,
Abel Mukakanya Muwumba*,
Sam Patrick Ogwang,
Wilfred Karukuza Nahamya,
Onesimus Oyesigye
The study investigated the relationship between Candidates’ performance in theory and practical papers. Specifically, it determined the performance differences across gender and examined factors that influence the performance of candidates in theory and practical papers. The study employed both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The study used the: Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient, to investigate the relationship between candidates’ performance in theory and practical papers; and Student’s t-test technique, to determine performance difference across gender. Different perceptions on the performance of candidates in practical and theory assessments from the students, instructors, assessors, principals and curriculum specialists using questionnaires and key informant interviews were obtained. Findings revealed a weak correlation between the performance of candidates in theory and practical papers. Descriptive statistics of candidates’ scores between 2017 and 2019 for NCES, showed that 76% of first year candidates scored below 50% in the theory papers compared to 43% in practical papers. For the Second-year candidates, 72% of the candidates scored below 50% compared to 0.7% in the practical papers. While for NCBC, NCAM and NCET, candidates performed better in practical papers than in theory. There was similar performance observed for all Programmes in year one and two. Additionally, the findings on theory and practical performance across gender established a significant difference in performance across gender. Factors that influenced students’ performance centered on availability of well-stocked libraries, workshops and equipped laboratory, adequate training and practical materials. The study recommended instructors’ retooling, stocking of libraries, and use of open spaces for practical training, practice and assessment.
| Published in | International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12 |
| Page(s) | 7-20 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Assessment, Candidate, Examinations, Performance Practical, Theory
| [1] | P. Iannone and A. Simpson, “University students’ perceptions of summative assessment: The role of context,” J. Furth. High. Educ., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 785–801, 2017, |
| [2] | T. Raupach, J. Brown, S. Anders, G. Hasenfuss, and S. Harendza, “Summative assessments are more powerful drivers of student learning than resource intensive teaching formats,” BMC Med., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 61, 2013, |
| [3] | S. Nurlina, “Transformasi Pendidikan di Era Digital 4.0: Tantangan dan Peluang,” J. Pendidik. Inov., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2023. |
| [4] |
C. I. Mackatiani, “Influence of Examinations Oriented Approaches on Quality Education in Primary Schools in Kenya,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 51–58, 2017, [Online]. Available:
http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/hanapi/hanapi.php?profile=4dfs1q6ik%2BHE5pTp1ZLu0eGT1tTR28jqzaLXyajL2dTV482lyNzZoJmu5NS8q%2BnpkKU%3D&DestinationURL= http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.ebscohost.com%2Flogin.aspx%3Fdirect%3Dtrue%26db%3Deric%26AN%3DEJ1143881%26 |
| [5] | A. A. Al-Asmar, A. H. Sabra, F. Sawair, and A. S. Khraisat, “Shear bond strength of repaired composite using single bond adhesive,” Jordan Med. J., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2018, |
| [6] | B. Patel, A. Kubavat, and K. Piparva, “Correlation of student’s performance in theory and practical of final summative pharmacology examination in M. B. B. S curriculum: A critical insight,” Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 171–175, 2013, |
| [7] | R. Leask, T. Cronje, D. E. Holm, and L. van Ryneveld, “The impact of practical experience on theoretical knowledge at different cognitive levels,” J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc., vol. 91, pp. 1–7, 2020, |
| [8] | J. Wrenn and B. Wrenn, “Enhancing Learning by Integrating Theory and Practice,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 258–265, 2009, [Online]. Available: |
| [9] | T. Saguy, M. Reifen-Tagar, and D. Joel, “The gender-binary cycle: The perpetual relations between a biological-essentialist view of gender, gender ideology, and gender-labelling and sorting,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., vol. 376, no. 1822, 2021, |
| [10] | U. Goni, S. B. Yagana, H. K. Ali, and M. W. Bularafa, “Gender Difference in Students ’ Academic Performance in Colleges of Education in Borno State, Nigeria : Implications for Counselling,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 6, no. 32, pp. 107–114, 2015. |
| [11] | T. Ayotunde Yusuf, C. A. Onifade, and T. Ayotunde, “Correlation Effects of Gender and Entry Qualifications on the Performance of Undergraduate Engineering Students in Universities,” J. Res. Initiat., vol. 4, no. 1, 2018. |
| [12] | O. O. Albert, A. Osman, and A. Yungungu, “An investigation of F actors that Influence Performance in KCSE Biology in selected secondary schools in Nyakach District, Kisumu County, Kenya Table 1.1 : The National Performance of Candidates in KCSE Biology E xamination for 2006-2010 No. of candi,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 957–977, 2014. |
| [13] | C. Kuśnierz, A. M. Rogowska, and I. Pavlova, “Examining gender differences, personality traits, academic performance, and motivation in ukrainian and polish students of physical education: A cross‐cultural study,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 1–21, 2020, |
| [14] | G. Can, “Turkish version of the academic motivation scale,” Psychol. Rep., vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 388–408, 2015, |
| [15] | S. C. South, A. M. Jarnecke, and C. E. Vize, “Sex differences in the Big Five model personality traits: A behavior genetics exploration,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 74, pp. 158–165, 2018, |
| [16] | A. L. Duckworth, E. P. Shulman, A. J. Mastronarde, S. D. Patrick, J. Zhang, and J. Druckman, “Will not want: Self-control rather than motivation explains the female advantage in report card grades,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 39, pp. 13–23, 2015, |
| [17] | H. Antecol, O. Eren, and S. Ozbeklik, “Peer effects in disadvantaged primary schools: Evidence from a randomized experiment,” J. Hum. Resour., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 95–132, 2016, |
| [18] | N. Neemati, R. Hooshangi, and A. Shurideh, “An Investigation into the Learners’ Attitudes towards Factors Affecting their Exam Performance: A Case from Razi University,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 1331–1339, May 2014, |
| [19] | T. Olufemioladebinu, A. A. Adediran, and W. O. Oyediran, “Factors influencing the academic achievement of students’ in colleges of education in Southwest, Nigeria,” J. Educ. Hum. Dev., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 109–115, 2018, |
| [20] | E. A. Brew, B. Nketiah, and R. Koranteng, “A Literature Review of Academic Performance, an Insight into Factors and their Influences on Academic Outcomes of Students at Senior High Schools,” OALib, vol. 08, no. 06, pp. 1–14, 2021, |
| [21] | J. Dania, A. R. Bakar, and S. Mohamed, “Factors influencing the acquisition of employability skills by students of selected technical secondary school in Malaysia,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 2014, |
| [22] | J. C. Cappelleri and W. M. Trochim, Regression Discontinuity Design, Second Edi., vol. 19, no. 2008. Elsevier, 2015. |
| [23] | T. H., “Determining sample size; how to calculate survey sample size.,” Int. J. Econ. Manag. Syst., no. February 2017, 2017, [Online]. Available: |
| [24] | M. Sheard and J. Golby, “Hardiness and undergraduate academic study: The moderating role of commitment,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 579–588, 2007, |
| [25] | M. Richardson, C. Abraham, and R. Bond, “Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 353–387, 2012, |
| [26] | E. Bal and H. Bicen, “The purpose of students’ social media use and determining their perspectives on education,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 120, pp. 177–181, 2017, |
APA Style
Nakawala, L., Muwumba, A. M., Ogwang, S. P., Nahamya, W. K., Oyesigye, O. (2025). Correlational Analysis Between Students’ Performance in Theory and Practical Summative Examinations. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research, 11(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12
ACS Style
Nakawala, L.; Muwumba, A. M.; Ogwang, S. P.; Nahamya, W. K.; Oyesigye, O. Correlational Analysis Between Students’ Performance in Theory and Practical Summative Examinations. Int. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. Res. 2025, 11(1), 7-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12,
author = {Lilian Nakawala and Abel Mukakanya Muwumba and Sam Patrick Ogwang and Wilfred Karukuza Nahamya and Onesimus Oyesigye},
title = {Correlational Analysis Between Students’ Performance in Theory and Practical Summative Examinations},
journal = {International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
pages = {7-20},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijvetr.20251101.12},
abstract = {The study investigated the relationship between Candidates’ performance in theory and practical papers. Specifically, it determined the performance differences across gender and examined factors that influence the performance of candidates in theory and practical papers. The study employed both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The study used the: Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient, to investigate the relationship between candidates’ performance in theory and practical papers; and Student’s t-test technique, to determine performance difference across gender. Different perceptions on the performance of candidates in practical and theory assessments from the students, instructors, assessors, principals and curriculum specialists using questionnaires and key informant interviews were obtained. Findings revealed a weak correlation between the performance of candidates in theory and practical papers. Descriptive statistics of candidates’ scores between 2017 and 2019 for NCES, showed that 76% of first year candidates scored below 50% in the theory papers compared to 43% in practical papers. For the Second-year candidates, 72% of the candidates scored below 50% compared to 0.7% in the practical papers. While for NCBC, NCAM and NCET, candidates performed better in practical papers than in theory. There was similar performance observed for all Programmes in year one and two. Additionally, the findings on theory and practical performance across gender established a significant difference in performance across gender. Factors that influenced students’ performance centered on availability of well-stocked libraries, workshops and equipped laboratory, adequate training and practical materials. The study recommended instructors’ retooling, stocking of libraries, and use of open spaces for practical training, practice and assessment.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Correlational Analysis Between Students’ Performance in Theory and Practical Summative Examinations AU - Lilian Nakawala AU - Abel Mukakanya Muwumba AU - Sam Patrick Ogwang AU - Wilfred Karukuza Nahamya AU - Onesimus Oyesigye Y1 - 2025/01/17 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12 T2 - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research JF - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research JO - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research SP - 7 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8199 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20251101.12 AB - The study investigated the relationship between Candidates’ performance in theory and practical papers. Specifically, it determined the performance differences across gender and examined factors that influence the performance of candidates in theory and practical papers. The study employed both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The study used the: Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient, to investigate the relationship between candidates’ performance in theory and practical papers; and Student’s t-test technique, to determine performance difference across gender. Different perceptions on the performance of candidates in practical and theory assessments from the students, instructors, assessors, principals and curriculum specialists using questionnaires and key informant interviews were obtained. Findings revealed a weak correlation between the performance of candidates in theory and practical papers. Descriptive statistics of candidates’ scores between 2017 and 2019 for NCES, showed that 76% of first year candidates scored below 50% in the theory papers compared to 43% in practical papers. For the Second-year candidates, 72% of the candidates scored below 50% compared to 0.7% in the practical papers. While for NCBC, NCAM and NCET, candidates performed better in practical papers than in theory. There was similar performance observed for all Programmes in year one and two. Additionally, the findings on theory and practical performance across gender established a significant difference in performance across gender. Factors that influenced students’ performance centered on availability of well-stocked libraries, workshops and equipped laboratory, adequate training and practical materials. The study recommended instructors’ retooling, stocking of libraries, and use of open spaces for practical training, practice and assessment. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -
Uganda Business and Technical Examinations Board, Kampala, Uganda
Uganda Business and Technical Examinations Board, Kampala, Uganda
Uganda Business and Technical Examinations Board, Kampala, Uganda
Uganda Business and Technical Examinations Board, Kampala, Uganda
Uganda Business and Technical Examinations Board, Kampala, Uganda
Information