Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Habitual and Demographic Determinants of Sleep Quality of Community Development College Students in Tanzania

Received: 30 October 2024     Accepted: 14 November 2024     Published: 13 December 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study intended to examine personal habits and demographic determinants of sleep quality in a sample of 640 students in the community development colleges in Tanzania. Two questions guiding the study sought to identify personal habits reported by college students that are likely to influence their sleep quality; and explain sleep problems from personal habits and demographic variables of community Development college students. Participants concurrently responded to the Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) and to the Sleep Deprivation scale (SDS). Other items in the questionnaire assessed the demographic information of the participants and personal habits presumed to determine sleep quality. Data were analyzed using techniques such as Principle Component Analysis (PCA), Pearson’s Moment Correlation Coefficient, and Direct Logistic Regression Analysis with an assistance of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). It was found that students’ sleep quality was uniquely explained by personal habits and demographic variables such as the number of times one wakes up at night, level for year of study, sleep deprivation and sex. It was concluded that sleep quality of college students is a product of a multifaceted influences including sex differences and daily habitual practices of the students. It has been recommended that policies should explicitly indicate it as a requirement for students to participate in fitness exercises, early sleep in the hostels as well as late start of studying schedules. In addition, policies should consider establishing psycho-social counselling desks where educative programs on sleep problems and their relationship with mental health should be taught.

Published in International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13
Page(s) 48-60
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Sleep Quality, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep Health, Sleep Problems, Determinants of Sleep

1. Introduction
Poor sleep quality has been reported to significantly affect academic performance of students in various levels of education. The prevalence of sleep quality in the universities is reported to be 61.31 (95% CI: 56.91-65.71), 62.23 (95% CI: 54.07-70.39), 54.43 (95% CI: 47.39-61.48), and 69.59 (95% CI: 50.39-88.80) in East, North, West, and South Africa respectively . This paper discusses sleep quality and its influence on college students’ psychological daily functioning. As applied in this study, the term sleep quality refers to both qualitative and quantitative domains, including daytime symptoms, restoration after sleep, problems initiating and maintaining sleep, difficulty waking, and sleep satisfaction . Specific to Tanzania, Joshua reported three categories of sleep deprivation among college students: normal range (43.9%), borderline (31.6%) and abnormal sleep deprivation (23.9%). Joshua further found that female than male students reported abnormal sleep deprivation [Ӽ2 (2, n = 114) = 7.27, p = 0.03, Cramer’s V = 0.32]. With regard to academic performance, Joshua concluded that sleep deprivation must not necessarily account for students’ difference in academic performance in terms of Grade point average (GPA) where almost everyone in the sample is already sleep deprived.
The prevalence of poor sleep quality and deprivation reported among college and university students in Africa signifies a dangerous alarm to the continent given both actual and potential ramifications of sleep in physical, biological and psychological health conditions of individuals. Teaching in one of the colleges that composed the sample of this study, the author of this article has been observing a number of students overwhelmed by sleep to the extent that they hardly followed the lessons given their lost attention. Studies have shown that individuals deprived of sleep and experiencing poor sleep quality have been found to develop mental health issues, executive function, hormone balance, emotional control, and attentiveness. Also, these individuals usually express psychopathology symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, stress, poor attention, poor concentration, and memory issues .
Sleep problems have far-reaching ramifications on human mental health that should not be ignored and left without intervention. For example, it has been established that generalized anxiety disorder is one of the most important consequences of sleep problems . Having conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis study involving 345,270 respondents from 39 countries, Alimoradi et al reported a prevalence of 18% of sleep problems in a general population and established its association with psychological distress and anxiety in particular (Fisher z-score = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.41–0.54). For successful intervention, however, it is crucial to examine the determining factors of sleep problems in the country in order to come up with mitigation strategies for the same.
1.1. The Concept of Sleep Quality
The term sleep quality refers to satisfaction of sleep experience involving sleep initiation, sleep maintenance, sleep quantity, and refreshment upon awakening. These are usually reflected in specific sleep parameters sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and Sleep Efficiency (SE) . Sleep onset latency (SOL) refers to the time one takes to accomplish one’s transition from the state of awake to sleep. Wake after sleep onset (WASO) is another sleep parameter referring to the amount of wake time in minutes during the sleeping period, after one has achieved the sleep onset. Sleep efficiency (SE) is commonly defined as the ratio of total sleep time (TST) and time in bed (TIB). In measuring sleep quality using self reporting scales, respondents are usually asked to share their experiences in difficulty or ease to achieve these parameters and attributes of sleep quality. It is therefore a common practice to find similarity of items measuring the attributes of sleep quality in the scales measuring sleep deprivation as well, implying the relationship between sleep deprivation and sleep quality. Although these attributes seem to be shared by both sleep quality and sleep deprivation, the two concepts (sleep quality and sleep deprivation) are not the same. Yet their similarities are inevitable given the fact that they are all the concepts born out of an attempt to address sleep problems. Thus, while the items addressing sleep problems have been measured using both Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) and Sleep Deprivation scale (SDS) , sleep quality and sleep deprivation are not the same despite sharing some similar attributes describing them. In fact, Nelson et al argues that sleep deprivation is an antecedent of sleep quality.
1.2. Plausible Explanations of Poor Sleep Quality
Theories of sleep are characterized by their role in explaining sleep as a property of several animals, including human beings, guiding the explanations of empirical studies regarding sleep deprivation and their ability to explain variations in sleep patterns across species. Oswald proposed that sleep is for restoration purposes. According to restoration theory, during NREM biological processes are restored, while during REM, brain processes are renewed through protein synthesis processes. Several empirical studies have supported restorative functions of sleep with specific evidence of changes in sleep patterns over the lifespan and sleep's role in immunity functioning. According to Nelson et al , sleep quality is determined by several factors including physiological (e.g., age, circadian rhythm, body mass index, NREM, REM), psychological (e.g., stress, anxiety, depression), environmental factors (e.g., room temperature, television/device use) and family/social commitments. It is not then surprising that some research tools, such as Sleep Quality scale consists of items evaluating restoration functions of sleep. Lopez found a relationship between sleep quality and golf score performance; subjective fatigue and sleep quality; and subjective fatigue and performance and suggested that long-distance travel affected the quality of sleep.
Altun et al reports that poor sleep experiences among university and college students are associated with factors such as exposure to psychological problems, stress, exposure to tobacco smoke in the sleeping room, pain, family problems, sickness, air quality of the room, strenuous physical activity, fatigue, sadness and noise that caused by other people in the room. In addition, Albinsaleh et. al outlines factors like smoking four hours before bedtime, consuming caffeine three hours before sleep or immediately before bedtime, using mobile phones right before bedtime, having anxiety and depression symptoms. Hall has associated loss of sleep with hours spent performing an activity considered vital.
In Brazil, Machado et al reports that sleep problems are determined by factors such as female sex, age greater than or equal to 40 years, lower schooling level, depressive symptoms, pesticide poisoning, and poor quality of life. Studies such as have reported statistically significant associations between sleep quality, depression, stress and anxiety among university health professions students. In addition, Khan, et al reported that 60.5% of undergraduate students at Karachi University had poor sleep quality and associated poor sleep quality with behavioral habits like consumption of caffeinated drinks, smoking, energy drinks, and technology use. A meta-analysis found that stressed students were 2.4 times more likely to have poor sleep quality than students who were not stressed; students who were in their second year of studies were 3.1 times more likely to have poor sleep quality than students in other years of study; and that students using electronic devices at bedtime were 4 times more likely to report poor sleep quality their counterparts.
Few studies on sleep problems have been carried out in Tanzania . Lang et al found that daily physical activity significantly predicted composite sleep health among children in Tanzania (ß = 5.83, p = .002) and Côte d’Ivoire (ß = 3.41, p = .072), but not in South Africa (ß = 0.67, p > .05). Joshua reported 23.9% of abnormal sleep deprivation among students in one college; and reported that female than male students reported abnormal sleep deprivation. Shayo & Mugusi found Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), a common cause of daytime sleepiness in 26.3% of diabetics (p= 0.042) and associated it with female sex, age group 45-54 years, central obesity and snoring. Curiosity on whether similar results could be consistently reported by students in other colleges with large samples in Tanzania motivated the present study. Therefore, this study sought to examine personal habitual and demographic determinants of sleep quality of community development college students. This was achieved by responding to the following questions:
What are the personal habits do community development college students report that are likely to influence their sleep quality?
To what extent do personal habits and demographic variables explain sleep problems among community Development college students?
2. Methodology
2.1. Place of Study
A study was conducted in Mara, Mwanza, Iringa, and Arusha regions of Tanzania. The regions were strategically selected given their role as homes to the sampled four colleges, namely; Buhare Community Development Training Institute (CDTI), Misungwi CDTTI, Ruaha CDTI, and CDTI Monduli, respectively. The four colleges were sampled out of the eight to represent each of the administrative zones hosting the Eight CDTI colleges owned and managed by the Government under the Ministry of Community Development, Gender, Women and Special Groups. Thus, respondents from each of these four colleges were proportionally distributed, as shown in Table 1. At the college level, a list of females was separated from that of male students to achieve proportional inclusion. However, selection of the individual respondents was systematically randomized so that individuals were picked from the first to the last count in the female or male registration list.
Table 1. Respondents by Colleges.

College

Number of respondents

Percentage

Misungwi

125

19.5

Buhare

180

28.1

Ruaha

200

31.3

Monduli

135

21.1

Total

640

100.0

2.2. Design, Measures and Data Collection
Cross-sectional survey design was employed, whereby both independent and dependent variables were concurrently collected. Data collection was done during free class time between May and June, 2023. The sampled students in each college stayed together in one room, researchers then distributed questionnaires, pencils and erasers. The researcher was present in person to clarify the instructions and respondents’ questions if any.
2.3. Instrumentation
Participants responded to one questionnaire, which was comprised of one sleep quality measure: the Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) , the Sleep Deprivation scale (SDS) , which measured sleep deprivation. Other items in the questionnaire assessed the demographic information of the participants and personal habits presumed to be determinants of sleep quality, such as number of hours used in sleep, number of times one wakes up in the midst of night sleep, activities done in the bedroom while in bed before sleeping, time used for pre-sleep activities, as well as timing of exercise whether morning, evening late evening, etc.
Structure of The Sleep Quality Scale
According to Yi, et al, , SQS is a self-administered scale composed of 28 items, developed to evaluate six factors such as daytime symptoms; restoration after sleep; problems initiating and maintaining sleep; difficulty waking; and sleep satisfaction among a variety of patient and research populations. The Principle Component Analysis (PCA) in the SPSS version 26 was employed to assess the psychometric structure of the 28 items of the Sleep Quality Scale (SQS). This followed the assessment of the suitability of data for factor analysis. The correlation matrix indicated that many coefficients were 0.4 and above, with the Kaiser-Meyer-Oklin value of 0.90. This was considered adequate since it was above the recommended value of 0.6 . Further, the factorability of the matrix was supported since the Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity reached statistical significance, Ӽ2 (378, n = 640) = 3912.59, p < 0.01. In this study, PCA of the SQS indicated five components with eigenvalues above1, namely; daytime symptoms/interference with work (22.762%), problems initiating and maintaining sleep (8.106%), sleep satisfaction (5.218%), difficulty waking (4.378%), and Physical and cognitive symptoms (3.912%) as indicated in Table 1 and Table 2.
Internal Consistency of SQS
According to the initial evaluation of the psychometric properties of SQS , internal consistency was good with Cronbach’s value of an Alpha = 0.92. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85.
The Relationship between Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) and Sleep Deprivation Scale (SDS)
The relationship between SQS and SDS was measured using Pearson’s Moment Correlation Coefficient. Results indicated that there was a positive low correlation (r = 0.43, p < 0.001), which is indicating that the two scales were to the large proportion (81%) independent from each other. Thus, SQS measured quality as opposed to sleep deprivation measured by SDS.
Table 2. Total Variance Explained.

Component

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadingsa

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

1

6.373

22.762

22.762

6.373

22.762

22.762

4.801

2

2.270

8.106

30.868

2.270

8.106

30.868

3.740

3

1.461

5.218

36.086

1.461

5.218

36.086

2.502

4

1.226

4.378

40.465

1.226

4.378

40.465

3.339

5

1.095

3.912

44.376

1.095

3.912

44.376

2.239

6

.993

3.547

47.924

7

.941

3.359

51.283

8

.895

3.195

54.478

9

.853

3.046

57.524

10

.833

2.974

60.497

11

.803

2.867

63.365

12

.792

2.828

66.192

13

.746

2.663

68.856

14

.735

2.623

71.479

15

.705

2.517

73.996

16

.695

2.484

76.480

17

.676

2.415

78.895

18

.655

2.341

81.236

19

.613

2.189

83.425

20

.603

2.153

85.578

21

.571

2.038

87.617

22

.558

1.994

89.611

23

.539

1.924

91.535

24

.520

1.856

93.391

25

.506

1.808

95.199

26

.484

1.730

96.929

27

.469

1.675

98.603

28

.391

1.397

100.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a. When components are correlated, sums of squared loadings cannot be added to obtain a total variance.

Table 3. The SQS Structure Matrix.

Item

Component

1

2

3

4

5

Poor sleep makes me forget things more easily

.681

Poor sleep makes me lose desire in all things

.669

Poor sleep makes it hard to concentrate at work

.665

Poor sleep causes me to make mistakes at work

.617

Poor sleep makes me lose interest of work and others

.599

Poor sleep makes me easily tired at work

.569

Poor sleep makes it hard for me to think

.552

-.440

Sleepiness interferes with my daily life

.523

Poor sleep makes my life painful

.511

I never go back to sleep after awakening during sleep

-.704

I feel unlikely to sleep after sleep

-.701

I have difficulty getting back to sleep once I wake up in the middle of night

-.677

I wake up easily because of noise

-.602

I have difficulty falling asleep

-.587

.507

I toss and turn

-.547

Poor sleep makes me lose my appetite

-.463

I am satisfied with my sleep

.730

My fatigue is relieved after sleep

.661

I feel vigorous after sleep

.645

My sleep hours are enough

.408

I wake up while sleeping

.755

I fall into a deep sleep

.678

I would like to sleep more after waking up

.593

I have difficulty getting out of bed

.556

I feel refreshed after sleep

Poor sleep gives me headaches

-.677

Poor sleep makes me irritated

-.623

I have a clear head after sleep

.457

-.609

2.4. Ethical Considerations
Prior to data collection all relevant authorities including the ethical committee of the Buhare CDTI authorized the permission to proceed with the study. In addition, the respondents were adults, whose informed consent were sought prior to their acceptance to respond to the questionnaires by signing the informed consent statement in the questionnaire. In addition, the respondents were assured of the confidentiality of the to be provided information as the same would be used solely for the purpose of the study. Furthermore, the respondents were informed about their right to withdraw from responding to the questionnaire should they decide to do so for any reason at any time.
3. Results
3.1. Respondents’ Characteristics
This study was conducted among Community Development College students. A sample was heterogeneous in nature, as appears in Table 4.
Table 4. Characteristics of the Respondents.

Variables

Variable Level

Freq.

Percentage

Sex

Males

270

42.2

Females

370

57.8

Age

Minimum

18

-

Maximum

47

-

Mean

21.92

-

Standard Deviation

3.38

-

Level of Study

Level 4

114

17.8

Level 5

423

66.1

Level 6

103

16.1

Marital Status

Married

19

3.0

Single

604

94.4

Divorced

13

2.0

Separated

1

.2

Cohabiting

3

.5

Tuition Fee Payment Status

Paid in full

277

43.3

Not paid and not sure of getting

159

24.8

Not paid, not sure of paying in time

204

31.9

Prior Education Reached

Form six

8

1.3

Form four

536

83.8

Not declared

96

15.0

Birth Order

First born

186

29.1

Last born

114

17.8

Middle (Not first nor last born)

340

53.1

Religious belief

Muslim

102

15.9

Christian

533

83.3

Traditionalist

4

.6

Atheist

1

.2

More important to note from Table 2 is an acute difference of prior level of education where 83% (536) joined college with Form four level of education compared to only 1.3% (8) with Form Six entry level. This variation might be due to the fact that most form six normally prioritize joining universities over diploma education in community development colleges. Female students, rather than male students, relatively dominated the sample given the fact that females were more numerous in these colleges than male students. Explanations for this variation were beyond the scope of this paper. Another important variable worth paying attention to is the level of study. Level Four (4) in the context of these colleges refers to first-year students. These students are at liberty to exit with a certificate at the end of year one or continue with Level Five. Level five students are at the second year of their studies in these colleges, undertaking courses leading to a diploma award at the end of year three (Level Six).
3.2. Sleep Problems Experienced by Community Development College Students
The question was raised as to whether or not community development college students experienced sleep problems as measured by Sleep Quality Scale. Table 5 summarizes students’ responses.
Data in Table 5 indicates a diverse distribution of the responses in each item of the SQS. For further analysis and meaningful conclusion, data were tallied, and entered into the logistic regression analysis. The model as a whole explained between 24.2% (Cox and Snell R square) and 32.3% (Nagelkerke R squared) of the variance in sleep quality and correctly classified 74.5% of respondents with sleep problems.
Table 5. Sleep Quality among College Students.

Items

Responses

Few/No

Sometimes

Often

Almost Always

Freq.

%

Freq.

%

Freq.

%

Freq.

%

I have difficulty falling asleep

4

.6

341

53.3

116

18.1

179

28.0

I fall into a deep sleep

252

39.4

157

24.5

135

21.1

96

15.0

I wake up while sleeping

216

33.8

137

21.4

168

26.3

119

18.6

I have difficulty getting back to sleep once I wake up in the middle of night

247

38.6

130

20.3

156

24.4

107

16.7

I wake up easily because of noise

226

35.3

141

22.0

142

22.2

130

20.3

I toss and turn

232

36.3

136

21.3

145

22.7

127

19.8

I never go back to sleep after awakening during sleep

255

39.8

136

21.3

150

23.4

99

15.5

I feel refreshed after sleep

196

30.6

104

16.3

164

25.6

175

27.3

I feel unlikely to sleep after sleep

263

41.1

128

20.0

140

21.9

109

17.0

Poor sleep gives me headaches

189

29.5

122

19.1

155

24.2

174

27.2

Poor sleep makes me irritated

159

24.8

141

22.0

173

27.0

166

25.9

I would like to sleep more after waking up

254

39.7

129

20.2

136

21.3

119

18.6

My sleep hours are enough

217

33.9

110

17.2

161

25.2

151

23.6

Poor sleep makes me lose my appetite

281

43.9

119

18.6

131

20.5

108

16.9

Poor sleep makes it hard for me to think

169

26.4

147

23.0

164

25.6

159

24.8

I feel vigorous after sleep

137

21.4

145

22.7

161

25.2

195

30.5

Poor sleep makes me lose interest in work and others

190

29.7

154

24.1

156

24.4

137

21.4

My fatigue is relieved after sleep

136

21.3

133

20.8

176

27.5

195

30.5

Poor sleep causes me to make mistakes at work

210

32.8

131

20.5

180

28.1

116

18.1

I am satisfied with my sleep

171

26.7

134

20.9

172

26.9

162

25.3

Poor sleep makes me forget things more easily

216

33.8

149

23.3

148

23.1

125

19.5

Poor sleep makes it hard to concentrate at work

193

30.2

152

23.8

162

25.3

133

20.8

Sleepiness interferes with my daily life

231

36.1

145

22.7

155

24.2

107

16.7

Poor sleep makes me lose desire for all things

188

29.4

137

21.4

186

29.1

128

20.0

I have difficulty getting out of bed

207

32.3

139

21.7

155

24.2

138

21.6

Poor sleep makes me easily tired at work

195

30.5

138

21.6

165

25.8

142

22.2

I have a clear head after sleep

140

21.9

133

20.8

143

22.3

224

35.0

Poor sleep makes my life painful

190

29.7

143

22.3

157

24.5

148

23.1

3.3. Personal Habits Reported by Community Development College Students
Three personal habits were assessed, and their results are presented in Table 6.
Table 6. Personal Habits of College students.

Variables/Habit

Variable Level

Freq.

Percentage

Number of times one wakes up in the midst of sleep

Not waking up until morning

84

13.1

Waking up once

212

33.1

Waking up once 2 times

214

33.4

Waking up once 3 times

109

17.0

Waking up once 4 times

19

3.0

Waking up once 5 times

2

.3

In-bed pre-sleep activities

Watching TV

43

6.7

Charting Via phone

133

20.8

Writing or reading on Laptop/Tablet

88

13.8

Reading class notes or book

213

33.3

Others (e.g Leisure)

55

8.6

Both 3 & 4 (Reading books, class notes/ reading or writing on electronic device

1

.2

Both 1 & 4 (TV watching and reading notes)

4

.6

Both 1 &2 (TV watching & charting via phone

10

1.6

Doing Nothing

93

14.5

Time of the day for Exercising

No exercise

121

18.9

Morning

224

35.0

Evening

294

45.9

Not declared

1

.2

Only 13.1% (84) of the respondents reported that they were not waking up until morning after sleep. Of those who reported waking up in the midst of sleep, while 33.1% reported waking up twice per night, and about 23% reported waking thrice and plus per night. This has a potential influence on sleep quality. Regarding in-bed pre-sleep activities, most respondents reported the use of electronic devices such as watching TV, charting via phone and using laptops, which all together amounts to about 264 (41.25%) followed by 213 (33.3%) who reported reading class notes and books. These habits were a potential alarm to influence sleep quality. Interestingly, most students reported engaging in fitness exercise (35% in morning hours and 45.9% in evening times), while only 93 (14.5%) reported not exercising.
3.4. Explaining Sleep Quality from Personal Habits
Direct logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the impact of several factors on the likelihood that college students would report acute sleep problems. The assumption was that the reported sleep problems would be determined by variables such as respondent’s level of study, sex, age in years, entry level, number of times one wakes up in the midst of night sleep, pre-sleep activities, time used for pre-sleep activities and timing of exercise whether morning, evening late evening and sleep deprivation. The full model containing all predictors was statistically significant, Ӽ2 (37, N = 640) = 173.496, p < 0.001, p < .001, indicating that the model was able to distinguish between respondents who reported acute from their counterparts who reported no or low sleep problem. The model as a whole explained between 24.2% (Cox and Snell R square) and 32.3% (Nagelkerke R squared) of the variance in sleep quality, and correctly classified 74.5% of respondents with sleep problems.
Table 7. Explaining Sleep Quality from Personal Habits.

Variables in the Equation

B

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp (B)

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower

Upper

Level/Year of study

15.056

2

.001

Level/Year of study (1)

.923

.324

8.123

1

.004

2.518

1.334

4.751

Level/Year of study (2)

1.562

.403

15.004

1

.000

4.770

2.164

10.517

Sex (1)

.435

.206

4.480

1

.034

1.545

1.033

2.312

Age in years

.032

.029

1.229

1

.268

1.033

.976

1.093

Entry Level

1.912

2

.384

Entry Level (1)

1.120

1.133

.977

1

.323

3.064

.333

28.211

Entry Level (2)

1.436

1.177

1.487

1

.223

4.202

.418

42.236

Waking up after sleep

43.603

4

.000

Waking up after sleep (1)

-.568

.279

4.160

1

.041

.566

.328

.978

Waking up after sleep (2)

1.383

.260

28.249

1

.000

3.987

2.394

6.640

Waking up after sleep (3)

-20.136

28403.761

.000

1

.999

.000

.000

.

Waking up after sleep (4)

-19.379

40192.970

.000

1

1.000

.000

.000

.

Frequency of wake up

.026

.107

.059

1

.808

1.026

.832

1.265

Pre- sleeping activities

-.076

.047

2.612

1

.106

.927

.846

1.016

Time for Pre-sleeping activities

-.002

.002

1.175

1

.278

.998

.995

1.002

Timing of exercise

-.055

.127

.188

1

.665

.946

.737

1.215

Total Sleep deprivation

.110

.039

7.808

1

.005

1.116

1.033

1.206

Constant

-4.180

1.428

8.564

1

.003

.015

As indicated in Table 7, only four independent variables were uniquely statistically significant. These are Post Sleep Waking up at night, level/Year of study, Sleep Deprivation and Sex. The strongest predictor of acute sleep problems was the level for year of study (p<0.001), recording an odds ratio of 4.77. This interprets that Level Six respondents (students in the second year in Diploma Course) were over 4 times more likely to report sleep problems than Level Four respondents (students in the first year in Certificate Course), while Level IV (First year) were 2 times more likely to report sleep problems than Level six students; controlling for all other factors in the model. Unexpectedly, Level Six (being in the final year of the Diploma Course) did not predict reporting sleep problems.
This was followed by the number of times one wakes up at night (p<0.001), recording an odds ratio of 3.987 interpreting that respondents who reported waking up in the midst of sleep at night between 2 and 4 times were over 3 times, more likely to report sleep problems than their counterparts who reported not waking up in the midst of sleep at night when all other factors in the model were put under control. Sleep Deprivation followed (p<0.01), recorded an odds ratio of 1.116. This means that respondents who reported sleep deprivation were 1.2 times more likely to report low sleep quality than their counterparts who reported no sleep deprivation, when all other factors in the model were controlled. Sex followed in the list (p<0.03), recording an odds ratio of 1.545. this means that males were 1.5 times more likely than females to report low sleep quality or sleep problems.
4. Discussion
These results come from a substantial sample of students from the community development institutes. In these colleges, students are at liberty to choose to stay either in the colleges’ hostels or in the rented houses outside the colleges. Usually, most students do not willingly choose to stay in rented houses until they find that the college hostels are not sufficiently available for every student in need of them. This is because the rented rooms outside the colleges are usually more expensive than hostels in the colleges. Given students’ variation in their family backgrounds in terms of economic status, not all students who miss rooms in the hostels are capable of running their lives in rented houses. Therefore, it is often necessary to have a roommate in order to be cost-efficient. They are thus, forced to start new life with the meager resources they have, in addition to learning to get along with their roommates, new environment and people, while at the same time struggling with college studies. These changes might be coupled with stress, which in turn become significant factors in circadian rhythm disruption, in turn impacting sleep quality. With increasing number of courses students have to study in second year, more tasks and assignments than available time might intensify their need to extend their working hours to the mid nights, resulting into sleep deprivation and thus, poor sleep quality. What makes students at the last year of studies to score low in reporting sleep quality than their counterparts at lower levels is so far not clear as it was beyond the scope of this study. More need to be done to explore this in the country.
It has been found here that sleep problems are associated with the number of times one wakes up at night, level for year of study, sleep deprivation, and sex. The results are similar to other studies done outside and within Tanzania, which also reported high sleep problems among college and university students and associated sleep problems with personal habits such as strenuous physical activity , technology use such as using mobile phones, laptops and watching TV right before bedtime , hours spent to perform an activity considered vital before sleeping , and demographic variables such as sex, lower schooling level .
Generalizability of these results is worth discussing. Habitual and demographic determinants of sleep quality have been identified in this study. However, caution should be taken when interpreting these results as no causality has been established. This is because data were concurrently rather than subsequently collected via self-reporting; making us remain uninformed of the past sleep-related habits of the respondents. However, it is interesting to note that although the studies cited in this work were done in different places with different samples and, interestingly with different tools and rigorous methodologies, there has been consistency in the findings as reported in the preceding paragraphs. With the fact that the results of this study have been consistent with other previous results, these results can be generalized to college students with similar socioeconomic backgrounds.
Practical and Theoretical Implications
The potential practical implications of psychological and policy interventions to both students and teachers in community development colleges and to policy makers in community health sector are also important. Both students and teachers might utilize these results by starting to participate in fitness exercises as this has been found to improve sleep. The fact that sleep quality is influenced by the frequency of waking up at night, which interferes with sleep cycles, calls for revisiting some habits that might lead to waking up. For example, both students and teachers might attend community awareness training on the negative impacts of poor sleep and appropriate feeding schedules, which specify the appropriate timing of foods and drinks. The role of sleep in restoration and avoiding its impacts to extend from individuals to society in general has been established . This is because the societal health is a property of the individuals of the society in reference. To consistently and systemically improve the sleep quality of the society at large, policies guiding sleep and their operational procedures need to be in place, with special attention given to females, whom several studies have established their dominance in reporting sleep problems.
Theoretical and methodological implications of these results are of paramount importance in this discussion, given their framework role. According to Yi et al, , the Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) was develop using item analysis and factor analysis on items with content validity. The inclusion of items assessing daytime symptoms/interference with work, problems initiating and maintaining sleep, difficulty waking, and Physical and cognitive symptoms in the SQS indicates the link between SQS and the restoration function of sleep whereby brain processes are renewed through protein synthesis processes . It follows then that these results support the usefulness of SQS and the restoration functions of sleep.
5. Conclusions
This study intended to examine personal habits and demographic determinants of sleep quality of students in the community development colleges. The study was guided by the two questions seeking identify personal habits reported by college students that are likely to influence their sleep quality; and explain sleep problems from personal habits and demographic variables of community Development college students. According to the responses of the Community Development College Students’ sample in Tanzania, the Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) assessed five factors, namely; daytime symptoms/interference with work, problems initiating and maintaining sleep, sleep satisfaction, difficulty waking, and Physical and cognitive symptoms. Regarding personal habits, students reported habits such as waking up at least twice per night, pre-sleeping activities such as watching TV, charting via phone and, using laptops, and reading class notes and books. Students further reported engaging in fitness exercises during the morning and evening hours. Four personal habits and demographic variables that uniquely explained sleep quality were: level/year of study, number of times one wakes up at night after sleep, sleep deprivation and sex. Following these results, it is concluded that sleep quality of college students is a product of a multifaceted influences including sex differences and daily habitual practices of the students.
6. Recommendations
Given the impacts of sleep problems discussed in this paper and the fact that a large proportion of college students have reported sleep problems, the following recommendations are made: to begin with, colleges should consider developing policies guiding personal habits that might interfere with sleep. For example, policies should explicitly indicate it as a requirement for students to participate in fitness exercises, early sleep in the hostels as well as late start of studying schedules. In addition, policies should consider establishing psycho-social counselling desks where educative programs on sleep problems and their relationship with mental health should be practised. Due to the fact that female than male respondents and second year students (Level Five in this study) have been repeatedly found to report sleep problems elsewhere, colleges should think of giving special attention to the female and second year students in the policies to be developed.
Abbreviations

CDTI

Community Development Training Institutes

CDTTI

Community Development Training Institute

SQS

Sleep Quality Scale

SDS

Sleep Deprivation Scale

OSA

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

REM

Rapid Eye Movement

NREM

Non-rapid Eye Movement

SOL

Sleep Onset Latency

TST

Total Sleep Time

WASO

Wake After Sleep Onset

SE

Sleep Efficiency

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

TIB

Time in Bed

Acknowledgments
I express my sincere gratitude to Buhare CDTI Management for their financial support, without which this research could not be achieved to its fullest scope.
Author Contributions
Joel Matiku Joshua is the sole author. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest
References
[1] Albinsaleh, A. A., Wael, W. M., Nouri, M. M. et. al. 2023. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Poor Sleep Quality Among Visitors of Primary Healthcare Centers in Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus 15(7):
[2] Alimoradi Z, Broström A, Tsang H. W. H., et al. 2021. Sleep problems during COVID- 19 pandemic and its’ association to psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 36: 100916. PMID: 34131640;
[3] Altun, I., Cinar, N. & Debe, C. 2012. The contributing factors to poor sleep experiences in according to the university students: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Research in Medical Science, 17(6): 557–561.
[4] Bartlett, M. S. 1954. A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16 (Series B), 296–8.
[5] Bayoumy, H. M., Sedek, H., Omar, H., & Ayman, S. 2023. Investigating the relationship of sleep quality and psychological factors among Health Professions students. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 19, 100581:
[6] Davis J. E, and Corbett C. F. 2022. Sleep quality: An evolutionary concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 57(1): 144-151.
[7] Eller T, Aluoja A, Vasar V, Veldi M. 2006. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in Estonian medical students with sleep problems. Depression Anxiety, 23: 250–6.
[8] Hall, M. H. 2013. Sleep Deprivativation. In: Gellman M. D.., Turner J. R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicie. Springer, New York. NY.
[9] Joshua, J. M. 2022. The Influence of Sleep Deprivation on Academic Performance among College Students. Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(4), 241-249.
[10] Kaiser, H. 1970. A Second-generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–15.
[11] Kaiser, H. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–6.
[12] Khan, F., Haroon, H., Murtaza, H. & Anwar, E. 2016. Determinants of Sleep Quality among Undergraduate Students of Universities of Karachi. Annals of Psychology 3 (1): 04
[13] Lang, C., Bassirou, B. Cheril, W., et al 2023. Sleep and physical activity patterns among Tanzanian, South African, and Côte d’Ivoire primary schoolchildren. Findings from the KaziAfya study. Current Issues in Sport Science 8 (2),
[14] Lopez, M. E. 2012. Quality and Quantity of Sleep Study and its Relationship to the Performance of LPGA Tour Players. Dissertations and Theses. 95.
[15] Lund, H. G., Reider, B. D., Whiting, A. B., and Prichard, J. R. 2010. Sleep patterns and predictors of disturbed sleep in a large population of college students. Journal of Adolescents’ Health, 46: 124–32.
[16] Maas, J. B. and Wherry, M. L. (1998). Power Sleep: The Revolutionary Program that repares Your Mind for Peak Performance. Villard: 248pp.
[17] Machado A. K. F., Wendt, A. Wehrmeister, F. C. 2018. Sleep problems and associated factors in a rural population of a Southern Brazilian city. Rev Saude Publica. 2018; 52 (Suppl 1): 5s.
[18] Moo-Estrella J, Pé rez-Benıtez H, Sol ́ ıs-Rodr ́ ıguez F, Arankowsky-Sandoval, G. ́ 2005. Evaluation of depressive symptoms and sleep alterations in college students. Arch Med Res. 36: 393–8.
[19] Moreira NF, Luz VG, Moreira CC, et al. 2013. Self-reported weight and height are valid Measures to determine weight status: results from the Brazilian National Health Survey (PNS 2013). Cad Saude Publica. 2018; 34(5): e00063917. PMID: 29768583;
[20] Nakie, G., Takelle, G. M., & Rtbey, G. et al. 2024. Sleep quality and associated factors among university students in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychiatry (3):
[21] Nelson KL, Davis JE, Corbett CF. Sleep quality: An evolutionary concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2022 Jan; 57(1): 144-151.
[22] Oswald, I. 1970. Sleep the great restorer. New Scientist, 46, 170-172.
[23] Shayo, G. A., & Mugusi, F. M. 2015. Prevalence and risk factors for obstructive sleep apnoea in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research, 17(1).
[24] Yi, H., Shin, K., & Shin, C. (2006). Development of the sleep quality scale. Journal of Sleep Research, 15 (3), 309–316.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Joshua, J. M. (2024). Habitual and Demographic Determinants of Sleep Quality of Community Development College Students in Tanzania. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research, 10(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Joshua, J. M. Habitual and Demographic Determinants of Sleep Quality of Community Development College Students in Tanzania. Int. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. Res. 2024, 10(2), 48-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Joshua JM. Habitual and Demographic Determinants of Sleep Quality of Community Development College Students in Tanzania. Int J Vocat Educ Train Res. 2024;10(2):48-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13,
      author = {Joel Matiku Joshua},
      title = {Habitual and Demographic Determinants of Sleep Quality of Community Development College Students in Tanzania
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {48-60},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijvetr.20241002.13},
      abstract = {This study intended to examine personal habits and demographic determinants of sleep quality in a sample of 640 students in the community development colleges in Tanzania. Two questions guiding the study sought to identify personal habits reported by college students that are likely to influence their sleep quality; and explain sleep problems from personal habits and demographic variables of community Development college students. Participants concurrently responded to the Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) and to the Sleep Deprivation scale (SDS). Other items in the questionnaire assessed the demographic information of the participants and personal habits presumed to determine sleep quality. Data were analyzed using techniques such as Principle Component Analysis (PCA), Pearson’s Moment Correlation Coefficient, and Direct Logistic Regression Analysis with an assistance of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). It was found that students’ sleep quality was uniquely explained by personal habits and demographic variables such as the number of times one wakes up at night, level for year of study, sleep deprivation and sex. It was concluded that sleep quality of college students is a product of a multifaceted influences including sex differences and daily habitual practices of the students. It has been recommended that policies should explicitly indicate it as a requirement for students to participate in fitness exercises, early sleep in the hostels as well as late start of studying schedules. In addition, policies should consider establishing psycho-social counselling desks where educative programs on sleep problems and their relationship with mental health should be taught.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Habitual and Demographic Determinants of Sleep Quality of Community Development College Students in Tanzania
    
    AU  - Joel Matiku Joshua
    Y1  - 2024/12/13
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13
    T2  - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research
    JF  - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research
    JO  - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research
    SP  - 48
    EP  - 60
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-8199
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.13
    AB  - This study intended to examine personal habits and demographic determinants of sleep quality in a sample of 640 students in the community development colleges in Tanzania. Two questions guiding the study sought to identify personal habits reported by college students that are likely to influence their sleep quality; and explain sleep problems from personal habits and demographic variables of community Development college students. Participants concurrently responded to the Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) and to the Sleep Deprivation scale (SDS). Other items in the questionnaire assessed the demographic information of the participants and personal habits presumed to determine sleep quality. Data were analyzed using techniques such as Principle Component Analysis (PCA), Pearson’s Moment Correlation Coefficient, and Direct Logistic Regression Analysis with an assistance of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). It was found that students’ sleep quality was uniquely explained by personal habits and demographic variables such as the number of times one wakes up at night, level for year of study, sleep deprivation and sex. It was concluded that sleep quality of college students is a product of a multifaceted influences including sex differences and daily habitual practices of the students. It has been recommended that policies should explicitly indicate it as a requirement for students to participate in fitness exercises, early sleep in the hostels as well as late start of studying schedules. In addition, policies should consider establishing psycho-social counselling desks where educative programs on sleep problems and their relationship with mental health should be taught.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Methodology
    3. 3. 4. Ethical Considerations
    4. 4. Results
    5. 5. Discussion
    6. 6. Conclusions
    7. 7. Recommendations
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contributions
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information