Protected areas are an important means of controlling deforestation. However, the effectiveness of protected areas in controlling deforestation depends on type of protected area which determines conservation policy pursued and thus how the protected area is managed. This paper reports on analysis of the relationship between deforestation and type of protected area, namely forest reserve, game reserve and national park in mainland Tanzania. The analysis used maps covering the whole of mainland Tanzania for 1995 and 2010 and applied GIS analytical techniques. Both forest reserves and game reserves had lower deforestation than areas that were not protected whereas national parks had higher deforestation than areas that were not protected. However, forest reserves had higher rate of deforestation than game reserves. These results raise questions with regards to ecological processes and policy options relevant for the three types of protected areas and their effects on deforestation. First, are the differences in deforestation due to varying levels of effectiveness of measures used to control deforestation among the three types of protected areas? Second, what is the role of natural processes such as elephants that kill trees? Third, why should national parks be associated with the highest rate of deforestation? Are forests so bad for wild animals in national parks? These questions form the basis of the discussion of the results.
| Published in | International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14 |
| Page(s) | 49-55 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
GIS, Spatial Analysis, Effectiveness, Wildlife Policy, Forest Act
| [1] | R. Walker et al., “Protecting the Amazon with protected areas,” PNAS, vol. 106, no. 26, pp. 10582–10586, 2009. |
| [2] | L. Naughton-Treves, M. B. Holland, and K. Brandon, “The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods,” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., vol. 30, pp. 219–252, 2005, doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.164507. |
| [3] | J. M. Hall et al., “Ecological and Social Outcomes of a New Protected Area in Tanzania,” Conserv. Biol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1512–1521, 2014, doi: 10.1111/cobi.12335. |
| [4] | B. Gizachew, J. Rizzi, D. D. Shirima, and E. Zahabu, “Deforestation and Connectivity among Protected Areas of Tanzania,” Forests, vol. 11, no. doi: 10.3390/f11020170, 2020. |
| [5] | FAO, “The State of the World’s Forests: Forests, biodiversity and people,” Rome, 2020. doi: 10.1515/9783035608632-002. |
| [6] | FAO, “Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 Report United Republic of Tanzania,” Rome, 2020. |
| [7] | B. Mackey et al., “Understanding the importance of primary tropical forest protection as a mitigation strategy,” Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 763–787, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11027-019-09891-4. |
| [8] | S. Chape, S. Blyth, L. Fish, P. Fox, and M. Spalding, “United Nations List of Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. ix+44pp].,” 2003. http://www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/wcp2003/english/outputs/. |
| [9] | URT, National Forest Policy, vol. 92, no. 9. Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, The United Republic of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam, 1998. |
| [10] | J. Southworth, H. Nagendra, and D. K. Munroe, “Editorial. Introduction to the special issue: Are parks working? Exploring human-environment tradeoffs in protected area conservation,” Appl. Geogr., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.001. |
| [11] | M. Cropper, J. Puri, and C. Griffiths, “Predicting the Location of Deforestation: The Role of Roads and Protected Areas in North Thailand,” Land Econ., vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 172–186, 2001. |
| [12] | URT, The Forest Act, vol. 83, no. 7. Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, The United Republic of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam, 2002. |
| [13] | URT, The Wildlife Policy of Tanzania. Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, The United Republic of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam, 1998. |
| [14] | URT, The Wildlife Conservation Act. Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, The United Republic of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam, 2009. |
| [15] | S. N. Hassan, Effects of fire on large herbivores and their forage resources in Serengeti, Tanzania, no. November. Thesis for the degree Philosophiae Doctor. Department of Biology. Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2007. |
| [16] | A. M. Manyonyi, S. B. Mariki, L. L. Mnyone, S. R. Belmain, and L. S. Mulungu, “Effects of prescribed burning on rodent community ecology in Serengeti National Park,” J. Vertebr. Biol., vol. 69 (2): 200, no. DOI: 10.25225/jvb.20001, 2020. |
| [17] | H. Eva and E. F. Lambin, “Fires and land-cover change in the tropics: a remote sensing analysis at the landscape scale,” J. Biogeogr., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 765–776, 2000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00441.x. |
| [18] | A. J. Tepley et al., “Influences of fire–vegetation feedbacks and post-fire recovery rates on forest landscape vulnerability to altered fire regimes,” J. Ecol., vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1925–1940, 2018, doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12950. |
| [19] | A. Christopoulou et al., “Assessing the impact of different landscape features on post-fire forest recovery with multitemporal remote sensing data: The case of Mount Taygetos (southern Greece),” Int. J. Wildl. Fire, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 521–532, 2019, doi: 10.1071/WF18153. |
| [20] | J. Qiu, H. Wang, W. Shen, Y. Zhang, H. Su, and M. Li, “Quantifying forest fire and post-fire vegetation recovery in the daxing’anling area of northeastern china using landsat time-series data and machine learning,” Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs13040792. |
| [21] | A. Akida, I. Mnangwone, and L. Lyimo, “Financing for Sustainable Forest Management in Tanzania,” INDUFOR Oy, Helsinki, Finland, 2012. |
| [22] | R. Mabugu and P. Mugoya, “Financing, Revenue-Sharing, and Taxation Issues in Wildlife Management Areas,” Wildlife Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism and USAID/Tanzania, 2001. [Online]. Available: papers3://publication/uuid/4D75EBDC-FBA2-45A5-9E94-700A7F9C4F90. |
| [23] | H. Geist and E. Lambin, “What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on sub-national case study evidence,” LUCC International Project Office, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 2001. |
| [24] | N. B. P. Jaimes, J. B. Sendra, M. G. Delgado, and R. F. Plata, “Exploring the driving forces behind deforestation in the state of Mexico (Mexico) using geographically weighted regression,” Appl. Geogr., vol. 30, pp. 576–591, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.004. |
| [25] | R. G. J. Pontius, E. Shusasand, and M. McEachern, “Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 101, pp. 251–268, 2004. |
| [26] | J. J. Schulz, L. Cayuela, C. Echeverria, J. Salas, and J. M. R. Benayas, “Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of Central Chile (1975-2008),” Appl. Geogr., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 436–447, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.12.003. |
| [27] | M. S. Reis, L. V. Dutra, M. I. S. Escada, and S. J. S. Sant’Anna, “Avoiding invalid transitions in land cover trajectory classification with a compound maximum a posteriori approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 98787–98799, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997019. |
| [28] | Y. Wang et al., “Mapping tropical disturbed forests using multi-decadal 30m optical satellite imagery,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 221, no. April 2018, pp. 474–488, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.028. |
| [29] | P. Verburg, “The CLUE-S model. Tutorial CLUE-s (version 2.4) and DYNA-CLUE (version 2) Peter Verburg, Wageningen University.,” no. version 2. 1999. |
| [30] | R. Verburg, E. Stehfest, G. Woltjer, and B. Eickhout, “The effect of agricultural trade liberalisation on land-use related greenhouse gas emissions,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 434–446, 2009, [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VFV-4X1R2T0-1/2/e60c3294bcbc656a5b2b7cf6e9c1891f. |
| [31] | UNEP-WCMC, “World Database on Protected Areas,” UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK., 2016. doi: www.protectedplanet.net. |
| [32] | E. F. Nzunda and F. Midtgaard, “Spatial relationship between deforestation and protected areas, accessibility, population density, GDP and other factors in mainland Tanzania,” For. Trees Livelihoods, vol. Online, no. 10th May 2017, pp. 1–12, 2017, doi: 10.1080/14728028.2017.1322921. |
| [33] | E. F. Nzunda and F. Midtgaard, “Deforestation and loss of bushland and grassland primarily due to expansion of cultivation in mainland Tanzania (1995–2010),” J. Sustain. For., vol. 38, no. 6, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10549811.2019.1598437. |
| [34] | G. P. Quinn and M. J. Keough, Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge., 2002. |
| [35] | H. J. Seltman, Experimental Design and Analysis. 2015. |
| [36] | W. P. Carson and D. K. Abbiw, “No Title The vegetation of a protection site on the northern Accra Plains, Ghana.,” Afr. J. Ecol., vol. 28, pp. 143–146, 1990. |
| [37] | N. A. Nasseri, L. D. Mcbrayer, and B. A. Schulte, “The impact of tree modification by African elephant (Loxodonta africana) on herpetofaunal species richness in northern Tanzania,” Afr. J. Ecol., vol. 49, pp. 133–140, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2010.01238.x. |
| [38] | H. Nagendra, S. Pareeth, and R. Ghate, “People within parks - Forest villages, land-cover change and landscape fragmentation in the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve, India,” Appl. Geogr., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 96–112, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.002. |
| [39] | J. M. Lupala, M. V Mdemu, and S. P. Butungo, “Effects of Peri-Urban Land Use Changes on Forest Ecosystem Services: The Case of Settlements Surrounding Pugu and Kazimzumbwi Forest Reserves in Tanzania,” J. Geogr. Geol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 231–240, 2014, doi: 10.5539/jgg.v6n4p231. |
| [40] | J. J. Kashaigili, M. V. Mdemu, A. R. Nduganda, and B. P. Mbilinyi, “Integrated Assessment of Forest Cover Change and Above-Ground Carbon Stock in Pugu and Kazimzumbwi Forest Reserves, Tanzania,” Adv. Remote Sens., vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 1–9, 2013, doi: 10.4236/ars.2013.21001. |
| [41] | C. Capitani et al., “From local scenarios to national maps: a participatory framework for envisioning the future of Tanzania,” Ecol. Soc. 21 (3) 4., vol. 21, no. 3, 2016, doi: dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08565-21030. |
| [42] | P. Mayaux, P. Holmgren, F. Achard, H. Eva, H. Stibig, and A. Branthomme, “Tropical forest cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biological Sci., vol. 360, no. 1454, pp. 373–384, 2005, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1590. |
APA Style
Emmanuel Fred Nzunda. (2021). Conservation Policy, Type of Protected Area and Deforestation in Mainland Tanzania. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 6(2), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14
ACS Style
Emmanuel Fred Nzunda. Conservation Policy, Type of Protected Area and Deforestation in Mainland Tanzania. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 6(2), 49-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14
AMA Style
Emmanuel Fred Nzunda. Conservation Policy, Type of Protected Area and Deforestation in Mainland Tanzania. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2021;6(2):49-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14,
author = {Emmanuel Fred Nzunda},
title = {Conservation Policy, Type of Protected Area and Deforestation in Mainland Tanzania},
journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
volume = {6},
number = {2},
pages = {49-55},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20210602.14},
abstract = {Protected areas are an important means of controlling deforestation. However, the effectiveness of protected areas in controlling deforestation depends on type of protected area which determines conservation policy pursued and thus how the protected area is managed. This paper reports on analysis of the relationship between deforestation and type of protected area, namely forest reserve, game reserve and national park in mainland Tanzania. The analysis used maps covering the whole of mainland Tanzania for 1995 and 2010 and applied GIS analytical techniques. Both forest reserves and game reserves had lower deforestation than areas that were not protected whereas national parks had higher deforestation than areas that were not protected. However, forest reserves had higher rate of deforestation than game reserves. These results raise questions with regards to ecological processes and policy options relevant for the three types of protected areas and their effects on deforestation. First, are the differences in deforestation due to varying levels of effectiveness of measures used to control deforestation among the three types of protected areas? Second, what is the role of natural processes such as elephants that kill trees? Third, why should national parks be associated with the highest rate of deforestation? Are forests so bad for wild animals in national parks? These questions form the basis of the discussion of the results.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Conservation Policy, Type of Protected Area and Deforestation in Mainland Tanzania AU - Emmanuel Fred Nzunda Y1 - 2021/05/26 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14 T2 - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management JF - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management JO - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management SP - 49 EP - 55 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3061 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210602.14 AB - Protected areas are an important means of controlling deforestation. However, the effectiveness of protected areas in controlling deforestation depends on type of protected area which determines conservation policy pursued and thus how the protected area is managed. This paper reports on analysis of the relationship between deforestation and type of protected area, namely forest reserve, game reserve and national park in mainland Tanzania. The analysis used maps covering the whole of mainland Tanzania for 1995 and 2010 and applied GIS analytical techniques. Both forest reserves and game reserves had lower deforestation than areas that were not protected whereas national parks had higher deforestation than areas that were not protected. However, forest reserves had higher rate of deforestation than game reserves. These results raise questions with regards to ecological processes and policy options relevant for the three types of protected areas and their effects on deforestation. First, are the differences in deforestation due to varying levels of effectiveness of measures used to control deforestation among the three types of protected areas? Second, what is the role of natural processes such as elephants that kill trees? Third, why should national parks be associated with the highest rate of deforestation? Are forests so bad for wild animals in national parks? These questions form the basis of the discussion of the results. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: