Celiac plexus block and neurolysis (CPB/N) is an effective interventional technique for treating chronic upper abdominal pain. Currently, there are various CPB/N techniques, and there is an urgent need to develop an expert consensus to enable clinicians to correctly implement the CPB/N technique, improve efficacy, and reduce complications. A total of 20 medical experts were invited to participate in the writing of this expert consensus, including pain physicians, interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists/endoscopists, and anatomy professors. All experts are from Class A tertiary hospitals affiliated of medical universities in parts of China. Except for the anatomy professors, all experts are engaged in the clinical practice of CPB/N surgery and are familiar with indications, surgical procedures, and complication management. Chinese and English literatures related to CPB/N from January 2008 to October 2025 were retrieved to evaluate the recommendation levels. Each expert made multiple revisions to the initial draft of the expert consensus and voted on the classification levels with significant disagreements. This expert consensus reviews the anatomical characteristics of the celiac plexus, summarizes the indications and contraindications for the clinical implementation of CPB/N, describes in detail the technical methods of CPB/N via different approaches, expounds on the drugs and dosages for CPB and CPN, and depicts the clinical manifestations, management, and prevention of complications. Based on the current domestic practice of CPB/N and literature reports, the recommended grades for CPB/N are proposed. We recommend the posterior retrocrural/antecrural approach under CT guidance and EUS-guided CPB/N technique due to their high success rate and low risk. We do not recommend the approach with potential iatrogenic risks, such as transarterial puncture. The incidence of CPB/N complications is very low, and some complications are temporary. Performing CPB/N under imaging guidance can prevent the occurrence of serious complications such as nerve injury and bleeding.
| Published in | International Journal of Pain Research (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12 |
| Page(s) | 15-30 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Celiac Plexus, Splanchnic Nerve, Nerve Block, Neurolysis, Alcohol, Cancer Pain, Expert Consensus
| [1] | Chen CK and Erdek MA. Celiac plexus block and neurolysis procedure: treatment of chronic pain in pancreatic cancer. Pain Manag. 2025; 15(11): 779-781. |
| [2] | Kambadakone A, Thabet A, Gervais DA, Mueller PR and Arellano RS. CT-guided celiac plexus neurolysis: a review of anatomy, indications, technique, and tips for successful treatment. Radiographics. 2011; 31(6): 1599-621. |
| [3] | Burchiel KJ and Raslan AM. Contemporary concepts of pain surgery. J Neurosurg. 2019; 130(4): 1039-1049. |
| [4] | Uysal A, Unal E, Karaosmanoglu AD, Arellano R, Ciftci TT, Akinci D and Akhan O. The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1118): 20200702. |
| [5] | Yalamuru B, Weisbein J, Pearson ACS and Kandil ES. Minimally-invasive pain management techniques in palliative care. Ann Palliat Med. 2022; 11(2): 947-957. |
| [6] | Aman MM, Mahmoud A, Deer T, Sayed D, Hagedorn JM, Brogan SE, Singh V, Gulati A, Strand N, Weisbein J, Goree JH, Xing F, Valimahomed A, Pak DJ, El Helou A, Ghosh P, Shah K, Patel V, Escobar A, Schmidt K, Shah J, Varshney V, Rosenberg W and Narang S. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain. J Pain Res. 2021; 14: 2139-2164. |
| [7] | Pacheco-Feijoó GM, Amado-Tineo JP, Plancarte-Sánchez R, Valdivia CC and López-Millán JM. Efficacy and Safety of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in the Treatment of Chronic Pain Secondary to Oncological Pathology of the Upper Hemiabdomen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Indian J Palliat Care. 2023; 29(4): 394-406. |
| [8] | Gamboa AC and Snyder RA. Surgical Palliation for Pancreatic Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2026; 35(1): 167-179. |
| [9] | Daniels M, Duran E, Pan V, Rentzepis P, An T, Thabet A, Hao D. Computed Tomography-Guided Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis: Technical Outcomes and Complications. Pain Physician. 2026 Jan; 29(1): E71-E78. PMID: 41628217. |
| [10] | Bahn BM and Erdek MA. Celiac plexus block and neurolysis for pancreatic cancer. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013; 17(2): 310. |
| [11] | Wada S, Arai Y, Sone M, Sugawara S and Itou C. The value of angio-CT system on splanchnic nerve neurolysis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021; 27(3): 408-412. |
| [12] | Cai Z, Zhou X, Wang M, Kang J, Zhang M and Zhou H. Splanchnic nerve neurolysis via the transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance: a retrospective study. Korean J Pain. 2022; 35(2): 202-208. |
| [13] | Pereira GA, Lopes PT, Dos Santos AM, Pozzobon A, Duarte RD, Cima Ada S and Massignan Â. Celiac plexus block: an anatomical study and simulation using computed tomography. Radiol Bras. 2014; 47(5): 283-7. |
| [14] | Haviarová Z, Kuruc R and Matjčík V. Contribution to the variability in the coeliac plexus structure and formation. ANZ J Surg. 2024; 94(12): 2258-2262. |
| [15] | Moutinho-Ribeiro P, Costa-Moreira P, Caldeira A, Leite S, Marques S, Moreira T, Nunes N and Bispo M. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Celiac Plexus Interventions. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2020; 28(1): 32-38. |
| [16] | Vig S, Bhan S and Bhatnagar S. Celiac Plexus Block - An Old Technique with New Developments. Pain Physician. 2021; 24(5): 379-398. |
| [17] | Xie GL, Guo DP, Liu C, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of celiac plexus neurolysis alone or combined with retroperitoneal lymph node injection in the treatment pain associated with pancreatic cancer [J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2020, 100(5): 357-362. |
| [18] | Cornman-?Homonoff J, Holzwanger DJ, Lee KS, et al. Celiac plexus block and neurolysis in the management of chronic upper abdominal pain [J]. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2017, 34(4): 376-386. |
| [19] | Luo L, Cao X, Qiu M, Zhu M, Yan Y, Zhang D, Zhang X. Splanchnic nerve block via transdiscal and paraspinal approach in the treatment of pain in advanced pancreatic cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 19; 104(38): e44250. |
| [20] | Lu F, Li X, Song L, Ye L, Wang X, Wang R. Efficacy and Safety of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis Versus Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis in the Management of Abdominal Cancer Pain: A Meta-analysis of 359 Patients. Pain Physician. 2024 Jan; 27(1): 1-10. |
| [21] | Koyyalagunta D, Mach S, Chung M. Comparison of Different Spinal Level Approaches in Splanchnic Sympathetic Neurolysis for Intractable Upper Abdominal Cancer Pain: A Retrospective Review. Pain Physician. 2025 Jul; 28(4): E403-E410. |
| [22] | Lu XM, Gu YP, Wu GP, et al. Application of low volume phenol in celiac plexus neurolysis for the treatment of upper abdominal cancer pain [J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2021, 30(11): 1166-1169. |
| [23] | Shwita AH, Amr YM, Okab MI. Comparative study of the effects of the retrocrural celiac plexus block versus splanchnic nerve block, C?arm guided, for upper gastrointestinal tract tumors on pain relief and the quality of life at a six?month follow up [J]. Korean J Pain, 2015, 28(1): 22-31. |
| [24] | Hol PK, Kvarstein G, Viken O, et al. MRI?guided celiac plexus block [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000, 12(4): 562-564. |
| [25] | Jin G, Qiu X, Ding M, et al. Navigated magnetic resonance imaging?guided celiac plexus neurolysis using an open magnetic resonance system for pancreatic cancer patients with upper abdominal pain [J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2019, 15(4): 825-830. |
| [26] | Marker DR, U Thainual P, Ungi T, et al. 1.5 T augmented reality navigated interventional MRI: paravertebral sympathetic plexus injections [J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2017, 23(3): 227-232. |
| [27] | Wang L, Lu M, Wu X, et al. Contrast?enhanced ultrasound?guided celiac plexus neurolysis in patients with upper abdominal cancer pain: initial experience [J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(8): 4514-4523. |
| [28] | Asif AA, Walayat SK, Bechtold ML, et al. EUS?guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pain in pancreatic cancer patients?a metaanalysis and systematic review [J]. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect, 2021, 11(4): 536-542. |
| [29] | Pérez-Aguado G, de la Mata DM, Valenciano CM, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: An update. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct 16; 13(10): 460-472. |
| [30] | Abdel?Ghaffar ME, Ismail SA, Ismail RA, et al. Comparison between two volumes of 70% alcohol in single injection ultrasoundguided celiac plexus neurolysis: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Pain Physician, 2022, 25(3): 293-303. |
| [31] | Kamata K, Kinoshita M, Kinoshita I, et al. Efficacy of EUS?guided celiac plexus neurolysis in combination with EUS?guided celiac ganglia neurolysis for pancreatic cancer?associated pain: a multicenter prospective trial [J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2022, 27(7): 1196-1201. |
| [32] | Wyse JM, Chen YI, Sahai AV. Celiac plexus neurolysis in the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer: when and how? [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(9): 2186-2192. |
| [33] | Singh S, Facciorusso A, Vinayek R, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Treatments for Pancreatic Cancer: Understanding How Endoscopic Ultrasound Has Revolutionized Management of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 30; 17(1): 89. |
| [34] | Rogers HK, Shah SL. Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis and Management. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 31; 14(11): 1156. |
| [35] | Xuan M, Li N, Wu C. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Mar 28; 79: 100348. |
| [36] | Li M, Wang Z, Chen Y, et al. EUS?CGN versus EUS?CPN in pancreatic cancer: a qualitative systematic review [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(41): 1-7. |
| [37] | Motoyama Y, Sato H, Nomura Y, et al. Percutaneous retrocrural versus ultrasound-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis for refractory pancreatic cancer pain. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Oct; 13(e1): e81-e83. |
| [38] | Xu WJ, Hao SJ, Zhong L. Research progress of celiac plexus neurolysis for analgesia of pancreatic cancer [J]. International Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2014, 34(2): 93-95. |
| [39] | Sachdev AH, Gress FG. Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis: a review [J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2018, 28(4): 579?586. |
| [40] | Seicean A. Celiac plexus neurolysis in pancreatic cancer: the endoscopic ultrasound approach [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(1): 110-117. |
| [41] | Dong D, Zhao M, Zhang J, et al. Neurolytic splanchnic nerve block and pain relief, survival, and quality of life in unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 135(4): 686-698. |
| [42] | Shi R, Yang YN, Ma DX, et al. Celiac plexus neurolysis by CT localization and fluoroscopy guided for the treatment of intractable abdominal pain associated with pancreatic cancer: a case report and literature review [J]. Chinese Journal of Pain, 2020, 16(2): 136-139. |
| [43] | Yousefshahi F, Tahmasebi M. Long?lasting orthostatic hypotension and constipation after celiac plexus block: a case report [J]. Anesth Pain Med, 2018, 8(1): 1-3. |
| [44] | Okita M, Otani K, Gibo N, et al. Systematic review and meta?analysis of celiac plexus neurolysis for abdominal pain associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer [J]. Pain Pract, 2022, 22(7): 652-661. |
| [45] | Kong P, Yuan TW, He Y, et al. The application value of percutaneous celiac plexus block by CT guided in upper abdominal cancer pain [J]. Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2020, 29: 1000-1003. |
| [46] | Sato T, Nishibori Y, Sekikawa M, et al. Prophylactic Perioperative Fluid Infusion Strategy During Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis to Prevent Systemic Hypotension: A Case Series of 70 Patients With Cancer. Pain Physician. 2025 Jan; 28(1): 51-57. |
| [47] | West T, Pogu S, Wanderman R, et al. Possible Transient Anterior Spinal Artery Syndrome After a Celiac Plexus Neurolytic Block. Cureus. 2023 Aug 19; 15(8): e43771. |
| [48] | Sample J, Hammad F, Ghazaleh S, et al. A rare complication of ileus following endoscopic ultrasound?guided celiac plexus neurolysis: a case report [J]. Cureus, 2020, 12(10): 1-5. |
| [49] | Zhou Y, O′Donovan B, Beqari J, et al. Retroperitoneal necrosis as a rare complication after celiac plexus block [J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(2): 1-4. |
| [50] | Koker IH, Aralasmak A, Unver N, et al. Spinal cord ischemia after endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis: case report and review of the literature [J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2017, 52(10): 1158-1161. |
| [51] | McAninch SA, Raizada MS, Kelly SM. Pulmonary embolism following celiac plexus block and neurolysis [J]. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent), 2016, 29(3): 329-330. |
| [52] | Zhao L, Liu SW. Applied anatomy of percutaneous celiac plexus puncture [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 1998, 16(4): 331-333. |
| [53] | Chen W, Fei Y, Yao M, etc. The dosage-effect relationship of anhydrous ethanol celiac plexus block by CT guided for the treatment of refractory upper abdominal cancer pain [J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology, 2020: 320-322. |
| [54] | Ahmed A, Arora D. Fluoroscopy-guided Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block for Intractable Pain from Upper Abdominal Malignancies in Patients with Distorted Celiac Axis Anatomy: An Effective Alternative to Celiac Plexus Neurolysis - A Retrospective Study. Indian J Palliat Care. 2017 Jul-Sep; 23(3): 274-281. |
APA Style
Wang, X., Zhou, H., Xu, W., Liu, X., Ni, J., et al. (2026). Chinese Expert Consensus on Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis for Upper Abdominal Pain (2026). International Journal of Pain Research, 2(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12
ACS Style
Wang, X.; Zhou, H.; Xu, W.; Liu, X.; Ni, J., et al. Chinese Expert Consensus on Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis for Upper Abdominal Pain (2026). . 2026, 2(1), 15-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12,
author = {Xiaowen Wang and Huacheng Zhou and Wenjian Xu and Xiaohui Liu and Jiaxiang Ni and Guanglun Xie and Changsheng Ma and Senlin Hou and Zhaoxia Xue and Dong Yang and Xiaoqiu Yang and Tao Song and Tao Sun and Lingjie Xia and Ruilin He and Ke Ma and Lijuan Lu and Yongjin He and Li Wan and Guangzhao Liu},
title = {Chinese Expert Consensus on Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis for Upper Abdominal Pain (2026)},
journal = {International Journal of Pain Research},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {15-30},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijpr.20260201.12},
abstract = {Celiac plexus block and neurolysis (CPB/N) is an effective interventional technique for treating chronic upper abdominal pain. Currently, there are various CPB/N techniques, and there is an urgent need to develop an expert consensus to enable clinicians to correctly implement the CPB/N technique, improve efficacy, and reduce complications. A total of 20 medical experts were invited to participate in the writing of this expert consensus, including pain physicians, interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists/endoscopists, and anatomy professors. All experts are from Class A tertiary hospitals affiliated of medical universities in parts of China. Except for the anatomy professors, all experts are engaged in the clinical practice of CPB/N surgery and are familiar with indications, surgical procedures, and complication management. Chinese and English literatures related to CPB/N from January 2008 to October 2025 were retrieved to evaluate the recommendation levels. Each expert made multiple revisions to the initial draft of the expert consensus and voted on the classification levels with significant disagreements. This expert consensus reviews the anatomical characteristics of the celiac plexus, summarizes the indications and contraindications for the clinical implementation of CPB/N, describes in detail the technical methods of CPB/N via different approaches, expounds on the drugs and dosages for CPB and CPN, and depicts the clinical manifestations, management, and prevention of complications. Based on the current domestic practice of CPB/N and literature reports, the recommended grades for CPB/N are proposed. We recommend the posterior retrocrural/antecrural approach under CT guidance and EUS-guided CPB/N technique due to their high success rate and low risk. We do not recommend the approach with potential iatrogenic risks, such as transarterial puncture. The incidence of CPB/N complications is very low, and some complications are temporary. Performing CPB/N under imaging guidance can prevent the occurrence of serious complications such as nerve injury and bleeding.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Chinese Expert Consensus on Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis for Upper Abdominal Pain (2026) AU - Xiaowen Wang AU - Huacheng Zhou AU - Wenjian Xu AU - Xiaohui Liu AU - Jiaxiang Ni AU - Guanglun Xie AU - Changsheng Ma AU - Senlin Hou AU - Zhaoxia Xue AU - Dong Yang AU - Xiaoqiu Yang AU - Tao Song AU - Tao Sun AU - Lingjie Xia AU - Ruilin He AU - Ke Ma AU - Lijuan Lu AU - Yongjin He AU - Li Wan AU - Guangzhao Liu Y1 - 2026/02/20 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12 T2 - International Journal of Pain Research JF - International Journal of Pain Research JO - International Journal of Pain Research SP - 15 EP - 30 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 3070-1562 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpr.20260201.12 AB - Celiac plexus block and neurolysis (CPB/N) is an effective interventional technique for treating chronic upper abdominal pain. Currently, there are various CPB/N techniques, and there is an urgent need to develop an expert consensus to enable clinicians to correctly implement the CPB/N technique, improve efficacy, and reduce complications. A total of 20 medical experts were invited to participate in the writing of this expert consensus, including pain physicians, interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists/endoscopists, and anatomy professors. All experts are from Class A tertiary hospitals affiliated of medical universities in parts of China. Except for the anatomy professors, all experts are engaged in the clinical practice of CPB/N surgery and are familiar with indications, surgical procedures, and complication management. Chinese and English literatures related to CPB/N from January 2008 to October 2025 were retrieved to evaluate the recommendation levels. Each expert made multiple revisions to the initial draft of the expert consensus and voted on the classification levels with significant disagreements. This expert consensus reviews the anatomical characteristics of the celiac plexus, summarizes the indications and contraindications for the clinical implementation of CPB/N, describes in detail the technical methods of CPB/N via different approaches, expounds on the drugs and dosages for CPB and CPN, and depicts the clinical manifestations, management, and prevention of complications. Based on the current domestic practice of CPB/N and literature reports, the recommended grades for CPB/N are proposed. We recommend the posterior retrocrural/antecrural approach under CT guidance and EUS-guided CPB/N technique due to their high success rate and low risk. We do not recommend the approach with potential iatrogenic risks, such as transarterial puncture. The incidence of CPB/N complications is very low, and some complications are temporary. Performing CPB/N under imaging guidance can prevent the occurrence of serious complications such as nerve injury and bleeding. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -