Government procurement has great advantages in reducing the uncertainty of innovation, expanding the demand for innovative products, making up for the positive externalities of innovation, and improving the quality of public services, which can directly promote innovation. The use of government procurement to promote innovation is a common practice in many OECD countries. These countries have developed legal or policy tools to ensure that government procurement fully promotes innovation, and integrate innovation goals with other policy goals to better address social challenges. However, in recent years, China has not attached importance to the role of government procurement in promoting innovation, which is not conducive to the development of innovation. By learning from the experience of OECD countries, China should restore and improve the policy design to make it more operable and integrate the goal of promoting innovation into other social goals.
Published in | International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13 |
Page(s) | 15-22 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Government Procurement, Independent Innovation, OECD, Policy Implications
[1] | WIPO, Cornell University, INSEAD. The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation [R]. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva, 2016. |
[2] | Liu Shibai. Promote transformation and stabilize growth through technological innovation [J]. Economist, 2013, 11 (11): 5-13. |
[3] | Jiang Dayang. Is public procurement an innovation policy? —Analysis from the EU procurement policy [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, 2010, 26 (3): 85-89. |
[4] | E Mansfield, M Schwartz, S Wagner. Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study [J]. Economic Journal, 1981, 91 (364): 907-918. |
[5] | Economic Development Theory [M]. by Joseph Schumpeter, translated by Zou Jianping. Beijing: China Pictorial Publishing House, 2012. |
[6] | Porter Michael. The Competitive Advantage of Nations [M]. New York: The Free Press, October 1990. |
[7] | R Dalpé. Effects of government procurement on industrial innovation [J]. Technology in Society, 1994, 16 (1): 65-83. |
[8] | Externality, Technological Innovation and Government Role [J]. By Cheng Hua. Exploration of Economic Issues, 2000 (8): 67-69. |
[9] | Government Behavior Research on the Coordinated Development of Product and Innovation Process in Manufacturing Enterprises [J]. Bi Kexin, LIU Yuhong, SUN Jinhua, China Science and Technology Forum, 2009 (3): 82-87. |
[10] | The American Recovery and Reinvestment Acts of 2009, SEC1605. |
[11] | P. A. Geroski. Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy [J]. International Review of Applied Economics, 1988, 4 (2): 182-198. |
APA Style
Zhao Yu. (2019). Research and Implications on OECD Governments’ Procurement Policy to Promote Technology Innovation. International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies, 5(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13
ACS Style
Zhao Yu. Research and Implications on OECD Governments’ Procurement Policy to Promote Technology Innovation. Int. J. Sustain. Manag. Inf. Technol. 2019, 5(1), 15-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13
AMA Style
Zhao Yu. Research and Implications on OECD Governments’ Procurement Policy to Promote Technology Innovation. Int J Sustain Manag Inf Technol. 2019;5(1):15-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13, author = {Zhao Yu}, title = {Research and Implications on OECD Governments’ Procurement Policy to Promote Technology Innovation}, journal = {International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {15-22}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsmit.20190501.13}, abstract = {Government procurement has great advantages in reducing the uncertainty of innovation, expanding the demand for innovative products, making up for the positive externalities of innovation, and improving the quality of public services, which can directly promote innovation. The use of government procurement to promote innovation is a common practice in many OECD countries. These countries have developed legal or policy tools to ensure that government procurement fully promotes innovation, and integrate innovation goals with other policy goals to better address social challenges. However, in recent years, China has not attached importance to the role of government procurement in promoting innovation, which is not conducive to the development of innovation. By learning from the experience of OECD countries, China should restore and improve the policy design to make it more operable and integrate the goal of promoting innovation into other social goals.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Research and Implications on OECD Governments’ Procurement Policy to Promote Technology Innovation AU - Zhao Yu Y1 - 2019/04/18 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13 T2 - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies JF - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies JO - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies SP - 15 EP - 22 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5110 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20190501.13 AB - Government procurement has great advantages in reducing the uncertainty of innovation, expanding the demand for innovative products, making up for the positive externalities of innovation, and improving the quality of public services, which can directly promote innovation. The use of government procurement to promote innovation is a common practice in many OECD countries. These countries have developed legal or policy tools to ensure that government procurement fully promotes innovation, and integrate innovation goals with other policy goals to better address social challenges. However, in recent years, China has not attached importance to the role of government procurement in promoting innovation, which is not conducive to the development of innovation. By learning from the experience of OECD countries, China should restore and improve the policy design to make it more operable and integrate the goal of promoting innovation into other social goals. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -