This study utilizes a sample of 1231 college students in Beijing and employs the Family Socioeconomic Status Questionnaire, Social Support Scale, and Career Maturity Scale to investigate the mediating effect of social support on the relationship between family socioeconomic status and career maturity. The survey results found that the career maturity of male college students (3.311±0.444) was significantly higher than that of females' (3.267±0.427) (P<0.01), and the career maturity of urban students (3.291±0.422) was higher than that of rural students' (3.274±0.446) (P<0.01). As students' grades increase, their level of career maturity increases as well. The correlation analysis showed that family socioeconomic status, social support and career maturity were positively correlated with each other (r=0.114, 0.127, 0.270, P<0.01). Mediating effect test showed that social support played a partial mediating role between family socioeconomic status and career maturity, with a mediating effect value of 0.041. This mediating effect accounts for 31.4% of the total effect.. The study found that in the social support dimension, school support had a significantly higher impact on college students' career maturity compared to family support. The mediating effect values for school support and family support were 0.035 and 0.043, respectively. However, the support from friends and classmates did not show a significant mediating effect. These findings indicate that social support partially mediates the relationship between family socioeconomic status and college students' career maturity, with school support playing the most significant mediating role.
Published in | International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16 |
Page(s) | 66-70 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Family Socioeconomic Status, Career Maturity, Social Support
[1] | Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. The expected number of college graduates in 2022 is 10.76 million, an increase of 1.67 million year-on-year [EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2021/53931/mtbd/202112/t20211229_591046.html. |
[2] | Super, D. E. Dimensions and Measurement of Vocational Maturity [J]. Teachers College Record, 1955(57): 151-163. |
[3] | Liu Hongxia. Study on Gender Difference of vocational maturity of college students [J]. China Youth Study, 2009(7): 88-90. |
[4] | Keller BK, Whiston SC. The role of parental influences on young adolescents’career development [J]. Journal of Career Assessment, 2008(2): 198-217. |
[5] | Wang Wei. A Study on Career Maturity of College Students from the perspective of Family Social Capital-A Case study of Huaiyin Institute of Technology University [J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2014(12): 234-236. |
[6] | Li Hongbin, Meng Llingsheng, Shi Xinshegn, et al. Parental Political Capital and Capital and Children’s Labor Market Performance: Evidence from the First Job Offers of Chinese College Graduates [J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2012(3): 1015-1026. |
[7] | Huang Qian, Li Kuan, Xiong Deping. Family Socio-economic Status and Resident Health: Research Based on Dual Perspectives of Lifestyle and Social Support [J]. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2020(7): 68-78. |
[8] | Xu Yan. Family Socioeconomic Status, Social Support and College Students' Subjective Well-being. Youth Studies, 2017(1): 48-54. |
[9] | Xu Min. Study on the Relationship of Social Support, psychological Capital and Career Maturity of College Students [D]. Sichuan: Sichuan Normal University, 2014: 41-42. |
[10] | Bradley, R. H. & R. F. Crowyn. Socioeconomic Status and Child Development [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002(53): 371-399. |
[11] | Shen Hong. Status of University Faculty Development in China-Based on 2014 Faculty Survey [J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2016(2): 38-44. |
[12] | Zheng Jie. Family socio-economic status and Possibility of students' Employment [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 2004(3): 112-115. |
[13] | Yang Xiumu, Qi Yulong, Shen Zhengfu et al. Family Socioeconomic Status, Vocational Value on Subjective Well-being in Medical Students [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2015(1). |
[14] | Xiao Yuanyuan, Yang Desen. The effect of social support on Physical and Mental Health [J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 1987(4): 183-186. |
[15] | Ye Yuemei, Dai XiaoYang, Development of Social Support Scale for University Students [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2008(5): 456-458. |
[16] | TANG Haibo, Pu Weidan, Yao Shuqiao. The Effect of Perceived Social Support and Adult Attachment on Anxiety [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2009(3): 290-291. |
[17] | Zhang ZhiYong, Rong Yu, Guan Yanjun. The Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of College Students’ Career Maturity Inventory [J]. Journal of Southwest Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2006(5): 1-5. |
[18] | Wen Zhonglin, Zhang Lei, Hou Jietai et al. Testing and Application of the Mediating Effects [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2004(5): 615-617. |
[19] | Erceghurn D M, Mirosevich V M. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 2008, 63(7): 591-601. |
[20] | Cheng Lina. Social Economic Status and Study Engagement: the Mediating Effects of Perceived Social Support [J]. Research in Educational Development, 2016(4): 40-44. |
APA Style
Tangyan, W. (2023). The Mediating Effect of Social Support Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Career Maturity. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research, 9(2), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16
ACS Style
Tangyan, W. The Mediating Effect of Social Support Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Career Maturity. Int. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. Res. 2023, 9(2), 66-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16
AMA Style
Tangyan W. The Mediating Effect of Social Support Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Career Maturity. Int J Vocat Educ Train Res. 2023;9(2):66-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16, author = {Wu Tangyan}, title = {The Mediating Effect of Social Support Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Career Maturity}, journal = {International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {66-70}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijvetr.20230902.16}, abstract = {This study utilizes a sample of 1231 college students in Beijing and employs the Family Socioeconomic Status Questionnaire, Social Support Scale, and Career Maturity Scale to investigate the mediating effect of social support on the relationship between family socioeconomic status and career maturity. The survey results found that the career maturity of male college students (3.311±0.444) was significantly higher than that of females' (3.267±0.427) (P<0.01), and the career maturity of urban students (3.291±0.422) was higher than that of rural students' (3.274±0.446) (P<0.01). As students' grades increase, their level of career maturity increases as well. The correlation analysis showed that family socioeconomic status, social support and career maturity were positively correlated with each other (r=0.114, 0.127, 0.270, P<0.01). Mediating effect test showed that social support played a partial mediating role between family socioeconomic status and career maturity, with a mediating effect value of 0.041. This mediating effect accounts for 31.4% of the total effect.. The study found that in the social support dimension, school support had a significantly higher impact on college students' career maturity compared to family support. The mediating effect values for school support and family support were 0.035 and 0.043, respectively. However, the support from friends and classmates did not show a significant mediating effect. These findings indicate that social support partially mediates the relationship between family socioeconomic status and college students' career maturity, with school support playing the most significant mediating role. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Mediating Effect of Social Support Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Career Maturity AU - Wu Tangyan Y1 - 2023/12/26 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16 T2 - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research JF - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research JO - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research SP - 66 EP - 70 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8199 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20230902.16 AB - This study utilizes a sample of 1231 college students in Beijing and employs the Family Socioeconomic Status Questionnaire, Social Support Scale, and Career Maturity Scale to investigate the mediating effect of social support on the relationship between family socioeconomic status and career maturity. The survey results found that the career maturity of male college students (3.311±0.444) was significantly higher than that of females' (3.267±0.427) (P<0.01), and the career maturity of urban students (3.291±0.422) was higher than that of rural students' (3.274±0.446) (P<0.01). As students' grades increase, their level of career maturity increases as well. The correlation analysis showed that family socioeconomic status, social support and career maturity were positively correlated with each other (r=0.114, 0.127, 0.270, P<0.01). Mediating effect test showed that social support played a partial mediating role between family socioeconomic status and career maturity, with a mediating effect value of 0.041. This mediating effect accounts for 31.4% of the total effect.. The study found that in the social support dimension, school support had a significantly higher impact on college students' career maturity compared to family support. The mediating effect values for school support and family support were 0.035 and 0.043, respectively. However, the support from friends and classmates did not show a significant mediating effect. These findings indicate that social support partially mediates the relationship between family socioeconomic status and college students' career maturity, with school support playing the most significant mediating role. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -