We are in the middle of an international financial crisis, which intensifies the demands on high quality, reliable and efficient solutions that optimize production processes, making production more efficient while minimizing cost, produce more with high quality, with few raw materials and less energy. It is these circumstances that necessitates the use of response surface methodology to search for the optimal conditions for improving grinding process in case of convex situations in paper producing industries. The uniqueness of this work focused on modeling and adopting the necessary assumptions and conditions to further reduced the formulated second order response surface model to obtain a more adequate model that best optimized the production process. The design was based on the use of central composite rotatable approach known as CCRD with the grinding fineness as the response. The conditions were subjected to experimental method, search method, graphical method and feasible region approach to generate the result which is not significantly different from each other using the reduced model. We could established nine grinding conditions which involves one center points with four factorial and four axial points. The reduced second order response surface model was optimized to obtain the best grinding at machine voltage of two hundred within fifty minutes. It is on this condition that the response variable gave the value of 1399.36 meshes.
Published in | International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13 |
Page(s) | 13-23 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Optimization, Response Surface, Differentiable, Convexity, Models, Optimal Solution, Lack-of-Fit, Design, Experiment, Analysis, Maximization, Quadratic, Contour Plot
[1] | Dixit, A. K. (1990). Optimization Economic Theory. USA: Oxford University Press. |
[2] | Chen, M. J., Chen, K. N. & Lin, C. W. (2004).Sequential Quadratic Programming for Development of a new probiotic diary with glucono-lactone. Journal of Food Science, 69(22), 344-350. |
[3] | Lee, J. Y., Landen, W. O. & Eitenmiller, R. R. (2000). Optimization of an Extraction Procedure for the Quantification of Vitamin E in Tomato and Broccoli using Response Surface Methodology. USA: FoodComposition and Analysis publishers. |
[4] | Montgomery, D. C. (2005). Design and Analysis of Experiments: Response Surface Method and Designs. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
[5] | Guan, X. (2008). Optimization of Viscozyme Lassistedextraction of oat bran protein using response surface methodology. Food Chemistry Publication. |
[6] | Nwabueze T. U. (2010). Basic Steps in Adopting Response Surface Methodology as Mathematical Modeling for Bioprocess Optimization in the Food Systems, International. Journals of Food Science and Technology. 12(7), 104–124. |
[7] | Hill W. J. and Hunter W. G. (1966). Response Surface Methodology, a Review. Science Books Publishers 10(5), 345-456. |
[8] | Box, G. E., Hunter, J.S. & Hunter, G. W. (2005). Statistics for Experiments. New Jersey: John Willeyand Sons, Inc. |
[9] | Myers, R. H., Khuri, A. I. & Carter, W. H. (1989). Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Technometrics31 (2): 137-153. |
[10] | Connor, W. S. & Marvin, Z. A. (1959). Fractional Factorial Experiment Designs for Factors at three-levels.Washington: U. S. Government Publishing Company. |
[11] | Elfving, G. I. (1952), Optimal Allocation in Linear Regression Theory. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(1), 255-263 |
[12] | Zahid, A. M., Cheow, C. S. & Norizzah, A. R. (2011). Optimization of Process Conditions for the Applicationof edible coating emulsion on guava (Psidium guajava) using response surface methodology. Singapore: IACSIT Press. |
[13] | Oehlert, G. W. (2000). Design and Analysis of Experiments Response surface design. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. |
[14] | Onyeneke C. C. (2015). Multivariate Approach to Partial Correlation Analysis. Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 165-170. doi: 10.11648/j.sjams.20150303.20. |
[15] | Dave, Rudri, T. V. Ramana Rao, and A. S. Nandane (2015). RSM-Based Optimization ofEdible-Coating Formulations for Preserving Post-Harvest Quality and Enhancing Storability of Phalsa (Grewia asiatica L.) RSM-Based Optimization of Coatings for Phalsa. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. |
[16] | Myers, H. R. & Montgomery, D. C. (1995). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. New York: JohnWiley and Sons Inc. |
[17] | Devaki, C. S., and K. S. Premavalli. (2012). Development of Fermented Beverage UsingRSM and Nutrients Evaluation – I. Fermented Ashgourd Beverage, Journal of Food Research. |
[18] | Haber, A. B. & Runyon, R. A. (1977). General Statistics. USA: Addison-Wesley Press. |
[19] | Jacqueline George, Stephy, RajanGandhimathi, Puthiya Veetil Nidheesh, and Sreekrishnaperumal Thanga Ramesh (2016). Optimization of salicylic acid removal byelectro Fenton process in a continuous stirredtank reactor using response surface methodology, Desalination and Water Treatment. |
[20] | Joglekar, A. M. & May, A. T. (1987). Product Excellence through Design of Experiments. Journal of Cereal Food World, 32 (12), 857-868. |
[21] | Myers, H. R. Montgomery, D. C & Anderson C. C. (2009) Response Surface Methodology. New York: .John Wiley and Sons. |
APA Style
Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke, Effanga Okon Effanga. (2016). Application of Reduced Second Order Response Surface Model of Convex Optimization in Paper Producing Industries. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics, 2(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13
ACS Style
Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke; Effanga Okon Effanga. Application of Reduced Second Order Response Surface Model of Convex Optimization in Paper Producing Industries. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Math. 2016, 2(1), 13-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13, author = {Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke and Effanga Okon Effanga}, title = {Application of Reduced Second Order Response Surface Model of Convex Optimization in Paper Producing Industries}, journal = {International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {13-23}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijtam.20160201.13}, abstract = {We are in the middle of an international financial crisis, which intensifies the demands on high quality, reliable and efficient solutions that optimize production processes, making production more efficient while minimizing cost, produce more with high quality, with few raw materials and less energy. It is these circumstances that necessitates the use of response surface methodology to search for the optimal conditions for improving grinding process in case of convex situations in paper producing industries. The uniqueness of this work focused on modeling and adopting the necessary assumptions and conditions to further reduced the formulated second order response surface model to obtain a more adequate model that best optimized the production process. The design was based on the use of central composite rotatable approach known as CCRD with the grinding fineness as the response. The conditions were subjected to experimental method, search method, graphical method and feasible region approach to generate the result which is not significantly different from each other using the reduced model. We could established nine grinding conditions which involves one center points with four factorial and four axial points. The reduced second order response surface model was optimized to obtain the best grinding at machine voltage of two hundred within fifty minutes. It is on this condition that the response variable gave the value of 1399.36 meshes.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Application of Reduced Second Order Response Surface Model of Convex Optimization in Paper Producing Industries AU - Casmir Chidiebere Onyeneke AU - Effanga Okon Effanga Y1 - 2016/10/17 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13 T2 - International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics JF - International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics JO - International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics SP - 13 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5080 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20160201.13 AB - We are in the middle of an international financial crisis, which intensifies the demands on high quality, reliable and efficient solutions that optimize production processes, making production more efficient while minimizing cost, produce more with high quality, with few raw materials and less energy. It is these circumstances that necessitates the use of response surface methodology to search for the optimal conditions for improving grinding process in case of convex situations in paper producing industries. The uniqueness of this work focused on modeling and adopting the necessary assumptions and conditions to further reduced the formulated second order response surface model to obtain a more adequate model that best optimized the production process. The design was based on the use of central composite rotatable approach known as CCRD with the grinding fineness as the response. The conditions were subjected to experimental method, search method, graphical method and feasible region approach to generate the result which is not significantly different from each other using the reduced model. We could established nine grinding conditions which involves one center points with four factorial and four axial points. The reduced second order response surface model was optimized to obtain the best grinding at machine voltage of two hundred within fifty minutes. It is on this condition that the response variable gave the value of 1399.36 meshes. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -