Purpose: Day-case surgery for selected procedures has the potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient experience. In neurosurgery, brain biopsies have been performed as day-case procedures for selected patients. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of a clinical pathway that facilitates day-case brain biopsy surgery to improve the generalisability of the evidence and inform wider adoption of this practice. Materials and methods: A single centre, retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years requiring a brain biopsy for presumed tumour between November 2009 and December 2017 was performed. All patients received pre-admission radiology imaging +/- trajectory planning (as required), an operation on a morning theatre list and post-biopsy CT head 4-6 hours to rule out haemorrhage or other complications. Discharge was aimed at 6 hours post-biopsy if observations and CT were satisfactory. All data was collected via an institution operative database and descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 447 brain tumour biopsies performed over the eight-year study period of which a total of n=160 (35.8%) were planned day-case. The proportion of biopsies performed as day-case increased over the study period, from four in 2009 to 33 per annum in 2017, an increase from only 10% (n=4) to 66% (n=33) of the total annual biopsies for this centre. Of the 160 planned day-cases, 135 (84.4%) were actual day-cases and successfully discharged on the same day as the operation. The mean patient age was 58 years. Twenty-five cases had at least one overnight unplanned stay, revealing a failure rate of 15.6%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the safety of our day-case brain tumour biopsy service and is consistent with other centres’ experiences. This represents an opportunity for neurosurgeons to confidently contribute to an increasing provision of day-case surgery across the service.
Published in | International Journal of Neurosurgery (Volume 7, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16 |
Page(s) | 46-51 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Tumour, Biopsy, Patient Safety, Day-Case Surgery
[1] | Abou-Zeid, A., Palmer, J. and Gnanalingham, K. (2014) ‘Day case lumbar discectomy–Viable option in the UK?’, British journal of neurosurgery, 28 (3), pp. 320–3. |
[2] | Alderwick, H. and Dixon, J. (2019) ‘The NHS long term plan’, BMJ (Online), 364. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l84. |
[3] | Audit Commission (1990) A short cut to better services: day surgery in England and Wales. London: HMSO. |
[4] | Audit Commission (2001) Day surgery: review of national findings. London: Audit Commission Publications. |
[5] | Aylin, P. et al. (2005) ‘Trends in day surgery rates.’, BMJ, 8 (331), p. 803. |
[6] | Bailey, C. et al. (2019) ‘Guidelines for day‐case surgery 2019: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the British Association of Day Surgery.’, Anaesthesia, 74 (6), pp. 778–92. |
[7] | Bhardwaj, R. and Bernstein, M. (2002) ‘Prospective feasibility study of outpatient stereotactic brain lesion biopsy.’, Neurosurgery, (51), p. 358=364. |
[8] | Boulton, M. and Bernstein, M. (2008) ‘Outpatient brain tumor surgery: innovation in surgical neurooncology.’, Journal of neurosurgery, 108 (4), pp. 649–54. |
[9] | Cancer Research UK (2023) Brain, other CNS and intracranial tumours statistics. |
[10] | Darwin, L. and Chung, F. (2013) ‘Patient selection for day surgery.’, Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 14 (3), pp. 114–118. |
[11] | Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: a plan for investment. a plan for reform. |
[12] | Field, M. et al. (2001) ‘Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhage risks and outcomes after stereotactic brain biopsy.’, J Neurosurgery, (94), pp. 545–551. |
[13] | Grundy, P., Weidmann, C. and Bernstein, M. (2008) ‘Day-case neurosurgery for brain tumours: the early United Kingdom experience.’, British journal of neurosurgery., 22 (3), pp. 360–7. |
[14] | Heper, A. et al. (2005) ‘An analysis of stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors and nonneoplastic lesions: a prospective clinicopathologic study.’, Surgical neurology, 1 (64), pp. 82–8. |
[15] | Kaakaji, W., Barnett, G. and Bernhard, D. (2001) ‘Clinical and economic consequences of early discharge of patients following supratentorial stereotactic brain biopsy.’, J Neurosurg, (94), pp. 892–8. |
[16] | Kulkarni, A. et al. (1998) ‘Incidence of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic brain biopsy.’, J Neurosurg, (89), pp. 31–35. |
[17] | Lemos, P. et al. (2009) ‘Patient satisfaction following day surgery.’, Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, (21), pp. 200–205. |
[18] | Mirian, C. et al. (2019) ‘Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for de novo brain tumour-related epilepsy after craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of harm and benefits.’, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 90 (5), pp. 599–607. |
[19] | NICE (2021) Brain tumours (primary) and brain metastases in over 16s. |
[20] | Purzner, T. et al. (2011) ‘Outpatient brain tumor surgery and spinal decompression: a prospective study of 1003 patients.’, Neurosurgery, 69 (1), pp. 119–27. |
[21] | Quemby, D. and Stocker, M. (2014) ‘Day surgery development and practice: key factors for a successful pathway.’, Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain., 14 (6), pp. 256–61. |
[22] | Reisch, R. et al. (2013) ‘The keyhole concept in neurosurgery.’, World neurosurgery, 79 (2), pp. 17–19. |
[23] | Richardson, A. et al. (2019) ‘Predictors of Successful Discharge of Patients on Postoperative Day 1 After Craniotomy for Brain Tumor.’, World neurosurgery, 1 (126), pp. 869–77. |
[24] | Sawin, P. et al. (1998) ‘Computed imaging-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: A risk analysis of 225 consecutive cases.’, Surg Neurol, (49), pp. 640–640. |
[25] | Taylor, W. et al. (1995) ‘Timing of post- operative intracranial hematoma development and implications for the best use of neurosurgical intensive care.’, J Neurosurg, (82), pp. 48–50. |
[26] | Vaishnav, A. and McAnany, S. (2019) ‘Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery.’, Journal of Spine Surgery, 2. |
[27] | Vallejo, F. et al. (2022) ‘Same-day discharge after brain tumor resection: a prospective pilot study.’, Journal of Neuro-oncology, 157 (2), pp. 345–53. |
[28] | Venkatraghavan, L. et al. (2016) ‘Same-day discharge after craniotomy for supratentorial tumour surgery: a retrospective observational single-centre study.’, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 63 (11), pp. 1245–57. |
[29] | Weerakkody, R. et al. (2009) ‘The air bubble technique for confirming the location of an image-guided biopsy - a technical note.’, Br J Neurosurg, 29 (3), pp. 329–31. |
[30] | Wohns, R. (2010) ‘Safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient cervical disc arthroplasty.’, Surgical neurology international. |
APA Style
William Bolton, Fozia Saeed, Sandeep Solanki, Gnanamurthy Sivakumar, Robert Corns, et al. (2023). The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Neurosurgery, 7(2), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16
ACS Style
William Bolton; Fozia Saeed; Sandeep Solanki; Gnanamurthy Sivakumar; Robert Corns, et al. The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom. Int. J. Neurosurg. 2023, 7(2), 46-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16
AMA Style
William Bolton, Fozia Saeed, Sandeep Solanki, Gnanamurthy Sivakumar, Robert Corns, et al. The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom. Int J Neurosurg. 2023;7(2):46-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16, author = {William Bolton and Fozia Saeed and Sandeep Solanki and Gnanamurthy Sivakumar and Robert Corns and John Goodden and Paul Chumas and Simon Thomson}, title = {The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom}, journal = {International Journal of Neurosurgery}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, pages = {46-51}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijn.20230702.16}, abstract = {Purpose: Day-case surgery for selected procedures has the potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient experience. In neurosurgery, brain biopsies have been performed as day-case procedures for selected patients. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of a clinical pathway that facilitates day-case brain biopsy surgery to improve the generalisability of the evidence and inform wider adoption of this practice. Materials and methods: A single centre, retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years requiring a brain biopsy for presumed tumour between November 2009 and December 2017 was performed. All patients received pre-admission radiology imaging +/- trajectory planning (as required), an operation on a morning theatre list and post-biopsy CT head 4-6 hours to rule out haemorrhage or other complications. Discharge was aimed at 6 hours post-biopsy if observations and CT were satisfactory. All data was collected via an institution operative database and descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 447 brain tumour biopsies performed over the eight-year study period of which a total of n=160 (35.8%) were planned day-case. The proportion of biopsies performed as day-case increased over the study period, from four in 2009 to 33 per annum in 2017, an increase from only 10% (n=4) to 66% (n=33) of the total annual biopsies for this centre. Of the 160 planned day-cases, 135 (84.4%) were actual day-cases and successfully discharged on the same day as the operation. The mean patient age was 58 years. Twenty-five cases had at least one overnight unplanned stay, revealing a failure rate of 15.6%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the safety of our day-case brain tumour biopsy service and is consistent with other centres’ experiences. This represents an opportunity for neurosurgeons to confidently contribute to an increasing provision of day-case surgery across the service. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom AU - William Bolton AU - Fozia Saeed AU - Sandeep Solanki AU - Gnanamurthy Sivakumar AU - Robert Corns AU - John Goodden AU - Paul Chumas AU - Simon Thomson Y1 - 2023/10/31 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16 T2 - International Journal of Neurosurgery JF - International Journal of Neurosurgery JO - International Journal of Neurosurgery SP - 46 EP - 51 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1959 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16 AB - Purpose: Day-case surgery for selected procedures has the potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient experience. In neurosurgery, brain biopsies have been performed as day-case procedures for selected patients. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of a clinical pathway that facilitates day-case brain biopsy surgery to improve the generalisability of the evidence and inform wider adoption of this practice. Materials and methods: A single centre, retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years requiring a brain biopsy for presumed tumour between November 2009 and December 2017 was performed. All patients received pre-admission radiology imaging +/- trajectory planning (as required), an operation on a morning theatre list and post-biopsy CT head 4-6 hours to rule out haemorrhage or other complications. Discharge was aimed at 6 hours post-biopsy if observations and CT were satisfactory. All data was collected via an institution operative database and descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 447 brain tumour biopsies performed over the eight-year study period of which a total of n=160 (35.8%) were planned day-case. The proportion of biopsies performed as day-case increased over the study period, from four in 2009 to 33 per annum in 2017, an increase from only 10% (n=4) to 66% (n=33) of the total annual biopsies for this centre. Of the 160 planned day-cases, 135 (84.4%) were actual day-cases and successfully discharged on the same day as the operation. The mean patient age was 58 years. Twenty-five cases had at least one overnight unplanned stay, revealing a failure rate of 15.6%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the safety of our day-case brain tumour biopsy service and is consistent with other centres’ experiences. This represents an opportunity for neurosurgeons to confidently contribute to an increasing provision of day-case surgery across the service. VL - 7 IS - 2 ER -