| Peer-Reviewed

The Cognitive of Collective Action in Campaign-Based Watershed Management: The Case of Farmers in Ethiopian Highlands

Received: 31 May 2021     Accepted: 12 July 2021     Published: 21 July 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

With the increased importance of collective action in many phases of natural resource management, it is necessary to focus on farmers' cognitive abilities, such as intellect, social capital (social relationships), and orientation (symmetric information), which enhance group or team ability to solve problems through collective action, not missing physical abilities. Due to low land efficiency as a result of land degradation, the regime is reliant on continuing watershed management collective activity. Participating in a large-scale collective activity could be facilitated by different populations' cognitive abilities. As a result, this review article examined cognitive collective action in campaign-based watershed management in Ethiopia's highlands, as well as how cognition is linked to physical practices and what factors influence farmers' decisions to participate in collective action. Then, through strategic and expanded kinds of cooperative games, experimental games were taken. This has been done using both conceptual and analytical frameworks. Web Science Page Googled and reviewed a total of eighty-one articles and published books. Then, at the end, their connections and gaps in the literature were highlighted. As a result, it is plausible to conclude that investing in farmers' collective action cognition can result in beneficial changes in land degradation. As a result, future academics and policymakers should concentrate on: 1) integrating social capital and collective orientation with watershed management to support collective action. 2) The interplay between cognitive (mental) and physical abilities. 3) Amending property rights and strengthening institutions. As a result, researchers can use the findings to develop policy and extension efforts that prioritize future farmer cognition.

Published in International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11
Page(s) 93-107
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cognitive, Collective Action, Campaign-Based, Watershed Management

References
[1] Abafita Jaleta, Atkinson, J. and Kim, C. S. 2016. Smallholder commercialization in Ethiopia: Market orientation and participation. International food research journal, Vol, 23 (4): 1797-1807.
[2] Addisu Bezabeh. 2018. Collective action for technology transfer and commercialization: A systematic review of seed producer-farmer groups’ seeds technology promotion and supply experiences in Ethiopia. Academic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, Vol. 6 (9): 558-569.
[3] Agarwal, S. and Adjirackor, T. 2016. Impact of team work on organizational productivity in some selected basic schools in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly. European Journal of Business, Economics and Accountancy, UK, Vol. 4 (6): 40-52.
[4] Alem-meta Assefa A. and Singh, K. N. 2018. Factors affecting farmers’ participation in watershed management programs in the north eastern highlands of Ethiopia: a case study in the Teleyayen sub-watershed: Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
[5] Alem-meta Assefa A. and Singh, K. N. 2019. Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable land management practices at farm level in the north eastern highlands of Ethiopia: the teleyayen sub-watershed case study. Journal of Environ Pollution Manage Vol, 2 (103): 1-12.
[6] Ankur, S. K., Sondra, C. and Dnard, K. 2015. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 1 (2): 11-27.
[7] Asfaw Zewdu and Fekadu Beyene. 2018. Factors affecting smallholder farmers’ participation in degraded forest rehabilitation practices. The case of Gemachis district, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Journal of agricultural extension and rural development, Vol. 10 (11): 234-244.
[8] Berhanu Gebremedhin, Pender, J. and Girmay Tesfay. 2002. Collective action for grazing land management in crop-livestock mixed systems in the highlands of northern Ethiopia: Background paper for the CAPRi Workshop on Methods for Studying Collective Action, February 25 March 1, 2002, in Nyeri, Kenya.
[9] Birhan Asmame M. and Assfa Abegaz Y. 2017. Determinants of farmers’ adoption of land management practices in Gelana sub-watershed of Northern highlands of Ethiopia. Ecological processes (2017): 6-19.
[10] Bjorklund, D. F. 2013. Cognitive development: Anoverview. Oxford band book of development psychology, (1): 447-476.
[11] Choma, B. and McKeown, S. 2018. Intergroup contact and collective action: Integrative perspectives. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3 (9): 3-10.
[12] Daniel Jaleta N. 2020. Major constraints of watershed management practices in Ethiopia and ways forward. International journal of environmental protections and policy, vol, 8 (4): 70-76.
[13] David, G. 2014. Cognitive ability, character skills, and learning to play equilibrium: A Level-k Analysis. Discussion Paper No. 8236, Victoria Prowse Cornell University and IZA.
[14] Duncan, E. L. 2018. The psychology of collective action: The Oxford hand book of personality and social psychology. Oxford university press.
[15] Eswaran, H., Lal, R., Reich, P. 2001. Land degradation: response to degradation 1 (5): 20-35.
[16] Etenesh Bekele. 2018. Farmers collective action and agricultural transformation in Ethiopia: Degree of PhD. in developmental studies at the University of South Africa.
[17] Faysse, N. and Ben Mustapha, A. 2017. Finding common ground between theories of collective action: The potential of analyses at a Meso-Scale. International journal of the commons, Vol. 11 (2): 928-949.
[18] FDRE (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia). 1994. Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 1994 Ethiopia.
[19] Fekadu Beyene. 2009. Collective action in water-point management: The case of pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in eastern Ethiopia. Journal compilation United Nations: Natural Resources Forum, 33 (2): 175–188.
[20] Fekadu Beyene. 2010. Interclan cooperation in a risky pastoral ecology: Some lessons from Eastern Ethiopia. Springer Science + Business Media. Hum Ecol, 38 (3): 555–565.
[21] Francesco, G. 2012. Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate: Department of economics, University of Milan, 20122, Italy.
[22] Freeman, J., Baggio, A. J. and Coyle, R. T. 2020. Social and general intelligence improves collective action in a common pool resource system. Sustainability science, PNAS, Vol, 117 (14): 7712–7718.
[23] Friedenberg, J. and Silverman, G. 2006. Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the study of mind. Sage publications, Inc.order@sagepub.com. Accessed 19 April 2020.
[24] Gebrehaweria Gebregziabher, Dereje Assefa A., Girmay Gebresamuel, Giordano, M. and Langan, S. 2016. An Assessment of Integrated Watershed Management in Ethiopia. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI. doi: 10.5337/2016.214. Accessed 10 December 2020.
[25] Gebremedn Tesfaye, Tena Alamirew, Asfaw Kebede and Gete Zeleke. 2018. Institutional functionality in participatory integrated watershed development of Tana Sub-Basin, Ethiopia: Land (5): 1-17.
[26] Getachew Shambel E., Kibwika, P., Jemal Yousuf, H. and Bernard B. O. 2017. Harnessing social capital for resilience to livelihood shocks: Ethnographic Evidence of indigenous mutual support practices among rural households in Eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Population Research Volume, 1 (3): 1-26.
[27] Gudeta Kebede A. 2019. Citizens’ trust in public and political institutions in Ethiopia: College of Law and Governance, Jimma University, Ethiopia.
[28] Gutman, M. 2014. Campaign hand book: Auser’s guide to campaigning. Green European Foundation, Brussels Office, Belgium.
[29] Hancock, B. 1998. Trent focus for research and development in primary healthcare: An introduction to qualitative research. Trent Focus.
[30] Holzinger, VanK. 2003. The problems of collective action: A new approach, Preprint sausder Max-Planck-Projekt gruppe Rechtder Gemeinschaftsguter, Bonn.
[31] Hoque, E. Md. 2017. Three domains of learning: Cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The Journal of EFL Education and Research (JEFLER) Vol. 2, (6): 45-52.
[32] Ingram, J., Chiswell, H., Mills, J., Debruyne, L., Cooreman, H., Koutsouris, A., Pappa, E. and March and, F. 2018. Enabling learning in demonstration farms: A literature review. 13th European International Farming Systems Association (IFSA) Symposium, Greece: International. J. Agricultural Extension, (10): 29-42.
[33] Johann, F. K., Andrew, R. D., Colin, P. and Nick V. 2009. Institutional economics view son African agricultural development: Food policy research institute W.D.C.U.S.A.
[34] Kerr, J., Milne, G., Chhotray, V., Baumann, P., James, A. 2007. Managing watershed externalities in India: Theory and practice. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 9 (7): 263-281.
[35] KidaneTafa. 2018. Participation in watershed management programs and adoption of sustainable land management practices in Bassonaworana District, Central Highlands of Ethiopia: PhD Dissertation, Adis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
[36] Kim, K. Y., Edens, D., Iorio, M. f., Curtis, C. J., Romero, E., 2015. Cognitive skills development among international students at research universities in the United States. Journal of International Students, Vol, 5 (4): 526-540.
[37] Kitapc, I. 2016. The changing structure of the concept of capital: Cognitive social capital. Pamukkale university faculty of economics and administrative Sciences department of public finance, Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Eylül, 2 (3): 13-23.
[38] Lakew Desta, Carucci, V., Asrat Wendem-Ageňehu and Yitayew Abebe. 2005. Community based participatory watershed development: A guideline, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[39] Liang, Q., Huang, Z., Luc, H. and Wangd, X. 2015. Social capital, member participation, and cooperative performance: Evidence from China’s Zhejiang. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review Volume, 18 (5): 49-78.
[40] Lulseged Tamene, Kindu Mekonnen, Kifle Woldearegay and Berra Adie. 2014. Report of an integrated watershed management and water harvesting training workshop and experience sharing visit in the Ethiopian highlands. Published by ILRI.
[41] McElreath, R., Timothy. R., Clutton-Brock, H., Fehr, E., Daniel, M. T., Edward, F., Hagen, H., Hammerstein, P., Kosfeld, M., Silk, J. and Wilson, M. I. 2003. Group report: The role of cognition and emotion in cooperation. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation, (7): 125-152.
[42] Meinzen-Dick, R., Gregorio, M. D. and McCarthy, N. 2004. Methods for studying collective action in rural development: International Food Policy Research Institute 2033 K. Street, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20006, U.S.A.
[43] Mekonen Debara, Yisak Gecho, and Teklu Gebretsadik. 2016. The role of community based watershed management for climate change adaptation in Kindo Koyisha Woreda of Wolaita Zone. Journal of Food, Environmental Science, V, 3 (11): 70-86.
[44] Million Sileshi, Kadigi, R., Mutabazi, K. and Sieber, S. 2019. Determinants for adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures by smallholder farmers in Ethiopia: doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.08.002. Accessed 10 March 2020.
[45] Muluken Gezahegn, W. and Maria Sassi. 2017. Impact of farmers’ training centres on household income: Evidence from propensity score matching in Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Social Sciences (2017): 1-12.
[46] Mwhite, D. 2002. ROADMAP, Groups and Teamwork: “Team-building events are more likely to succeed if they include outsiders and unexpected activities,”http://www.News.ft.com. Accessed 1 May 2020.
[47] Nagle, G. 2006. Geo fact sheet: Soil degradation-A creeping concern. Journal of Curriculum press, bank house, 105 king street, Wellington, ISSN (2006): 1351-5136.
[48] Njuki, J., Mapila, M. T., Zingore, S. and Delve, R. 2008. The dynamics of social capital in influencing use of soil management options in the Chinyanja Triangle of southern Africa. Ecology and Society, 13 (2): 9-19.
[49] North, D. C. and Thomas, R. P. 1973. The rise of the western world: A new economic history. NewYork: Cambridge University press, 1973.
[50] Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[51] Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J. 1994. Rules, games and common-pool resources: The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
[52] Ostrom, E. 1999. Social capital: A fedora fundamental concept? In Social capital: A multi faceted perspective. Ed. P. Washington DC, USA: World Bank.
[53] Ostrom, E. 2005. Doing institutional analysis: Digging deeper than markets and hierarchies. (Eds.), Hand book of New Institutional Economics. Springer.
[54] Ostrom, E. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1): 1-27.
[55] Pugel, K., Javernick-Will, A., Walters, J. and Linden, K. 2018. Factor and Actor Networks: Alignment of collective action groups for water sustainability in Ethiopia: Bryan Franz, University of Florida and Iva Kovacic, TU Wien.
[56] Putnam, R. D. 1993. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13 (3): 35-42.
[57] Ramalingam, M., Kasilingam, G. and Chinnavan, E. 2014. Assessment of learning domains to improve student’s learning in higher education: Faculty of engineering and computer technology, school of physiotherapy, AIMST University, K, Malaysia.
[58] Robert, J., Jones, A. and Montanarella, L. 2002. Land degradation: Contributions to the international workshop, European commission, Ispra, Italy.
[59] Roger, D. 2015. The logic of collective action and beyond: Professor of economics West Virginia University.
[60] Roosmalen, T. M. 2012. Questionnaire on teamwork and team Effectiveness. The Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
[61] Samuel Assefa, Kessler, A. and Fleskens, L. 2019. Assessing farmers’ willingness to participate in campaign-based watershed management: Experiences from Boset District, Ethiopia: The Netherlands.
[62] Samuel Assefa H. 2020. Participatory agent-based modeling for sustainable watershed management in the central rift valley of Ethiopia. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.
[63] Sandler, T. 2015. Collective action: Department of economics, school of economic, political & policy sciences, University of Texasat Dallas, 800 W. Camp bell Rd., Richardson, TX75080, USA, openaccessatSpringerlink.com, 164 (2015): 195-216.
[64] Seline, S. M., Delia, C. 2015. The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agro forestry innovations among smallholder farmers in SSA. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 13 (1): 40-54.
[65] Sonmez, V. 2017. Association of cognitive, affective, psychomotor and intuitive domains in education, Sönmez Model: Faculty of education, Cyprus International University, Cyprus. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5 (3): 347-356.
[66] Suhas, P. W. and Kaushal, K. G. n. d. Watershed management concept and principles: International crops research institute, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India.
[67] Sverker, C. J., Niklas, H., Åsa, L., Martin, S., Francisco, A., Bengt, B., David, L., Andreas, N., Bethanie, C. A., Sam, D. and Will, S. 2019. On the preconditions for large-scale collective action: The centre for University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
[68] Taiwo, T. M. 2019. An introduction to logic and critical thinking: International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) Ekiti State University, Nigeria, Vol, 3 (2): 28-34.
[69] Tesfaye Lemma, T. 2009. Supply response, local reality and livelihood sustainability: the policy dilemma of khat (Cathae dulis) production in eastern Ethiopia: International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7 (3): 176–188.
[70] Tesfaye Yaekob, Lulseged Tamene, Solomon G. Gebrehiwot, Solomon, S. Demissie, Zenebe Adimassu, Kifle Woldearegay, Kindu Mekonnen, Tilahun Amede, Wuletawu Abera, John W. R., Dawit Solomon and Thorne, P. 2020. Assessing the impacts of different land uses and SWC interventions on run off and sediment yield at different scales in the central highlands of Ethiopia: Cambridge University.
[71] Thorat, M. M. 2017. Watershed management: International research. Journal of Science and Engineering, 5 (7): 81-83.
[72] Tozier, P. A., Burch field, E. K. and Carrico, A. R. 2018. The implications of group norms for adaptation in collectively managed agricultural systems: evidence from Sri Lankan paddy farmers. Ecology and Society, 23 (3): 21-39.
[73] UNCCD (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification). 2014. Land degradation neutrality: Resilience at local, national and regional levels, Bonn, Germany.
[74] Wang, Y. 2010. Industry expansion, organization innovation, and farmer cooperative growth. China Rural Survey (2): 47-50.
[75] Wani, S., Sreedevi, T., Reddy, T. V., Ven kateswarlu, B. and Prasad, C. 2008. Community watersheds for improved livelihoods through consortium approach in drought prone rain-fed areas. Journal of Hydrological Research and Dev., 23 (6): 55-77.
[76] WB (World Bank). 2012. Agricultural innovation systems: an investment source book. Washington, D. C. USA. www.worldbank.org. Accessed on 11 November 2020.
[77] WB (World Bank). 2013. Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) integrating disaster and climate risk management: Case study. Washington, DC. USA.
[78] WB (World Bank). 2019. For a climate action through landscape management program for results: Environment and Natural Resources Global Practice Africa Region.
[79] Weimann, J., Brosig-Koch, J., Heinrich, T., Hennig-Schmidt, H. and Keser, C. 2018. The logic of collective action revisited. Working paper of CIRANO Allier savoir et decision. weimann@ww.uni-magdeburg.de. Accessed 7 December 2020.
[80] Wilson, D. S., John, J. T. and Ralph, R. M. 2014. Cognitive cooperation: When the going gets tough, thank as a group. Human nature, Vol, 15 (3): 1-15.
[81] Wuletaw Mekuria. 2019. Integrated watershed management practices: Evidences from Tsegur and Kanat Micro-Watersheds of the Ethiopian highlands. Journal of Agric Forest Meteorol Res, 2 (3): 123-125.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. (2021). The Cognitive of Collective Action in Campaign-Based Watershed Management: The Case of Farmers in Ethiopian Highlands. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 6(3), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. The Cognitive of Collective Action in Campaign-Based Watershed Management: The Case of Farmers in Ethiopian Highlands. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 6(3), 93-107. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. The Cognitive of Collective Action in Campaign-Based Watershed Management: The Case of Farmers in Ethiopian Highlands. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2021;6(3):93-107. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11,
      author = {Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael},
      title = {The Cognitive of Collective Action in Campaign-Based Watershed Management: The Case of Farmers in Ethiopian Highlands},
      journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {93-107},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20210603.11},
      abstract = {With the increased importance of collective action in many phases of natural resource management, it is necessary to focus on farmers' cognitive abilities, such as intellect, social capital (social relationships), and orientation (symmetric information), which enhance group or team ability to solve problems through collective action, not missing physical abilities. Due to low land efficiency as a result of land degradation, the regime is reliant on continuing watershed management collective activity. Participating in a large-scale collective activity could be facilitated by different populations' cognitive abilities. As a result, this review article examined cognitive collective action in campaign-based watershed management in Ethiopia's highlands, as well as how cognition is linked to physical practices and what factors influence farmers' decisions to participate in collective action. Then, through strategic and expanded kinds of cooperative games, experimental games were taken. This has been done using both conceptual and analytical frameworks. Web Science Page Googled and reviewed a total of eighty-one articles and published books. Then, at the end, their connections and gaps in the literature were highlighted. As a result, it is plausible to conclude that investing in farmers' collective action cognition can result in beneficial changes in land degradation. As a result, future academics and policymakers should concentrate on: 1) integrating social capital and collective orientation with watershed management to support collective action. 2) The interplay between cognitive (mental) and physical abilities. 3) Amending property rights and strengthening institutions. As a result, researchers can use the findings to develop policy and extension efforts that prioritize future farmer cognition.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Cognitive of Collective Action in Campaign-Based Watershed Management: The Case of Farmers in Ethiopian Highlands
    AU  - Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael
    Y1  - 2021/07/21
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11
    T2  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
    JF  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
    JO  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
    SP  - 93
    EP  - 107
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3061
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.11
    AB  - With the increased importance of collective action in many phases of natural resource management, it is necessary to focus on farmers' cognitive abilities, such as intellect, social capital (social relationships), and orientation (symmetric information), which enhance group or team ability to solve problems through collective action, not missing physical abilities. Due to low land efficiency as a result of land degradation, the regime is reliant on continuing watershed management collective activity. Participating in a large-scale collective activity could be facilitated by different populations' cognitive abilities. As a result, this review article examined cognitive collective action in campaign-based watershed management in Ethiopia's highlands, as well as how cognition is linked to physical practices and what factors influence farmers' decisions to participate in collective action. Then, through strategic and expanded kinds of cooperative games, experimental games were taken. This has been done using both conceptual and analytical frameworks. Web Science Page Googled and reviewed a total of eighty-one articles and published books. Then, at the end, their connections and gaps in the literature were highlighted. As a result, it is plausible to conclude that investing in farmers' collective action cognition can result in beneficial changes in land degradation. As a result, future academics and policymakers should concentrate on: 1) integrating social capital and collective orientation with watershed management to support collective action. 2) The interplay between cognitive (mental) and physical abilities. 3) Amending property rights and strengthening institutions. As a result, researchers can use the findings to develop policy and extension efforts that prioritize future farmer cognition.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Rural Development and Agricultural Innovation, Haramaya University, Oromia, Ethiopia

  • Sections