The beneficiaries’ involvement in Monitoring and Evaluation is one of the key drivers for the performance of development projects. The Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer is a neediness decrease project carried out in all the districts. The motivation behind the study was to lay out the influence of households’ associations in the implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation plan on the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. The study took on a pragmatic paradigm with a blended research design strategy. Yamane formula was used to obtain a sample size of 400 heads of households while eight Village Committees and eight Monitoring Officers were selected by using purposive sampling. Quantitative data was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation and regression models while qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis. The study established a significant influence between households’ involvement in the implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation plan (t= 8.472, p-value =.000) on the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. In this manner, it was evidenced that households’ contribution to Monitoring and Evaluation significantly influenced the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. It was recommended therefore that the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project Monitoring and Evaluation policy should be reviewed in order to ensure it is people-centered and make it vital for households’ involvement in the Monitoring and Evaluation cycle. The review must define the Monitoring and Evaluation team that is composed of households’ representatives. Further investigations ought to look at the organizational practice of Monitoring and Evaluation and level of use of Monitoring and Evaluation information for further improving performance.
Published in | International Journal of Sustainable Development Research (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12 |
Page(s) | 11-17 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Household, Monitoring and Evaluation, Poverty, Performance, Conditional Cash Transfer
[1] | Ahenkan, A., Bawole, N., & Domfer, K. (2013). Improving citizens’ participation in local government planning and financial management in Ghana: A stakeholder analysis of the Sefwi Wiawso Municipal Assembly. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 3 (2), 191-208. |
[2] | Alfred, A. (2015). Enhancing stakeholder’s involvement in program monitoring among metropolitan, municipal and district assemblies: A case study of Atwima Mponua District Assembly. https://www.modernghana.com/news/60/news/602582/enhancing stakeholders-involvement-in project.html. |
[3] | Aupe, N., Awiti, L., & Aketch, N. (2019). Community participation and sustainability of water projects in Kwanza Sub-County, Trans-Nzoia County, Kenya. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 3 (3), 160-173. |
[4] | Aycrigg, N. L. (1998). Participation and the World Bank: Successes, constraints, and responses (World Bank Social Development Paper No. 29). Washington, DC: World Bank. |
[5] | Barasa, F., & Jelagat, T. (2013). Community participation in program planning, management and implementation: Building the foundation for sustainable development. International Journal of Current Research, 5 (2), 398-401. |
[6] | Beegle, K., & Christiaensen, L. (2019). Accelerating poverty reduction in Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank. |
[7] | Campos, O., Villani, C., Davis, B., & Takagi, M. (2018). Ending extreme poverty in rural areas - Sustaining livelihoods to leave no one behind. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture. |
[8] | Coupal, F. (2001). Results-based participatory monitoring and evaluation, CIDA’s performance review. Ottawa, Canada: Mosaic Net International. |
[9] | Dube, N. (2009). Evaluating community participation in development projects (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa. |
[10] | ISPA (2017). Assessment of TASAF PSSN in Tanzania Using the ISPA-PWP Tool. Iter-Agency Social Protection Assessment. |
[11] | Kananura, M., et. al. (2017). Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: Lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15 (2), 55-68. |
[12] | Kiumbe, P., Wambungu, L., & Luketero, S. (2018). Influence of stakeholder participation in utilization of monitoring and evaluation results on the performance of fish farming projects in Kenya. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 23 (09), 65-70. |
[13] | Mansouri, G., & Rao, V. (2003). Evaluating community-based and community driven development: A critical review of the evidence. Washington, DC. |
[14] | Mushi, A., Mwaita, K., & Makauki, A. F. (2019). Contribution of Social Protection Systems to children’s Education in Tanzania: A Case of TASAF III Cash Transfer Programme1. Unpublished thesis. |
[15] | Mutale, W et. al. (2017). Exploring community participation in project design: application of the community conversation approach to improve maternal and newborn health in Zambia. BMC Public Health, 17 (1), 1-14. |
[16] | Ngochi, E., Mbugua, L., & Thiong’o, K. (2020). An analysis of the influence of monitoring and evaluation functions on projects performance among selected constituency development fund projects in Kirinyaga County, Kenya. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 2 (8), 61-80. |
[17] | Noori, H. (2017). Community participation in sustainability of development projects: A case study of national solidarity program Afghanistan. Journal of Culture, Society and Development, 30, 27-36. |
[18] | Nyaguthii, E., & Oyugi, L. A. (2013). Influence of community participation on successful implementation of constituency development fund projects in Kenya: Case study of Mwea Constituency. International Journal of Education and Research, 1 (8), 1-16. |
[19] | Nyonje, R. O., Ndunge, K. D., & Mulwa, A. S. (2012). Monitoring and evaluation of projects and programs: A handbook for students and practitioners. Nairobi, Kenya: Aura Books. |
[20] | Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. (2018). Global multidimensional poverty index 2018: The most detailed picture to date of the World's poorest people. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford. |
[21] | Rajalahti, R., Woelcke, J., & Pehu, E. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation for World Bank agricultural research and extension programs: A good practice note (Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper No. 20). Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. |
[22] | Sulemana, M., Musah, A. B., & Simon, K. K. (2018). An assessment of stakeholder participation in monitoring and evaluation of district assembly projects and programmes in the Savelugu-Nanton Municipality Assembly, Ghana. Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 15 (1), 173-195. |
[23] | Rimberia, K. (2012). Determinants of water projecys sustainability: A case of water projects in Kieni East division, Nyeri County, Kenya. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya. |
[24] | Tengan, C., & Aigbavboa, C. (2017). Level of stakeholder engagement and participation in monitoring and evaluation of construction projects in Ghana. Procedia Engineering, 196, 630-637. |
[25] | Thwala, W. D. (2010). Community participation is a necessity for project success: A case study of rural water supply project in Jeppes Reefs, South Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5 (10), 970-979. |
[26] | United Nations Development Programme. (2018). Tanzania human development report 2017: Social policy in the context of economic transformation. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Economic and Social Research Foundation. |
[27] | United Nations Development Programme. (2019). Global multidimensional poverty index 2019: Illuminating inequalities. New York. |
[28] | Valentine, I., Shukla, J., & Eugene, N. (2016). Effect of beneficiaries’ participation in program monitoring and evaluation on program success. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 4 (2), 334-349. |
[29] | World Bank. (2018). Poverty and shared prosperity 2018: Piecing together the poverty puzzle. Washington, DC. |
[30] | World Bank. (2019). Tanzania mainland poverty assessment: Executive summary. Washington, DC. |
[31] | World Bank (2022) Sub-Saharan Africa: Macro Poverty Outlook, Country-by-country Analysis and Projections for the Developing World. United States of America, New York. |
[32] | Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper and Row. |
APA Style
Bernard Katerengabo, Christopher Gakuu, Harriet Kidombo. (2023). Implementing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Plan with Beneficiaries for Improving Performance: Evidence from Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer. International Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 9(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12
ACS Style
Bernard Katerengabo; Christopher Gakuu; Harriet Kidombo. Implementing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Plan with Beneficiaries for Improving Performance: Evidence from Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Res. 2023, 9(1), 11-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12
AMA Style
Bernard Katerengabo, Christopher Gakuu, Harriet Kidombo. Implementing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Plan with Beneficiaries for Improving Performance: Evidence from Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer. Int J Sustain Dev Res. 2023;9(1):11-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12, author = {Bernard Katerengabo and Christopher Gakuu and Harriet Kidombo}, title = {Implementing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Plan with Beneficiaries for Improving Performance: Evidence from Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer}, journal = {International Journal of Sustainable Development Research}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {11-17}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsdr.20230901.12}, abstract = {The beneficiaries’ involvement in Monitoring and Evaluation is one of the key drivers for the performance of development projects. The Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer is a neediness decrease project carried out in all the districts. The motivation behind the study was to lay out the influence of households’ associations in the implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation plan on the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. The study took on a pragmatic paradigm with a blended research design strategy. Yamane formula was used to obtain a sample size of 400 heads of households while eight Village Committees and eight Monitoring Officers were selected by using purposive sampling. Quantitative data was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation and regression models while qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis. The study established a significant influence between households’ involvement in the implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation plan (t= 8.472, p-value =.000) on the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. In this manner, it was evidenced that households’ contribution to Monitoring and Evaluation significantly influenced the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. It was recommended therefore that the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project Monitoring and Evaluation policy should be reviewed in order to ensure it is people-centered and make it vital for households’ involvement in the Monitoring and Evaluation cycle. The review must define the Monitoring and Evaluation team that is composed of households’ representatives. Further investigations ought to look at the organizational practice of Monitoring and Evaluation and level of use of Monitoring and Evaluation information for further improving performance.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Implementing Project Monitoring and Evaluation Plan with Beneficiaries for Improving Performance: Evidence from Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer AU - Bernard Katerengabo AU - Christopher Gakuu AU - Harriet Kidombo Y1 - 2023/02/27 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12 T2 - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research JF - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research JO - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research SP - 11 EP - 17 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1832 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20230901.12 AB - The beneficiaries’ involvement in Monitoring and Evaluation is one of the key drivers for the performance of development projects. The Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer is a neediness decrease project carried out in all the districts. The motivation behind the study was to lay out the influence of households’ associations in the implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation plan on the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. The study took on a pragmatic paradigm with a blended research design strategy. Yamane formula was used to obtain a sample size of 400 heads of households while eight Village Committees and eight Monitoring Officers were selected by using purposive sampling. Quantitative data was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation and regression models while qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis. The study established a significant influence between households’ involvement in the implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation plan (t= 8.472, p-value =.000) on the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. In this manner, it was evidenced that households’ contribution to Monitoring and Evaluation significantly influenced the performance of the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project. It was recommended therefore that the Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project Monitoring and Evaluation policy should be reviewed in order to ensure it is people-centered and make it vital for households’ involvement in the Monitoring and Evaluation cycle. The review must define the Monitoring and Evaluation team that is composed of households’ representatives. Further investigations ought to look at the organizational practice of Monitoring and Evaluation and level of use of Monitoring and Evaluation information for further improving performance. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -