| Peer-Reviewed

Content Validation of Questionnaire on Social Perception of Access to Higher Education

Received: 2 May 2021     Accepted: 7 June 2021     Published: 10 November 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This paper aims at determining the criteria from a group of experts regarding content validity of a questionnaire exploring social perception of access to higher education. It is part of the “Professional training and development” research line, developed at the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Havana. Its direct methodological background is the thesis for specialization on opinion polls developed by B.A. Solanch Garcia Contino, where the process of preparation and validation of the questionnaire began. This process responds to the need for creating a tool for approaching inequality in access to higher education (which has been widely addressed in literature) from the students’ perspective. We used quantitative methodology and statistics for data processing, and the main technique is the Delphi method. The sample of experts was made up of seven professionals with high expertise on access to higher education. As key results of our research, we have that comments from the panel experts were, as a trend, positive; nevertheless, experts’ criteria did not reach consensus as to the content validity of the questionnaire on social perception of access to higher education. Accordingly, we made —taking into consideration the comments and recommendations of experts— some changes to the questionnaire, in order to present it in a second round of evaluations.

Published in International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13
Page(s) 58-66
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Access to Higher Education, Social Perception, Delphi Method

References
[1] United Nations Development Program. (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible [Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development]. Buenos Aires. Retrieved 13 January 2017, from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi5wZ3y_f3wAhVGU98KHSDdBdAQFjAJegQIHBAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.undp.org%2Fcontent%2Fdam%2Fargentina%2FPublications%2FAgenda2030%2FPNUDArgent-DossierODS.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1AaR1UL86469C1B-0XlS7m.
[2] Almeida, Y. (2016). El acceso a la educación superior en Cuba. Breve reflexión desde la perspectiva racial [Access to higher education in Cuba. Brief reflection from the racial perspective]. Havana. 11-23. Retrieved 30 May 2019, from http://www.seeci.net/cuiciid2016/PDFs/INNOV%201%20Unida.pdf.
[3] Ávila, N. (2021). Participación familiar en el acceso y permanencia en la educación superior. Un estudio de caso en la Carrera Sociología de la Universidad de La Habana [Family involvement in the access and continuance in higher education. A case study from the Sociology course of the University of Havana]. Doctoral Thesis. Havana, Cuba.
[4] Batista, P. (2018). Caracterización del proceso de inclusión-exclusión educativa en grupos escolares de enseñanza media y media superior [Characterization of the educational inclusion-exclusion process in high school and pre-university groups]. Educational Psychology Master’s Thesis, Havana.
[5] Domínguez, M. (2016). Educación superior en Cuba e inclusión social de las juventudes [Higher education in Cuba and social inclusion of youth]. Nómadas, (4), 85-103. Retrieved 2 August 2018, from en https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1051/105146818006.pdf.
[6] García, R. (2016). Desigualdades en el acceso a la educación superior en función de los ingresos familiares. La educación cubana a debate [Inequalities in access to higher education based on family income. Cuban education under debate]. Cuba Posible, 55-66. Retrieved 13 August 2018, from https://cubaposible.com/desigualdades-acceso-la-educacion-superior-funcion-los-ingresos-familiares/.
[7] García, S. (2019). Percepción social del acceso a la Universidad de estudiantes de la Enseñanza Media Superior de La Habana y Veracruz [Social perception of access to university in pre-university students from Havana and Veracruz]. Specialty thesis. Veracruz, Mexico.
[8] País, B. (2019). El acceso a la Educación Superior en el contexto cubano actual: un análisis interseccional de la composición social de una cohorte de estudiantes en la Universidad de La Habana [Access to higher education in the current Cuban context: cross-sectional analysis of the social make-up of a student cohort in the University of Havana]. Diploma work. University of Havana.
[9] Sosa, A. M., & Martín, E. (2016). Espacios en la accesibilidad de la educación superior cubana [Spaces in the accessibility of Cuban higher education]. Congreso Universidad, 5 (6), 111-130. Retrieved 10 August 2018, from http://revista.congresouniversidad.cu/index.php/rcu/article/view/790.
[10] Tejuca, M., Gutiérrez, O., Hernández, G., & García, I. (2017). Análisis del acceso a la educación superior cubana de los estudiantes de preuniversitario en el curso 2014-2015* [Analysis of access to Cuban higher education of pre-university students in 2014-2015 academic year*]. Revista cubana de Educación Superior, 36 (1), 166-188. Retrieved 18 January 2018, from http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0257-43142017000100015&lng=es&nrm=iso.
[11] Tejuca, M. (2018). El acceso a la Educación Superior. Cambios y desafíos. [Access to higher education. Changes and challenges] From Anaya, Betsy y Díaz (compil.) Economía cubana: entre cambios y desafíos [Cuban economy. Changes and challenges] (Havana: Instituto Cubano de Investigación Cultural Juan Marinello). pp. 124-139. Retrieved 10 April 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332858308_El_acceso_a_la_educacion_superior_Cambios_y_desafios.
[12] Tejuca, M. (2020). Desigualdades en el acceso de los territorios a la Educación Superior. Economía y Desarrollo [Inequalities in access to higher education by territories. Economy and Development] (from the press). 164 (2) Retrieved 14 February 2021, from http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0252-85842020000200012&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es.
[13] Almeyda, A. (2017). Programa de Orientación Profesional para la elección profesional responsable [Career Guidance Program for responsible professional choice]. Havana: Faculty of Psychology of the University of Havana. Doctoral Thesis in Psychological Sciences.
[14] Horruitiner, P. (2006). El problema de la calidad y el acceso a la Educación Superior. La experiencia cubana [The problem of quality and access to Higher Education. The Cuban experience]. Revista Pedagogía Universitaria, XI (4). Retrieved 27 December 2018, from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwir3Yjwjf7wAhW7TDABHcEACXMQFjADegQICxAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcvi.mes.edu.cu%2Fpeduniv%2Findex.php%2Fpeduniv%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F376%2F367&usg=AOvVaw05epfzEf5ypxdr71C51Ow_.
[15] Brito, J. M., & Quijada, M. (2012). Los sistemas de acceso, normativas de permanencia, y estrategias de tutoría y retención de estudiantes de educación superior en Cuba [Access systems, permanence regulations, and tutoring and retention strategies for higher education students in Cuba]. Retrieved 13 June 2017, from https://projectes.uab.cat/accedes/pt-pt/content/cuba-los-sistemas-de-acceso-normativas-de-permanencia-y-estrategias-de-tutor%C3%ADa-y-retenci%C3%B3n.html.
[16] Santos, S. C., & López, F. (2008). Revolución cubana y Educación Superior [Cuban Revolution and Higher Education]. Perfiles educativos [online] 29 (116), 85-112. Retrieved 25 September 2016, from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0185-26982007000200005&lng=es&nrm=iso.
[17] Morales, E. (2011). La percepción social del proceso de marginación. Un estudio psicosocial en la juventud cubana [The social perception of the marginalization process. A psychosocial study in Cuban youth]. University of Havana, Havana.
[18] García, M., & Suárez, M. (2013). Empleo del método Delphi en investigaciones sobre salud publicadas en revistas científicas cubanas [Use of the Delphi method in health research published in Cuban scientific journals]. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 24 (2), 133-144. Retrieved 10 May 2015, from http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2307-21132013000200004.
[19] Gil-Gómez, B., & Pascual, D. (2012). La metodología Delphi como técnica de estudio de la validez de contenido [The Delphi methodology as a content validity study technique]. Anales de Psicología, 28 (3), 1011-1020. Retrieved 10 April 2018, from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/167/16723774041.pdf.
[20] Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta [Research methodology: The quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods]. (7th ed.). Mexico City: McGRAW-HILL Education.
[21] Cabero, J., & Infante, A. (2014). Empleo del método Delphi y su empleo en la investigación en comunicación y en educación [The Delphi method and its use in communication and education research]. EDUTEC. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa (48), 1-16. Retrieved 19 December 2015 from https://www.edutec.es/revista/index.php/edutec-e/article/view/187.
[22] Reguant, M., & Torrado, M. (2016). El método Delphi [The Delphi method]. REIRE, Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 9 (1), 87-102. Retrieved 17 March 2018. DOI: 10.1 344/reire2016.9.191.
[23] López, E. (2018). El método Delphi en la investigación actual en educación: una revisión teórica y metodológica [The Delphi method in current research in education: a theoretical and methodological review]. Educación XXI 21 (1), 17-40. Retrieved 17 March 2018. DOI: 10.5944/educXX1.15536.
[24] García, S. (2016). Validación del Programa de Orientación Profesional "Elige tu futuro" [Validation of the Career Guidance Program "Choose your future"]. Diploma work, Faculty of Psychology. University of Havana, Havana.
[25] Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización [Content validity and expert judgment: an approach to its use]. Avances en Medicina, 27-36. Retrieved 20 October 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302438451_Validez_de_contenido_y_juicio_de_expertos_Una_aproximacion_a_su_utilizacion.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Karla Torres Fernandez, Annia Almeyda Vazquez, Solanch Garcia Contino. (2021). Content Validation of Questionnaire on Social Perception of Access to Higher Education. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research, 7(2), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Karla Torres Fernandez; Annia Almeyda Vazquez; Solanch Garcia Contino. Content Validation of Questionnaire on Social Perception of Access to Higher Education. Int. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. Res. 2021, 7(2), 58-66. doi: 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Karla Torres Fernandez, Annia Almeyda Vazquez, Solanch Garcia Contino. Content Validation of Questionnaire on Social Perception of Access to Higher Education. Int J Vocat Educ Train Res. 2021;7(2):58-66. doi: 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13,
      author = {Karla Torres Fernandez and Annia Almeyda Vazquez and Solanch Garcia Contino},
      title = {Content Validation of Questionnaire on Social Perception of Access to Higher Education},
      journal = {International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {58-66},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijvetr.20210702.13},
      abstract = {This paper aims at determining the criteria from a group of experts regarding content validity of a questionnaire exploring social perception of access to higher education. It is part of the “Professional training and development” research line, developed at the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Havana. Its direct methodological background is the thesis for specialization on opinion polls developed by B.A. Solanch Garcia Contino, where the process of preparation and validation of the questionnaire began. This process responds to the need for creating a tool for approaching inequality in access to higher education (which has been widely addressed in literature) from the students’ perspective. We used quantitative methodology and statistics for data processing, and the main technique is the Delphi method. The sample of experts was made up of seven professionals with high expertise on access to higher education. As key results of our research, we have that comments from the panel experts were, as a trend, positive; nevertheless, experts’ criteria did not reach consensus as to the content validity of the questionnaire on social perception of access to higher education. Accordingly, we made —taking into consideration the comments and recommendations of experts— some changes to the questionnaire, in order to present it in a second round of evaluations.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Content Validation of Questionnaire on Social Perception of Access to Higher Education
    AU  - Karla Torres Fernandez
    AU  - Annia Almeyda Vazquez
    AU  - Solanch Garcia Contino
    Y1  - 2021/11/10
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13
    T2  - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research
    JF  - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research
    JO  - International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research
    SP  - 58
    EP  - 66
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-8199
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20210702.13
    AB  - This paper aims at determining the criteria from a group of experts regarding content validity of a questionnaire exploring social perception of access to higher education. It is part of the “Professional training and development” research line, developed at the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Havana. Its direct methodological background is the thesis for specialization on opinion polls developed by B.A. Solanch Garcia Contino, where the process of preparation and validation of the questionnaire began. This process responds to the need for creating a tool for approaching inequality in access to higher education (which has been widely addressed in literature) from the students’ perspective. We used quantitative methodology and statistics for data processing, and the main technique is the Delphi method. The sample of experts was made up of seven professionals with high expertise on access to higher education. As key results of our research, we have that comments from the panel experts were, as a trend, positive; nevertheless, experts’ criteria did not reach consensus as to the content validity of the questionnaire on social perception of access to higher education. Accordingly, we made —taking into consideration the comments and recommendations of experts— some changes to the questionnaire, in order to present it in a second round of evaluations.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Undergraduate Training Directorate, University of Havana, Havana, Cuba

  • Faculty of Psychology, University of Havana, Havana, Cuba

  • Undergraduate Training Directorate, University of Havana, Havana, Cuba

  • Sections