GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed

Almaz Deche

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11

| Peer-Reviewed

GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed

Almaz Deche

Published in International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 7, Issue 4)

Received: 17 October 2022 Accepted: 12 November 2022 Published: 29 November 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

To attain optimum productivity of the land and ensure sustainability environmental resource suitable land use decisions are vita. The aim of this paper is to evaluate physical land suitability of maize and sorghum crops using GIS by identify areas with physical constraints for maize and sorghum land uses and the management requirements. The quality rating for each crop type was evaluated against the recommended threshold level for rain fed agriculture. Each crop type was rated for rain fed agriculture suitability following standard FAO guidelines. The findings of the study revealed that, The results of the climate considering, temperature suitability of Efa Gudina watershed show that is highly suitable (S1) for both Maize and Sorghum varieties production under rain fed conditions in all mapping unit. But climate considering, rain fall suitability show that marginally suitable (S3) for Maize and permanently not suitable (N2) for sorghum in all mapping unit. In addition, landscape suitability evaluation showed that, soil mapping units (SMU) 0, 1, 2. 3, 4, & 19 is highly suitable and SMU5 to 13 is marginally suitable (S3) for both rain fed maize and sorghum production. On the other hand, soil mapping units SMU14, 15, 16, 17 & 18 and SMU20, 21, & 22 permanently not suitable (N2) for both maize, and sorghum production due to problems related to sever erosion hazard. Therefore the study suggested that most of the limitations can be improved through improving and sustaining soil management so as to attain the potential suitability of the watershed. However, land suitability for growing crop is not only limited by the selected physical constraints but also socioeconomic factors.

Published in	International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 7, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11
Page(s)	145-156
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Crop Type, Rain Fed Agriculture, Suitability, Land Quality Parameters, Limiting Factor

References

[1]	Hudson HR (2005). Sustainable drainage management field guide. New Zealand Water Environment Research Foundation, Wellington.
[2]	Amiri and Shariff, (2011). Application of geographic information systems in land-use suitability evaluation for beekeeping: A case study of Vahregan watershed (Iran), African Journal of Agricultural Research 7 (1): 89–97.
[3]	Nayak BR, Manjappa K, Patil VC (2010). Influence of rainfall and topo situations on physic-chemical properties of rice soils in hill region of Uttara Kannada district. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 23 (4): 575-579.
[4]	Sys IC, Van Ranst E and Debaveye J (1991). Land evaluation. Part I. Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. Agricultural publication, No. 7, General Administration for Development Cooperation. Brussels, Belgium.
[5]	Davidson DA (1992). The evaluation of land resources. John Wiley, New York.
[6]	FAO/UNDP (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Development Program) (1984). Land evaluation: Technical report 5, Part III. Crop environmental requirements; Report prepared for the Government of Ethiopia by FAO acting as executing agency for the UNDP, Rome, Italy.
[7]	FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2007). Land evaluation: Towards a revised framework. Land and Water Discussion Paper 6. Rome, Italy.
[8]	Al-Mashreki, M. H., Akhir, J. B. M., Rahim, S. A., Desa, K. M., Lihan, T & Haider, A. R. 2011. Land Suitability Evaluation for Sorghum Crop in the Ibb Governorate, Republic of Yemen Using Remote Sensing And GIS Techniques. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5 (3): 359-368.
[9]	FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1976). A framework for land evaluation. Soil Bulletin 32. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
[10]	Van Ranst E, Tang H, Groenemans R, Sinthurahat S (1996). Application for fuzzy logic to land suitability for rubber production in peninsular Thailand. Geoderma 70: 1-19.
[11]	Oluwatosin GA (2005). Land suitability assessment in continental grift of northwestern Nigeria for rainfed crop production. West Afr J. Appl. Ecol. 7: 53-67.
[12]	KurtenerD, Torbert A and Krueger E, (2008). Evaluation of Agricultural Land Suitability: Application of Fuzzy Indicators: Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2008, International Conference, Perugia, Italy, June 30 - July 3, 2008, Proceedings, Part IDOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69839-5_35.
[13]	Teshome Y, Kibebew K, Heluf G, Sheleme B (2013). Physical land suitability evaluation for rainfed production of cotton, maize, upland rice and sorghum in Abobo Area, western Ethiopia. Am. J. Res. Commun. 1 (10): 296-318.
[14]	Menale K, Pender J, Yesuf M, Köhlin G, Bluffstone R, Mulugeta E (2008). Estimating Returns to Soil Conservation Adoption in the Northern Ethiopian Highlands. Agric. Econ. J. 38: 213-232.
[15]	Counsel P (1999). Land capability assessment guidelines. Retrieved from http://apps.actpla.act.gov.au/tplan/plan ningregister/register_docs/landcapabilitygl5a.pdf.
[16]	Teklu, E. J. (2005). Land Preparation Methods and Soil Quality of a Vertisol Area in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. PhD Thesis Universitat Hohenheim (310); D-70593 Stuttgar.
[17]	Behzad, M., Algaji, M., Papan, P., Boroomand Nasab, S., Naseri, A. A & Bavi, A. (2009). Qualitative Evaluation of Land Suitability for Principal Crops in the Gargar Region, Khuzestan Province, Southwest Iran. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 8 (1): 28-34.
[18]	Central statistical Agency (CSA) (2008). The federal democratic republic of Ethiopia central statistical agency, agricultural sample survey (2000 E.C.), volume I, report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season) statistical bulletin 417. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[19]	Pender, J., and B. Gebremedhin. (2004). Impacts of policies and technologies in dryland agriculture: Evidence from northern Ethiopia. In Challenges and strategies for dryland agriculture, ed. S. C. Rao. CSSA Special Publication 32. Madison, Wisc., U.S.A.: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America.
[20]	Addeo, G.; Guastadisegni, G.; Pisante, M. (2001). Land and water quality for sustainable and precision farming. I World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, Madrid, 2001.
[21]	Bagherzadeh A, Mansouri Daneshvar MR. (2011). Physical land suitability evaluation for specific cereal crops using GIS at Mashhad Plain, Northeast of Iran. Frontiers of Agriculture Journal, 5 (4): 504-513.
[22]	Gawo Kebe woreda Agricultural Rural Development Office (GKWARDO), 2007 Annual Report (unpublished), Agriculture and rural development Office.
[23]	van Reeuwijk, L. P. (2002). Procedures for soil analysis. Wageningen: International Soil Reference and Information Centre.
[24]	Ceballos-Silva, A.; J. Lopez-Blanco. Evaluating biophysical variables to identify suitable areas for oat in Central Mexico: a multi-criteria and GIS approach. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment Journal, 2002, 95: 371-377.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Almaz Deche. (2022). GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 7(4), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Almaz Deche. GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 7(4), 145-156. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Almaz Deche. GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2022;7(4):145-156. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11,
  author = {Almaz Deche},
  title = {GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed},
  journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
  volume = {7},
  number = {4},
  pages = {145-156},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20220704.11},
  abstract = {To attain optimum productivity of the land and ensure sustainability environmental resource suitable land use decisions are vita. The aim of this paper is to evaluate physical land suitability of maize and sorghum crops using GIS by identify areas with physical constraints for maize and sorghum land uses and the management requirements. The quality rating for each crop type was evaluated against the recommended threshold level for rain fed agriculture. Each crop type was rated for rain fed agriculture suitability following standard FAO guidelines. The findings of the study revealed that, The results of the climate considering, temperature suitability of Efa Gudina watershed show that is highly suitable (S1) for both Maize and Sorghum varieties production under rain fed conditions in all mapping unit. But climate considering, rain fall suitability show that marginally suitable (S3) for Maize and permanently not suitable (N2) for sorghum in all mapping unit. In addition, landscape suitability evaluation showed that, soil mapping units (SMU) 0, 1, 2. 3, 4, & 19 is highly suitable and SMU5 to 13 is marginally suitable (S3) for both rain fed maize and sorghum production. On the other hand, soil mapping units SMU14, 15, 16, 17 & 18 and SMU20, 21, & 22 permanently not suitable (N2) for both maize, and sorghum production due to problems related to sever erosion hazard. Therefore the study suggested that most of the limitations can be improved through improving and sustaining soil management so as to attain the potential suitability of the watershed. However, land suitability for growing crop is not only limited by the selected physical constraints but also socioeconomic factors.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed
AU  - Almaz Deche
Y1  - 2022/11/29
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11
T2  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JF  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JO  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
SP  - 145
EP  - 156
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3061
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11
AB  - To attain optimum productivity of the land and ensure sustainability environmental resource suitable land use decisions are vita. The aim of this paper is to evaluate physical land suitability of maize and sorghum crops using GIS by identify areas with physical constraints for maize and sorghum land uses and the management requirements. The quality rating for each crop type was evaluated against the recommended threshold level for rain fed agriculture. Each crop type was rated for rain fed agriculture suitability following standard FAO guidelines. The findings of the study revealed that, The results of the climate considering, temperature suitability of Efa Gudina watershed show that is highly suitable (S1) for both Maize and Sorghum varieties production under rain fed conditions in all mapping unit. But climate considering, rain fall suitability show that marginally suitable (S3) for Maize and permanently not suitable (N2) for sorghum in all mapping unit. In addition, landscape suitability evaluation showed that, soil mapping units (SMU) 0, 1, 2. 3, 4, & 19 is highly suitable and SMU5 to 13 is marginally suitable (S3) for both rain fed maize and sorghum production. On the other hand, soil mapping units SMU14, 15, 16, 17 & 18 and SMU20, 21, & 22 permanently not suitable (N2) for both maize, and sorghum production due to problems related to sever erosion hazard. Therefore the study suggested that most of the limitations can be improved through improving and sustaining soil management so as to attain the potential suitability of the watershed. However, land suitability for growing crop is not only limited by the selected physical constraints but also socioeconomic factors.
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Almaz Deche

Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Assosa University, Assosa, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Almaz Deche. (2022). GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 7(4), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Almaz Deche. GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 7(4), 145-156. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Almaz Deche. GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2022;7(4):145-156. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11,
  author = {Almaz Deche},
  title = {GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed},
  journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
  volume = {7},
  number = {4},
  pages = {145-156},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20220704.11},
  abstract = {To attain optimum productivity of the land and ensure sustainability environmental resource suitable land use decisions are vita. The aim of this paper is to evaluate physical land suitability of maize and sorghum crops using GIS by identify areas with physical constraints for maize and sorghum land uses and the management requirements. The quality rating for each crop type was evaluated against the recommended threshold level for rain fed agriculture. Each crop type was rated for rain fed agriculture suitability following standard FAO guidelines. The findings of the study revealed that, The results of the climate considering, temperature suitability of Efa Gudina watershed show that is highly suitable (S1) for both Maize and Sorghum varieties production under rain fed conditions in all mapping unit. But climate considering, rain fall suitability show that marginally suitable (S3) for Maize and permanently not suitable (N2) for sorghum in all mapping unit. In addition, landscape suitability evaluation showed that, soil mapping units (SMU) 0, 1, 2. 3, 4, & 19 is highly suitable and SMU5 to 13 is marginally suitable (S3) for both rain fed maize and sorghum production. On the other hand, soil mapping units SMU14, 15, 16, 17 & 18 and SMU20, 21, & 22 permanently not suitable (N2) for both maize, and sorghum production due to problems related to sever erosion hazard. Therefore the study suggested that most of the limitations can be improved through improving and sustaining soil management so as to attain the potential suitability of the watershed. However, land suitability for growing crop is not only limited by the selected physical constraints but also socioeconomic factors.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - GIS Based Physical Land Suitability Evaluation of Maize and Sorghum: Case Study Efa Gudina Sub Watershed
AU  - Almaz Deche
Y1  - 2022/11/29
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11
T2  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JF  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JO  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
SP  - 145
EP  - 156
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3061
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20220704.11
AB  - To attain optimum productivity of the land and ensure sustainability environmental resource suitable land use decisions are vita. The aim of this paper is to evaluate physical land suitability of maize and sorghum crops using GIS by identify areas with physical constraints for maize and sorghum land uses and the management requirements. The quality rating for each crop type was evaluated against the recommended threshold level for rain fed agriculture. Each crop type was rated for rain fed agriculture suitability following standard FAO guidelines. The findings of the study revealed that, The results of the climate considering, temperature suitability of Efa Gudina watershed show that is highly suitable (S1) for both Maize and Sorghum varieties production under rain fed conditions in all mapping unit. But climate considering, rain fall suitability show that marginally suitable (S3) for Maize and permanently not suitable (N2) for sorghum in all mapping unit. In addition, landscape suitability evaluation showed that, soil mapping units (SMU) 0, 1, 2. 3, 4, & 19 is highly suitable and SMU5 to 13 is marginally suitable (S3) for both rain fed maize and sorghum production. On the other hand, soil mapping units SMU14, 15, 16, 17 & 18 and SMU20, 21, & 22 permanently not suitable (N2) for both maize, and sorghum production due to problems related to sever erosion hazard. Therefore the study suggested that most of the limitations can be improved through improving and sustaining soil management so as to attain the potential suitability of the watershed. However, land suitability for growing crop is not only limited by the selected physical constraints but also socioeconomic factors.
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download