Nowadays, Phacoemulsification surgery is mostly carried out under local anesthesia. In this type of anesthesia the patient needs to be sedated. Because of painful intracameral injection, an Intravenus (IV) analgesia is also required using bolus dose of Fentanil or Remifentanil. Our main purpose was the comparison of the sedative effects of 2 models of Intravenous local analgesia during Phacoemulsification in cataractus patients. Moreover , to investigate the patient, surgeon satisfaction and complication rate in two groups. Material and methods: This Clinical Trial study was carried out on 64 patients with cataract who underwent phacoemulsification surgery in Baqiyatallah hospital in second half of year 2013. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system ; ASA class I & II were chosen and randomly divided into two groups. The level of sedation was assessed using the Ramsay sedation(RS) scale. Moreover , along with sedative effect, patient, surgeon satisfaction ,Vital signs, rate of pain and complication rate were recorded and compared in two groups. Results: Thirty six patients were in Fentanil group with mean age of 64.71± 8.21 years and 28 in Remifentanil group with mean age of 65.2 ± 12.43. RS in Fentanil group was significantly higher than Remifentanil group (2.02±1.08 versus 1.42±1.19, p<.05). Rate of satisfaction of patients and surgeons was significantly higher in Fentanil group in comparison with Remifentanil group (p<.05). Side effects in Fentanil group was also significantly less than Remifentanil (p<.05). There was no significant difference in vital signs of patients in two groups neither before surgery nor after that. Conclusion: Results of this study show that, Fentanil has fewer side effects, more sedation effect and more patient and surgeon satisfaction in comparison with Remifentanil. The administration of fentanil appears to be a better choice as an analgesic with local anesthesia in cataract surgery
| Published in | Journal of Anesthesiology (Volume 2, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11 |
| Page(s) | 22-26 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Fentanil, Remifentanil, Cataract, Phacoemulsification, Sedation, Local Anesthesia
| [1] | Claoue C, Lanigan C. Topical anesthesia for cataract surgery. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25:265–8.[PubMed] |
| [2] | Miller RD. Anesthesia. 7th ed. USA: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. pp. 769. Chapter 27 |
| [3] | Ezra DG1, Allan BD.Topical anaesthesia alone versus topical anaesthesia with intracameral lidocaine for phacoemulsification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD005276. |
| [4] | Ryu JH1, So YM, Hwang JW, Do SH.Optimal target concentration of remifentanil during cataract surgery with monitored anesthesia care. J Clin Anesth. 2010 Nov;22(7):533-7 |
| [5] | Hoke JF, Cunningham F, James MK, Muir KT, Hoffman WE (April 1997). "Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil, its principle metabolite (GR90291) and alfentanil in dogs". J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 281 (1): 226–32. |
| [6] | Patel SS, Spencer CM (Sep 1996). "Remifentanil". Drugs 52 (3): 417–27. |
| [7] | Sir James Black (2005). "A Personal Perspective on Dr. Paul Janssen". J. Med. Chem. 48 (6): 1687–1688. doi:10.1021/jm040195b. |
| [8] | Caputi FF1, Lattanzio F, Carretta D, Mercatelli D, Candeletti S, Romualdi P.Morphine and fentanyl differently affect MOP and NOP gene expression in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. J Mol Neurosci. 2013 Oct;51(2):532-8.. |
| [9] | Stanley, Theodore Henry; Petty, William Clayton (1983-03-31). New Anesthetic Agents, Devices, and Monitoring Techniques. Springer. ISBN 9789024727964. |
| [10] | Smydo J. Delayed respiratory depression with fentanyl. Anesthesia Progress. 26(2):47-8, 1979. |
| [11] | van Leeuwen L. Deen L. Helmers JH. A comparison of alfentanil and fentanyl in short operations with special reference to their duration of action and postoperative respiratory depression. Anaesthesist. 30(8):397-9, 1981. |
| [12] | Drug Safety Update, vol 2(2) September 2008 p2. Available online on http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Publications/Safetyguidance/DrugSafetyUpdate/CON025631. |
| [13] | Sublimaze Official FDA information, side effects and uses". Drugs.com http://www.drugs.com/pro/sublimaze.html. Retrieved 2010-07-28. |
| [14] | Van Bever W, Niemegeers C, Janssen P (1974). "Synthetic analgesics. Synthesis and pharmacology of the diastereoisomers of N-(3-methyl-1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidyl)-N-phenylpropanamide and N-(3-methyl-1-(1-methyl-2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidyl)-N-phenylpropanamide". J Med Chem 17 (10): 1047–51. |
| [15] | Fentanyl probe nets 3 suspects by Norman Sinclair and Ronald J. Hansen, The Detroit News, June 23, 2006. Retrieved June 25, 2006. |
| [16] | Miller RD. Anesthesia. 7th ed. USA: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. pp. 2378. Chapter 75 |
| [17] | Weale NK, Rogers CA, Cooper R, Nolan J, Wolf AR (February 2004). "Effect of remifentanil infusion rate on stress response to the pre-bypass phase of paediatric cardiac surgery". Br J Anaesth 92 (2): 187–94. |
| [18] | Lundgren S, Rosenquist JB: Amnesia, pain experience, and patient satisfaction after sedation with intravenous diazepam. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:99, 1983. PUBMED Abstract |
| [19] | Lundgren S, Rosenquist JB: Comparison of sedation, amnesia, and patient comfort produced by intravenous and rectal diazepam. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:646, 1984. PUBMED Abstract |
| [20] | Aydin ON, Kir E, Ozkan SB, Gürsoy F. Patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with fentanyl in phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Nov;28(11):1968-72. |
| [21] | Singh R1, Ghazanwy M, Vajifdar H.A randomized controlled trial to compare fentanyl-propofol and ketamine-propofol combination for procedural sedation and analgesia in laparoscopic tubal ligation. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;7(1):24-8. |
| [22] | MasoodEntezariasl, Godrat Akhavanakbari, and Khatereh Isazadehfar .The comparison of Alfentanil and Remifentanil infusion during anesthesia on post-anesthesia recovery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Oct-Dec; 6(4): 323–326. |
| [23] | Rodrigues PA1, Vale PJ, Cruz LM, Carvalho RP, Ribeiro IM, Martins JL..Topical anesthesia versus sub-Tenon block for cataract surgery: surgical conditions and patient satisfaction. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):356-60. |
| [24] | Erdurmus M1, Aydin B, Usta B, Yagci R, Gozdemir M, TotanYPatient comfort and surgeon satisfaction during cataract .surgery using topical anesthesia with or withoutdexmedetomidine sedation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):361-7 |
APA Style
Aliagha Alishiri, Mohammadjavad Foruzanmehr, Seyed Aliasghar Mosavi, Abaszadeh Mehrdad. (2014). Comparison of Sedative Effect of Fentanil and Remifentanil during Phacoemulsification with Local Anesthesia. International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine, 2(3), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11
ACS Style
Aliagha Alishiri; Mohammadjavad Foruzanmehr; Seyed Aliasghar Mosavi; Abaszadeh Mehrdad. Comparison of Sedative Effect of Fentanil and Remifentanil during Phacoemulsification with Local Anesthesia. Int. J. Anesth. Clin. Med. 2014, 2(3), 22-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11,
author = {Aliagha Alishiri and Mohammadjavad Foruzanmehr and Seyed Aliasghar Mosavi and Abaszadeh Mehrdad},
title = {Comparison of Sedative Effect of Fentanil and Remifentanil during Phacoemulsification with Local Anesthesia},
journal = {International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine},
volume = {2},
number = {3},
pages = {22-26},
doi = {10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ja.20140203.11},
abstract = {Nowadays, Phacoemulsification surgery is mostly carried out under local anesthesia. In this type of anesthesia the patient needs to be sedated. Because of painful intracameral injection, an Intravenus (IV) analgesia is also required using bolus dose of Fentanil or Remifentanil. Our main purpose was the comparison of the sedative effects of 2 models of Intravenous local analgesia during Phacoemulsification in cataractus patients. Moreover , to investigate the patient, surgeon satisfaction and complication rate in two groups. Material and methods: This Clinical Trial study was carried out on 64 patients with cataract who underwent phacoemulsification surgery in Baqiyatallah hospital in second half of year 2013. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system ; ASA class I & II were chosen and randomly divided into two groups. The level of sedation was assessed using the Ramsay sedation(RS) scale. Moreover , along with sedative effect, patient, surgeon satisfaction ,Vital signs, rate of pain and complication rate were recorded and compared in two groups. Results: Thirty six patients were in Fentanil group with mean age of 64.71± 8.21 years and 28 in Remifentanil group with mean age of 65.2 ± 12.43. RS in Fentanil group was significantly higher than Remifentanil group (2.02±1.08 versus 1.42±1.19, p<.05). Rate of satisfaction of patients and surgeons was significantly higher in Fentanil group in comparison with Remifentanil group (p<.05). Side effects in Fentanil group was also significantly less than Remifentanil (p<.05). There was no significant difference in vital signs of patients in two groups neither before surgery nor after that. Conclusion: Results of this study show that, Fentanil has fewer side effects, more sedation effect and more patient and surgeon satisfaction in comparison with Remifentanil. The administration of fentanil appears to be a better choice as an analgesic with local anesthesia in cataract surgery},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of Sedative Effect of Fentanil and Remifentanil during Phacoemulsification with Local Anesthesia AU - Aliagha Alishiri AU - Mohammadjavad Foruzanmehr AU - Seyed Aliasghar Mosavi AU - Abaszadeh Mehrdad Y1 - 2014/08/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11 T2 - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine JF - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine JO - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine SP - 22 EP - 26 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2997-2698 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ja.20140203.11 AB - Nowadays, Phacoemulsification surgery is mostly carried out under local anesthesia. In this type of anesthesia the patient needs to be sedated. Because of painful intracameral injection, an Intravenus (IV) analgesia is also required using bolus dose of Fentanil or Remifentanil. Our main purpose was the comparison of the sedative effects of 2 models of Intravenous local analgesia during Phacoemulsification in cataractus patients. Moreover , to investigate the patient, surgeon satisfaction and complication rate in two groups. Material and methods: This Clinical Trial study was carried out on 64 patients with cataract who underwent phacoemulsification surgery in Baqiyatallah hospital in second half of year 2013. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system ; ASA class I & II were chosen and randomly divided into two groups. The level of sedation was assessed using the Ramsay sedation(RS) scale. Moreover , along with sedative effect, patient, surgeon satisfaction ,Vital signs, rate of pain and complication rate were recorded and compared in two groups. Results: Thirty six patients were in Fentanil group with mean age of 64.71± 8.21 years and 28 in Remifentanil group with mean age of 65.2 ± 12.43. RS in Fentanil group was significantly higher than Remifentanil group (2.02±1.08 versus 1.42±1.19, p<.05). Rate of satisfaction of patients and surgeons was significantly higher in Fentanil group in comparison with Remifentanil group (p<.05). Side effects in Fentanil group was also significantly less than Remifentanil (p<.05). There was no significant difference in vital signs of patients in two groups neither before surgery nor after that. Conclusion: Results of this study show that, Fentanil has fewer side effects, more sedation effect and more patient and surgeon satisfaction in comparison with Remifentanil. The administration of fentanil appears to be a better choice as an analgesic with local anesthesia in cataract surgery VL - 2 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: