Bioactive Glass Development and Clinical Applications. New J Glas Ceram 2013; 03: 67–73. https://doi.org/10.4236/njgc.2013.32011. |
| [2] | Kaur G, Pandey OP, Singh K, Homa D, Scott B, Pickrell G. A review of bioactive glasses: Their structure, properties, fabrication and apatite formation. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A, 2014; 102: 254–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34690. |
| [3] | Bekir KARASU, Ali Ozan YANAR, Alper KOÇAK ÖK. Bioactive Glasses. El-Cezerî J Sci Eng 2017; 4: 436–71. |
| [4] | Krishnan V, Lakshmi T. Bioglass: A novel biocompatible innovation. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2013; 4: 78–83. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.111523. |
| [5] | Cacciotti I. Bivalent cationic ions doped bioactive glasses: the influence of magnesium, zinc, strontium and copper on the physical and biological properties. J Mater Sci 2017; 52: 8812–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1010-0. |
| [6] | Baino F, Hamzehlou S, Kargozar S. Bioactive glasses: Where are we and where are we going? J Funct Biomater 2018; 9: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010025. |
| [7] | Kar A, Chaudhary D, Nagpal R, Bishnoi A, Gandhi B. Bag : bagged the future. Chronicles Dent Res 2017; 16. |
| [8] | Hench LL. Opening paper 2015-some comments on Bioglass: Four eras of discovery and development. Biomed Glas 2015; 1: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2015-0001. |
| [9] | Hench LL. The story of Bioglass®. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006; 17: 967–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z. |
| [10] | Izquierdo-Barba I, Salinas AJ, Vallet-Regí M. Bioactive Glasses: From Macro to Nano. Int J Appl Glas Sci 2013; 4: 149–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.12028. |
| [11] | Chen X, Hu Q. Bioactive Glasses. Front Nanobiomedical Res 2017; 3: 147–82. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813202573_0004. |
| [12] | Greenlee TK, Beckham C a, Crebo a R, Malmorg JC. Glass-ceramic bone implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1972; 6: 235–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820060312. |
| [13] | Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1971; 5: 117–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820050611. |
| [14] | Piotrowski G, Hench LL, Allen WC, Miller GJ. Mechanical studies of the bone bioglass interfacial bond. J Biomed Mater Res 1975; 6: 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820090408. |
| [15] | Griss P, Greenspan DC, Heimke G, Krempien B, Buchinger R, Hench LL, et al. Evaluation of a bioglass‐coated Al2O3 total hip prosthesis in sheep. J Biomed Mater Res 1976; 7: 511–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820100406. |
| [16] | Hench LL, Hench JW, Greenspan D. Bioglass: a short history and bibliography. J Aust Ceram Soc 2004; 40: 1–42. |
| [17] | Wilson J, Pigott GH, Schoen FJ, Hench LL. Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses. J Biomed Mater Res 1981; 15: 805–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820150605. |
| [18] | Wilson J, Merwin G, Rodgers L, Martin R, Spilman D. Facial Bone Augmentation Using Bioglass in Dogs. Adv Biomater 1986; 112: 280–4. |
| [19] | Li R, Clark AE, Hench LL. An investigation of bioactive glass powders by sol-gel processing. J Appl Biomater 1991; 2: 231–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jab.770020403. |
| [20] | Bunting S, Di Silvio L, Deb S, Hall S, Standring S. Bioresorbable glass fibres facilitate peripheral nerve regeneration. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30: 242–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.11.003. |
| [21] | Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery LDK, Hench LL, Polak JM. Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass® 45S5 dissolution. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 55: 151–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<151::AID-JBM1001>3.0.CO;2-D. |
| [22] | A. GUIDA, M. R. TOWLER, J. G. WALL, R. G. HILL SE. Preliminary work on the antibacterial effect of strontium in glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Lett 2003; 22: 1401–3. |
| [23] | Hench LL. An introduction to bioceramics, Chapters 6-12 & 31. 2nd ed., Imperial College Press, London; 2013. |
| [24] | Tidball JG. Inflammatory processes in muscle injury and repair. Am J Physiol-Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005; 288. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00454.2004. |
| [25] | Ma AN, Gong N, Lu JM, Huang JL, Hao B, Guo Y, et al. Local protective effects of oral 45S5 bioactive glass on gastric ulcers in experimental animals. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2013; 24: 803–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4844-7. |
| [26] | Chen Q, Jin L, Cook WD, Mohn D, Lagerqvist EL, Elliott DA, et al. Elastomeric nanocomposites as cell delivery vehicles and cardiac support devices. Soft Matter 2010; 6: 4715–26. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0sm00213e. |
| [27] | Wang Z, Jiang T, Sauro S, Pashley DH, Toledano M, Osorio R, et al. The dentine remineralization activity of a desensitizing bioactive glass-containing toothpaste: An in vitro study. Aust Dent J 2011; 56: 372–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01361.x. |
| [28] | Haggerty AE, Oudega M. Biomaterials for spinal cord repair. Neurosci Bull 2013; 29: 445–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-013-1362-7. |
| [29] | Chauhan N, Mulcahy MF, Salem R, Benson AB, Boucher E, Bukovcan J, et al. Therasphere yttrium-90 glass microspheres combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver: Protocol for the EPOCH phase 3 randomized clinical trial. J Med Internet Res 2019; 8:e11545. |
| [30] | Singh H, Moss IL. Biologics in Spinal Fusion. Elsevier Inc.; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-55140-3.00015-1. |
| [31] | Gao W, Sun L, Zhang Z, Li Z. Cellulose nanocrystals reinforced gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds for potential application in bone regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2020; 0: 000. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.1735607. |
| [32] | Tyagi S, Singh K. Development and In Vitro Characterization of Melt Quench Derived Silica based Bioglasses. Process. Fabr. Adv. Mater. XVII Part 8, vol. II, 2009, p. 832–9. |
| [33] | Nicholson JW. The Chemistry of Medical and Dental Materials. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2002. |
| [34] | Khalid MD, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Farooq I, Khan RS, Najmi A. Bioactive Glasses and their Applications in Dentistry. J Pakistan Dent Assoc 2017; 26: 32–8. https://doi.org/10.25301/jpda.261.32. |
| [35] | Drago L, Toscano M, Bottagisio M. Recent evidence on bioactive glass antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity: A mini-review. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020326. |
| [36] | Kokubo T, Yamaguchi S. Novel Bioactive Materials Derived by Bioglass: Glass-Ceramic A-W and Surface-Modified Ti Metal. Int J Appl Glas Sci 2016; 7: 173–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.12203. |
| [37] | Li H, Wu Z, Zhou Y, Chang J. Bioglass for skin regeneration. Elsevier Ltd; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102546-8.00008-x. |
| [38] | Skallevold HE, Rokaya D, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS. Bioactive glass applications in dentistry. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235960. |
| [39] | Filho OP, Latorre GP, Hench LL. Effect of crystallization on apatite-layer formation of bioactive glass 45S5. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 30: 509–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199604)30:4<509::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-T. |
| [40] | Prasad S, Kumar Vyas V, Ershad, Pyare R. Crystallization and mechanical properties of (45S5-HA) biocomposite for biomedical implantation. Ceram-Silikaty 2017; 61: 378–84. https://doi.org/10.13168/cs.2017.0039. |
| [41] | Phulé PP, Wood TE. Ceramics and Glasses, Sol–Gel Synthesis of. Encycl Mater Sci Technol 2001: 1090–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043152-6/00201-1. |
| [42] | Abou Neel EA, Pickup DM, Valappil SP, Newport RJ, Knowles JC. Bioactive functional materials: A perspective on phosphate-based glasses. J Mater Chem 2009; 19: 690–701. https://doi.org/10.1039/b810675d. |
| [43] | Wu C, Fan W, Gelinsky M, Xiao Y, Simon P, Schulze R, et al. Bioactive SrO-SiO2 glass with well-ordered mesopores: Characterization, physiochemistry and biological properties. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 1797–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.018. |
| [44] | Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: S96–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100282. |
| [45] | Rabiee SM, Nazparvar N, Azizian M, Vashaee D, Tayebi L. Effect of ion substitution on properties of bioactive glasses: A review. Ceram Int 2015; 41: 7241–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.140. |
| [46] | Vukajlovic D, Parker J, Bretcanu O, Novakovic K. Chitosan based polymer/bioglass composites for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 2019; 96: 955–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.026. |
| [47] | Li Z, Khun NW, Tang XZ, Liu E, Khor KA. Mechanical, tribological and biological properties of novel 45S5 Bioglass® composites reinforced with in situ reduced graphene oxide. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017; 65: 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.007. |
| [48] | Kaur G, Kumar V, Baino F, Mauro JC, Pickrell G, Evans I, et al. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: State-of-the-art review and future challenges. Mater Sci Eng C 2019; 104: 109895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109895. |
| [49] | Bretcanu O, Chatzistavrou X, Paraskevopoulos K, Conradt R, Thompson I, Boccaccini AR. Sintering and crystallization of 45S5 Bioglass® powder. J Eur Ceram Soc 2009; 29: 3299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.06.035. |
| [50] | Bellucci D, Cannillo V, Sola A. An overview of the effects of thermal processing on bioactive glasses. Sci Sinter 2010; 42: 307–20. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOS1003307B. |
| [51] | Peitl O, Dutra Zanotto E, Hench LL. Highly bioactive P2O5-Na2O-CaO-SiO2glass-ceramics. J Non Cryst Solids 2001; 292: 115–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00822-5. |
| [52] | Clupper DC, Mecholsky JJ, Latorre GP, Greenspan DC. Sintering temperature effects on the in vitro bioactive response of tape cast and sintered bioactive glass-ceramic in Tris buffer. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 57: 532–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20011215)57:4<532::AID-JBM1199>3.0.CO;2-3. |
| [53] | Chen QZ, Thompson ID, Boccaccini AR. 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2414–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.025. |
| [54] | Rizwan M, Hamdi M, Basirun WJ. Bioglass® 45S5-based composites for bone tissue engineering and functional applications. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A 2017; 105: 3197–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36156. |
| [55] | Xie ZP, Zhang CQ, Yi CQ, Qiu JJ, Wang JQ, Zhou J. In vivo study effect of particulate Bioglass® in the prevention of infection in open fracture fixation. J Biomed Mater Res-Part B Appl Biomater 2009; 90: 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31273. |
| [56] | Hu S, Chang J, Liu M, Ning C. Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass®. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009; 20: 281–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3564-5. |
| [57] | Allan I, Newman H, Wilson M. Antibacterial activity of particulate Bioglass® against supra-and subgingival bacteria. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 1683–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00330-6. |
| [58] | Fernandes JS, Gentile P, Pires RA, Reis RL, Hatton P V. Multifunctional bioactive glass and glass-ceramic biomaterials with antibacterial properties for repair and regeneration of bone tissue. Acta Biomater 2017; 59: 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.046. |
| [59] | Begum S, Johnson WE, Worthington T, Martin RA. The influence of pH and fluid dynamics on the antibacterial efficacy of 45S5 Bioglass. Biomed Mater 2016; 11: 15006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/015006. |
| [60] | Jurczyk K, Kubicka MM, Ratajczak M, Jurczyk MU, Niespodziana K, Nowak DM, et al. Antibacterial activity of nanostructured Ti-45S5 bioglass-Ag composite against Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed 2016; 26: 118–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64096-7. |
| [61] | Mortazavi V, Mehdikhani Nahrkhalaji M, Fathi MH, Mousavi SB, Nasr Esfahani B. Antibacterial effects of sol-gel-derived bioactive glass nanoparticle on aerobic bacteria. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A 2010; 94: 160–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32678. |
| [62] | Gonzalez Moreno M, Butini ME, Maiolo EM, Sessa L, Trampuz A. Antimicrobial activity of bioactive glass S53P4 against representative microorganisms causing osteomyelitis – Real-time assessment by isothermal microcalorimetry. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2020; 189: 110853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110853. |
| [63] | Gergely I, Zazgyva A, Man A, Zuh S, Pop T. The in vitro antibacterial effect of S53P4 bioactive glass and gentamicin impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2014; 61: 145–60. https://doi.org/10.1556/AMicr.61.2014.2.5. |
| [64] | Cunha MT, Murça MA, Nigro S, Klautau GB, Salles MJC. In vitro antibacterial activity of bioactive glass S53P4 on multiresistant pathogens causing osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infection. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3069-x. |
| [65] | Balamurugan A, Balossier G, Laurent-Maquin D, Pina S, Rebelo AHS, Faure J, et al. An in vitro biological and antibacterial study on a sol-gel derived silver-incorporated bioglass system. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1343–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.015. |
| [66] | Ahmed AA, Ali AA, Mahmoud DAR, El-Fiqi AM. Preparation and characterization of antibacterial P2O5-CaO-Na2O-Ag2O glasses. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A 2011; 98 A: 132–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.33101. |
| [67] | Magyari K, Stefan R, Vodnar DC, Vulpoi A, Baia L. The silver influence on the structure and antibacterial properties of the bioactive 10B2O3-30Na2O-60P2O2 glass. J Non Cryst Solids 2014; 402: 182–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.05.033. |
| [68] | Ciceo Lucacel R, Radu T, Tǎtar AS, Lupan I, Ponta O, Simon V. The influence of local structure and surface morphology on the antibacterial activity of silver-containing calcium borosilicate glasses. J Non Cryst Solids 2014; 404: 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.08.004. |
| [69] | Liu L, Pushalkar S, Saxena D, Legeros RZ, Zhang Y. Antibacterial property expressed by a novel calcium phosphate glass. J Biomed Mater Res-Part B Appl Biomater 2014; 102: 423–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33019. |
| [70] | Esfahanizadeh N, Nourani MR, Bahador A, Akhondi N, Montazeri M. The Anti-biofilm Activity of Nanometric Zinc doped Bioactive Glass against Putative Periodontal Pathogens: An in vitro Study. Biomed Glas 2020; 4: 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2018-0009. |
| [71] | Miola M, Cochis A, Kumar A, Arciola CR, Rimondini L, Verné E. Copper-doped bioactive glass as filler for PMMA-based bone cements: Morphological, mechanical, reactivity, and preliminary antibacterial characterization. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060961. |
| [72] | Mulligan AM, Wilson M, Knowles JC. The effect of increasing copper content in phosphate-based glasses on biofilms of Streptococcus sanguis. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1797–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00577-X. |
| [73] | Goh YF, Alshemary AZ, Akram M, Abdul Kadir MR, Hussain R. In-vitro characterization of antibacterial bioactive glass containing ceria. Ceram Int 2014; 40: 729–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.06.062. |
| [74] | Brauer DS, Karpukhina N, Kedia G, Bhat A, Law R V., Radecka I, et al. Bactericidal strontium-releasing injectable bone cements based on bioactive glasses. J R Soc Interface 2013; 10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0647. |
| [75] | Ranga N, Poonia E, Jakhar S, Sharma AK, Kumar A, Devi S, et al. Enhanced antimicrobial properties of bioactive glass using strontium and silver oxide nanocomposites. J Asian Ceram Soc 2019; 7: 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2018.1564477. |
| [76] | Yunus Basha R, Sampath SK, Doble M. Design of biocomposite materials for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 2015; 57: 452–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.016. |
| [77] | Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 2015; 23: S53–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.019. |
| [78] | Seeman E. Modeling and remodeling. In: John Bilezikian, T. John Martin, Thomas Clemens CR, editor. Princ. Bone Biol. 4th editio, Academic Press; 2008, p. 3e28. |
| [79] | J.R. Lieberman GEF. Chapter I. Bone dynamics. Bone Regen. Repair, 2005, p. 1. |
| [80] | Wang W, Yeung KWK. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review. Bioact Mater 2017; 2: 224–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007. |
| [81] | DeLacure MD. Physiology of bone healing and bone grafts. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994; 27: 859–74. |
| [82] | Sela JJ, Bab IA. Healing of bone fracture: General concepts. In: Sela JJ. BIA (Eds.., editor. Princ. Bone Regen., Springer-Verlag New York; 2012, p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2059-0_1. |
| [83] | Lee FYI, Yong Won Choi, Behrens FF, DeFouw DO, Einhorn TA. Programmed removal of chondrocytes during endochondral fracture healing. J Orthop Res 1998; 16: 144–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100160124. |
| [84] | Khan SN, Cammisa FP, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200501000-00010. |
| [85] | Sepantafar M, Mohammadi H, Maheronnaghsh R, Tayebi L, Baharvand H. Single phased silicate-containing calcium phosphate bioceramics: Promising biomaterials for periodontal repair. Ceram Int 2018; 44: 11003–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.050. |
| [86] | Szcześ A, Hołysz L, Chibowski E. Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2017; 249: 321–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.007. |
| [87] | Padrines M, Rohanizadeh R, Damiens C, Heymann D, Fortun Y. Inhibition of apatite formation by vitronectin. Connect Tissue Res 2000; 41: 101–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008200009067662. |
| [88] | Huan Z, Zhou J, Duszczyk J. Magnesium-based composites with improved in vitro surface biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 3163–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4165-7. |
| [89] | Ducheyen P, Hench LL. The processing and static mechanical properties of metal fibre reinforced Bioglass. J Mater Sci 1982; 17: 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591494. |
| [90] | Gheysen G, Ducheyne P, Hench LL, de Meester P. Bioglass composites: a potential material for dental application. Biomaterials 1983; 4: 81–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(83)90044-3. |
| [91] | Schepers E, Ducheyne P, De Clercq M. Interfacial analysis of fiber‐reinforced bioactive glass dental root implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23: 735–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230706. |
| [92] | H. B. Guo, X. Miao, Y. Chen, P. Cheang KAK. Characterization of hydroxyapatite-and bioglass-316L fibre composites prepared by spark plasma sintering. Mater Lett 2004; 58: 304–7. |
| [93] | Huan ZG, Leeflang MA, Zhou J, Duszczyk J. ZK30-bioactive glass composites for orthopedic applications: A comparative study on fabrication method and characteristics. Mater Sci Eng B Solid-State Mater Adv Technol 2011; 176: 1644–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2011.07.022. |
| [94] | Navarro M, Aparicio C, Charles-Harris M, Ginebra MP, Engel E, Planell JA. Development of a biodegradable composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering: Physicochemical, topographical, mechanical, degradation, and biological properties. Adv Polym Sci 2006; 200: 209–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/12_068. |
| [95] | Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials (Basel) 2010; 3: 3867–910. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3073867. |
| [96] | Miguez-Pacheco V, Hench LL, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glasses beyond bone and teeth: Emerging applications in contact with soft tissues. Acta Biomater 2015; 13: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.004. |
| [97] | Wuisman PIJM, Smit TH. Bioresorbable polymers: Heading for a new generation of spinal cages. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 133–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1003-6. |
| [98] | Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 2335–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00101-0. |
| [99] | Bertesteanu S, Chifiriuc M, Grumezescu A, Printza A, Marie-Paule T, Grumezescu V, et al. Biomedical Applications of Synthetic, Biodegradable Polymers for the Development of Anti-Infective Strategies. Curr Med Chem 2014; 21: 3383–90. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867321666140304104328. |
| [100] | Ulery BD, Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 2011; 49: 832–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.22259. |
| [101] | Xie Z, Liu X, Jia W, Zhang C, Huang W, Wang J. Treatment of osteomyelitis and repair of bone defect by degradable bioactive borate glass releasing vancomycin. J Control Release 2009; 139: 118–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.012. |
| [102] | Otsuka M, Matsuda Y, Kokubo T, Yoshihara S, Nakamura T, Yamamuro T. A novel skeletal drug delivery system using self-setting bioactive glass bone cement. III: the in vitro drug release from bone cement containing indomethacin and its physicochemical properties. J Control Release 1994; 31: 111–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-3659(94)00007-7. |
| [103] | Vallet-Regí M, Arcos D. Bioceramics for drug delivery. Acta Mater 2013; 61: 890–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.039. |
| [104] | Vallet-Regí M, Balas F, Arcos D. Mesoporous materials for drug delivery. Angew Chemie-Int Ed 2007; 46: 7548–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200604488. |
| [105] | Mohamad Yunos D, Bretcanu O, Boccaccini AR. Polymer-bioceramic composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci 2008; 43: 4433–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2552-y. |
| [106] | Rahaman MN, Brown RF, Bal BS, Day DE. Bioactive Glasses for Nonbearing Applications in Total Joint Replacement. Semin Arthroplasty 2006; 17: 102–12. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2006.09.003. |
| [107] | Bellucci D, Chiellini F, Ciardelli G, Gazzarri M, Gentile P, Sola A, et al. processing and characterization of innovative scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012; 23: 1397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4622-6. |
| [108] | Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol 2012; 30: 546–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005. |
| [109] | Deepthi S, Venkatesan J, Kim SK, Bumgardner JD, Jayakumar R. An overview of chitin or chitosan/nano ceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2016; 93: 1338–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.041. |
| [110] | Poologasundarampillai G, Lee PD, Lam C, Kourkouta AM, Jones JR. Compressive Strength of Bioactive Sol–Gel Glass Foam Scaffolds. Int J Appl Glas Sci 2016; 7: 229–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.12211. |
| [111] | Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 4457–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023. |
| [112] | Boccardi E, Melli V, Catignoli G, Altomare L, Jahromi MT, Cerruti M, et al. study of the mechanical stability and bioactivity of Bioglass® based glass-ceramic scaffolds produced via powder metallurgy-inspired technology. Biomed Mater 2016; 11: 15005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/015005. |
| [113] | Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5474–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002. |
| [114] | Kumar P, Vinitha B, Fathima G. Bone grafts in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013; 5: 125–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.113312. |
| [115] | Flynn JM. Fracture Repair and Bone Grafting. OKU 10 Orthop. Knowl. Updat., American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2011, p. 11–21. |
| [116] | Roberts TT, Rosenbaum AJ. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis 2012; 8: 114–24. https://doi.org/10.4161/org.23306. |
| [117] | Chiarello E, Cadossi M, Tedesco G, Capra P, Calamelli C, Shehu A, et al. Autograft, allograft and bone substitutes in reconstructive orthopedic surgery. Aging Clin Exp Res 2013; 25: 101–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0088-8. |
| [118] | Han J, Meng H, Xu L. Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2002; 37: 225–7. |
| [119] | Ji S, M A, U T, Mj B, Ei Z. Bioactive glass in dentistry. Dent Update 2009; 2: 208–19. |
| [120] | SCHEPERS E, CLERCQ M DE, DUCHEYNE P, KEMPENEERS R. Bioactive glass particulate material as a filler for bone lesions. J Oral Rehabil 1991; 18: 439–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1991.tb01689.x. |
| [121] | Gjorgievska E, Nicholson JW. Prevention of enamel demineralization after tooth bleaching by bioactive glass incorporated into toothpaste. Aust Dent J 2011; 56: 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01323.x. |
| [122] | Peltola MJ, Aitasalo KMJ, Suonpää JTK, Yli-Urpo A, Laippala PJ, Forsback AP. Frontal Sinus and Skull Bone Defect Obliteration with Three Synthetic Bioactive Materials. A Comparative Study. J Biomed Mater Res-Part B Appl Biomater 2003; 66: 364–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.10023. |
| [123] | Banerjee A, Hajatdoost-Sani M, Farrell S, Thompson I. A clinical evaluation and comparison of bioactive glass and sodium bicarbonate air-polishing powders. J Dent 2010; 38: 475–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.001. |
| [124] | Pashley DH. Consensus Report Dentine Hypersensitivity-Into the 21St Century 1994; 39. |
| [125] | Profeta A, Huppa C. Bioactive-glass in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2016; 9: 001–14. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551543. |
| [126] | Stanley HR, Hall MB, Clark AE, King CJ, Hench LL, Berte JJ. Using 45S5 bioglass cones as endosseous ridge maintenance implants to prevent alveolar ridge resorption: a 5-year evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants n.d.; 12: 95–105. |
| [127] | Fabert M, Ojha N, Erasmus E, Hannula M, Hokka M, Hyttinen J, et al. Crystallization and sintering of borosilicate bioactive glasses for application in tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 2017; 5: 4514–25. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tb00106a. |
| [128] | Farag MM, Abd-Allah WM, Ibrahim AM. Effect of gamma irradiation on drug releasing from nano-bioactive glass. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2015; 5: 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-014-0214-y. |
| [129] | Baddeley M. Keynes on Rationality, Expectations and Investment. Keynes, Post-Keynesianism Polit Econ 1999: 570–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.xxxx. |
| [130] | Sola A, Bellucci D, Cannillo V, Cattini A. Bioactive glass coatings: A review. Surf Eng 2011; 27: 560–72. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743294410Y.0000000008. |
| [131] | Baino F, Verne E. Glass-based coatings on biomedical implants: A state-of-the-art review. Biomed Glas 2017; 3: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2017-0001. |
| [132] | Kargozar S, Hamzehlou S, Baino F. Potential of bioactive glasses for cardiac and pulmonary tissue engineering. Materials (Basel) 2017; 10: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121429. |
| [133] | Anderson JM. Future challenges in the in vitro and in vivo evaluation of biomaterial biocompatibility. Regen Biomater 2016; 3: 73–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/RB/RBW001. |
| [134] | Levy N. The use of animal as models: Ethical considerations. Int J Stroke 2012; 7: 440–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00772.x. |
| [135] | Renno ACM, Bossini PS, Crovace MC, Rodrigues ACM, Zanotto ED, Parizotto NA. Characterization and in vivo biological performance of biosilicate. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/141427. |
APA Style
Jahidul Haque, Ahsan Habib Munna, Ahmed Sidrat Rahman Ayon, Zarin Rafa Shaitee, Arko Saha. (2020). A Comprehensive Overview of the Pertinence and Possibilities of Bioactive Glass in the Modern Biological World. Journal of Biomaterials, 4(2), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11
ACS Style
Jahidul Haque; Ahsan Habib Munna; Ahmed Sidrat Rahman Ayon; Zarin Rafa Shaitee; Arko Saha. A Comprehensive Overview of the Pertinence and Possibilities of Bioactive Glass in the Modern Biological World. J. Biomater. 2020, 4(2), 23-38. doi: 10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11
AMA Style
Jahidul Haque, Ahsan Habib Munna, Ahmed Sidrat Rahman Ayon, Zarin Rafa Shaitee, Arko Saha. A Comprehensive Overview of the Pertinence and Possibilities of Bioactive Glass in the Modern Biological World. J Biomater. 2020;4(2):23-38. doi: 10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11,
author = {Jahidul Haque and Ahsan Habib Munna and Ahmed Sidrat Rahman Ayon and Zarin Rafa Shaitee and Arko Saha},
title = {A Comprehensive Overview of the Pertinence and Possibilities of Bioactive Glass in the Modern Biological World},
journal = {Journal of Biomaterials},
volume = {4},
number = {2},
pages = {23-38},
doi = {10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jb.20200402.11},
abstract = {An unbelievable revolution happened in medical science during the late '60s. A casual conversation with a colonel led Larry Hench to the invention of a biomaterial that is more biocompatible, biodegradable, and bioactive, which was named as Bioglass. The material started its journey with its application in the replacement of ossicles in the middle ear, and today Bioglass is dominating in major medical fields like bone tissue engineering, drug delivery, dentistry, and so on. The wide range of applications and such bio-friendly properties of the material also convey a message that this material is a promising area to work in the field of research. Bioglass is synthesized by two methods i) melt quenching and ii) sol-gel. We aim to help new optimistic researchers in uplifting their interest to conduct researches with this auspicious biomaterial. This paper provides a bird's eye view of the history, preparation process, composition of different bioactive glasses and their biological feedback, biocompatibility mechanism, fundamental properties, noteworthy applications, possibilities along with the shortcomings of Bioglass. The shortcomings of Bioglass are elaborated so that the researchers can explore more about those limitations. We have also depicted the chronological advancements of bioglasses over the years. We believe that the prospects of more advanced researches with Bioglass can bring more success in the modern biomedical world.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Comprehensive Overview of the Pertinence and Possibilities of Bioactive Glass in the Modern Biological World AU - Jahidul Haque AU - Ahsan Habib Munna AU - Ahmed Sidrat Rahman Ayon AU - Zarin Rafa Shaitee AU - Arko Saha Y1 - 2020/09/03 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11 T2 - Journal of Biomaterials JF - Journal of Biomaterials JO - Journal of Biomaterials SP - 23 EP - 38 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2629 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jb.20200402.11 AB - An unbelievable revolution happened in medical science during the late '60s. A casual conversation with a colonel led Larry Hench to the invention of a biomaterial that is more biocompatible, biodegradable, and bioactive, which was named as Bioglass. The material started its journey with its application in the replacement of ossicles in the middle ear, and today Bioglass is dominating in major medical fields like bone tissue engineering, drug delivery, dentistry, and so on. The wide range of applications and such bio-friendly properties of the material also convey a message that this material is a promising area to work in the field of research. Bioglass is synthesized by two methods i) melt quenching and ii) sol-gel. We aim to help new optimistic researchers in uplifting their interest to conduct researches with this auspicious biomaterial. This paper provides a bird's eye view of the history, preparation process, composition of different bioactive glasses and their biological feedback, biocompatibility mechanism, fundamental properties, noteworthy applications, possibilities along with the shortcomings of Bioglass. The shortcomings of Bioglass are elaborated so that the researchers can explore more about those limitations. We have also depicted the chronological advancements of bioglasses over the years. We believe that the prospects of more advanced researches with Bioglass can bring more success in the modern biomedical world. VL - 4 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: