Background: Nigeria is blessed with abundant natural resources, which accounts for over 65% of her total tax revenue, motivated mostly by an upsurge in export earnings from the oil and gas sector. Most of the resource- based conflicts are caught up by the unfair and inequitable distribution of benefits accruing to resources. The government and some acclaimed elite, in alliance with foreign corporations, enjoy the gains and benefits of the exploited resource. Meanwhile, the host-communities face the devastating and undesirable environmental impacts with discrepancy between indigenous traditional laws and state laws that define ownership of natural resources in a federal structure has led to controversial relations among states in Nigeria. Objectives: The paper took an extensive look at the politics of natural resource governance in Nigeria and explored broadly the themes through which the causative link between natural resources and conflicts can be distinguished. The study further explores the role of good governance of natural resources in promoting socio-economic and people-centred development in Nigeria. Methods: The paper relied solely on secondary sources of data, focusing on the three main variables: conflict, politics and power. Results: The study revealed among others that the political economy of natural resources as embedded within the broader global power relations has not been properly explored by the Nigerian government. Conclusion: The paper therefore concludes that regulation must be attached to reflect on the principles of good governance, especially democracy, rule of law, transparency and accountability, as well as efficient and equitable management and distribution of resource revenues.
Published in | International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 8, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11 |
Page(s) | 1-11 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Natural Resource, Governance, Conflicts, Politics, Constitution
[1] | Venables A. J (2016). Using Natural Resources for Development: “Why has it proven so difficult?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30 (1), Pp. 161-184, Winter. |
[2] | Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) (2021) Nigeria facts and figures. Opec.org. |
[3] | World Bank, 2010. Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? 8 September. Washington, DC: The World Bank. |
[4] | Jagger, P. (2012). Environmental income, rural livelihoods, and income inequality in western Uganda. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 21 (2), 70-84. |
[5] | Acosta A. (2010). Review of impact and effectiveness of transparency and accountability initiatives, Paper prepared for the Transparency and Accountability Initiative Workshop October 14 –15, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex. |
[6] | Alao A. (2007). Natural resources and conflict in Africa: The tragedy of endowment, U Rochester Press. |
[7] | Auty, R. M. (1993). Resource-based industrialization: Sowing the oil in eight development countries. New York: Oxford University Press. |
[8] | Carmody, P. (2011). The new scramble for Africa. Cambridge, UK: Polity Pres. |
[9] | Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010). Governance principles for natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 23 (10), 986–1001. |
[10] | Danso, F. (2020). Mineral Resource Governance and Human Development in Ghana. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. LONDON AND NEW YORK. |
[11] | Osawe, A. I. & Ikhayere, A. S. (2021. Resources Management and Revenue Distribution: Towards an Intergenerational Equity. Noun International Journal of Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution (NIJPCR) Vol. 1, No. 1, March 2021. A Special Edition in Celebration of Prof Hakeem Ibikunle Tijan’s Thirty two (32) Years Anniversary in Academics. Pages 294-312. |
[12] | Dovers, S. (2005). Environment and sustainable policy: Creation, implementation, evaluation. Sydney: Federation Press. |
[13] | Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. (1997). Natural resource abundance and economic growth. Development Discussion Paper No. 517a. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University. |
[14] | Tollison, R. D. (1982). Rent seeking: A survey. Kyklos, 35 (4), 575–60. |
[15] | Rosser, A. (2006). The political economy of the resource curse: A literature survey. Retrieved from www2.ids.ac.uk/gdr/cfs/pdfs/wp 268.p |
[16] | Beck, U. (2007). Beyond Class and Nation: Reframing Social Inequalities in a Globalized World, British Journal of Sociology 58 (4): 680-705. |
[17] | Baldwin, R. E. (1956). Patterns of development in newly settled regions. Manchester School of Social and Economic Studies, 24 (2), 161–179. |
[18] | Ross M. (2004). “What Do We Know About Natural Resources and Civil War?”, Journal of Peace Research, 41 (3): 337–356, 2004. |
[19] | Meissner, H. (2010). The resource curse and rentier state in the Caspian region. A need for context analysis. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies. |
[20] | Bardt, H. (2005). Rohstoffreichtum: Fluch oder Segen? Retrieved from www.iwkoeln.de/fileadmin/publikationen/2005/53806/trends01_05_3 |
[21] | Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2000). Greed and grievance in civil war. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2355. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/359271468739530199/pdf/multi-. page.pdf |
[22] | Gelb, A. (1998). Oil windfalls: Blessing or curse? Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[23] | Akpabio, E. M. & Akpan, N. S. (2010). Governance and oil politics in Nigeria’s Niger Delta: The question of distributive equity. J Hum Ecol, 30 (2): 111-121. |
[24] | Danjuma T. Y. (1994) Revenue Sharing and the Political Economy of Nigeria Federalism. In: The Journal of Nigerian Federalism. Vol. 1, Pp. 94-96, 112. |
[25] | Haysom, N. & Kane, S. (2009) Negotiating Natural Resource for Peace: Ownership, control and Wealth Sharing. Centre for humanitarian Dialogue, Briefing Paper. |
[26] | Ekeji, C. C. (2011) Politics of Revenue Allocation in Nigeria: A Reconsideration of Some contending issues. Sacha Journal of Policy and Strategic Studies Volume 1 Number 1 pp. 121-136. |
[27] | Higazi A. (2016). Farmer-Pastoralist Conflicts on the Jos Plateau, Central Nigeria: Security responses of local vigilantes and the Nigerian State, Conflict, Security and Development, 16 (4): 365-85. |
[28] | Osawe, A. I. (2020). Geographic perspective on farmers –pastoralists’ conflict. Ekpoma Political Review Vol. V, No 1 (41-66). |
[29] | Ako, R. (2013). Environmental Justice in Developing Countries: Perspectives from Africa and Asia-Pacific. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Print. Routledge Explorations in Environmental Studies. |
[30] | Iwilade, A. (2014). Networks of violence and becoming: Youth and the politics of patronage in Nigeria's oil-rich Delta*. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 52 (4), 571. |
[31] | Kedem, S. (2021). All you need to know about Nigeria’s new mining law. African Business, New African Magazine, 2022. |
[32] | Koubi, V., Spilker G., Bohmelt T. and Bernauer T. (2014). Do natural resources matter for interstate and intrastate armed conflict? Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 51 (2): 227. |
[33] | Homer-Dixon, T. (2004). Environmental Scarcities & Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases. N.p.: Cambridge Mass, Print. |
[34] | TANA high-level forum on security in Africa (2027). Background paper on natural resource governance in Africa: Conflict, politics and power. https://www.tralac.org |
[35] | Kaplan, R. (1994). The coming anarchy, Atlantic Monthly (February): 44 -76. |
[36] | Alden C. and Alves A. (2009). China and Africa’s Natural Resources: The Challenges and Implications for Development and Governance, Occasional Paper 41, Pretoria: South African Institute of International Affairs. |
[37] | Large, D. (2010). India’s African Diplomacy, available at http://www.lse.ac.uk/IDEAS/publications/reports/pdf/SR016/SR-016-Large.pd |
[38] | Haufler, V. (2010). Disclosure as governance: the extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 53-73. |
[39] | EITI Report (2016). Extractive industry transparency initiative annual report. Accra: Ministry of Finance. |
[40] | Obiora, C. O. (2004). “ A Modest Harvest: On the significant (but limited) impact of human rights NGOs on legislative and executive behavior in Nigeria” Journal of African Law 23 (14), 24-36. |
[41] | Eghosa, E. (2014). “Improving access to environmental justice under the African Charter: The role of NGOs in Nigeria” African Journal of Inernational and Comparative Law 6 (3) 2238. |
[42] | Raji, A. O. Y. and Ajibade, T. S. (2014). ‘The British mining and oil regulation in colonial Nigeria C. 1914-1960s: An assessment. Singaporean Journal of Business and management studies, Vol. 2 (10) 63-66. |
[43] | UNDP (2011). Conflict prevention in resource-rich economies. The UN interagency framework team for preventive action. United Nations plaza, New York. |
APA Style
Anthony Ikhide Osawe, Osimen Goddy Uwa. (2023). Natural Resource Governance and Conflict in Nigeria. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11
ACS Style
Anthony Ikhide Osawe; Osimen Goddy Uwa. Natural Resource Governance and Conflict in Nigeria. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 8(1), 1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11
AMA Style
Anthony Ikhide Osawe, Osimen Goddy Uwa. Natural Resource Governance and Conflict in Nigeria. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2023;8(1):1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11, author = {Anthony Ikhide Osawe and Osimen Goddy Uwa}, title = {Natural Resource Governance and Conflict in Nigeria}, journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management}, volume = {8}, number = {1}, pages = {1-11}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20230801.11}, abstract = {Background: Nigeria is blessed with abundant natural resources, which accounts for over 65% of her total tax revenue, motivated mostly by an upsurge in export earnings from the oil and gas sector. Most of the resource- based conflicts are caught up by the unfair and inequitable distribution of benefits accruing to resources. The government and some acclaimed elite, in alliance with foreign corporations, enjoy the gains and benefits of the exploited resource. Meanwhile, the host-communities face the devastating and undesirable environmental impacts with discrepancy between indigenous traditional laws and state laws that define ownership of natural resources in a federal structure has led to controversial relations among states in Nigeria. Objectives: The paper took an extensive look at the politics of natural resource governance in Nigeria and explored broadly the themes through which the causative link between natural resources and conflicts can be distinguished. The study further explores the role of good governance of natural resources in promoting socio-economic and people-centred development in Nigeria. Methods: The paper relied solely on secondary sources of data, focusing on the three main variables: conflict, politics and power. Results: The study revealed among others that the political economy of natural resources as embedded within the broader global power relations has not been properly explored by the Nigerian government. Conclusion: The paper therefore concludes that regulation must be attached to reflect on the principles of good governance, especially democracy, rule of law, transparency and accountability, as well as efficient and equitable management and distribution of resource revenues.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Natural Resource Governance and Conflict in Nigeria AU - Anthony Ikhide Osawe AU - Osimen Goddy Uwa Y1 - 2023/01/17 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11 T2 - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management JF - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management JO - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management SP - 1 EP - 11 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3061 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20230801.11 AB - Background: Nigeria is blessed with abundant natural resources, which accounts for over 65% of her total tax revenue, motivated mostly by an upsurge in export earnings from the oil and gas sector. Most of the resource- based conflicts are caught up by the unfair and inequitable distribution of benefits accruing to resources. The government and some acclaimed elite, in alliance with foreign corporations, enjoy the gains and benefits of the exploited resource. Meanwhile, the host-communities face the devastating and undesirable environmental impacts with discrepancy between indigenous traditional laws and state laws that define ownership of natural resources in a federal structure has led to controversial relations among states in Nigeria. Objectives: The paper took an extensive look at the politics of natural resource governance in Nigeria and explored broadly the themes through which the causative link between natural resources and conflicts can be distinguished. The study further explores the role of good governance of natural resources in promoting socio-economic and people-centred development in Nigeria. Methods: The paper relied solely on secondary sources of data, focusing on the three main variables: conflict, politics and power. Results: The study revealed among others that the political economy of natural resources as embedded within the broader global power relations has not been properly explored by the Nigerian government. Conclusion: The paper therefore concludes that regulation must be attached to reflect on the principles of good governance, especially democracy, rule of law, transparency and accountability, as well as efficient and equitable management and distribution of resource revenues. VL - 8 IS - 1 ER -