| Peer-Reviewed

Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Pre and Post Decompression laminectomy Outcomes in a Single Neurosurgery Private Practice

Received: 30 August 2021     Accepted: 26 September 2021     Published: 5 October 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) or Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is the most common degenerative condition affecting older adults. The clinical presentation of LCS includes lower back pain, radiating pain, tingling sensation, and numbness in the lower limbs, as well as nocturnal leg cramps, and bladder dysfunction due to neurological compression. Laminectomy is one of the most common procedures performed for the treatment of LCS. This study aimed to examine the pre-surgical presentations and post-surgical outcomes based on the available clinical records from a single neurosurgeon private practice based in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. The clinical records of 166 patients were extracted and reviewed for clinical presentation notes, surgical notes, post-surgery follow-up letters between 2010 and 2019. Records without follow-up notes were excluded. The presurgical presentation symptoms included lower back pain, weakness, neurogenic claudication, pins and needles, and sensory and motor deficits. Post-surgical outcomes were evaluated based on the 1-month, 3-month, and 1-year follow up based on the notes and letters. Many patients mentioned significant improvement in symptoms immediately after the decompressive laminectomy. Descriptive analysis was performed; the results have been presented as percentages and charts. Post- laminectomy results reported that 87% improvement in back pain and 85% people reported improvements in neurogenic claudication. This study suggested that decompressive laminectomy was effective in the management of LCS. However, further studies are required due to the limitations, such as small population size, data availability, multiple re-presentations, and lack of proper follow-up.

Published in International Journal of Neurosurgery (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14
Page(s) 70-74
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Back Pain, Neurogenic Claudication, Neurosurgery, Laminectomy

References
[1] Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 1992 Jan; 17 (1): 1–8.
[2] Jankowitz BT, Atteberry DS, Gerszten PC, Karausky P, Cheng BC, Faught R, et al. Effect of fibrin glue on the prevention of persistent cerebral spinal fluid leakage after incidental durotomy during lumbar spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 1169-74.
[3] Katz J. N., Harris M. B.: Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 358: pp. 818-825.
[4] Bydon M, Macki M, Abt NB, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, et al. Clinical and surgical outcomes after lumbar laminectomy: An analysis of 500 patients. Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6: S190-3.
[5] Bailey P, Casamajor L. Osteo-arthritis of the spine as a cause of compression of the spinal cord and its roots: with report of five cases. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1911; 38: 588–609.
[6] Blau JN, Logue V. Intermittent claudication of the cauda equina: an unusual syndrome resulting from central protrusion of a lumbar intervertebral disc. Lancet 1961; 277: 1081–6.
[7] Smith AG. Account of a case in which portions of three dorsal vertebrae were removed for the relief of paralysis from fracture, with partial success. North American Medical and Surgical Journal 1829; 8: 94–7.
[8] Lane A. Case of spondylolisthesis associated with progressive paraplegia; laminectomy. Lancet 1893; 1: 991–2.
[9] Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: Analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine. 2012; 37: 67–76.
[10] Zaina F, Tomkins-Lane C, Carragee E, Negrini S. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29; 2016 (1): CD010264. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010264.pub2. PMID: 26824399; PMCID: PMC6669253.
[11] Daffner SD, Wang JC. The pathophysiology and nonsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Instr Course Lect 2009; 58: 657–68.
[12] Chou R., Baisden J., Carragee E. J., et. al.: Surgery for low back pain: A review of the evidence for an American Pain Society clinical practice guideline. Spine 2009; 34: pp. 1094-1109.
[13] Armon C., Argoff C E., Samels J., et. al.: Assessment: Use of epidural steroid injections to treat radicular lumbosacral pain: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2007; 68: pp. 723-729.
[14] Ghogawala Z., Dziura J., Butler W., et. al.: Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. New England Journal of Medicine 2016; 374: pp. 1424-1434.
[15] Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG, McInnes JM, Fossel AH, Liang MH. The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 809-16.
[16] Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1139–1157.
[17] Kandadai P, Saini J, Patterson D, O'Dell K, Flynn M. Urinary retention after hysterectomy and postoperative analgesic use. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2015; 21: 257–262.
[18] Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN, Fossel AH, et al. Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1995; 20: 1155-60.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Satheesh Kumar Cheella Reddy. (2021). Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Pre and Post Decompression laminectomy Outcomes in a Single Neurosurgery Private Practice. International Journal of Neurosurgery, 5(2), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Satheesh Kumar Cheella Reddy. Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Pre and Post Decompression laminectomy Outcomes in a Single Neurosurgery Private Practice. Int. J. Neurosurg. 2021, 5(2), 70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Satheesh Kumar Cheella Reddy. Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Pre and Post Decompression laminectomy Outcomes in a Single Neurosurgery Private Practice. Int J Neurosurg. 2021;5(2):70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14,
      author = {Satheesh Kumar Cheella Reddy},
      title = {Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Pre and Post Decompression laminectomy Outcomes in a Single Neurosurgery Private Practice},
      journal = {International Journal of Neurosurgery},
      volume = {5},
      number = {2},
      pages = {70-74},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijn.20210502.14},
      abstract = {Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) or Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is the most common degenerative condition affecting older adults. The clinical presentation of LCS includes lower back pain, radiating pain, tingling sensation, and numbness in the lower limbs, as well as nocturnal leg cramps, and bladder dysfunction due to neurological compression. Laminectomy is one of the most common procedures performed for the treatment of LCS. This study aimed to examine the pre-surgical presentations and post-surgical outcomes based on the available clinical records from a single neurosurgeon private practice based in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. The clinical records of 166 patients were extracted and reviewed for clinical presentation notes, surgical notes, post-surgery follow-up letters between 2010 and 2019. Records without follow-up notes were excluded. The presurgical presentation symptoms included lower back pain, weakness, neurogenic claudication, pins and needles, and sensory and motor deficits. Post-surgical outcomes were evaluated based on the 1-month, 3-month, and 1-year follow up based on the notes and letters. Many patients mentioned significant improvement in symptoms immediately after the decompressive laminectomy. Descriptive analysis was performed; the results have been presented as percentages and charts. Post- laminectomy results reported that 87% improvement in back pain and 85% people reported improvements in neurogenic claudication. This study suggested that decompressive laminectomy was effective in the management of LCS. However, further studies are required due to the limitations, such as small population size, data availability, multiple re-presentations, and lack of proper follow-up.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Pre and Post Decompression laminectomy Outcomes in a Single Neurosurgery Private Practice
    AU  - Satheesh Kumar Cheella Reddy
    Y1  - 2021/10/05
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14
    T2  - International Journal of Neurosurgery
    JF  - International Journal of Neurosurgery
    JO  - International Journal of Neurosurgery
    SP  - 70
    EP  - 74
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1959
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20210502.14
    AB  - Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) or Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is the most common degenerative condition affecting older adults. The clinical presentation of LCS includes lower back pain, radiating pain, tingling sensation, and numbness in the lower limbs, as well as nocturnal leg cramps, and bladder dysfunction due to neurological compression. Laminectomy is one of the most common procedures performed for the treatment of LCS. This study aimed to examine the pre-surgical presentations and post-surgical outcomes based on the available clinical records from a single neurosurgeon private practice based in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. The clinical records of 166 patients were extracted and reviewed for clinical presentation notes, surgical notes, post-surgery follow-up letters between 2010 and 2019. Records without follow-up notes were excluded. The presurgical presentation symptoms included lower back pain, weakness, neurogenic claudication, pins and needles, and sensory and motor deficits. Post-surgical outcomes were evaluated based on the 1-month, 3-month, and 1-year follow up based on the notes and letters. Many patients mentioned significant improvement in symptoms immediately after the decompressive laminectomy. Descriptive analysis was performed; the results have been presented as percentages and charts. Post- laminectomy results reported that 87% improvement in back pain and 85% people reported improvements in neurogenic claudication. This study suggested that decompressive laminectomy was effective in the management of LCS. However, further studies are required due to the limitations, such as small population size, data availability, multiple re-presentations, and lack of proper follow-up.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Human Movement, Oceania University of Medicine, Apia, Samoa

  • Sections